Latest news with #SlaterAndGordon
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Automotive
- Yahoo
Will car finance claimants get fair payouts? Yahoo Finance UK readers have their say
The Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) plan to launch a compensation scheme for motorists affected by the car finance scandal has raised many questions about eligibility and cost. The regulator said as much as £18bn could eventually be paid out to affected motorists, although exact details are still being finalised. Banks such as Lloyds (LLOY.L) and Close Brothers (CBG.L) have both set aside money for payouts, although the sums are likely to be smaller than they initially expected. Read more: Tesla's UK sales plunge 60% as BYD surges There was a mixed reaction from law firms about the compensation scheme. Lizzy Comley, COO of Slater and Gordon, said it was positive news for "millions of people who have lost money", while Nicola Pangbourne, a partner at Kennedys, said: 'If I was a driver, I would be very pessimistic about getting compensation." Earlier this week, we asked whether you thought claimants would receive fair payouts. We received 437 votes, with 18% believing affected motorists would be treated fairly, 72% believing that justice would not be done and 10% undecided. Read more: UK house prices rise by over £1,000 in July Rachel Reeves is under pressure to balance the books. This chart shows the scale of UK debt What are share buybacks?Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Guardian
14-05-2025
- The Guardian
NSW police argument that unlawful strip-search was necessary is ‘outrageous', class action lawyer says
New South Wales police made an 'outrageous' argument that it was 'objectively necessary' to search a woman's genital area during a strip-search at a music festival, despite admitting the search was unlawful, a court has heard. The police force admitted in court documents that its July 2018 strip-search of Raya Meredith at Splendour in the Grass – which discovered nothing illegal – was unlawful and unjustified. Meredith is the lead plaintiff of a group of 3,000 people subjected to potentially unlawful strip-searches at music festivals by NSW police officers between 2016 and 2022. They are part of a class action, brought by Slater and Gordon lawyers and the Redfern Legal Centre, against the state of NSW over allegedly unlawful strip-searches – including of children – by police. The affected cohort could be more than twice that size. Last week, the court heard from Meredith, who gave emotional testimony about her strip-search by police in a makeshift tarpaulin tent at the 2018 Splendour in the Grass after a drug dog sniffed in her direction but then walked on. During the search, Meredith – who was 27 at the time and postpartum – was asked to remove her tampon Acting for the plaintiffs, Kylie Nomchong SC, told the court in her closing argument that NSW police should pay aggravated damages due to their conduct during the class action. She said on Wednesday that the police, who are yet to give their closing argument, had argued in a submission that aspects of Meredith's search were 'objectively reasonably necessary' despite admitting the search was unlawful. 'We get to the quite outrageous submissions ... where the defendant is asking your honour to infer that it was objectively necessary to search the plaintiff's breasts and genital area,' Nomchong told the court. 'It is unbelievably offensive to assert, without any evidence whatsoever, that there was some objectively reasonable basis on the part of the searching officer to inspect the plaintiff's vagina, to ask her to pull out her tampon, to ask her to bear her buttocks and anal area and to bend over and drop her breasts. It's just offensive.' Justice Dina Yehia responded by stating she would also question the police's legal team. 'I'm not quite sure I understand those submissions, given the way this matter has proceeded,' the judge said. Nomchong also raised the decision by NSW police not to call any witnesses. In the days before the hearing began, the state of NSW withdrew 22 witnesses, mostly police officers, who were due to contest Meredith's version of events. That change saw the case reduced from a scheduled 2o days to three days. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The female police officer who conducted the strip search was one of the witnesses the police force withdrew. 'All we know about her is that there's nothing in her notebook and she has no recollection of it whatsoever,' Nomchong told the court. 'The only available inference is that any evidence from those police officers would not have assisted the defendant.' Nomchong told the court that because no officers were called, it was difficult to know whether it was 'deliberate or not' that a male officer who came into the tent while Meredith was undressed. 'On the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence, he came in and he observed her in that position, there is no basis on which to say he wasn't a participant in the search,' Nomchong told the court. 'He didn't stand outside the tent and say: 'knock, knock, can I come in? Is it all right?' He burst in unannounced.' Closing arguments before Yehia were expected to end on Wednesday.
