logo
#

Latest news with #RonGrossman

Letters: Lawmakers should pass the FAIR Act to ensure all Illinoisans get a fair defense in court
Letters: Lawmakers should pass the FAIR Act to ensure all Illinoisans get a fair defense in court

Chicago Tribune

time20-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Chicago Tribune

Letters: Lawmakers should pass the FAIR Act to ensure all Illinoisans get a fair defense in court

Under the Sixth Amendment of the United State Constitution, all accused indigent people are guaranteed the right to effective legal representation in a court of law. Unfortunately, that is not happening in Illinois. Illinois has not significantly updated its public defense structure since 1949. The result is that Illinois is an outlier in the United States and is one of only a handful of states with no statewide body to ensure that those who cannot afford an attorney receive effective representation. Additionally, with 102 counties in Illinois, there are some counties that have no public defenders at all. About 60% of Illinois counties have no government office of public defense and instead contract with private attorneys, often on a part-time basis. Some counties may share a public defender or a judge may appoint any lawyer to represent a client even if that lawyer has no experience in public defense. The result of this lack of effective legal representation can lead to unnecessary jail admissions or prison sentences, which then damage individuals, families and communities through incarceration and lost wages. The Funded Advocacy & Independent Representation (FAIR) Act (HB3363) is currently in the Illinois Senate. Under the FAIR Act, an independent State Public Defender Commission and a state public defender position would be created. The commission would provide resources to county public defender offices, establish training programs and advocate for court system funding. The commission would determine metrics regarding public defender offices, caseloads, staffing and resources. It also would be able to offer resources to under-resourced counties in Illinois. Passing the FAIR Act would put into law the necessary structural changes that Illinois residents need in order to obtain fair and effective public defense representation. The passage of the FAIR Act would modernize the public defense system and offer to all people the constitutional protection and the vigorous defense we all should expect. When I was a child, my father believed that we only get the justice we can afford. That needs to change in Illinois now.A recent news article and opinion piece in the Tribune have an important connection. The Tribune Editorial Board enthused about successes at O'Hare International Airport ('First job for new aviation commissioner? Don't mess up Chicago's O'Hare Airport,' May 11), and Ron Grossman gave a fascinating look at Chicago Union Station's storied past ('100 years ago, the first trains pulled into Union Station,' May 11). Together, this coverage highlights the best possible future for Chicago transportation: connecting these two assets via a quick train ride. The key is bringing intercity and regional rail passengers within walking distance of O'Hare's ticket counters. The best transit systems in the world provide this. Imagine being able to travel conveniently between O'Hare and destinations throughout the region by intercity train. This would make O'Hare an even more appealing hub airport. It would allow ORD to focus on more profitable long-distance flights instead of connectors, while saving fuel and innumerable hours simply getting travelers to and from the airport. It would also fulfill the great potential of Union Station, now 100 years young and looking forward to a bright future as the hub of a magnificent Midwest rail system and future home of high-speed rail. We hope Michael McMurray, Chicago's new commissioner of aviation, sees this potential to revolutionize Chicago transit with a Union Station-O'Hare connection. We're pushing for five straightforward fixes at Union Station to better connect it to the region while increasing its capacity tenfold: a new concourse to make it easier to find your train, direct access to southern platforms from above, through-running trains on Amtrak and Metra to