Latest news with #StateLibraryofVictoria
The Advertiser
3 days ago
- Politics
- The Advertiser
'Extraordinary overreach': anti-Semitism report blasted
A plan to combat anti-Semitism including suggestions funding may be stripped from arts bodies and events amounts to overreach, a pro-Palestinian writer says. The recommendation to axe support for publicly funded institutions and festivals that promote or fail to effectively deal with hate speech is part of Australia's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal's report. The federal government is considering the advice as it examines ways to combat a surge in discrimination against Jewish Australians. Writer and activist Omar Sakr said adopting the recommendations would lead to further silencing people who supported the Palestinian cause. The report's suggested measures were so wide-ranging they amounted to "extraordinary overreach", he said, arguing pro-Palestinian artists were already treated unfavourably by the sector. "It's beyond clear that the end goal of this strategy is a kind of cultural apartheid and it aims for a total stigmatisation and erasure of Palestinian culture," Sakr said. He was one of a group of writers contracted to provide teen workshops at the State Library of Victoria in 2024 before their agreements were cancelled following an examination of their political views, including his criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza. Ms Segal's report, released on Thursday, also suggested deporting and cancelling the visas of people involved in discrimination against Jewish people. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government was already taking those steps, pointing to the decision to block controversial US rapper Kanye West from entering the country after he released a song titled Heil Hitler. "We screen people ... when they apply for visas it's something that we make sure that we represent Australia's national interests," he told reporters on Friday. Criticism of the report has also focused on Ms Segal's recommendation Australia adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism. Some detractors - including the original author of the definition, Kenneth Stern - argue it conflates anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. Jewish Council of Australia executive officer Max Kaiser labelled the report a "blueprint for silencing dissent", saying the emphasis on surveillance, censorship and punitive control over funding was "straight out of Trump's authoritarian playbook". Ms Segal said those criticisms misunderstood the definition. "(It) clearly says if Israel is criticised, that's absolutely fine - and indeed, so many Israelis are criticising the policies of their own government," she told ABC Radio. She said the Jewish Council of Australia, a progressive organisation, was a small group that did not represent the nation's broader Jewish community. Several other Jewish groups called for her recommendations to be adopted in full. They include embedding Holocaust education into school curriculums and strengthening legislation against hateful conduct, in addition to terminating or withholding funds from universities, broadcasters and cultural institutions that fail to address anti-Semitism. National Union of Students president Ashlyn Horton questioned the way widespread pro-Palestinian student encampment protests were portrayed as targeting Jewish people. "Conflating actual anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel is a massive, massive concern," she said. Universities Australia has committed to considering the report's recommendations. Walkley Award-winning journalist Jan Fran said Israel had killed nearly 200 people in Gaza since Tuesday, while it was also ordering Palestinians into what critics have labelled an internment camp. "If the anti-Semitism envoy's plan stifles criticism of Israel for these actions, particularly at public broadcasters and in media organisations broadly, then we are headed down a very dark path," she said. Ms Segal's report found threats, vandalism and physical violence against Jewish Australians tripled between October 2023 and September 2024. Australia's government-appointed envoy to combat Islamophobia, Aftab Malik, said he would soon provide "comprehensive" recommendations to the prime minister. A plan to combat anti-Semitism including suggestions funding may be stripped from arts bodies and events amounts to overreach, a pro-Palestinian writer says. The recommendation to axe support for publicly funded institutions and festivals that promote or fail to effectively deal with hate speech is part of Australia's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal's report. The federal government is considering the advice as it examines ways to combat a surge in discrimination against Jewish Australians. Writer and activist Omar Sakr said adopting the recommendations would lead to further silencing people who supported the Palestinian cause. The report's suggested measures were so wide-ranging they amounted to "extraordinary overreach", he said, arguing pro-Palestinian artists were already treated unfavourably by the sector. "It's beyond clear that the end goal of this strategy is a kind of cultural apartheid and it aims for a total stigmatisation and erasure of Palestinian culture," Sakr said. He was one of a group of writers contracted to provide teen workshops at the State Library of Victoria in 2024 before their agreements were cancelled following an examination of their political views, including his criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza. Ms Segal's report, released on Thursday, also suggested deporting and cancelling the visas of people involved in discrimination against Jewish people. