Latest news with #RorschachTest
Scoop
15-05-2025
- Politics
- Scoop
On The Mock Horror Over Political Profanity
Heavens to Betsy. Let me get this right. In her own opinion column, a female journalist (the fearsome Angela Vance) used a bad word to refer to female politicians who had just extinguished the ability of about 150,000 women to get fair pay for the work they do. The nation reeled, and expressed its outrage – mainly at the journalist for using that bad word. Without a trace of irony, Brooke Van Velden, the ACT politician who is leading the government's attack on the principles and practices of pay equity, said this in Parliament about Vance's us of the C-word and other derisive terms: 'The women of this government are hard-working, dedicated and strong. No woman in this Parliament, nor in this country, should be subjected to sex-based discrimination." Good grief. The low-paid women that Van Velden and her well-paid cronies have just dumped on so harshly – with actions, not words – are just as 'hard working, dedicated and strong.' Surely, they didn't deserve to be 'subjected to sex-based discrimination' either, as imposed on them by Van Velden and her colleagues. Should we have been surprised at the hypocrisy of Van Velden/ACT/the government playing the victim card in this context? Not really. It seems par for the course. Meaning: the ACT Party's pearl clutching over the C-word stands in marked contrast to the message they have repeatedly given to everyone on the receiving end of hate speech. Here's what David Seymour has to offer when someone else is on the receiving end: ' Free speech is a bedrock of modern New Zealand. That means sometimes hearing words and ideas that challenge us. [My emphasis.] If we sacrifice such a fundamental principle, we are losing something precious. Freedom of expression is central to who we are as Kiwis. So to everyone else, ACT is saying: 'suck it up' in the name of free speech. But when harsh criticism is directed at proprieties must then be respected – whether it be by journalists like Vance, or by the Te Pāti Māori MPs who issued a haka challenge to ACT's Treaty Principles Bill. Seymour is quite the walking contradiction. On the Te Pāti Māori haka, ACT has come out as the Punishment Party ('They got off lightly.') Currently, they're hardliners when it comes to what free speech and which cultural expressions are deemed permissible within the Parliamentary sanctum. Radical conservatives, or conservative radicals? Or maybe, just hypocrites. The Victorian Gent Across the Tasman, the conservative coalition led by Peter Dutton has just been hammered by voters who felt Dutton was tone deaf on issues affecting women. Here, feigning outrage over Vance's alleged misogyny enables the Luxon government to dodge some of the flak for the misogyny central to its blitzkrieg against the pay equity legislation. That said, the public furore over the use of the C-word in this instance has also been an oddly illuminating Rorschach Test. On RNZ for instance, a couple of Victorian Gents pondered whether Vance might have been better advised to use less 'extreme' language to express her opinions, given that she did have other options. Maybe she was that angry though, they surmised. (Still, no excuse for bad language, right?) Moreover, they also intimated, unless Vance, her publishers at Stuff, Chris Hipkins etc did not renounce and denounce such then, so much for their ability in future to credibly criticise the abuse that's commonly levelled at politicians! To which one could reply: mate, that would depend entirely on what vile things the politicians may choose to do in future. Long ago, Tom Wolfe had this to say about the Victorian Gentlemen who, he felt, were always trying to set the tone of acceptable media discourse: In all matters of national importance the proper emotion, the seemly sentiment, the fitting moral tone, should be established and should prevail; and all information that muddied the tone and weakened the feeling should simply be thrown down the memory hole... Sentiments that one scarcely gives a second thought to in one's private life are nevertheless insisted upon in all public utterances. Right. I would argue that day in week out the media's tonal problems have less to do with genitalia, and far more to do with an excess of gentility. One of the few interesting commentaries on this whole non- affair was by Anna Rawhiti-Connell in The Spinoff. She noted a double standard, in that using male genitalia as a means of criticism is barely an issue, and she's right about that. On an almost daily basis, there is good reason to conclude that David Seymour is a cock acting like a dick, and yet no-one would even blush if you said so, publicly. And as for expressions of was hardly the same outpouring of national outrage earlier this year when one female politician – Education Minister Erica Stanford – referred to another female politician – Labour's Jan Tinetti – as a quote, 'stupid bitch' unquote. With all that in mind, as Rawhiti-Connell suggests, there is a strong case for actively defusing the C -word. Thankfully, we can turn to popular media, in the shape of the tech industry satire Silicon Valley to see how to do this. Because context is everything – right? – here's how the woman at the centre of a job interview scene at a tech start-up was being considered for employment: And Alice, the woman in question, gets the drift, she decides to put these guys through the wringer. Warning: there is more calm, objective and satirical use of the C-word in this 57 second excerpt than you would have thought to be humanly possible: Footnote One: Friends, we should have seen this coming. In all likelihood Brooke Van Velden will continue to play the victim card, any chance she gets. Yet before she scrapped 33 pay equity claims and post-postponed (at best) and entirely prevented (at worst) the chance of any group of women workers in future being able to launch a successful pay equity claim…there had been a lot more in a similar vein. As Workplace Minister, Van Velden has all but exempted small business from health and safety requirements. She has also abolished the ability of workers in the gig economy from seeking redress in court for the unfair pay and conditions they were forced to swallow in order to get the job at all. In short, Van Velden has set out to be a radical politician, one more than willing to demolish the procedures and protections essential to achieving a just balance in the workplace. In doing so, she has cashed in her right to be thin-skinned. Regardless, she is expecting as of right, to be shielded from any fierce blowback for what she is doing. Some people really do expect to have it all.
