Latest news with #Sidlesham
Yahoo
10-05-2025
- General
- Yahoo
Traveller site expansion refused near Chichester
Chichester District Council has refused planning permission for 22 traveller pitches at a site in Sidlesham. The Melita Nursery site, in Chalk Lane, already contains more than 40 mobile homes despite only having permission for nine. The retrospective application to extend permission to 22 was voted down unanimously during a planning committee meeting, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. But a council report called the "unmet need" for traveller accommodation a "significant factor" in favour of the proposal. Risk of future tidal flooding, over-development of the site and harm to biodiversity were some of the reasons it was refused, plus the council is already taking action over the number of mobile homes there. A council report also said the site would fail to provide satisfactory living conditions for gypsy and travellers. "When taken collectively the adverse impacts of the proposed development would significantly outweigh the benefits," it added. Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Travellers face injunction banning more caravans Police use new powers on unauthorised camps Money approved to stop travellers staying in car parks Chichester District Council
BBC News
10-05-2025
- General
- BBC News
Traveller site expansion refused near Chichester
Chichester District Council has refused planning permission for 22 traveller pitches at a site in Melita Nursery site, in Chalk Lane, already contains more than 40 mobile homes despite only having permission for retrospective application to extend permission to 22 was voted down unanimously during a planning committee meeting, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. But a council report called the "unmet need" for traveller accommodation a "significant factor" in favour of the proposal. Risk of future tidal flooding, over-development of the site and harm to biodiversity were some of the reasons it was refused, plus the council is already taking action over the number of mobile homes there. A council report also said the site would fail to provide satisfactory living conditions for gypsy and travellers. "When taken collectively the adverse impacts of the proposed development would significantly outweigh the benefits," it added.
