Latest news with #SeniorCitizensAct
New Straits Times
01-08-2025
- Business
- New Straits Times
Mandatory retirement age review gains support from employers, ageing advocates
KUALA LUMPUR: The proposal to review Malaysia's mandatory retirement age has gained support from employers and ageing advocacy groups, who are calling for a flexible, sector-sensitive approach with adequate safeguards for both older and younger workers. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, when tabling the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) yesterday, said the government would review the retirement age as the nation transitions towards an ageing society. Senior Citizens Advisory Council member Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye said the review was timely and necessary, given Malaysia's increasing life expectancy and a growing number of older citizens who remain active and capable. "Sixty is too young to retire in this day and age. With the average lifespan now exceeding 75, people still want to contribute, and many need to continue working to support themselves or their families," he said. Lee said the government should consider raising the age gradually, for instance, to 63 first, and then move towards 65 with proper study and stakeholder input. He also advocated for a flexible retirement model where those who wish to retire can do so, while those willing and able to work may continue. "Many seniors are still fit, of sound mind, and eager to stay productive. They bring years of experience that can be channelled through roles like mentorship or advisory work," he said. Addressing concerns that an extended retirement age may affect youth employment, Lee said the government must focus on expanding job creation to avoid intergenerational friction. "If the government can generate the 1.2 million jobs projected under the plan, both older and younger Malaysians can be meaningfully absorbed into the labour force," he said. He also urged the swift introduction of the long-proposed Senior Citizens Act to enshrine protections for elderly Malaysians, including employment rights, healthcare access, and public mobility. Meanwhile, Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF) president Dr Syed Hussain Syed Husman said the move was "sound and forward-looking" but must not be implemented as a blanket policy. He said MEF supports retaining capable older workers, especially in knowledge-based or strategic roles, but warned that physically demanding jobs in sectors such as construction, agriculture, and manufacturing may not be suitable for employees beyond 60. "Without proper structure, extending the retirement age could lead to safety risks, productivity losses, and higher medical claims," he said. He added that older workers may also face challenges in adapting to fast-paced technological changes without sustained, accessible upskilling initiatives. Syed Hussain said while the extension could reduce dependency on retirement savings and preserve medical coverage, it might also slow promotion pipelines and limit wage growth for younger workers. "To move forward, we recommend a flexible policy based on health, performance, and job suitability — not a blanket extension," he said. MEF also called for structured role transitions, such as fixed-term contracts and mentorship roles, alongside tax relief incentives for seniors who remain employed. "With the right safeguards and support, this policy can help Malaysia harness the full potential of its ageing workforce without compromising youth employment or business competitiveness," he said.
Hindustan Times
25-07-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Bomb threat calls received for Mumbai airport, CSMT; turn out to be hoaxes: Police
The Allahabad High Court ruled that maintenance tribunals under the Senior Citizens Act cannot adjudicate property ownership claims, particularly in third-party disputes, which must be resolved in civil courts. The court dismissed a petition from Ishak seeking protection against threats regarding his property, clarifying that the Act primarily addresses maintenance claims against children or relatives.
Hindustan Times
25-07-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Air India has improved training, strengthened standards: CEO Campbell Wilson
The Allahabad High Court ruled that maintenance tribunals under the Senior Citizens Act cannot adjudicate property ownership claims, particularly in third-party disputes, which must be resolved in civil courts. The court dismissed a petition from Ishak seeking protection against threats regarding his property, clarifying that the Act primarily addresses maintenance claims against children or relatives.
Hindustan Times
25-07-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Maintenance tribunals under senior citizens act have no power to adjudicate property ownership claims: Allahabad HC
Prayagraj, The Allahabad High Court has held that the maintenance tribunals under the senior citizens act have no power to adjudicate property ownership claims, especially in case of third party disputes and these must be adjudicated before civil courts. Maintenance tribunals under senior citizens act have no power to adjudicate property ownership claims: Allahabad HC Dismissing a writ petition filed by a man named Ishak, a division bench comprising Justices Arindam Sinha and YK Srivastava said, "The maintenance tribunals constituted under the Act have been empowered to entertain applications relating to claims for maintenance against children or in case of a childless senior citizen against his relative who would inherit the property." "There is no conferment of jurisdiction to adjudicate questions relating to property and ownership rights particularly where there is a dispute with third parties. The disputes in this regard are to be adjudicated before the civil courts of competent jurisdiction," the bench said. The petitioner had sought protection of his life and property under rule 21 of UP Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2014. He claimed that he was threatened by the private respondents because he wanted to construct a gate on his private property. It was argued that the Senior Citizens Act and rules protect them not only against their children but also against third parties. The court observed that the Act was enforced to protect the senior citizens who were neglected due to withering joint family structures in India. It observed that section 4 of the 2007 Act entitles a senior citizen who is unable to fend for himself to maintenance. The section 5 of the Act empowers such a senior citizen to make an application before the Maintenance Tribunal constituted under section 7 of the Act. The court held that obstruction by the petitioner's neighbour in constructing a gate over his property did not fall within the purview of the Senior Citizens Act and no legal right there under was infringed. In the hearing on July 16, the court thereby dismissed the petition. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
23-07-2025
- Business
- Time of India
HC rejects senior citizen's petition to revoke gift deed to destitute daughter
Nagpur: A 74-year-old businessman's attempt to revoke a property gift deed executed in favour of his daughter was dismissed by the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court, which found no legal basis under the Senior Citizens Act to declare the transfer null and void. Justice RM Joshi, upholding earlier rulings of Maintenance Tribunal and Appellate Authority, ruled that the gift deed — executed in 2016 for a commercial shop in Sitabuldi — did not contain any express or implied condition that the daughter had to maintain her father and provide basic amenities. "In such circumstances, the tribunal was justified to reject the application," the judge ruled recently. The petitioner claimed the shop was gifted out of affection at a time when his daughter was experiencing marital issues. Later, citing a breakdown in family ties and lack of support, he approached the Tribunal under Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, arguing that she breached an unwritten promise to care for him. His daughter challenged the verdict through counsel Atul Pande, also the High Court Bar Association (HCBA) president. However, the court pointed out a crucial contradiction. "When it was the petitioner's own case that his daughter is destitute, the question of her taking care of his basic needs does not arise," Justice Joshi stated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ready for a Glow-Up? [Get Your Reading Now] Undo Glow-Up Packages from $15 [Sign Up] Undo Affect Your Future Now! (Book Today) Undo Also, the father continues to reside in his own hotel and he had stated before the Appellate Authority that he was not seeking maintenance from her. The shop in question was part of a family partition, where one shop each was allocated to the petitioner's two sons and the third to the daughter. "There is no stipulation in the gift deed that it was executed on condition of maintenance," the court observed, dismissing the petitioner's argument that obligations of care could be implied under the law. The court also rejected the petitioner's claim that a domestic violence case filed by the daughter against her brother and mother should justify revoking the gift. "Merely because such a proceeding is initiated, won't become a ground for revocation," Justice Joshi held. Warning against misuse of the Senior Citizens Act, the judge noted that the provision is sometimes invoked as a shortcut to avoid pursuing disputes through civil courts. "Apparently, this is one such attempt, wherein there is reason to believe that since the woman has filed proceedings against the father under provisions of Domestic Violence Act, the gift deed executed in her favour is sought to be declared null and void," the court said before dismissing the case.
