Latest news with #StandardsofQuality
Yahoo
14-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Va. education department submits overdue reports to lawmakers; one report outstanding
The new General Assembly Building in Richmond's Capitol Square. (Markus Schmidt/Virginia Mercury) Two months after a deadline imposed by lawmakers, the Virginia Department of Education published four of its five overdue reports, detailing progress on funding programs, how school divisions perform under quality standards and outcomes for special education students in private day schools. Two of the reports published by the department included summaries on teacher salaries compared with other states and how funds are used in several programs to provide students with extra help with their studies and learning to read. The other reports were summaries on how localities are meeting the Standards of Quality, or the set minimum requirements to support school divisions, and on the outcome data for students with disabilities who are enrolled in private schools. The fifth report, which is still outstanding, is survey results of school-level teaching conditions and the impact such conditions have on teacher retention and student achievement. The reports, typically requested by lawmakers, help them make legislative and funding decisions. When the reports reached a two-month delay, on March 2, state lawmakers contacted the agency, specifically Secretary of Education Aimee Guidera and then-Superintendent of Public Instruction Lisa Coons, about the delayed reports. Within a week, Coons signed four completed reports, between March 6-10. The following week, Coons resigned from her position. Since then, the agency has welcomed Emily Anne Gullickson as the superintendent of public instruction. Gullickson's appointment will be considered by the General Assembly. Questions linger after Coons' sudden resignation from Va. education department In response to the Mercury's questions, the Department of Education did not explain why the reports were delayed or how four of them were able to be produced so quickly once lawmakers pushed for their submission. The Department said it 'sends assigned reports to the General Assembly immediately upon completion.' Sen. Ghazala Hashmi, D-Richmond, and Del. Sam Rasoul, D-Roanoke, signed the letter directed to Coons and Guidera in March requesting the reports that provide 'critical information' that they said will be essential for future discussions. The two lawmakers, who chair their respective education committees in the Senate and House, requested a timeline for completion and submission of each report. Instead, the agency published four of the five reports without the two receiving a response as to why the reports took as long as they did to be published. 'The reality is that there's clearly a lot of internal strife inside of the administration. That's why there's been so much turnover at the superintendent level and within the department,' Rasoul said. 'I think that there are many good people, both within the administration and in the legislature, who are trying to just focus on improving Virginia schools. However, there are too many folks, including the governor, who have just hyper-politicized every move in education.' In addition to the overdue reports, Hashmi said the list of delays also includes a delay in the release the results of the state assessments 'for parents and students and teachers to take a look at an individual student's performance' and the teaching guidelines for the history and social science standards to help provide resources for teachers before the fall. 'They were supposed to be available at least last year, and here we are still waiting for them,' Hashmi said. She said past reports under Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration have also included errors and have had quality issues. 'I'm hoping that we'll see some changes now under a new leadership,' she said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
17-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Senate panel kills effort to track English learner funding
A cup of pencils sit on top of a classroom desk in Virginia (Photo by Nathaniel Cline/Virginia Mercury) A push to examine how Virginia funds English language learners (ELLs) in public schools was shut down Monday, as the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee rejected a proposal for data collection on the issue. The effort stemmed from a 2023 report by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC), which found that Virginia has been underfunding schools under the Standards of Quality (SOQ) — the state's funding formula for public education. Lawmakers had requested the report to identify gaps in school funding and determine whether ELL students were receiving adequate resources. The funding gap is stark. A 2022 study from EdTrust, an education advocacy group, showed that Virginia school districts serving the highest number of ELL students receive 48% less revenue per student than districts with fewer ELL students, VPM first reported. 'I think it's important for us, as a commonwealth, to provide funding for the requirements that we set forth, so that local appropriations are not needed to close that gap,' Del. Atoosa Reaser, D-Loudoun, the legislation's sponsor, said Monday. 