Latest news with #RussianDefense
Reuters
27-05-2025
- General
- Reuters
Air defences down 112 Ukrainian drones over Russia, 8 headed to Moscow, officials say
May 28 (Reuters) - Russian air defences destroyed or intercepted 112 Ukrainian drones over a three-hour period, most of them over central or southern regions, the Russian Defence Ministry said early on Wednesday. A ministry statement on the Telegram messaging app said the incidents occurred between 9 p.m. and midnight Moscow time. Fifty-nine drones were downed over the Bryansk region on the Ukrainian border, the others were intercepted over five different regions. The ministry announcement made no mention of drones being downed in the region surrounding Moscow. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, in three separate notices posted in rapid succession on Telegram, said eight Ukrainian drones were repelled while heading for the Russian capital. Recovery crews were examining fragments on the ground, he said. Russia and Ukraine fired large numbers of missiles at each other over the past week. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Monday that more than 900 had been fired at Ukrainian targets over a three-day period ending early on Monday. The numbers tapered off on Monday night to Tuesday morning.
Russia Today
27-05-2025
- General
- Russia Today
Kiev's actions harming peace process
The recent rise in the number of Ukrainian attacks on Russian soil is detrimental to the ongoing efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict between the two countries, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has said. Over the past week alone, Russian air defenses have downed 1,465 Ukrainian drones over territories outside the active conflict zone, the Defense Ministry in Moscow reported on Tuesday. 'At the very least, we can say that these actions by Kiev… are clearly at odds with the pursuit of the peace process,' Peskov told a press briefing that same day. 'Of course we condemn these actions,' he said, adding that they 'do not contribute to the advancement of the peace process.' The Russian Defense Ministry stated on Tuesday that the 'Kiev regime, supported by certain European countries, has taken a number of provocative steps aimed at disrupting the negotiation process,' which was initiated by Moscow earlier in May. According to the ministry, there has been a spike in Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory involving drones as well as Western-made missiles. Military officials in Moscow estimated that between May 20 and May 27, air defense systems intercepted more than 2,300 Ukrainian UAVs, most of them operating outside frontline areas. The ministry added that Russian forces retaliated with high-precision missile and drone strikes aimed 'exclusively at Ukraine's military and defense industrial facilities.' The developments followed last week's telephone conversation between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, which both leaders characterized as productive. Earlier this month, Russia and Ukraine held their first direct talks since 2022 in Istanbul, Türkiye. The two sides agreed on a record prisoner swap and discussed a follow-up meeting. As part of the ongoing diplomatic process, Moscow has said it is working on a memorandum for settling the conflict, which will be presented to Kiev in the near future. It is expected to include Moscow's key terms for a potential ceasefire, conflict settlement, and a timeline for an eventual peace agreement.
Yahoo
18-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Russia says it downed 25 Ukrainian drones over two of its border regions, one woman reported killed
(Reuters) -Russian air defence forces destroyed 25 Ukrainian drones over two of its border regions overnight and on Sunday morning, the Russian Defence Ministry said, and the governor of another region said one woman had been killed in a drone attack. Twenty two drones had been downed over the Belgorod region and another three destroyed over the Bryansk region, the ministry said in statements. Both regions border Ukraine. Alexander Bogomaz, the governor of Bryansk, said the attempted attack did not inflict any damage or cause any casualties. Alexander Khinshtein, governor of Kursk, another region bordering Ukraine, said a 69-year-old woman had been killed by an explosive dropped from a drone overnight. Reuters could not independently verify the reports. Both sides deny targeting civilians, but thousands have been killed in the conflict, the majority of them Ukrainians. Ukrainian authorities said early on Sunday that the largest known Russian drone attack since President Vladimir Putin sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine in 2022 had killed a woman in the Kyiv region and injured at least three people.
