Latest news with #SenateBill1284
Yahoo
11-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bill could open door to civil lawsuits over abortions and drive away OB/GYNs
State Sen. Erin Grall sponsored Florida's tight abortion restriction and now wants to allow wrongful-death claims for fetal death. (Photo via Ron DeSantis Facebook page) This Florida Legislature continues its all-out attack on reproductive freedom. A near-total ban was not far enough for this extreme anti-abortion Legislature. Although the majority of Floridians — 57% — voted to limit government interference with abortion, Florida's extreme anti-abortion politicians are ignoring the will of the people and seeking to further restrict abortion access in Florida. Now they are seeking to open the door to civil lawsuits for money damages against doctors — and even the friends, family, and clergy members who help individuals seeking abortion care obtain the care they need. Senate Bill 1284, by Sen. Erin Grall, and its House companion, HB 1517, by Rep. Sam Greco, purport to be about ensuring that grieving expectant mothers injured by a third party can recover for their loss of pregnancy. However, this type of recovery already exists under current law. (See Tanner v. Hartog, 696 So.2d 705 (1997)). This bill is unnecessary for that stated purpose. The Senate Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice approved the bill on Thursday, the second committee to do so. Its next stop, if taken up, will be the Senate Rules Committee. The legislation has already cleared the House. So, what are these bills really about? You guessed it: abortion. These bills will make it harder for pregnant patients to access abortions by threatening their healthcare providers and support systems with civil lawsuits for damages. These are not hypothetical situations — we have seen dangerous wrongful death cases like these brought in Texas and Arizona. In Texas, a man sued three friends of his now ex-wife for $1 million each for helping his then-wife access abortion pills. In Arizona, a man accompanied his former wife to her abortion appointment, then, two years later following their divorce, filed a wrongful death suit against the clinic. It is worth noting that this bill's Senate sponsor is the same senator who brought us the extreme six-week abortion ban and who has made clear her opposition to abortion. These deceptive bills make it more difficult for Floridians to access the care they need by threatening litigation against loved ones and healthcare providers. They incentivize and encourage civil lawsuits for money damages for abortions against doctors providing essential health care and against the friends, family members, and support systems who help their loved ones access the care they need. This could lead to doctors denying necessary healthcare and delaying treatment for pregnancy complications. Additionally, the threat of having to defend against lawsuits and having to pay money damages will likely result in fewer OB/GYNs willing to practice in Florida or provide care to Floridians. As more and more OB/GYNs leave Florida for states where they are not subject to civil lawsuits, the quality of prenatal care in Florida will suffer. Because these bills also encourage lawsuits against the friends, family, and support systems of pregnant Floridians, they will result in pregnant patients being more isolated and afraid to seek help from friends and family members for fear of exposing them to potential lawsuits. Under these bills, civil lawsuits for damages could be brought by any person who impregnates someone else, including an abusive ex-partner, a rapist, or an uncommitted partner. Additionally, the bills would broadly define 'unborn child' as including 'any stage of development,' thus treating a fertilized egg the same as an actual child. In the vast majority of states that allow for similar wrongful death lawsuits, the 'unborn child' must have reached the developmental stage of viability in order to bring a wrongful death action. This overly broad bill would allow for wrongful death civil lawsuits with regard to fertilized eggs and embryos. The bill sponsors disingenuously claim that these bills are necessary to support grieving families, but current law already allows expectant parents to seek compensation for their pain and suffering after the loss of a pregnancy. Do not let yourselves be duped. If these bills have nothing to do with restricting abortion access, the bill sponsor would simply amend the bill to state that 'no cause of action shall be brought against anyone in connection with an abortion.' The devastating impact of these bills on abortion access in Florida is clear. Treating fertilized eggs the same as actual human beings could lead to dangerous cascading restrictions on fertility services like IVF, as well as patient access to emergency care and cancer treatments. Anti-abortion politicians aren't satisfied with criminalizing abortion after six weeks. They won't stop until they abolish all access to abortion and there are no OB/GYNs left in the state to provide such care. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
28-01-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Senate panel kills controversial campus terrorism bill amid free speech concerns
An encampment in the spring. (Photo by) Legislation aimed at barring Virginia colleges and universities from engaging with terrorist groups or affiliates was struck down Monday by a Senate Education subcommittee, following heated debate over its potential impact on free speech and student activism. Sen. Bill Stanley, R-Franklin, introduced the bill in response to growing concern over terrorism cases nationwide. 'I think what we're trying to do is make sure that our learning environments are places to learn and not to have fear be a part of that,' Stanley said of his Senate Bill 1284. The proposal sought to prohibit terrorist organizations, countries or groups supporting terrorism, representatives of such groups, and individuals attempting to recruit for terrorist activities from operating on Virginia college campuses. However, the bill faced strong opposition from speakers who argued that its broad language could stifle free speech and unfairly target student groups, particularly those advocating for Palestinian rights. Selma Ait-Bella, a senior at Virginia Commonwealth University, criticized the measure, saying it would exacerbate discrimination against Muslim and Arab communities and suppress human rights activism. 'This bill will only heighten the persecution of human rights activists by failing to define these terms clearly and explicitly,' Ait-Bella said. 'This bill risks criminalizing legitimate forms of protest, academic inquiry and advocacy, and in this particular moment, we must note that this has extremely concerning impacts on the discourse surrounding Palestine, which is under increasing scrutiny by governments that funnel our tax paying dollars towards genocide destruction.' Stanley defended his bill, arguing it wouldn't infringe on students' free speech rights. 'It does not shut down discourse or dialogue,' he said. Del. Terry Kilgore, R-Scott, is carrying a companion bill in House, which has yet to be heard. The free speech debate has been a focal point leading into the General Assembly session, following the arrests after more than 130 people on Virginia college campuses in response to the Israel-Hamas war last spring. The conflict, which erupted in October 2023 after Hamas launched an assault on Israel near the Gaza Strip, claimed thousands of lives and ignited global protests. The demonstrations brought increased scrutiny to institutions receiving funding from entities connected to Israel and highlighted the groups involved in the campus demonstrations. The subcommittee also struck down Senate Bill 1247, introduced by Sen. Tara Durant, R-Fredericksburg, which sought to bar colleges and universities from 'accepting any grant from or participating in any partnership or agreement' with foreign countries. The bill would have required the State Council of Higher Education of Virginia (SCHEV) to enforce compliance and mandated colleges and universities to disclose all foreign grants received. However, lawmakers raised concerns about SCHEV's lack of enforcement authority and potential unintended consequences for initiatives like the Fullbright Program, which partners with foreign governments to promote international education. Durant, too, defended her measure, emphasizing the need for transparency. 'We should have disclosure by our universities and colleges if they are receiving foreign funding,' she said. She added that such oversight could help prevent 'nefarious activities from developing on our Virginia campuses.' Sen. Mamie Locke, D-Hampton, a former Fulbright Scholar, opposed the measure, stating it would undermine academic freedom. Meanwhile, lawmakers are expected to consider additional legislation addressing issues related to Israel and terrorism. HB 1650 proposes creating the Virginia Antiterrorism Act to strengthen the state's ability to combat terrorism. Other bills on the table include HBB 2529, which would prevent public colleges or universities from ceasing investments from a country unless that country is under official U.S. Department of the Treasury sanctions. Additionally, HB 2776 aims to prohibit certain businesses from engaging in a boycott of Israel. Resolutions in both the House and Senate have also been reintroduced, reaffirming Virginia's commitment to Israel and Jewish Americans, as well as supporting the 'inherent rights and safety of those who support Israel regardless of their faith or persuasion.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
