Latest news with #S&P400
Mint
2 days ago
- Business
- Mint
Nvidia share price: Market cap tops $4.47 trillion, commands over 8% of S&P 500
Nvidia Corp. has cemented its dominance in U.S. equity markets, ending Tuesday with a market capitalisation of $4.47 trillion and accounting for more than 8% of the S&P 500's total market value — the highest weighting ever recorded for a single stock in the index's history. Nvidia share price closed 0.52% higher at $183.10 apiece, lifting its market share in the S&P 500 to a record high level. On Tuesday, the S&P 500 gained 72.31 points, or 1.13%, to close at a record high of 6,445.76, with a market cap of $53.66 trillion, buoyed in part by shares of the AI chipmaker Nvidia's continued rally. The milestone underscores Nvidia's rapid ascent, fuelled by insatiable demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs) that power artificial intelligence applications worldwide. Nvidia now holds a larger slice of the S&P 500 than tech giants Microsoft ($3.93 trillion market cap) and Apple Inc. ($3.41 trillion), which rank second and third by index weight. Rounding out the top five are Alphabet ($2.46 trillion) and Amazon ($2.36 trillion). The technology sector remains the dominant force in the S&P 500, with an overall index weight of 34%, followed by financials at 13.8% and consumer discretionary at 10.4%. Nvidia's share price has rallied 7% in the past month, 41% over three months, and 37% year-to-date. Over the past year, the stock has surged 58%, driven by robust demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs) that power artificial intelligence applications globally. By comparison, the S&P 400 index has posted more modest gains — up 3% in one month, 9.5% in three months, and 10% so far in 2025. On a one-year basis, the index has delivered 19% returns. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Bloomberg
3 days ago
- Business
- Bloomberg
Cava Cuts Sales Outlook on Cautious Diners, High Growth Bar
Cava Group Inc. trimmed its annual sales outlook after a sharp deceleration in the second quarter as skittish diners spent less on restaurant meals, showing the pressure the brand is facing to keep up with its speedy growth in recent years. Cava's shares fell about 23% in postmarket trading in New York on Tuesday, which would be its largest decrease on record if it holds through Wednesday's close. The company's stock declined roughly 25% this year through Tuesday's close, compared with the 3.8% slump in the S&P 400 Consumer Discretionary Index.
Yahoo
17-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Primerica Schedules Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results Webcast
DULUTH, Ga., July 16, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Primerica, Inc. (NYSE:PRI) announced today that it will hold a webcast on Thursday, August 7, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. (ET) to discuss the Company's results for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, as well as other business-related matters, including future expectations. A news release announcing the quarter's results will be distributed after the close of the market on Wednesday, August 6, 2025. The earnings news release, financial supplement and live webcast will be available on the Primerica Investors website at A replay of the call will be available for approximately 30 days. About Primerica, Inc. Primerica, Inc., headquartered in Duluth, GA, is a leading provider of financial products and services to middle-income households in North America. Independent licensed representatives educate Primerica clients about how to better prepare for a more secure financial future by assessing their needs and providing appropriate solutions through term life insurance, which we underwrite, and mutual funds, annuities and other financial products, which we distribute primarily on behalf of third parties. We insured over 5.5 million lives and had approximately 3.0 million client investment accounts on December 31, 2024. Primerica, through its insurance company subsidiaries, was the #3 issuer of Term Life insurance coverage in the United States and Canada in 2024. Primerica stock is included in the S&P MidCap 400 and the Russell 1000 stock indices and is traded on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "PRI". View source version on Contacts Investor Contact: Nicole Russell470-564-6663Email: Media Contact: Susan Chana404-229-8302Email: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
History Says the S&P 400 and 600 Indexes Could Be Poised to Soar
Over the last three and five years, large-cap stocks have outperformed small- and mid-cap stocks. The gap between the forward P/Es of the S&P 500 index and the S&P 400 and 600 indexes hasn't been this wide in decades. The last time the valuation gap reached this level, small- and mid-cap stocks made a big move for many years. