Latest news with #SanjaySharma
Time of India
6 hours ago
- General
- Time of India
Chambal survey begins ahead of proposed sanctuary denotification
1 2 Jaipur: The forest administration of Mukundra Tiger Reserve has launched a comprehensive wildlife assessment of the Chambal River's aquatic ecosystem. This evaluation is a key step toward the proposed denotification of certain upstream sections of the river. The state govt plans to exclude a stretch of the National Chambal Gharial Sanctuary—between Kota Barrage and the Hanging Bridge—to facilitate development and provide relief to thousands of residents living along the riverbanks. A forest official said, "The Wildlife Institute of India (WII) began this study about eight months ago, and studies covering both summer and winter seasons are already complete, and a monsoon-season survey will follow. Once complete, a report will be submitted to the chief wildlife warden." The study area covers approximately 8,000 hectare—including 1,060 hectares of forest land—within a 1km belt on both sides of the river, from the Hanging Bridge to Kota Barrage. This zone is home to crocodiles, turtles, otters, snakes, and various aquatic birds. Although gharials haven't been seen in recent years, the crocodile population is reportedly increasing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트, 비용 걱정되셨다면? 인천 시민을 위한 알짜 정보 플란치과 더 알아보기 Undo An official said, "In 1983, under the Wildlife Protection Act, the Gharial Sanctuary was notified, which included parts of Kishorpura, Shaktinagar, Shivpura, Hanuman Nagar, Dadabari, and Shyam Nagar." Since these areas fall within the sanctuary's limits, around 25,000 houses have not been issued land ownership documents. "No one within 1 km of the river, from Kishorpura to Shyam Nagar, holds a patta, making them ineligible for housing loans. If the area is denotified, 25,000 houses near the city may finally get pattas of their plots." The process was initiated in response to long-pending demands from residents. Recently, senior politicians wrote a letter to the forest department, after which a meeting was held with forest minister Sanjay Sharma. "Colonies and residential areas were established by the Kota Urban Improvement Trust and Kota Municipal Corporation, leading to dense population clusters in the region. The proposal was prepared to benefit thousands of people living in these areas. This will rationalise the boundaries of these protected areas to better align with current ecological realities and human settlement patterns," added a senior forest department source.
Time of India
14-05-2025
- Time of India
Tragedy strikes Ranthambore: Tigress claim second victim – essential safari safety tips
In a tragic incident at Rajasthan's Ranthambore National Park , a sub-adult tigress, offspring of the renowned Arrowhead (T-84), fatally attacked 40-year-old forest ranger Devendra Chaudhary near the Jogi Mahal area. This marks the second fatal attack by the same tigress within a month, following the death of a 7-year-old boy in April. The tigress may be tranquilised and moved to an enclosure in the Taleda range, according to the forest department. Experts warn that prior attempts to house tigers in this location have resulted in clashes with wild tigers, and that this area is located within a natural tiger corridor. There are practical difficulties in keeping a tiger in an enclosure inside the core area as well. The tigress's hostility is ascribed by conservationists to poor forest management, which includes baiting techniques that made the cubs less fearful of people. Read more: Cyclone Shakti alert: What it means for travel and monsoon In response to the incident, Rajasthan's Environment Minister Sanjay Sharma visited Chaudhary's family, offering condolences and assuring government support, including a job for the widow in the education department and financial assistance. Tips for safe safari experiences in Ranthambore While the recent events highlight the importance of safety, Ranthambore National Park remains a premier destination for wildlife enthusiasts. Follow these essential steps to keep your safari experience thrilling, not chilling. Book official safaris: Always opt for government-approved safari operators to ensure safety and compliance with park regulations. Follow guide instructions: Listen attentively to your guide's advice and adhere to all safety protocols during the safari. Stay inside the vehicle: Never attempt to exit the vehicle during the safari, even if animals are nearby. Avoid loud noises: Keep noise levels to a minimum to prevent startling wildlife and to enhance your chances of observing animals in their natural behavior. Respect wildlife: Maintain a safe distance from all animals and avoid any actions that could disturb their natural habitat. Read more: 5 states where every city feels like a different country The recent tragic events in Ranthambore underscore the complex dynamics between humans and wildlife in protected areas. It is imperative for authorities to implement effective wildlife management strategies to prevent such incidents in the future. Simultaneously, visitors must remain vigilant and adhere to safety protocols to ensure a harmonious coexistence with nature. Future-Proof Your Child with AI Skills | Limited Early Bird Seats – 33% OFF! | WhatsApp: 9560500838
Hans India
14-05-2025
- Politics
- Hans India
Ban on 4PM YouTube channel lifted, SC told
New Delhi: The Supreme Court was apprised on Tuesday that the Union government has withdrawn its directive to block the YouTube channel 4PM News Network. A bench of Justices B. R. Gavai and A. G. Masih were hearing a plea filed by journalist Sanjay Sharma challenging the Centre's directive to block his news channel on YouTube on the grounds of 'national security' and 'public order'. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing on the petitioner's behalf, submitted that since the blocking order has been withdrawn by the authorities, the prayer for interim relief has turned infructuous. However, Sibal pressed the prayer contained in the petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Information Technology (IT) Blocking Rules, 2009. In view of the submission, the Apex Court ordered tagging the instant petition with the pending batch of pleas raising similar issues. Last week, the Justice Gavai-led Bench issued notice on the plea filed by the editor of the digital news platform and sought responses from the Union government, including the Ministry of Home Affairs, and YouTube. When a prayer for interim relief was pressed, the Top Court had said that it was not inclined to pass any stay order without hearing from the government. In his writ petition filed before the Apex Court, journalist Sanjay Sharma said that non-furnishing of the blocking order or underlying complaint violated statutory and constitutional safeguards.