O'Hare, a shift from diesel to electric trains and better connections between Union Station and other transit assets, especially the Ogilvie Transportation Center and the Blue Line. The key is investment, and the looming fiscal cliff for transit presents an opportunity. Let's invest in a comprehensive railway program that connects O'Hare and Union Station as part of a network of fast, frequent, affordable trains and transit that serve our entire state and has become a thriving hub for life sciences innovation. Through our elected officials' foresight and planning and fueled by world-class universities, tech incubators and a growing ecosystem of venture-backed startups, Chicago is an epicenter of biotech and digital health. And essential to the innovation and breakthroughs emerging from the Chicago life sciences industry is artificial intelligence, a powerful tool whose promise we're only beginning to comprehend. AI is transforming the pace and precision of life sciences research in Chicago (and everywhere else). Machine learning is helping startups model new innovations to enhance clinical trials, power personalized medicine tailored to each patient's biology and achieve predictive diagnostics with unthinkable accuracy. It goes without saying that protecting the development of AI and minimizing obstacles to its continued use is essential for a hub such as Chicago. Lawmakers in Springfield are considering a bill, HB3506, to regulate companies that are utilizing AI, proposing technical reporting and compliance obligations that would prove costly and burdensome. As well intentioned as the policy may be, it would as written have a chilling effect on AI innovation by entangling early-stage life sciences startups in red tape before their innovations ever reach a patient or become commercially viable. Before finalizing any bill, Illinois policymakers should thoughtfully engage the community of talented life sciences entrepreneurs here in Chicago to better understand how AI functions in the life sciences. Regulation of this emerging industry is warranted but must be narrowed to address bad actors without handcuffing innovation. Proposed regulations that couple burdensome reporting requirements with overreaching policies risk imposing unsustainable costs on small startups — draining limited resources and possibly forcing promising startups to close before they can get off the ground. Illinois is poised to be a major contender in the next wave of medical innovation, so instead of fast-tracking legislation around a complex and nuanced issue such as artificial intelligence, legislators should take a measured and forward-looking approach. Chicago's life sciences and tech ecosystems are thriving, and we've only scratched the surface on the promise of AI to transform health care. Let's make sure Chicago is at the center of that transformation, supported by smart policy that fosters innovation at every my business was strapped for cash and traditional lending wasn't an option, I had to take a loan from a quick cash lender so my business could survive. But after taking out that financing, I realized that the lender lacked transparency when I saw how high the interest rate really was. This traps small business owners in a vicious debt cycle in which all they can afford to do is make the minimum loan payment, and sometimes, they can't even afford that. While I'm paying off my loan now, other small business owners are still struggling. There's no road map for navigating this debt while keeping cash flow steady. That's why I'm urging the Illinois legislature to support any legislation that would require noncommercial lenders to disclose their annual percentage rate, or APR. This is the only metric that enables borrowers to make apples-to-apples comparisons between different financing products. Small businesses need to be able to make informed decisions so they can access true capital, not high-interest traps that keep us struggling.I'm wondering why Jasmine Paolini, the first Italian to win the Italian Open in 40 years, got the 'Shorts' spot in the Sunday Sports section, while the match between Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner (who lost) got the nice, quarter page article the next day? Oh yeah. Women's sports. Silly me.