The Guardian
01-05-2025
- Sport
- The Guardian
Holding Fever: when club side Rishton signed the fastest bowler in the world
To paraphrase Bishop Berkeley's famous empiricist thought-experiment: if a legendary over is bowled in a game that isn't televised, did it really happen? The answer is: yes, Bish, it happened. In fact, Geoffrey Boycott still remembers punching a 150kph throat ball toward Joel Garner in the gully. But, unless you happened to have been watching Tony Francis' two-minute despatch on News at Ten on Saturday 14 March 1981, it would have slipped past your attention that Rishton's new pro, Michael Holding, had relocated Geoffrey's off stump 20 yards nearer the press box. Which, if you were one of the Lancashire League's top-order batters, might not be a bad thing to have slipped your attention. Nevertheless, if they hadn't seen the recent Barbados bombardment, they will have had vivid memories of Andy Roberts' and especially Mikey's Old Trafford brutalism from five years earlier: Holding roaring in off the boundary, the 45-year-old Brian Close now jerking his combover away at the last second from the hard red missile, like a stuntman avoiding a punch, now chesting it away to point like Niall Quinn playing in Kevin Phillips after a long diagonal from full-back, eventually walking off with a torso resembling a Rorschach Test – heavily bruised, yes, but not out. 'Closey got one run in 59 minutes and had the shit knocked out of him,' recalls Pat Pocock. 'He was in a terrible state when he came in. I had got in as nightwatchman in the first innings [on day one] and I didn't get out that night. Next morning, I'm walking out with John Edrich and he asked me, 'Which end do you fancy?' I told him I'd have Andy Roberts' end as he was a bit of light relief. John pisses himself laughing: 'I tell you now, if Andy Roberts is light relief then we've got problems.'' Yep, the 1981 season promised to be a challenge for the hardy amateurs of east Lancashire's mill towns. So much so, in fact, that Ian Bell, the 21-year-old opening bat at Ramsbottom, Rishton's first opponents, decided to retire on the eve of the season, calling the hiring of Roberts by Haslingden and Holding 'a retrograde step' – this in a league with a lineage of West Indian speedsters (not to mention Ray Lindwall, Dennis Lillee, Frank Tyson and others) running from Learie Constantine and Manny Martindale through Roy Gilchrist, Chester Watson, Wes Hall and Charlie Griffith, who in 1964, en route to a league-record 144 wickets for Burnley, was rumoured to have sent 37 people to hospital. When Rishton played them in the Worsley Cup final that year, a jar of laxative tablets was found in their dressing room, which they promptly launched out of the window before going on to win the game. 'I just don't fancy playing against bowlers such as Holding and Roberts,' Bell told the Lancashire Telegraph. 'I will be getting married in the summer and I have other responsibilities in addition to playing cricket. I want to feel that I will be at work every Monday morning in a fit condition.' It's fair to say there were a few nerves jangling about on Easter Sunday – a few prayers as Ramsbottom opener Peter Ashworth scratched out his guard and looked up into the distance to see the lean and mean 27-year-old Jamaican standing at the top of his run and preparing to send down his first ball in Lancashire League cricket. His partner, Mick Everett, a police sergeant in Bury who had knocked off from his night shift at 5am, was glad to be getting a look at one. Hallelujah. Adding to the air of anxiety was the Ramsbottom committee's unprecedented investment in three brand new, plum-coloured helmets, along with assorted padding, which could either be seen as confidence-building tools or as starkly tactile reminders of the impending physical jeopardy. The procurement of these various bone protectors formed the main through-line in Saturday's Rossendale Free Press – the weekly newspaper covering Rammy, Haslingden, Rawtenstall and Bacup – which ran its preview under the headline: 'Enter the Tin-Hat Brigade.' After noting the purchase of the new £50 helmets, the correspondent observed: 'There will be a number of well concealed chest and thigh pads among equipment. Some players could find it difficult just walking to the crease! But now the talking has to stop. The action is about to start. And, to be fair to these world-class cricketers, let's just give them a chance to get on with the job