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government was already taking those steps, pointing to the decision to block controversial US rapper Kanye West from entering the country after he released a song titled Heil Hitler. "We screen people ... when they apply for visas it's something that we make sure that we represent Australia's national interests," he told reporters on Friday. Criticism of the report has also focused on Ms Segal's recommendation Australia adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism. Some detractors - including the original author of the definition, Kenneth Stern - argue it conflates anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. Jewish Council of Australia executive officer Max Kaiser labelled the report a "blueprint for silencing dissent", saying the emphasis on surveillance, censorship and punitive control over funding was "straight out of Trump's authoritarian playbook". Ms Segal said those criticisms misunderstood the definition. "(It) clearly says if Israel is criticised, that's absolutely fine - and indeed, so many Israelis are criticising the policies of their own government," she told ABC Radio. She said the Jewish Council of Australia, a progressive organisation, was a small group that did not represent the nation's broader Jewish community. Several other Jewish groups called for her recommendations to be adopted in full. They include embedding Holocaust education into school curriculums and strengthening legislation against hateful conduct, in addition to terminating or withholding funds from universities, broadcasters and cultural institutions that fail to address anti-Semitism. National Union of Students president Ashlyn Horton questioned the way widespread pro-Palestinian student encampment protests were portrayed as targeting Jewish people. "Conflating actual anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel is a massive, massive concern," she said. Universities Australia has committed to considering the report's recommendations. Walkley Award-winning journalist Jan Fran said Israel had killed nearly 200 people in Gaza since Tuesday, while it was also ordering Palestinians into what critics have labelled an internment camp. "If the anti-Semitism envoy's plan stifles criticism of Israel for these actions, particularly at public broadcasters and in media organisations broadly, then we are headed down a very dark path," she said. Ms Segal's report found threats, vandalism and physical violence against Jewish Australians tripled between October 2023 and September 2024. Australia's government-appointed envoy to combat Islamophobia, Aftab Malik, said he would soon provide "comprehensive" recommendations to the prime minister. A plan to combat anti-Semitism including suggestions funding may be stripped from arts bodies and events amounts to overreach, a pro-Palestinian writer says. The recommendation to axe support for publicly funded institutions and festivals that promote or fail to effectively deal with hate speech is part of Australia's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal's report. The federal government is considering the advice as it examines ways to combat a surge in discrimination against Jewish Australians. Writer and activist Omar Sakr said adopting the recommendations would lead to further silencing people who supported the Palestinian cause. The report's suggested measures were so wide-ranging they amounted to "extraordinary overreach", he said, arguing pro-Palestinian artists were already treated unfavourably by the sector. "It's beyond clear that the end goal of this strategy is a kind of cultural apartheid and it aims for a total stigmatisation and erasure of Palestinian culture," Sakr said. He was one of a group of writers contracted to provide teen workshops at the State Library of Victoria in 2024 before their agreements were cancelled following an examination of their political views, including his criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza. Ms Segal's report, released on Thursday, also suggested deporting and cancelling the visas of people involved in discrimination against Jewish people. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government was already taking those steps, pointing to the decision to block controversial US rapper Kanye West from entering the country after he released a song titled Heil Hitler. "We screen people ... when they apply for visas it's something that we make sure that we represent Australia's national interests," he told reporters on Friday. Criticism of the report has also focused on Ms Segal's recommendation Australia adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism. Some detractors - including the original author of the definition, Kenneth Stern - argue it conflates anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. Jewish Council of Australia executive officer Max Kaiser labelled the report a "blueprint for silencing dissent", saying the emphasis on surveillance, censorship and punitive control over funding was "straight out of Trump's authoritarian playbook". Ms Segal said those criticisms misunderstood the definition. "(It) clearly says if Israel is criticised, that's absolutely fine - and indeed, so many Israelis are criticising the policies of their own government," she told ABC Radio. She said the Jewish Council of Australia, a progressive organisation, was a small group that did not represent the nation's broader Jewish community. Several other Jewish groups called for her recommendations