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 400 Index - MidCap Price Return (USD) › If you've invested your money in the broader benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) index over the last five years, then you've done quite well. The index recently registered all-time highs and was up close to 96% over the last five years (as of July 7). A large part of the success can be attributed to a handful of high-flying artificial intelligence (AI) stocks that have reached multitrillion-dollar market caps, effectively putting the rest of the index on their backs. However, value investors who like to go fishing for small- and mid-cap stocks in the S&P 400 (SNPINDEX: ^MID) and S&P 600 indexes haven't fared as well, lagging the S&P 500, especially for small-cap stocks in the S&P 600. Luckily, by some historical metrics, history says this could be about to change. While the five-year charts don't look so bad, the three-year chart is worse, especially for the S&P 600, which gained about 22.5% over the last three years, compared to the S&P 500's 63% gain. In fact, on a forward price-to-earnings basis, the gap between small- and mid-cap stocks and large-cap stocks in the S&P 500 hasn't been this wide in decades, according to Tobias Carlisle, a portfolio manager at the Acquirers Funds. As you can see above, small- and mid-cap stocks have more or less been stagnant over the last 3.5 years. They've faced difficulties from the high interest rate environment, which increases their cost of debt; concerns about a recession; and more recently uncertainty over tariffs and how that might impact their businesses. Carlisle points out that the last time this happened, the S&P 400 and 600 indexes went on to widely outperform large-cap stocks in the S&P 500 for well over a decade -- and he wasn't kidding. There are, of course, different periods of time within this larger time frame that large-cap stocks may have performed better or not underperformed as much, but small and medium caps pretty regularly held a lead. Part of the reason for this could have been the zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) that ensued after the Great Recession in 2008 all the way until the end of 2018. When rates fall and safer assets yield less, investors take more of a risk-on approach, which makes small- and mid-cap stocks more appealing. A ZIRP environment also carries other advantages, like a lower cost to borrow, as mentioned above, and can result in more economic activity. Investors should always keep in mind that while history often rhymes, it rarely repeats itself. That means that while data can be helpful in informing investment decisions, it doesn't predict the future, so there's certainly a chance that small- and mid-caps don't go on to outperform. It seems unlikely that the Federal Reserve will revert to a ZIRP environment anytime soon, unless the economy really struggles, and some are worried about a higher inflationary environment down the line, whether due to tariffs or U.S. fiscal concerns. That said, there are potential tailwinds that could lift small- and mid-cap stocks. The market is forecasting two interest rate cuts in the back half of the year, and some market strategists like Morgan Stanley see the rate cuts accelerating in 2026 -- they are calling for seven next year. Furthermore, at some point, President Donald Trump is likely to finalize tariffs, which, at the very least, will give businesses clarity, even if they are higher than expected. The recently passed U.S. budget reconciliation bill also firmed up tax cuts for corporations that were first implemented in Trump's first term, which could help with growth. Ultimately, I do think the more attractively priced small- and mid-cap groups are poised for a breakout at some point. It's not a guarantee, so don't bet the farm, but having some exposure to this group in your portfolio is a good idea. Before you buy stock in S&P 400 Index - MidCap Price Return (USD), consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and S&P 400 Index - MidCap Price Return (USD) wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $687,764!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $980,723!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 179% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. History Says the S&P 400 and 600 Indexes Could Be Poised to Soar was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Wire
01-07-2025
- Business
- Business Wire
Glass Lewis Recommends Stockholders Vote for Change at Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Ortelius Advisors, L.P. ('Ortelius') today announced that a third leading independent proxy advisory firm, Glass, Lewis & Co. ('Glass Lewis'), has recommended that stockholders vote FOR the election of Ortelius nominees to the Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (NYSE: BKD) ('Brookdale' or 'Company') Board of Directors, on the WHITE Ortelius proxy card, at the upcoming 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The recommendation from Glass Lewis builds on supportive commentary already published by Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. ('ISS') and the Egan-Jones Ratings Company ('Egan-Jones') related to Ortelius' campaign for change at Brookdale. Peter DeSorcy, Managing Member of Ortelius, said: 'We appreciate that Glass Lewis has further confirmed the need for change at Brookdale. With three independent proxy advisors now having validated Ortelius' position, we reiterate our call to stockholders that now is the time to put more qualified and independent voices in the boardroom at Brookdale. As confirmed by Glass Lewis, ISS, and Egan-Jones, Ortelius' nominees are necessary to effect the critical changes required at Brookdale. If elected, the Ortelius nominees will leverage their well-documented expertise to restore confidence in the critical process to select the Company's next CEO and accelerate the necessary steps to unlock the significant value within Brookdale. A new and qualified Board is a necessary first step to realizing the potential within Brookdale and we urge our fellow Brookdale stockholders to vote FOR all six of the Ortelius nominees on the WHITE proxy card.' In its report finding