that they're being paid (handsomely) to do. It is so easy to prejudge. Surely, players of their calibre have no need to stoop to any intimidatory tactics? Flying deliveries won't get many wickets but they could result in one or two sore heads. Captains and umpires will, hopefully, keep a close watch on the situation.' The tone was wary – the fears and pre-emptive bargaining of a village that had spotted hordes of barbarian invaders on the horizon. Four days earlier, Holding had been playing the final day of the Jamaica Test in 32C heat. He flew into London with the England squad on the Friday, from where he was collected the next day by Wilf Woodhouse, owner of a shop on Rishton High Street that rented TVs and top-loading video recorders. The Rishton chairman, evidently, was a gifted salesman, coaxing Holding to the village for a summer's work when he was near the top of many counties' shopping lists. Woodhouse had approached his man during the previous summer's Old Trafford Test, impressing with his passion and energy, as Holding would later recount in his autobiography No Holding Back: 'Wilf was very enthusiastic; I liked that. He told me that the standard of cricket was good and I would not find it a chore. He said that Rishton would pay me £5,000 for the summer. In those days that was a lot of money, especially for playing at weekends only. After discussing it further I thought, why not?' Holding left his job in the Central Data Processing Unit of the Jamaican government and took his 'first venture into professional cricket outside West Indies'. Woodhouse would also loan Holding to Lancashire for what turned out to be seven first-class and seven List A matches that summer. They had tried to sign Holding in 1977, only for him to return to Jamaica to complete his degree, and would pay Rishton a fee for his services as well as provide insurance coverage should he pick up an injury on county duty – although the chances of this were diminished by having his West Indies skipper, Clive Lloyd, in the captain's chair at Old Trafford. The loan fee wasn't the only benefit of the arrangement, either. Holding's new-ball partner at Rishton, Barrie Hill, a purveyor of little in-swinging floaters, was carrying over a troublesome shoulder injury from the previous summer and as a deal-sweetener he would receive treatment from the Lancashire physio. When Woodhouse and Holding pulled on to Rishton's Blackburn Road ground that Sunday lunchtime there were already around 2,000 spectators there, the biggest crowd since the days of Hall and Griffith almost 20 years earlier and 10 times the average of the previous few seasons. But then, this was the fastest bowler in the world – an action that was pure liquid, the most sublime cricketing spectacle of the age – and he was at the peak of his powers. Of course they flocked in. Besides, the pubs shut at 2pm, whereas the cricket club didn't. The gate of £850 (around £3,175 in today's money) already meant that 20% of Rishton's outlay had been chalked off. Canny bit of business, Wilf. Membership had almost doubled to 700, which was very welcome with work ongoing on a new £60,000 clubhouse. Holding Fever had arrived, so much so that the 1,200 meat pies the club had bought in for the day were gone before the tea interval, forcing club secretary Harry Crabtree to head off in search of more. 'We'll need a lot of meat and potato pie nights to pay for yon lad,' observed one Rishton ultra. The pie consumption might have been connected to the nippy April weather, a chilly 12C, with spectators hunkered under blankets, which wasn't the case at Sabina Park earlier in the week. Cold or not, Holding Fever had also drawn film crews from the BBC and Granada TV, who busily conducted their David-and-Goliath interviews with the Ramsbottom players. A phalanx of national press were there, too – Telegraph, Times, Sunday People – and the previous evening Woodhouse had told the Guardian: 'A man of Holding's abilities should find this a piece of cake. But he will be under pressure to get us the wickets. Rishton have been third these last three years. We want to win the league and the cup, so we went for the best.' Lemon squeezy. Rishton lost the toss and Rammy opted not to get stuck straight into the batting, hoping the temperature might drop another muscle-stiffening degree or two before their turn came. The pitch had spent three Sisyphean weeks under covers and the winds were biting, but the hum of excitement could not be muffled. Alas, the home side's batting was unable to rise to the challenge of the grand tour's opening night, and Holding's 26 – featuring one six out of the ground, which became something of a motif – was the top score in a disappointing effort. His wicket was taken by Andy Taylor, a private in the Royal Transportation Corps in Hull, back home on leave for the weekend and fresh from football in the morning. No send-off was proffered. Rishton subsided from 98 for five to 108 all out. And then it was time. How's your ticker? 