NDTV
13-05-2025
- Politics
- NDTV
Ban On 4PM YouTube Channel Lifted, Supreme Court Told
New Delhi: The Supreme Court was apprised on Tuesday that the Union government has withdrawn its directive to block the YouTube channel 4PM News Network. A bench of Justices BR Gavai and AG Masih was hearing a plea filed by journalist Sanjay Sharma challenging the Centre's directive to block his news channel on YouTube on the grounds of "national security" and "public order". Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing on the petitioner's behalf, submitted that since the blocking order has been withdrawn by the authorities, the prayer for interim relief has turned infructuous. However, Mr Sibal pressed the prayer contained in the petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Information Technology (IT) Blocking Rules, 2009. In view of the submission, the top court ordered tagging the instant petition with the pending batch of pleas raising similar issues. Last week, the Justice Gavai-led Bench issued notice on the plea filed by the editor of the digital news platform and sought responses from the Union government, including the Ministry of Home Affairs, and YouTube. When a prayer for interim relief was pressed, the Top Court had said that it was not inclined to pass any stay order without hearing from the government. In his writ petition filed before the Top Court, journalist Sanjay Sharma said that non-furnishing of the blocking order or underlying complaint violated statutory and constitutional safeguards. "Rules 8, 9, and 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009, which permit blocking without notice or hearing, are violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 21 of the Constitution, as they oust the principles of natural justice and enable a shadow regime of censorship devoid of transparency or accountability," stated the petition filed through Talha Abdul Rahman. Further, it said that the Constitution does not permit the blanket removal of content without an opportunity to be heard. "'National security' and 'public order' are not talismanic invocations to insulate executive action from scrutiny. They are constitutionally recognised grounds under Article 19(2), but are subject to the test of reasonableness and proportionality," the plea said. A vague reference to these grounds, without even disclosing the offending content, makes it impossible for the petitioner to challenge or remedy the allegation, thereby depriving him of his fundamental right to free speech and fair hearing, added the petition. The Editors Guild of India, in a recent press statement, said that it was "deeply concerned" by the decision of the Union government to block YouTube Channel 4PM News Network, and termed the move an "opaque use of executive power, without prior notice or opportunity for response". "Arbitrary takedown orders undermine the fundamental right to freedom of speech. The Guild reiterated its demand for a transparent and accountable mechanism for content takedowns, particularly when it concerns journalistic work. National security cannot become a pretext to silence critical voices or independent reporting," added the press statement.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13-05-2025
- Politics
- Business Standard
Order blocking YouTube channel '4PM' withdrawn: Centre informs SC
The apex court was hearing a plea filed by Sanjay Sharma, who is the editor of digital news platform 4PM, seeking quashing of an order blocking the channel Press Trust of India New Delhi The Supreme Court was on Tuesday informed that an order blocking YouTube channel "4PM", which has a subscriber base of 73 lakh, was withdrawn. "They have withdrawn the blocking order," senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, informed a bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih. The apex court was hearing a plea filed by Sanjay Sharma, who is the editor of digital news platform 4PM, seeking quashing of an order blocking the channel. The plea claimed the blocking was effected by the intermediary pursuant to an undisclosed direction allegedly issued by the Centre citing vague grounds of "national security" and "public order". Sibal requested the bench that the plea be tagged with separate pending petitions which have challenged Rule 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009. He said Sharma's petition also sought quashing of Rule 16 of the 2009 Rules. Rule 16 says strict confidentiality shall be maintained regarding all the requests and complaints received and actions taken thereof. The plea also sought striking down or reading down Rule 9 of the Blocking Rules, 2009, to mandate issuance of a notice, opportunity of hearing and communication of a copy of the interim order to the originator or creator of the content prior to passing of a final order. The bench tagged the plea with the pending separate pleas. On May 5, the top court sought responses from the Centre and others on Sharma's plea, which said the blocking was a "chilling assault on journalistic independence" and the right of public to receive information. The plea, filed through advocate Talha Abdul Rahman, said no blocking order or underlying complaint was furnished to the petitioner, violating both statutory and constitutional safeguards. The petition said it was a settled law that the Constitution does not permit blanket removal of content without an opportunity to be heard. "'National security' and 'public order' are not talismanic invocations to insulate executive action from scrutiny," it said. The plea said the action was not only ultra vires the parent statute but also strikes at the core of democratic accountability ensured by a free press. "The blocking is a chilling assault on journalistic independence and the right of the public to receive information," it said. Seeking a direction to the Centre to produce the order with reasons and records, if any, issued to the intermediary for blocking the channel, it asked for a direction to quash the blocking order. The plea said the petitioner's YouTube channel was blocked without giving any fair opportunity to clarify or justify his case. Blocking Rules, 2009, including Rules 8, 9, and 16, infringe upon fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, particularly the rights to freedom of speech and expression, right to equality and the right to life and personal liberty, it added. It said the authorities concerned have a duty under the law to ensure that blocking of YouTube channels were not done arbitrarily, suppressing the freedom of speech and expression. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