Letters: Chicago woman's group was ahead of its time in focusing on outcomes for the most vulnerable
Letters: Chicago woman's group was ahead of its time in focusing on outcomes for the most vulnerable

Chicago Tribune

time15-03-2025

  • Politics
  • Chicago Tribune

Letters: Chicago woman's group was ahead of its time in focusing on outcomes for the most vulnerable

Thank you to Ron Grossman for his terrific article about the Chicago Woman's Club ('Champion of social reform,' March 9). Founded in 1876, the organization was years ahead of its time in its reform efforts in so many areas ranging from birth control to domestic violence to education and health care. As mentioned in the article, members of the Chicago Woman's Club played a key role in establishing the nation's first juvenile court in 1899. These members included Jane Addams, the founder of Hull House who is often considered the parent of modern social work. We should be proud that Illinois was the first state in the country to create a special court with special procedures to hear cases involving children who are abused, neglected or charged with offenses. In time, every state would follow our lead and initiate special courts for cases involving children. The Illinois Juvenile Court Act, which created the court and is still in effect today, is an extraordinary document. It acknowledges that children are developmentally different than adults. It focuses on efforts to educate and rehabilitate child offenders rather than on punitive measures. It recognizes that abused and neglected children are victims, not offenders. It ensures confidentiality for children involved in court proceedings. While we take these notions for granted today, they were remarkably progressive insights in the 1890s. Hopefully, Chicago and Illinois will continue in the tradition of the Chicago Woman's Club and remain at the forefront of creative efforts to improve outcomes for the most vulnerable. — Charles P. Golbert, Cook County public guardian, Chicago Senseless rebranding The people of Illinois have voted against redesigning the state flag, and I think that's a big win. Don't get me wrong — the current flag is no masterpiece of graphic design, but this relentless trend of 'rebranding' needs to stop. Too often, redesigns happen simply for the sake of change — unnecessary, expensive and often worse than what came before. Rebranding is rarely the game-changer companies or teams think it will be. Look at automakers such as GM and Kia, recently tweaking their logos in ways that added no real value. Sports teams, desperate for relevance, throw away decades of tradition on new designs that are often met with backlash. Chicago's soccer teams are prime examples. The Chicago Fire, named in honor of the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, once had a meaningful emblem featuring the cross of St. Florian, the patron saint of firefighters. Then, for no good reason, they scrapped it. Meanwhile, our women's soccer club, the Chicago Red Stars, abandoned the name chosen by the people of Chicago and watered down their identity in the process. The worst part? Most of these rebrands don't even achieve their goal. If the product on the field, court or marketplace isn't improving, a new logo won't fix it. Consumers and fans connect with authenticity, not a superficial redesign. Legendary designers Charles and Ray Eames understood this when they turned down a lucrative offer to redesign Budweiser's logo, telling Anheuser-Busch (as paraphrased by a documentarian): 'This is a terrific logo for you. It speaks to what your product is. So many people identify with it now.' The company wisely listened. Now imagine if the New York Yankees, the Boston Celtics, the Toronto Maple Leafs — or our own Cubs, Bulls or Bears — decided to change their iconic logos. You can't. Their branding is timeless because it represents something real. Instead of chasing trends, teams and companies should embrace their history. The same logic applies to the Illinois state flag. A redesign wouldn't make our state any stronger or more unified — it would just be change for the sake of change. Tradition has value, and not everything needs a fresh coat of paint. I'll close with a wise reminder from someone I greatly respect: 'Just because you can doesn't mean you should.' — R.J. LaPorta, Chicago Illinoisans have spoken The people of Illinois, who voted for our state flag, have spoken! The final decision should be the Illinois voters, not the legislators. Case closed. — Ann DeFronzo, Woodridge State flag's non-contest Whose bright idea was it to hold a state flag contest that had no winner? Just wondering what this non- contest cost us, the long-suffering taxpayers of Illinois. I'd call it a joke, but I know that I am not laughing. — Jackie Huffman, Chicago Sorry state of Walgreens Growing up in Chicago with a Walgreens everywhere you turned was a wonderful experience. The minute Walgreens agreed to a merger and it was no longer calling the shots, I cringed. The new corporation quickly began making one bad move after the other. My heart bleeds over the destructive way this company eviscerated our beloved Walgreens! It should be held accountable and never run another business again. It should be renamed the grim reaper. So very sad for Chicago. — Margie Cruz, Chicago Congressman's service In his March 2 op-ed about former U.S. Rep. Timothy P. Sheehan, a respected Chicago politician ('A Chicago congressman wanted to annex Canada long before Trump'), author Arthur Milnes writes: 'Sheehan served an unremarkable four terms in Congress.' To that, I say, Milnes needs to do his homework before summarily dismissing Sheehan's political career. On Sept. 18, 1951, Sheehan was appointed as a distinguished member of the Select Committee to Conduct an Investigation and Study of the Facts, Evidence and Circumstances of the Katyn Forest Massacre, known as the Madden Committee. The Soviets were accused of international war crimes consisting of the mass murder of thousands of Polish military officers and intellectuals in the spring of 1940 in a forest near Smolensk in the Soviet Union. The committee, in its final report in 1952, concluded that the Soviets, who blamed the Germans for the atrocities, were responsible beyond a doubt. In 1990, after decades of denial by the Soviet Union, President Mikhail Gorbachev finally acknowledged the truth of those findings. The investigation received tremendous media attention in the U.S. and worldwide. For his efforts on behalf of Poland's government and citizenry, Sheehan was honored by members of the Polish government-in-exile. I knew Sheehan for 29 years, until his passing in 2000, and it was an honor and privilege to serve as secretary to this accomplished, moral and principled man for 22 of those years. — Ruth Susmarski, Chicago

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store