logo
#

Latest news with #SaveARDemocracy

Push to protect ballot initiatives advances in Arkansas
Push to protect ballot initiatives advances in Arkansas

Axios

time23-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Axios

Push to protect ballot initiatives advances in Arkansas

A proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution could have a sweeping impact on voters' control over how future laws are shaped. Why it matters: The measure, backed by Arkansas' League of Women Voters and Save AR Democracy, seeks to require a statewide vote before changing Arkansas' direct democracy process. It would also streamline legal reviews and prohibit the state Legislature from amending or repealing constitutional amendments. Driving the news: Attorney General Tim Griffin's office on Wednesday approved the popular name and ballot title for the citizen-led constitutional amendment. His office rejected three previous drafts. The most recent rejection cited a 2025 law, Act 602, which requires the language to be at or below eighth-grade reading level according to the Flesch-Kincaid scale. The big picture: Arkansas voters can change or reject laws enacted by the state Legislature through a citizen-initiated ballot process. Changes can be in the form of a proposed ballot initiative as a state statute (a change to a law) or a constitutional amendment (a more significant change to the state's constitution). They also may repeal legislation with a veto referendum. Yes, but: In recent years, lawmakers have made the process more difficult, passing laws that riddle it with technicalities and all but require a group to be well funded to gather petition signatures. Acts 240 and 241, signed this year, require canvassers to submit an affidavit proclaiming they will follow Arkansas law and to check photo ID before a voter can sign a petition. Act 274 requires canvassers to certify a voter has read the ballot title summarizing the measure, or to read it aloud to the voter before they sign the petition. Flashback: Last year, three citizen-led initiatives collected enough signatures for the November ballot. However, the abortion amendment and the recreational marijuana amendment were eventually disqualified over paperwork. Only a measure to revoke a casino license and require voters to approve future licenses was included. Voters approved it by a wide majority. State of play: Supporters of the proposed amendment can now begin gathering signatures from registered voters. Signature requirements vary for each type of citizen-initiated proposal, based on a percentage of the votes cast in the most recent gubernatorial election. Constitutional amendments require 10%, or 90,704 signatures. Due to a 2023 law, signatures must be gathered from 50 counties instead of the previously required 15. What they're saying:"This victory belongs to every Arkansan who believes in the power of the people to shape their own government," Bonnie Miller, president of the League, said in a statement following Griffin's decision. "Despite the challenges, we refused to give up because the right to direct democracy is worth fighting for." What we're watching: It will be telling to see how quickly or slowly Arkansas voters sign the petition.

Attorney general approves Arkansas League of Women Voters, Save AR Democracy ballot title for referendum roll-back
Attorney general approves Arkansas League of Women Voters, Save AR Democracy ballot title for referendum roll-back

Yahoo

time21-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Attorney general approves Arkansas League of Women Voters, Save AR Democracy ballot title for referendum roll-back

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – The Arkansas attorney general approved a ballot title on Wednesday that could change the way citizens bring issues to the ballot for voters to decide. This was the third ballot title submitted by the League of Women Voters of Arkansas to the attorney general. The league, along with the Save AR Democracy group, intends to ask voters whether access to the referendum process should be part of the Arkansas Constitution. Arkansas coalition submits proposed ballot initiative to overturn legislative changes to referendum law Attorney General Tim Griffin's opinion that accompanied the approval said the group's submission had appropriate language in the title, as compared to the previous submissions. The league president classified Wednesday's decision as a victory. 'This victory belongs to every Arkansan who believes in the power of the people to shape their own government,' League president Bonnie Miller said. 'Despite the challenges, we refused to give up because the right to direct democracy is worth fighting for.' Two additional groups ask to join Arkansas League of Women Voters suit against changes to referendum law Secretary of State Cole Jester's office says the next step in the process is to meet with someone from its elections division and start collecting their signatures to try to get enough valid signatures to get it on the ballot. By state law, the group will need to gather 90,704 signatures, amounting to 10% of the total number of votes cast for governor in the last election. The league has also filed a lawsuit against the referendum changes. The most recent legislative session created several laws that tightened access to the referendum process, including multiple laws on signature gathering and the reading level of the title. The group's second submission being above an eighth-grade reading level is what led to its rejection. This is the first ballot title approved under the new laws. A recent successful ballot initiative in Arkansas was an amendment repealing the Pope County casino's license. In the past, a 2018 initiative increased the state's minimum wage, and a 2016 initiative established an Arkansas medical marijuana program. Arkansas League of Women Voters speaks on lawsuit regarding changes voter referendum process Other ballot initiatives to increase access to marijuana failed in 2022 and 2024. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Lawsuit challenges new restrictions on initiative process in Arkansas
Lawsuit challenges new restrictions on initiative process in Arkansas

The Independent

time22-04-2025

  • Politics
  • The Independent

Lawsuit challenges new restrictions on initiative process in Arkansas

A federal judge was asked Monday to strike down several restrictions on the Arkansas initiative process in a lawsuit that accused the state of violating voters' constitutional rights. The League of Women Voters of Arkansas filed the lawsuit challenging four new laws on the initiative process as well as existing restrictions that the group says pose significant hurdles for citizens trying to put proposals on the ballot. 'These laws interfere, restrict, hamper, and impair the freedom of the people in circulating and procuring petitions,' the group said in the lawsuit. 'The laws do not facilitate the operation of the initiative and referendum process.' Arkansas is among several Republican-led states where lawmakers have been pushing for restrictions on the ballot initiative process. The new laws in Arkansas being challenged include requirements that someone read the text of a ballot initiative and show photo identification before signing a petition. The groups are also challenging existing restrictions, including a ban on paying canvassers per signature collected and a requirement that canvassers be residents of the state. Attorney General Tim Griffin's office was reviewing the lawsuit and standing "ready to defend the state,' spokesperson Jeff LeMaster said. Secretary of State Cole Jester vowed to protect the measures, claiming the "petition system has been filled with fraud and bad actors for too long. 'These laws are basic, common-sense protections, and we look forward to fighting for them,' Jester said in a statement. The lawsuit argues that the measures attempt to circumvent the protections for the initiative process that are enshrined in the state's constitution. The complaint also notes that voters rejected proposed restrictions on the process that went before them in the 2020 and 2022 elections. The restrictions come after abortion rights supporters were unable to get a proposal on the ballot in Arkansas last year after election officials rejected petitions submitted in favor of them. The state Supreme Court upheld the decision. The lawsuit's plaintiffs include Save AR Democracy, a group formed to try and propose a constitutional amendment that would add protections to the initiative process.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store