Russia Today
15-05-2025
- Politics
- Russia Today
Russian shield for India: How S-400s gave New Delhi an edge over Pakistan
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi made headlines when he publicly credited Russia's S-400 'Triumf' air defense system with playing a key role in the country's response to recent Pakistani strikes. More than a political gesture, Modi's remarks marked the first confirmed combat use of the S-400 by Indian forces. 'Platforms like the S-400 have given unprecedented strength to the country,' he said while standing before the system. 'A strong security shield has become the identity of India.' He also noted that India now has access to military technology that its adversaries – chiefly Pakistan – simply can't match. Coming amid a real military confrontation, his words carried unmistakable weight. The clash erupted during India's counterterrorism operation 'Sindoor.' Pakistan responded with strikes on Indian military infrastructure using drones, precision-guided munitions, and air-to-ground missiles. For the first time, India deployed its Russian-made S-400s in combat, stationing them in the strategically sensitive states of Punjab and Rajasthan. According to reports, the system successfully neutralized incoming threats before they even entered Indian airspace. Debris found on Pakistani territory suggests that ultra-long-range 40N6E missiles may have been used, capable of taking down targets from up to 370 kilometers away. Military analyst Mikhail Khodaryonok summed it up bluntly: The ultimate test for any weapon system is war. That's where it either proves itself – or fails completely. He believes the S-400 not only met but exceeded expectations during Russia's own military campaign, successfully intercepting a wide range of targets – from SCALP cruise missiles and tactical ballistic rockets to drones and MLRS projectiles. Now, it has proven itself again – this time in South Asia. India signed a $5.43 billion deal with Russia in 2018 for five regimental units of the S-400 after an exhaustive review of the country's long-term defense needs. The country's primary concerns: China and Pakistan. At the time, China had already secured its own S-400 systems and was reportedly planning to deploy them in Tibet, just across the border from India. Delivery to India began in 2021, and the final shipments are scheduled for 2025. With each new deployment, India extends a sophisticated 'air defense umbrella' across more of its vulnerable frontier. The decision to buy the S-400 was driven by its standout capability to intercept virtually any airborne threat: aircraft, helicopters, drones, cruise missiles, smart bombs, and ballistic missiles. No other air defense system on the market offers this level of versatility. Khodaryonok points out that if the coordinates are known, the S-400 can even be used to strike ground targets – though that's not its primary function. Equally important for India, the system integrates smoothly with the country's existing command infrastructure, which still bears the hallmarks of Soviet and Russian design. For India, adopting the S-400 wasn't just a technical upgrade – it was an evolution built on decades of military-technical continuity. The American-made Patriot system is often cited as an alternative, but the two platforms reflect fundamentally different doctrines. The Patriot was developed during the Cold War to protect NATO forces from enemy aircraft and short-range missiles. Its fire zones are narrow, and it can take up to 25 minutes to fully deploy – an eternity in a fast-moving conflict. The S-400, on the other hand, was designed to provide wide-area coverage as part of a national air defense grid. It takes just five minutes to deploy and can simultaneously track up to 300 targets. Its engagement range extends up to 400km in distance and 35km in altitude. As Khodaryonok put it, 'In almost every key metric, Patriot falls short of Triumf – especially in range, target variety, and electronic countermeasures.' The missile loadouts tell the story too: S-400 uses a broad mix: 48N6 (up to 250 km), 9M96M (up to 130 km), 40N6E (up to 370 km), and 9M100 for short-range defense. The Patriot relies mainly on MIM-104 and ERINT, with far fewer options. The S-400's biggest advantage might just be its price-to-performance ratio. When China purchased two S-400 regiments, the price tag exceeded $3 billion. For India, each regiment cost around $1 billion. That's enough to defend an area roughly 1,000 by 500 kilometers against simultaneous attacks by hundreds of aircraft and missiles. By contrast, equipping India with enough Patriot systems for comparable coverage would cost several times more. A single Patriot battery alone is often priced similarly to an entire S-400 regiment – despite offering much less coverage and flexibility. India's choice, in this light, wasn't just practical. It was strategic – and smart. Only a handful of nations can produce air defense systems like the S-400. So far, China, India, and Turkey have officially acquired the system. But dozens of countries – from Saudi Arabia and Algeria to Iran and even Latin American states – have expressed an interest. 'There's a waiting list for the S-400—and it keeps growing,' says Khodaryonok. 'Quality weapons don't come cheap. But nations that prioritize defense choose Triumf.' Turkey's decision to buy the S-400 despite threats of US sanctions shows just how powerful that appeal can be. For many, it's not just a weapons purchase – it's a step toward greater strategic autonomy. Once all five regiments are in place, India will be able to shield its entire northern and western borders, as well as critical coastal zones in the south—vital for securing trade routes and deterring precision air strikes. What's being built is more than just a missile shield. It's a multi-layered, autonomous defense system designed to withstand massive air raids, drone swarms, hypersonic threats, and saturation missile attacks. The recent conflict with Pakistan was a turning point. For the first time, India brought high-end Russian technology into real combat – and saw firsthand what it could do. The S-400 didn't just stop enemy missiles. It sent a message. The S-400 'Triumf' isn't just another piece of hardware. It's a political lever, a pillar of strategic independence, and a cornerstone of airpower in South-East Asia.
