Latest news with #RoboticSurgery


Zawya
4 days ago
- Health
- Zawya
A Global Milestone: Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital in Jeddah receives accreditation for 14 centers of excellence from SRC
In a remarkable and unprecedented global achievement that adds to its legacy of excellence, Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital in Jeddah has been awarded accreditation for 14 Centers of Excellence by the Surgical Review Corporation (SRC) across various medical and surgical specialties—setting a world record for the highest number of Centers of Excellence accredited by SRC within a single hospital. This prestigious international recognition reflects the hospital's deep commitment to implementing 10 rigorous global standards, ensuring the delivery of safe, comprehensive, and high-quality patient care. The accredited specialties include: 1. Robotic Surgery 2. Urology 3. Orthopedic Surgery 4. Spine Surgery 5. Surgery of the Hand 6. Colorectal Surgery 7. Hernia Surgery 8. Plastic Surgery 9. Endoscopy 10. Ear, Nose & Throat (ENT) 11. Ophthalmology 12. Minimally Invasive Gynecology 13. Specialized Anesthesia in Obesity Surgery 14. Specialized Anesthesia in Orthopedic Surgery These accreditations are based on the hospital's adherence to ten rigorous global standards developed by SRC for Centers of Excellence. These include institutional commitment with a clear vision and a quality-first culture, certified medical expertise from highly qualified physicians with outstanding surgical records, trusted medical leadership to oversee program efficiency, and comprehensive consultative services with ongoing medical support for all medical and surgical cases. Additional standards include the use of state-of-the-art equipment and advanced technology with fully trained staff, the availability of a qualified and dedicated medical and surgical teams with consistent on-call coverage, the application of standardized clinical pathways with precise protocols to ensure optimal care, and well-trained support teams including program coordinators, nurses, assistants, and specialized surgical staff. Patient education is also prioritized through the provision of clear information and the obtaining of informed consent for all procedures with a shared decision-making approach. There is also a firm commitment to ongoing quality evaluation, outcome monitoring, and full compliance with data protection regulations. Dr. Mazen Fakeeh, President of Fakeeh Care Group, expressed his pride in this exceptional global achievement, reaffirming the hospital's commitment to delivering specialized, world-class healthcare that meets patients' expectations and supports the vision of Fakeeh Care Group for excellence, leadership, and innovation in healthcare. It's worth noting that the Surgical Review Corporation (SRC) is an independent, global, non-profit organization dedicated to accrediting hospitals, surgeons, and surgical centers according to the highest standards of quality and patient safety. The Center of Excellence designation is awarded only after a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation process that ensures healthcare services are advanced, safe, and aligned with the best global medical practices.


Medscape
23-06-2025
- Health
- Medscape
Is Robotic Surgery Safe in Older Patients With Lung Cancer?
TOPLINE: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) was safe in patients aged 80 years or older with lung cancer and demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes to younger patients, a retrospective study found. After propensity score matching, researchers found no significant differences in complications, hospital stay duration, and 90-day mortality between the two age groups. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 340 patients who underwent major lung resections using RATS between 2015 and 2022 in Italy. They divided patients into very elderly patients (VEPs; ≥ 80 years; n = 28) and non-elderly patients (NEPs; < 80 years; n = 312). Patients were characterised according to demographic variables, comorbidities, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and clinical and pathological stage. Propensity score matching at a 1:3 ratio was performed to balance the two groups, resulting in 26 VEPs and 71 NEPs, using clinically relevant variables that were significantly different at baseline. The primary endpoint was the assessment of complications; secondary endpoints were the comparison of the complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, postoperative stay, and mortality rate between VEP and NEP groups. TAKEAWAY: After propensity matching, complication rates did not differ significantly between VEP and NEP groups (46.2% vs 32.4%; P = .21). The mean hospital stay was 4 days for both age groups (P = .85), and the 90-day mortality was low and not significantly different between VEP and NEP groups (3.9% vs 0%). Pathological stage I disease was associated with a lower risk for complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; P = .006), and lobectomy was linked to a decreased risk for complications (OR, 0.29; P = .033); however, FEV1 continued to demonstrate a protective effect (OR, 0.97; P = .025). IN PRACTICE: "This study provides strong evidence supporting the safety and feasibility of RATS in patients aged 80 years and older, demonstrating comparable postoperative outcomes to younger patients after propensity score matching. FEV1, smoking history, and ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] score were the most significant predictors of postoperative complications, while age itself was not an independent risk factor," the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Pierluigi Novellis, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. It was published online on June 17, 2025, in the Journal of Clinical Medicine. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the retrospective nature of the analysis and the difference in the sample size between the two groups. DISCLOSURES: This study did not receive any external funding. Several authors reported receiving honoraria or having other ties with various sources. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.