'That's money that belongs to the taxpayer; and the state should be, in my opinion, funding its fair share, which the House budget works toward.' Reaser's House Bill 2032 would have directed the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) to collect data on expenditures and proficiency levels for ELL students. The measure also called for the identification of additional support strategies and a status report to lawmakers later this year. However, the Virginia Department of Planning and Budget found no expected fiscal impact, as data on proficiency is already collected. Reaser's proposal cleared the House on Jan. 28, but not without changes. Lawmakers stripped out a provision that would have allocated additional state funding for ELL students, instead folding that language into HB 1954, sponsored by House Education Committee Chair Sam Rasoul, D-Roanoke. That bill also failed but could resurface during budget negotiations in the coming days. Last year, the legislature created the Joint Subcommittee on Elementary and Secondary Education to review JLARC's recommendations with the goal of replacing the outdated formula. Sen. Mamie Locke, D-Hampton, the committee chair, on Monday urged the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee to shelve the English learner funding bill, arguing that the panel's work isn't finished. 'It's important we do this in a manner that we are looking at all of the JLARC recommendations,' Locke said, adding that some of the commission's proposals have already been addressed in the state budget. The bill also coincides with recent changes from the Virginia Board of Education, which now require more English learner test scores to be included in school accountability calculations — a shift that could have significant consequences for schools that serve large ELL populations. However, some Democrats are pushing to delay the rollout of the new accountability system, citing concerns about fairness and accuracy in measuring student performance. For now, the debate over English learner funding remains tied to the larger fight over how Virginia funds its schools. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
12-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
K-12 cap removal stumbles, but remains alive in budget
Virginia State Capitol on Jan. 8, 2025. Charlotte Rene Woods / Virginia Mercury Lawmakers are trying to lift the decades-long cap on state-funded support positions for public schools through budget negotiations after legislation that would end the restriction failed earlier this week. Senators have proposed spending $758.1 million for K-12 public education, which includes an additional $208.8 million over the state's current biennium budget. To remove the cap, senators recommended adding $222.9 million from the general fund. The proposed Senate budget also called for $52.8 million for special education. 'Our goal with these investments is to provide additional resources to support our schools so that teachers are able to spend more time on instruction and less time on other administrative responsibilities,' said Sen. Mamie Locke, D-Hampton, during the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee's Feb. 2 meeting. Last session, lawmakers formed a joint committee to overhaul the Standards of Quality (SOQ), the state's funding formula determining the financial needs of school divisions. The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) found that Virginia's local governments are shouldering a disproportionate share of K-12 education costs compared to the state's contributions. The more affluent a locality, the more its share, while those with less revenue contribute less to schools. In 1993, the General Assembly changed how much state and localities should pay, with the state's share at 55% and localities providing 45%, according to JLARC's 2023 report. The change was prompted after lawmakers asked localities to start paying for K-12 fringe benefits. The contributions had been split evenly since 1972. But in 2009 during the Great Recession, lawmakers implemented a 'cap' or state-imposed limit on spending for support staff. On Tuesday, the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee killed House Bill 1954, introduced by House Education Committee Chair Sam Rasoul, D-Roanoke. The proposal would have provided additional support for students with special needs and created a program for at-risk, or low-income students and English language learners. Democrats carried two bills to address removing the cap. Last month, the House version was incorporated into Rasoul's bill. Then on Feb. 5, the Senate version died in Senate Finance & Appropriations. Senate Education and Health Committee Chair Ghazala Hashmi, D-Richmond, told her colleagues earlier in the session that Virginia schools have been shortchanged by the commonwealth by over $6.6 billion in recent years. Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration has opposed the legislation, instead calling for a broader funding formula overhaul. While Youngkin and the General Assembly partially eased the cap last year by increasing the funding ratio from 21 support positions to 24 per 1,000 students, they agree more needs to be done after localities have had to pick up the shared cost. The state uses the local composite index (LCI) to determine each locality's ability to pay. It also determines the local and state split of funding. The House budget bill redirected $50 million earmarked for the proposed Virginia Opportunity Scholarship Program to removing the cap. The change would boost the funding ratio from 24 support positions per 1,000 students to 27.89 per 1,000 students. Opponents criticized the 'vouchers' program, which would have paid for students to attend private schools and other educational expenses. Dean Lynch, executive director for the Virginia Association of Counties, wrote in a letter to the House and Senate money committees that the association appreciates the proposal in advancing 'critical investments' in K-12 education. 'The elimination of the 15-year-old support cap represents a transformative step forward, allowing school divisions to hire additional support staff and better meet the needs of students,' Lynch wrote. 'Additionally, the investments made in special education funding and compensation for instructional and support positions will further enhance educational outcomes across the commonwealth.' The Senate and House budget bills are on track to pass and advance to the governor for review. Youngkin's proposed budget did not include any plan to remove the cap. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