to be adopted in full. They include embedding Holocaust education into school curriculums and strengthening legislation against hateful conduct, in addition to terminating or withholding funds from universities, broadcasters and cultural institutions that fail to address anti-Semitism. National Union of Students president Ashlyn Horton questioned the way widespread pro-Palestinian student encampment protests were portrayed as targeting Jewish people. "Conflating actual anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel is a massive, massive concern," she said. Universities Australia has committed to considering the report's recommendations. Walkley Award-winning journalist Jan Fran said Israel had killed nearly 200 people in Gaza since Tuesday, while it was also ordering Palestinians into what critics have labelled an internment camp. "If the anti-Semitism envoy's plan stifles criticism of Israel for these actions, particularly at public broadcasters and in media organisations broadly, then we are headed down a very dark path," she said. Ms Segal's report found threats, vandalism and physical violence against Jewish Australians tripled between October 2023 and September 2024. Australia's government-appointed envoy to combat Islamophobia, Aftab Malik, said he would soon provide "comprehensive" recommendations to the prime minister. A plan to combat anti-Semitism including suggestions funding may be stripped from arts bodies and events amounts to overreach, a pro-Palestinian writer says. The recommendation to axe support for publicly funded institutions and festivals that promote or fail to effectively deal with hate speech is part of Australia's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal's report. The federal government is considering the advice as it examines ways to combat a surge in discrimination against Jewish Australians. Writer and activist Omar Sakr said adopting the recommendations would lead to further silencing people who supported the Palestinian cause. The report's suggested measures were so wide-ranging they amounted to "extraordinary overreach", he said, arguing pro-Palestinian artists were already treated unfavourably by the sector. "It's beyond clear that the end goal of this strategy is a kind of cultural apartheid and it aims for a total stigmatisation and erasure of Palestinian culture," Sakr said. He was one of a group of writers contracted to provide teen workshops at the State Library of Victoria in 2024 before their agreements were cancelled following an examination of their political views, including his criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza. Ms Segal's report, released on Thursday, also suggested deporting and cancelling the visas of people involved in discrimination against Jewish people. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government was already taking those steps, pointing to the decision to block controversial US rapper Kanye West from entering the country after he released a song titled Heil Hitler. "We screen people ... when they apply for visas it's something that we make sure that we represent Australia's national interests," he told reporters on Friday. Criticism of the report has also focused on Ms Segal's recommendation Australia adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism. Some detractors - including the original author of the definition, Kenneth Stern - argue it conflates anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. Jewish Council of Australia executive officer Max Kaiser labelled the report a "blueprint for silencing dissent", saying the emphasis on surveillance, censorship and punitive control over funding was "straight out of Trump's authoritarian playbook". Ms Segal said those criticisms misunderstood the definition. "(It) clearly says if Israel is criticised, that's absolutely fine - and indeed, so many Israelis are criticising the policies of their own government," she told ABC Radio. She said the Jewish Council of Australia, a progressive organisation, was a small group that did not represent the nation's broader Jewish community. Several other Jewish groups called for her recommendations to be adopted in full. They include embedding Holocaust education into school curriculums and strengthening legislation against hateful conduct, in addition to terminating or withholding funds from universities, broadcasters and cultural institutions that fail to address anti-Semitism. National Union of Students president Ashlyn Horton questioned the way widespread pro-Palestinian student encampment protests were portrayed as targeting Jewish people. "Conflating actual anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel is a massive, massive concern," she said. Universities Australia has committed to considering the report's recommendations. Walkley Award-winning journalist Jan Fran said Israel had killed nearly 200 people in Gaza since Tuesday, while it was also ordering Palestinians into what critics have labelled an internment camp. "If the anti-Semitism envoy's plan stifles criticism of Israel for these actions, particularly at public broadcasters and in media organisations broadly, then we are headed down a very dark path," she said. Ms Segal's report found threats, vandalism and physical violence against Jewish Australians tripled between October 2023 and September 2024. Australia's government-appointed envoy to combat Islamophobia, Aftab Malik, said he would soon provide "comprehensive" recommendations to the prime minister.
IOL News
01-05-2025
- Politics
- IOL News
80 years after Mussolini's death, what can democracies learn from his fascist rise?