Russia Today
14-05-2025
- Politics
- Russia Today
Russian shield for India: How S-400 gave New Delhi an edge over Pakistan
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi made headlines when he publicly credited Russia's S-400 'Triumf' air defense system with playing a key role in the country's response to recent Pakistani strikes. More than a political gesture, Modi's remarks marked the first confirmed combat use of the S-400 by Indian forces. 'Platforms like the S-400 have given unprecedented strength to the country,' he said while standing before the system. 'A strong security shield has become the identity of India.' He also noted that India now has access to military technology that its adversaries – chiefly Pakistan – simply can't match. Coming amid a real military confrontation, his words carried unmistakable weight. The clash erupted during India's counterterrorism operation 'Sindoor.' Pakistan responded with strikes on Indian military infrastructure using drones, precision-guided munitions, and air-to-ground missiles. For the first time, India deployed its Russian-made S-400s in combat, stationing them in the strategically sensitive states of Punjab and Rajasthan. According to reports, the system successfully neutralized incoming threats before they even entered Indian airspace. Debris found on Pakistani territory suggests that ultra-long-range 40N6E missiles may have been used, capable of taking down targets from up to 370 kilometers away. Military analyst Mikhail Khodaryonok summed it up bluntly: The ultimate test for any weapon system is war. That's where it either proves itself – or fails completely. He believes the S-400 not only met but exceeded expectations during Russia's own military campaign, successfully intercepting a wide range of targets – from SCALP cruise missiles and tactical ballistic rockets to drones and MLRS projectiles. Now, it has proven itself again – this time in South Asia. India signed a $5.43 billion deal with Russia in 2018 for five regimental units of the S-400 after an exhaustive review of the country's long-term defense needs. The country's primary concerns: China and Pakistan. At the time, China had already secured its own S-400 systems and was reportedly planning to deploy them in Tibet, just across the border from India. Delivery to India began in 2021, and the final shipments are scheduled for 2025. With each new deployment, India extends a sophisticated 'air defense umbrella' across more of its vulnerable frontier. The decision to buy the S-400 was driven by its standout capability to intercept virtually any airborne threat: aircraft, helicopters, drones, cruise missiles, smart bombs, and ballistic missiles. No other air defense system on the market offers this level of versatility. Khodaryonok points out that if the coordinates are known, the S-400 can even be used to strike ground targets – though that's not its primary function. Equally important for India, the system integrates smoothly with the country's existing command infrastructure, which still bears the hallmarks of Soviet and Russian design. For India, adopting the S-400 wasn't just a technical upgrade – it was an evolution built on decades of military-technical continuity. The American-made Patriot system is often cited as an alternative, but the two platforms reflect fundamentally different doctrines. The Patriot was developed during the Cold War to protect NATO forces from enemy aircraft and short-range missiles. Its fire zones are narrow, and it can take up to 25 minutes to fully deploy – an eternity in a fast-moving conflict. The S-400, on the other hand, was designed to provide wide-area coverage as part of a national air defense grid. It takes just five minutes to deploy and can simultaneously track up to 300 targets. Its engagement range extends up to 400km in distance and 35km in altitude. As Khodaryonok put it, 'In almost every key metric, Patriot falls short of Triumf – especially in range, target variety, and electronic countermeasures.' The missile loadouts tell the story too: S-400 uses a broad mix: 48N6 (up to 250 km), 9M96M (up to 130 km), 40N6E (up to 370 km), and 9M100 for short-range defense. The Patriot relies mainly on MIM-104 and ERINT, with far fewer options. The S-400's biggest advantage might just be its price-to-performance ratio. When China purchased two S-400 regiments, the price tag exceeded $3 billion. For India, each regiment cost around $1 billion. That's enough to defend an area roughly 1,000 by 500 kilometers against simultaneous attacks by hundreds of aircraft and missiles. By contrast, equipping India with enough Patriot systems for comparable coverage would cost several times more. A single Patriot battery alone is often priced similarly to an entire S-400 regiment – despite offering much less coverage and flexibility. India's choice, in this light, wasn't just practical. It was strategic – and smart. Only a handful of nations can produce air defense systems like the S-400. So far, China, India, and Turkey have officially acquired the system. But dozens of countries – from Saudi Arabia and Algeria to Iran and even Latin American states – have expressed an interest. 'There's a waiting list for the S-400—and it keeps growing,' says Khodaryonok. 'Quality weapons don't come cheap. But nations that prioritize defense choose Triumf.' Turkey's decision to buy the S-400 despite threats of US sanctions shows just how powerful that appeal can be. For many, it's not just a weapons purchase – it's a step toward greater strategic autonomy. Once all five regiments are in place, India will be able to shield its entire northern and western borders, as well as critical coastal zones in the south—vital for securing trade routes and deterring precision air strikes. What's being built is more than just a missile shield. It's a multi-layered, autonomous defense system designed to withstand massive air raids, drone swarms, hypersonic threats, and saturation missile attacks. The recent conflict with Pakistan was a turning point. For the first time, India brought high-end Russian technology into real combat – and saw firsthand what it could do. The S-400 didn't just stop enemy missiles. It sent a message. The S-400 'Triumf' isn't just another piece of hardware. It's a political lever, a pillar of strategic independence, and a cornerstone of airpower in South-East Asia.