that Ortelius has presented a compelling case for change at Brookdale, Glass Lewis*: Recognized the validity of Ortelius' campaign to end a history of underperformance at Brookdale: 'The current bout, spearheaded here by Ortelius, largely orbits alternatives relating to Brookdale's portfolio of senior living communities and associated efforts to reverse long-term trendlines which have left the Company trailing comps and fighting to remedy a moribund returns profile.' Credited Ortelius' public campaign for driving change, with the Board only acting under pressure from Ortelius: '…notwithstanding the board's contention to the contrary, we believe Brookdale's contest tack – which includes the outwardly sudden and immediately effective termination of longtime CEO Cindy Baier with no heir apparent and the appointment of multiple new board members – very strongly correlates with Ortelius' involvement….and the Dissident's application of significant public pressure. Further, we note certain culpable members continue to serve on the board despite Brookdale's flat-footed refreshment process and decidedly less than laudatory long-term performance.' 'We further note Brookdale's shares experienced a one-day gain of 7.1% following announcement of Ortelius' current campaign (Ventas, Welltower and the S&P 400 gained 1.0%, 0.6% and 3.1%, respectively), suggesting that the Dissident's public involvement was viewed as a prospective catalyst for further value creation.' 'Just as notably, Brookdale's shares surged 8.5% on the announcement that former CEO Cindy Baier would be transitioned with immediate effectiveness (Ventas, Welltower and the S&P 400 gained 2.0%, 2.1% and 1.2%, respectively), clearly reinforcing the notion that her prior executive service was viewed as a valuation millstone for Brookdale. Neither of these developments seem to reflect a ringing endorsement for Brookdale's pre-Ortelius oversight architecture.' Agreed with Ortelius on the need for Board renewal to bring greater expertise and fresh independent perspectives as well as to hold long-term directors accountable for poor performance: '…we do believe there exists persuasive cause to advance incremental change to bolster key competencies, hold certain long-term directors accountable and provide fresh insight into a critical and, to date, murky succession initiative.' '...we similarly don't believe investors should forego the opportunity to promote incremental change and firm accountability as the Company moves through the early innings of a pivotal strategic and financial transition.' Validated Ortelius' criticisms about Brookdale's operating performance: '…for all the board's public posturing, basic facts should prevail here: slightly more than a third of the Company's properties presently sit at lower than 75% occupancy, with a substantial subset of that group sitting at less than 70%.' Echoed Ortelius' well-founded concerns about Brookdale's occupancy rates: 'Ortelius does, however, reasonably note that Brookdale's occupancy fell further than Ventas and Welltower amid COVID headwinds and that Brookdale currently remains below senior housing occupancy rates posted by those comps, suggesting the Company's emergent rebound still leaves Brookdale off peer levels.' Confirmed Ortelius' commentary on Brookdale's poor financial performance including lagging net operating income (NOI) margins and excessive leverage: 'We do believe Ortelius offers persuasive commentary regarding depressed NOI margins.' '…NOI margins do indeed appear to remain below both pre-COVID figures and margins posted by Ventas and Welltower, again suggesting that Brookdale's recovery from long-term performance trends remains very much a work in progress.' '… there appears to be little meaningful debate that Brookdale presently remains heavily levered.' Confirmed that Ortelius' plan to sell underperforming properties is well conceived and viable: '…we note central elements of Ortelius' plan critically rely on exiting Brookdale's existing portfolio of leased properties while concurrently monetizing the Company's underperforming owned assets, leaving Brookdale with an optimized pool of high-quality communities which would be expected to unlock significant value for investors.' Questioned Brookdale's governance practices and the Board's capacity to lead a credible CEO search process given concerns around the Board's recent director appointments: 'Two of the four directors recently appointed to the Brookdale board (Mr. Fioravanti and Ms. Mace) were identified by Ms. Baier, while one other (Mr. Hausman) was identified by current chair and interim CEO Denise Warren. That these appointments do not appear to reflect legacy relationships is arguably much less important than the impression that the nominating and corporate governance committee – currently helmed by Victoria Freed – expressly skirted retaining an independent search firm in favor of recommendations submitted by Brookdale's senior executives, one of which, Ms. Baier, appears to have been well out of favor with investors. This framework does not go particularly far in establishing that a broad, independent, externally validated candidate identification process was prioritized, and does little to deflect the implication that key members of leadership have increasingly self-selected the members of the board to which they report.' 