Latest news with #StateFinancesAuditReport
Time of India
3 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
CAG warns Goa of rising debt, calls for urgent management strategy
Porvorim: With Goa's debt burden continuing to rise, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) reiterated its warning that the state needs a debt sustainability framework to achieve long-term sustainability in fiscal management. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the close of 2023-24, Goa's total outstanding debt stood at Rs 32,867 crore. However, when off-budget fiscal liabilities of Rs 706 crore were factored in, Goa's debt rose to Rs 33,573 crore, which is equivalent to 29.9% of the state's economic output. 'Given the increasing trend of committed expenditure over the last five years, state govt may work out a well thought out debt management strategy,' said the CAG in its report titled, 'State Finances Audit Report' for the year ended March 31, 2024. The CAG pointed out that govt breached the targeted debt-to-GSDP ratio for five consecutive years and faces steep repayment obligations in the coming decade. According to the report, 85% of Goa's public debt, that is Rs 23,470 crore, will come up for repayment within the next 10 years. Between 2024 and 2029 alone, govt must repay principal and interest amounting to Rs 16,580 crore. This includes Rs 5,149 crore in principal and Rs 4,057 crore in interest by 2026-27, followed by Rs 5,321 crore in principal and Rs 2,053 crore in interest in 2027-29. From 2029-30 onwards, repayments of Rs 16,912 crore in principal and Rs 1,922 crore in interest will need to be made. The state has also seen interest payments climb from Rs 1,465 crore in 2019-20 to Rs 1,889 crore in 2023-24, though the interest payment-to-revenue receipts ratio declined marginally to 10% in 2023-24 from 11% the previous year. While govt claimed to end 2023-24 with a revenue surplus of Rs 1,423 crore against the revised estimate of Rs 906 crore, the CAG pointed out that Rs 167 crore in revenue expenditure was either unpaid, short-paid, or not recorded in the accounts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Adjusting for this, the surplus stands reduced to Rs 1,256 crore, the audit report said. The higher-than-expected surplus, the report said, was mainly because govt managed to spend only Rs 16,849 crore against the Rs 19,447 crore it was supposed to spend on social welfare schemes and economic services.
Indian Express
28-07-2025
- Politics
- Indian Express
Opposition alleges Rs 70,000 crore scam as CAG flags accounting lapses in poll-bound Bihar
Just months ahead of the upcoming Assembly election in Bihar, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India has flagged massive accounting lapses in the state's finances. The CAG has reported that as of March 31, 2024, as many as 49,649 Utilisation Certificates (UCs) — documents that confirm that allocated resources were utilised for the intended purpose — amounting to Rs 70,877.61 crore, had not been submitted to the Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) of Bihar. The findings have come as fresh ammunition for the Opposition. Bihar Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav said in a social media post, 'Thanks to Modi-Nitish, a scam of Rs 70,000 crore has taken place in Bihar. The CAG has unearthed the theft. No work was seen, but the entire expenditure was made… Modi-Nitish made history by committing a Rs 70,000 crore scam. Just like the Srijan scam, now efforts to manage this from Delhi to Patna have intensified.' According to the CAG's State Finances Audit Report for 2023-24, the non-submission of UCs violates Rule 271(e) of the Bihar Treasury Code that requires departments to submit the documents within 18 months of the financial year in which the grant is released. The report notes that the Bihar government 'did not comply' with the national accounting standards of IGAS-1, IGAS-2, and IGAS-3. The auditing body suspects that nearly Rs 70,878 crore of budgeted money has no audit clearance, and raised serious risk of fraud. 'In the absence of UCs, there is no assurance that funds disbursed have been used for the intended purpose,' the report said, adding that this level of pendency is 'fraught with the risk of embezzlement, misappropriation, and diversion of funds'. The report's year-wise data shows that Rs 14,452.38 crore worth of these pending UCs relate to grants issued up to 2016-17. In 2017-18, the pending UCs amounted to Rs 3,746.64 crore; to Rs 5,870.67 crore in 2018-19; Rs 17,980.24 crore in 2019-20 and 2020-21; Rs 16,014.34 crore in 2021-22; and Rs 12,813.34 in 2022–23. The pending UCs are heavily concentrated in a few departments, the CAG report revealed, indicating that five departments account for the majority of the unverified expenditure. The largest default is in the Panchayati Raj Department, with UCs worth Rs 28,154.10 crore pending, the report said. This is followed by the Education Department (Rs 12,623.67 crore), Urban Development and Housing Department (Rs 11,065.50 crore), Rural Development Department (Rs 7,800.48 crore), and Agriculture Department (Rs 2,107.63 crore). In addition to department-level grants, the CAG also found that large sums of grants to local bodies remained unverified. As per the CAG, as of March 31, 2024, utilisation certificates were pending for Rs 4,277.22 crore given to Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) and Rs 2,221.83 crore given to Rural Local Bodies under various central and state schemes, including 15th Finance Commission grants. The report also highlighted significant pendency in the submission of Detailed Contingent (DC) bills against Abstract Contingent (AC) bills. AC bills are required to draw advances by departments, and rules mandate that a department submitting an AC bill to withdraw cash must finalise the accounts by submitting a DC bill within six months. However, as on March 31, 2024, the report showed massive non-compliance, as Rs 9,205.76 crore was drawn in advance payments through 22,130 AC bills, but its expense details through DC bills were not submitted. Of this, Rs 5,577.91 crore (60.60%) pertained to advances drawn for the 'creation of Capital Assets', including major schemes under road works, education, health, rural development, etc. The CAG further noted that 1,648 AC bills, totalling Rs 1,041.12 crore, were drawn in March 2024 alone, indicating a 'rush' to exhaust budgets at the end of the financial year. The audit said that this pattern of drawing money late in the year and not reconciling it 'indicates poor public expenditure management'. 'The non-submission of DC bills within the prescribed period breaches financial discipline and enhances the risk of misappropriation of public money,' the report warned. The CAG also pointed to issues highlighting systemic lapses in financial reporting with classification of expenditure, particularly under grants-in-aid. It observed that 59.95% of the total budgeted grants-in-aid of Rs 77,600.47 crore disbursed during 2023-24 were lumped under the category, 'Others', without clearly identifying the institutions or schemes to which the funds were released. The CAG noted that without proper institutional codes, 'the amounts outstanding against all institutions could not be worked out.' This, it said, is a gap that 'affected the transparency of accounts'. The CAG also flagged significant parking of funds under the Deposit of Local Funds. According to the CAG report, funds budgeted as grants to local bodies and municipal bodies were transferred there, but never spent. Over 2019-24, the balance in these accounts swelled to Rs 30,017.64 crore. 'This amount has been shown as Revenue or Capital Expenditure in the respective years but is lying unspent in the deposit head,' the report says. It observes that this practice overstates actual expenditure, and further mentions that the 'reason for transfer of funds for parking in Deposit of Local Fund Head of Account were awaited'. The CAG also noted that internal audit mechanisms in departments were either weak or non-functional, and several previous audit recommendations had not been acted upon. It observed that delays in submission of audit replies and lack of timely action 'defeated the very purpose of the audit'. The CAG said that the combination of the issues of missing UCs, unreconciled advances, off-book deposits and generic accounting entries 'indicate lack of internal controls in the administrative departments'.