'He did not start his run-up across the main road or on Rishton Station as some comedians in the clubhouse had suggested,' observed the Lancashire Telegraph. 'He took 17 giant strides from the sightscreen and several times tried a shorter run.' Peter Ashworth survived physically intact, but contributed just three to a run-chase in which Holding's figures after an eight-over opening burst – four off the longer run – were none for 21. The Sunday People described him as 'hampered by jet-lag, two sweaters, a bitter wind, no proper total to bowl at, and stiffness from his winter chore of cleaning out Boycott and Gooch.' On the eve of the match, Sergeant Everett had told the Guardian that his aim was simply to 'pick up one four off the meat of the bat', and this he did as he and Mark Price took the score to 58 for one before the latter was run out for 23 by a direct hit from Holding at cover. At 70 for two the game looked as good as won, but Holding returned to clean up Everett up for a valiant 30, made over what he called '90 wonderful minutes' and at the cost of one thumbnail. Holding had needed 70 deliveries to take his first Lancashire League wicket, 19 more than his Test strike rate, and when it came he raised his hands to the heavens in salutation. Runs thereafter were dragged from the depths of Rammy's doggedness and, despite a wobble from 93 for four to 94 for seven, they managed to scramble over the line. Maurice Haslam struck the winning four off Mikey, a moment taking pride of place on the mental mantelpiece. 'Holding, though very fast, was never vicious,' reported the Lancashire Telegraph. 'He bowled fairly and won respect and admiration when he did not allow the pressure to drive him to send down bumpers.' Price reflected on 'the best day of my cricketing life' (there are 23s and 23s) while Everett told the Bolton News: 'It is something you cannot describe. I set my stall out just to survive and help the team win. When I first went out my nerves were really bad but once at the wicket I just concentrated on batting. He was nippy, particularly early on.' Nippy indeed – though not as nippy as he might have been had it not been quite so nippy – Mikey had finished with three for 48 on a wicket lacking the zip of Bridgetown. Ever keen to take the sensationalist line, the Sunday People was having none of the 'respect and admiration' stuff, none of this bowling fairly. It was red meat all the way, as they saw it, a rhetorical flurry that was as much projection as reporting: 'Rishton, home of 7,000 cricket maniacs, wants to win something after three years of finishing among the bridesmaids. That's why Holding is being paid nearly £200 a match. That's why the ground was packed for his debut. They won't be coming back if he insists on being the first gentleman of speed. They want someone pinned to the sightscreen. And somewhere in his engagement of 26 matches Holding will feel obliged to satisfy them.' Whether Holding would crank things up and/or abandon his full length as circumstances (and conditions) changed was a question for down the track, so to speak. However, if anyone thought having the world's quickest bowler in Rishton's ranks would simply mean other teams folding, Rammy had shown them to be sorely mistaken, not least because the league was littered with international pros, including five players who would take part in the World Cup final a couple of years later. Besides Holding and Roberts, there was Lowerhouse's Mohinder Amarnath (player of the match, of course, in India's shock win at Lord's), Enfield's Madan Lal (a trophy in each of his first three seasons at Dill Hall Lane, 1,087 runs at 78 in his fourth), and Nelson's newcomer Kapil Dev, who sat at No 4 in the ICC bowling rankings, three spots above Mikey, 10 above Andy. Those illustrious West Indian sleeves would need to be rolled up. Weather permitting, naturally. This is an extract from Sticky Dogs and Stardust – The Second Innings.
