29-07-2025
Gujarat HC directs state education board to clearly specify questions meant for visually impaired students in Class 10, 12 exams
The Gujarat High Court has directed the state Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Board (GSHSEB) to ensure that henceforth, question papers for Class 10 and 12 Board examinations will clearly specify which questions are to be answered by visually impaired students and by regular students.
Justice Nikhil S Kariel, in the order issued on the writ petition on July 7, observed, 'The marks of 10th standard examination, though very important to a student, would not be the criteria for any future admission (except for standard 11) or any future employment. After the 10th board results were released and the students, including the petitioner, had joined new academic courses, it would not be in the larger public interest to interfere in the present petition.'
The petitioner Mohammed Afzal Shaikh, on behalf of his daughter Aasiyabanu Shaikh, who studies at a private school in Surat, said the girl had appeared for her Class 10 exams in March this year, in which she opted for Basic Mathematics. She cleared the exams with a B1 grade. In Basic Mathematics, she scored 59 out of 80 marks and an overall 77 out of 100 marks.
The petition states that after getting the Basic Mathematics examination paper, Aasiyabanu was confused as questions also appeared in sections B and C, which contained sections for visually impaired students. Each question carried 2 to 4 marks. She complained about this to her father.
Following this, Shaikh filed a writ petition with the Gujarat High Court challenging the actions, arbitrary and negligent conduct of the State Board for having ambiguous information in the question paper, causing significant confusion among students.
Aasiyabanu, the plea said, inadvertently answered questions meant specifically for visually impaired (blind) students, relying solely on her general understanding. Several other students too were misled and answered questions intended for visually impaired students. Despite Aasiyabanu's father submitting a detailed representation and a subsequent application under the Right to Information Act (RTI), there was no positive response.
In the petition, Shaikh had sought directions to the respondents to re-evaluate Aasiyabanu's Basic Mathematics answer sheet, taking into account the confusion caused due to the defective question paper and appropriately revise the results.
The petitioner's lawyer Dr Rafik Lokhandwala, in his representations to the court, said the issue occurred in part-B of the question paper. The same issue had occurred in the Class 12 question paper, he said.
Public Prosecutor Aditya Pathak argued that the petitioner is presently studying in Class 11 in the Commerce stream and it is not the case that the petitioner, due to lack of marks, could not get appropriate admission to some other stream.
Taking the arguments into consideration, the court observed, 'The petitioner had not suffered any real substantial prejudice on account of the error which may have been committed by the respondent Board. While the petitioner may have a case against the respondent Board, public interest and equity demand that there should not be any interference in the present petition.'
'The list of instructions contained in the question paper does not specify whether the questions preceding or following the instructions are for visually impaired students. Thus, a reasonable doubt would be caused in anyone's mind, more particularly a student appearing in the 10th standard examination, as to whether the instructions would be relatable to the preceding questions or later questions,' it added.
Issuing a direction to the Board, the court said it has to 'ensure that for examinations held in future, both for standard 10th and 12th, the list of instructions preceding the actual questions shall specifically state that the questions are only to be attended by the visually impaired students. Furthermore, the general instructions in the body of the question paper shall also specifically mention the question numbers which are for the students having visual impairment.'
Speaking to The Indian Express, B N Rajgor, Joint Director, GSHSEB, said, 'Generally, we set a common Board examination paper for visually impaired and general students. This time, the instructions were in the middle, and the questions appeared after the instructions for visually impaired students. Now, we will give more clarity in our Board examination papers.'
Aasiyabanu's father, Afzal Shaikh, said, 'Now the mistake of the Board will be rectified in future board exams of Class 10 and 12, after the court's order. My act will benefit lakhs of students appearing in future Board exams.'