'Brookdale indicates it retained Spencer Stuart to aid in CEO succession matters as early as November 2024. However, currently available materials do not give a particularly firm impression that any significant progress was made on those matters during the roughly five-month period between retention and Ms. Baier's departure. For the sake of clarity, our engagement with the board indicated five of seven investors with which Brookdale engaged after Ortelius' emergence expressed a desire for immediate management change. That the board thereafter swiftly accelerated Ms. Baier's exit in lieu of purportedly ongoing succession processes suggests to us that its members realized relatively late that they were materially out of phase with investor sentiment and thus sought to blunt possible solicitation vulnerabilities narratives by securing Ms. Baier's immediate resignation despite the apparent absence of any qualified long-term replacement.' 'Ms. Warren is slated to serve as interim CEO until a permanent successor to Ms. Baier is named. Notably, Brookdale's own skills matrix indicates senior housing is not among Ms. Warren's core competencies (an assessment which curiously clashes with recent materials published by Brookdale stating Ms. Warren has 'directly relevant senior living experience').' '...the fact that Ms. Warren was selected as pro tem CEO over any existing employee seems to invite immediate scrutiny regarding the depth of Brookdale's bench and the efficacy of the board's succession architecture.' '...closer scrutiny suggests key elements of the Company's refresh – including what seems to be nominal involvement from the nominating and corporate governance committee and the continuation of an objectively atypical and functionally reactive CEO succession process – suggest fresh perspectives could be beneficial here.' Endorsed Ortelius nominees Steven J. Insoft and Steven Vick for bringing important skills and perspectives to the Board: 'We believe both Ortelius candidates offer valuable senior housing and real estate expertise at a critical juncture, with particular attention to Brookdale's ongoing portfolio optimization efforts. Their elections in place of Ms. Freed and Mr. Wielansky would further demonstrate board refreshment directly predicated on exercise of the shareholder franchise, rather than on deference to members of management.' Recommended 'Withhold' votes on long tenured Brookdale directors Lee Wielansky, Chair of the Investment Committee, and Victoria Freed, Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee: 'Withholding votes from incumbent nominees Freed and Wielansky – Ms. Freed and Mr. Wielansky are, ex Ms. Warren, the longest serving members of the Brookdale board and thus the most readily accountable for the Company's comparatively poor long-term performance' 'Mr. Wielansky's purportedly valuable strategic insight and real estate expertise should, in the context of Brookdale's long-term arc, warrant particular scrutiny by investors, while Ms. Freed's experience seems to have very little crossover with the Company's core operations or ongoing strategic and financial initiatives.' 'Importantly, both directors have overseen significantly subpar shareholder returns during their respective tenures. We are further concerned that Ms. Freed, as chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee, has heavily deferred to the recommendations of current and former senior executives during Brookdale's recent board refresh, a tack which, taken together with the Company's muddled succession effort, reflects unfavorably on the fundamental efficacy of Brookdale's existing oversight architecture.' Your vote is important, no matter how many or how few shares of common stock you own. Ortelius urges you to sign, date, and return the WHITE universal proxy card today to vote 'FOR' the election of all six Ortelius nominees and in accordance with Ortelius' recommendations on the other proposals on the agenda for the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who have questions or require assistance in voting their WHITE Proxy Card, or those who require copies of Ortelius' proxy materials, should contact: Saratoga Proxy Consulting LLC at (888) 368-0379 or info@ *Permission to use quotations from the report was neither sought nor obtained. Additional Information Ortelius Advisors, L.P., together with the other participants in its proxy solicitation (collectively, 'Ortelius'), has filed a definitive proxy statement and accompanying WHITE universal proxy card with the Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC') to be used to solicit votes for the election of Ortelius' slate of highly-qualified director nominees at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders (the 'Annual Meeting') of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., a Delaware corporation (the 'Company'). Stockholders are advised to read the proxy statement and any other documents related to the solicitation of stockholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting because they contain important information, including information relating to the participants in Ortelius' proxy solicitation. These materials and other materials filed by Ortelius with the SEC in connection with the solicitation of proxies are available at no charge on the SEC's website at The definitive proxy statement and other relevant documents filed by Ortelius with the SEC are also available, without charge, by directing a request to Ortelius' proxy solicitor, Saratoga Proxy Consulting LLC, at its toll-free number (888) 368-0379 or via email at info@ Ortelius is a research-intensive, fundamental-based, activist-oriented alternative investment management firm focused on event-driven opportunities.