Reuters
27-01-2025
- Business
- Reuters
Davos presents elites with economic Rorschach Test
LONDON, Jan 27 (Reuters Breakingviews) - It's become something of a cliché for delegates at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting to quiz each other about 'the mood in Davos'. The nearly 3,000 political leaders, executives, financiers, and policymakers who descended on the Swiss mountain resort last week offered differing answers to that theme. Given it coincided with Donald Trump being sworn in for his second term, Davos presented the global elites with an economic Rorschach Test. Much like the psychological exam that logs a subject's perceptions of inkblots, the U.S. president divided opinion. Business leaders and top bankers in Davos were eager to praise the Trump administration's promises to lower taxes and sweep away excessive regulations. Some lined up to congratulate the commander-in-chief, perhaps conscious that they missed his inauguration, where tech leaders including Apple's (AAPL.O), opens new tab Tim Cook and Mark Zuckerberg of Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab were seated in front of the president's cabinet nominees. Yet Brian Moynihan on Thursday learned the limits of obsequience. In front of a packed crowd in the Davos Congress Hall, the Bank of America boss (BAC.N), opens new tab received a public dressing down from Trump. Speaking by video link, the president repeated unfounded accusations that the bank and its large rivals refuse to open accounts for conservatives. 'What you're doing is wrong,' he said. Moynihan responded by promising to sponsor the 2026 World Cup. Behind closed doors, investors pointed out that Trump's plans to lower taxes, impose tariffs on U.S. exports and deport illegal immigrants would push up inflation, raising interest rates and testing high share prices. Some believe the threat of a selloff will restrain the president. After all, 'his main key performance indicator is the S&P 500 Index,' one senior banker observed. Other global financiers mused on how the president might attempt to cut a grand bargain with China to shrink the trade deficit as an alternative to imposing sanctions. They mapped out a contrarian path to strong returns in the People's Republic, supported by Beijing's own measures to stimulate the world's second-largest economy. Chinese investors were more despondent, arguing that Trump's security hawks would pull him back from any such deal. Some in the cryptocurrency industry, which supported the Republican Party last year in the hopes of receiving more supportive regulation, expressed dismay at Trump's decision to launch his own crypto token days before his inauguration. Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly served as White House communications adviser in Trump's first term, said the move would make it harder for the administration to push through new crypto-friendly rules. Policymakers meanwhile fretted that Trump's early actions, which included pardoning hundreds of jailed supporters who participated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol four years earlier, will chip away at public faith in law and order. Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel laureate who is leading Bangladesh's government after protests forced out the previous prime minister, told Reuters Breakingviews that the upheaval in his country demonstrated the dangers of sycophantically praising politicians who pursue headline GDP growth without much thought about the consequences. Executives who have committed to green energy projects hoped that renewable power could withstand Trump's pro-fossil fuel stance, and his rallying call for the world to pump more oil. They also warned of potential lawsuits if the U.S. withdraws incentives promised by the Inflation Reduction Act. Acknowledgement of U.S. economic strength was mirrored by deep gloom surrounding Europe. Senior executives contrasted deregulation stateside with the thicket of financial, environmental, and planning rules that companies must navigate in the European Union. Yet some expressed hope that the Trump administration, which European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde described as an 'existential threat', would force a response. Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, told the Davos crowd she would sweep away, opens new tab unnecessary regulations and introduce a so-called '28th regime' which would allow innovative companies to operate across all 27 EU countries under a single set of rules. The idea isn't entirely new. Still, on Friday Larry Fink of BlackRock (BLK.N), opens new tab, the world's largest asset manager, declared it was 'probably time to be investing' in Europe again. The other recurring theme at the panels, bilateral meetings, discreet dinners, and private concerts was artificial intelligence. AI experts marvelled at the speed at which large-language models are improving, including one developed by Chinese startup DeepSeek. Bankers and tech firms talked excitedly of the vast investments being made in data centres, although a mooted $500 billion plan for digital infrastructure unveiled last week, opens new tab by Trump appeared to be more hot air than hardware. At the same time, many companies are beginning to roll out AI agents: digital assistants trained on historical data to perform administrative tasks. Senior executives at financial and IT services firms predicted that these agents would eventually handle much of the work currently done by junior accountants, creative teams, radiologists, and coders. The exponential rise in efficiency and productivity will force companies to fundamentally rethink their revenue models and how many days people work, though the Davos crowd appeared less interested in the implications for the distribution of income, nor the steps governments might need to take to mitigate the expected fallout. As one executive told Reuters Breakingviews: 'Companies don't like to talk about it in public'. Ultimately, the Davos elite remain keen to see the glass as half full. Some attendees pointed to a potential surprise upside from a Trump presidency: rational regulation, an end to wars in Europe and the Middle East, and a trade and security détente with China that could prevent the global economy from further fragmenting. Of course, as Hermann Rorschach knew, the interesting thing about staring at an inkblot is what it reveals about its observer. For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab to try Breakingviews for free.