Hitler and Mussolini in Munich, Germany, June 18, 1940. Image: Everett Collection/Shutterstock Matthew Sharpe Monday marked 80 years since Italian dictator Benito Mussolini was killed in an Italian village towards the end of the Second World War in 1945. The following day, his body was publicly desecrated in Milan. Given the scale of Adolf Hitler's atrocities, our image of fascism today has largely been shaped by Nazism. Yet, Mussolini preceded Hitler. Il Duce, as Mussolini was known, was Hitler's inspiration. Today, as commentators, bloggers and scholars are debating whether the governments of US President Donald Trump, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Russian President Vladimir Putin are 'fascist', we can learn from Il Duce's career about how democracies fail and dictators consolidate autocratic rule. Il Duce, as Mussolini was known, was Hitler's inspiration. Image: State Library of Victoria The early years The term 'fascist' itself originated around the time of Mussolini's founding in 1914 of the Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria, a militaristic group promoting Italy's entry into the First World War. Mussolini had been raised in a leftist family. Before WWI, he edited and wrote for socialist newspapers. Yet, from early on, the young rebel was also attracted to radically anti-democratic thinkers like Friedrich Nietzsche, George Sorel and Wilfred Pareto. When WWI broke out, Mussolini broke from the socialists, who opposed Italy's involvement in the conflict. Like Hitler, he fought in the war. Mussolini considered his front-line experience as formative for his future ideas around fascism. His war experience led him to imagine making Italy great again – an imperial power worthy of the heritage of ancient Rome. In March 1919, Mussolini formed the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento in Milan. This group brought together a motley collection of war veterans, primarily interested in fighting the socialists and communists. They were organised in squadristi (squads), which would become known for their black shirts and violence – they forced many of their targets to drink castor oil. The political success of Mussolini's fascist ideals, however, was neither instant nor inevitable. In the 1919 Italian elections, Mussolini received so few votes, communists held a mock funeral march outside his house to celebrate his political death. The rise to power and the march on Rome Fascism became a part of national political life in 1920-21, following waves of industrial and agricultural strikes and worker occupations of land and factories. As a result, rural and industrial elites turned to the fascist squadristi to break strikes and combat workers' organisations. Fascist squads also overturned the results of democratic elections in Bologna and Cremona, preventing left-wing candidates from assuming office. Mussolini's political capital, remarkably, was boosted by this violence. He was invited to enter Prime Minister Ivanoe Bonomi's first government in July 1921. The following October, fascists occupied the towns of Bolzano and Trento. The liberals, socialists and Italian monarchy were indecisive in the face of these provocations, allowing Mussolini to seize the moment. Mustering the fascist squads, he ordered the famous 'march on Rome' in late October 1922 to demand he be appointed prime minister. All the evidence suggests if the government had intervened, the march on Rome would have disbanded. It was a bold piece of political theatre. Nevertheless, fearing civil war — and the communists more than the black shirts — King Victor Emmanuel III caved in without a shot being fired. Mussolini was made leader of a new government on October 31, 1922. Mussolini announcing Italy's declaration of war on France and Britain in 1940. Image: Australian War Memorial The consolidation of dictatorship Like Hitler in 1933, Mussolini's rule started as the head of a coalition government including non-fascist parties. Yet, with the repressive powers of the state now at his disposal, Mussolini exploited the division among his rivals and gradually consolidated power. In 1923, the communist party was targeted with mass arrests and the fascist squads were brought under official state control as a paramilitary force. Mussolini began to use state powers to surveil all non-fascist political parties. In the 1924 general election, with fascist militia menacingly manning the polls, Il Duce won 65% of the vote. Then, in June, socialist leader Giacomo Matteotti was kidnapped and murdered by black shirts. When investigations pointed to Mussolini's responsibility, he at first denied any knowledge of the killing. Months later, however, Mussolini proudly admitted responsibility for the deed, celebrating the fascists' brutality. He faced no legal or political consequences. The last nail in the coffin of Italy's enfeebled democracy came in late 1926. Following an assassination attempt in which Mussolini's nose was grazed (he wore a bandage for a time afterwards), Mussolini definitively banned all political opposition. Lessons for democracies after 80 years The infamy of the crimes associated with the word 'fascism' has meant that few people today claim the label – even those attracted to the same kinds of authoritarian, ethnonationalist politics. Mussolini, even more than Hitler, can seem a bombastic fool, with his uniform, theatrical gestures, stylised hyper-masculinity and patented steely jaw. Yet, one of the lessons of Mussolini's career is that such political adventurists are only as strong as the democratic opposition allows. To fail to take them seriously is to enable their success. Mussolini pushed his luck time and again between 1920 and 1926. As the wonderful recent teleseries of his ascent, Mussolini, Figlio del Seculo shows, time and again, the opposition failed to concertedly oppose the fascists' attacks on democratic norms and institutions. Then it was too late. Democracies mostly fall over time, by a thousand cuts and shifts of the goalposts of what is considered 'normal'. Fascism, moreover, depends in no small measure on shameless political deception, including the readiness to conceal its own most radical intentions. Fascist 'strongmen' like Mussolini accumulate power thanks to people's inabilities to believe that the barbarisation of political life – including open violence against opponents – could happen in their societies. And there is a final, unsettling lesson of Mussolini's career. Il Duce was a skilled propagandist who portrayed himself as leading a popular revolt to restore respectable values. He was able to win widespread popular support, including among the elites, even as he destroyed Italian democracy. Yet, if the monarchy, military, other political parties and the church had attempted a principled, united opposition to fascism early enough, most of Mussolini's crimes would likely have been avoided. | The Conversation Matthew Sharpe is Associate Professor in Philosophy, Australian Catholic University
