Latest news with #Russiangovernment
LeMonde
22-05-2025
- Politics
- LeMonde
How Russian public fund Pravfond continued to subsidize its allies in Europe despite sanctions
In October 2024, border guards stopped a 65-year-old travel agent trying to carry €10,000 in cash into Estonia from Russia. Tatjana Sokolova was supposed to deliver the money to Andrei Andronov, a Russian national on trial in Estonia. Accused there of collaborating with Russian intelligence, he needed to pay his legal fees. It remains unclear why this travel agency head was helping Andronov, but authorities quickly discovered that the money was not hers. She had gone to collect the cash on the other side of the border after receiving the funds in a Russian bank account, sent from Pravfond, the Fund for Support and Protection of the Rights of Russian Compatriots Living Abroad – an organization created and funded by the Russian government. In April 2025, Sokolova, who did not respond to our requests for comment, was convicted in Estonia of violating sanctions against Moscow. Pravfond's stated aim is to defend the interests of Russians living abroad, mostly by providing legal aid. But, the foundation has also financed pro-Russian propaganda in various European countries, especially the former Soviet states in the Baltics, and helped advance the Kremlin's foreign policy interests. The "Dear Compatriots" Project, conducted in partnership with the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and involving some 20 media outlets, also revealed that Pravfond paid the legal fees of alleged spies. Sanctioned since 2023 The European Union sanctioned Pravfond and its executive director, Aleksandr Oudaltsev, in June 2023, making it theoretically much harder to move money into Europe. But tens of thousands of internal Pravfond emails obtained by Danish public broadcaster DR – shared with the OCCRP consortium and 28 partner media outlets, including Le Monde – show how the foundation has been able to continue its work across Europe with relative ease.
Yahoo
16-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Trump-appointed prosecutor's appearances on Russia-backed outlets draw scrutiny
Given Ed Martin's recent record as the interim U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., it was difficult to imagine how he could become even more controversial. But a new Washington Post report makes matters worse for the hyper-partisan Trump loyalist and former 'Stop the Steal' organizer. Martin is now interim U.S. attorney for D.C. and Trump's pick to serve full time in the role. But as a conservative activist and former Missouri Republican official, he appeared more than 150 times on [the Russian state television network RT] and Sputnik — networks funded and directed by the Russian government — as a guest commentator from August 2016 to April 2024, according to a search of their websites and the Internet Archive's database of television broadcasts. What makes a story like this so striking is that it's really made up of three overlapping problems. The first is that Martin agreed to appear more than 150 times on Russian propaganda outlets. The second is what Martin said during those on-air appearances: The Republican lawyer apparently had a knack for offering commentary that aligned with Kremlin talking points, including telling one host that there was 'no evidence' of a Russian military buildup on Ukraine's borders the week before the Russian military crossed those borders and began a war in Ukraine. But every bit as important, if not more so, is the third problem: As part of his presidential nomination to serve as the U.S. attorney in one of the nation's most important prosecutorial offices, Martin was required to disclose these media appearances to the Senate Judiciary Committee — and according to the Post's report, at least initially, he did not. (The article has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News.) 'Martin's office did not initially respond last week to questions about his appearances on RT and Sputnik, including why he did not disclose them to the Senate or whether he was compensated for them,' the Post added. The report went on to note that his spokesperson said Martin sent senators 'a supplemental letter' disclosing the appearances he failed to mention earlier. On Monday, a group of former Jan. 6 prosecutors and conservative attorneys asked a disciplinary board to investigate Martin, arguing that Trump's right-wing nominee — who has no prosecutorial experience — has a 'fundamental misunderstanding of the role of a federal prosecutor.' The letter, addressed to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel at the U.S. District Court of Appeals, said Martin's actions 'threaten to undermine the integrity of the U.S. Attorney's Office and the legal profession in the District of Columbia.' Two days later, Martin's nomination suddenly looks even worse. For those unfamiliar with the Missouri Republican, Martin's 'greatest hits' package features misguided and unnecessary fights with the dean of Georgetown University's law school, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, former President Joe Biden and Democratic Reps. Robert Garcia of California and Eugene Vindman of Virginia. During his brief tenure, Martin has also: demoted multiple senior officials involved in Jan. 6 insurrection cases; compared one of the criminal charges used against Jan. 6 defendants to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II; falsely described himself as one of the president's lawyers; weighed in on a civil case involving the White House, which had literally nothing to do with his office; intervened in a dubious Environmental Protection Agency investigation; made a dubious decision in a case involving Republican Rep. Cory Mills of Florida; launched the wildly unnecessary 'Operation Whirlwind'; also launched the wildly unnecessary 'Project 1512' initiative; also launched a wildly unnecessary 'election accountability' unit; made a creepy public vow to wield his prosecutorial powers against those who get in Elon Musk's way; engaged in brazen conflict of interest in a Jan. 6 case, in which he effectively took both sides of a criminal case; and kicked off a radically unnecessary investigation into Jack Smith and a law firm that gave the former special counsel pro bono legal services. In a piece for New York magazine, Elie Honig recently described the lawyer as Trump's 'dangerous and ridiculous prosecutor.' Martin seems to be going out of his way to prove his many critics right. What's more, The New York Times reported that Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have asked the D.C. Bar's disciplinary counsel to investigate Martin, arguing that the Trump-appointed Republican has 'abused' his prosecutorial powers. The Senate has not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing for Martin, and the calendar is of increasing relevance: If he isn't confirmed by May 20, his interim appointment will expire and he'll have to be replaced at the U.S attorney's office. Watch this space. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on
Saba Yemen
27-02-2025
- Business
- Saba Yemen
Moscow discusses with Baghdad possibility of one of its oil companies participating in Iraq
Moscow - Saba: Russian Energy Minister Sergei Tsevilev announced Thursday that his country discussed with Iraq the possibility of the Russian company "Zarubezhneft" participating in oil projects in Iraq. The Russian minister said in statements to reporters: "We have suggested that the company "Zarubezhneft" also enter the Iraqi market." Tsevilev explained that this company owned by the Russian government was created specifically to work abroad, noting that it has great and rich experience in this field. The Russian minister indicated that the Iraqi side had in turn suggested involving the entire Russian business community in tenders related to oil projects. Whatsapp Telegram Email Print more of (International)
