logo
#

Latest news with #Sundresh

SC declines to stay QR code rule for Kanwar Yatra eateries
SC declines to stay QR code rule for Kanwar Yatra eateries

United News of India

time22-07-2025

  • Politics
  • United News of India

SC declines to stay QR code rule for Kanwar Yatra eateries

New Delhi, July 22 (UNI) The Supreme Court today refused to examine the legality of directives issued by Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand authorities requiring eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display QR codes revealing owners' details, stating that the matter had become infructuous with the Yatra ending. A bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice NK Singh disposed of the interlocutory applications challenging the mandates, while clarifying that eateries must continue to display their licences and registration certificates as per statutory requirements. 'We are told today is the last day of the Yatra. In any case, it is likely to come to an end in the near future. Therefore, at this stage, we would only pass an order that hotel owners comply with the mandate of displaying licences and registration certificates,' the bench ordered, adding that it was not entering into other contentious issues raised. During the hearing, Justice Sundresh emphasised the importance of consumer choice, observing, 'People have different food preferences. A vegetarian person may prefer to go only to a place serving exclusively vegetarian food, especially during a religious pilgrimage. If a hotel was earlier serving non-veg and switches to veg only during the Yatra for business reasons, the consumer should know. The choice is of the consumer… Customer is the king.' Senior advocate Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the directives mandating QR codes and owner names promoted religious profiling in violation of constitutional rights. 'How does the surname of the owner ensure good service? The only intent is to cause religious profiling. This is the most divisive initiative, to ostracise people as if they are untouchables,' Singhvi submitted, citing media reports of attacks on shops due to such identity disclosures. Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi also objected, illustrating that under the directive, even a neutral business name like 'Bombay Mart' would require adding the owner's personal name, thereby exposing religious identity. 'This promotes untouchability through the back door,' he warned. Justice Sundresh, however, maintained that while personally agnostic, he recognised that food choices matter deeply to many pilgrims. He added, quoting Marx in passing, 'Religion is the opium of the masses,' and clarified that the bench was seeking a balance between consumers' rights to know and avoiding discrimination. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, for Uttar Pradesh, defended the directives as compliance with FSSAI regulations, arguing that last year's Supreme Court order was only ad-interim and that misrepresentation by eateries regarding vegetarian food had previously triggered law-and-order issues. 'As per regulations under the Act, they require photo identity. Why are you scared of showing your name?' he asked. The bench refused to entertain further arguments, noting that the petitions had become infructuous with the Yatra's conclusion, and advised petitioners to approach the High Court if they sought further clarification. 'We have said that we are not going into it. If you want to challenge it, go before the High Court,' Justice Sundresh said. UNI SNG PRS

‘Consumer is king': Supreme Court says eateries along Kanwar Yatra route must display licence, registration
‘Consumer is king': Supreme Court says eateries along Kanwar Yatra route must display licence, registration

Indian Express

time22-07-2025

  • Business
  • Indian Express

‘Consumer is king': Supreme Court says eateries along Kanwar Yatra route must display licence, registration

The Supreme Court said Tuesday that eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route 'shall comply with the mandate of displaying the licence and the registration certificate as per the statutory requirements.' A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N K Singh underlined that 'consumer is the king' and should be given a choice to know what food a restaurant serves to make an informed choice. The court was hearing an interlocutory application which challenged the direction to food sellers along the Kanwar Yatra route to display QR code stickers which, on scanning, would reveal ownership details of the eatery and other legal compliance. The bench said it was not going into the legal challenge. 'We are told that today is the last day of the yatra. In any case, it is likely to come to an end in the near future. Therefore, at this stage, we would only pass an order that all the respective hotel owners shall comply with the mandate of displaying the licence and the registration certificate as per the statutory requirements. We make it clear that we are not going into the other issues argued. The application is closed,' the order said. Pointing out that it was only trying to balance the sentiments of the pilgrims with the rights of the hoteliers, Justice Sundresh remarked during the hearing that 'if a hotel is running as a vegetarian hotel all through, then the question of indicating names and other things will not arise. But if only for the purpose of yatra, somebody stops serving non-veg and starts selling veg, the consumer should know.' 'To that extent, consumers should have that flexibility. If one hotel was earlier serving non-veg, and for the purpose of better business they serve only veg during the yatra, that will be an issue for the consideration of the consumer. The choice is of the consumer,' Justice Sundresh observed. 'Breach of privacy rights,' says plea The application cited news reports that the state administration had issued a directive making it mandatory for the eateries to display the QR codes. It also referred to a 'press note dated 25.06.2024 issued by the Chief Minister of UP' and said 'it expressly calls for shopkeeper names to be clearly displayed during the yatra'. The application said that similar directives to display the names of owners outside the shops along the Kanwar Yatra route were also issued last year, but were stayed by the Supreme Court. The fresh directive, it said, 'couched under the garb of 'lawful license requirements' is a breach of privacy rights'. Appearing for the applicants, Senior Advocate A M Singhvi said authorities should have sought the modification of last year's court order before issuing the QR code directives. Terming it an attempt to further 'identity politics', Singhvi said, 'This is the most divisive initiative, to ostracise people during the yatra, as if these people are untouchables.' Justice Sundresh said people have different food choices and may want to know if a place serves vegetarian or non-vegetarian food. 'I am basically agnostic. I have no problem at all. But there are some who will not even touch certain foods,' he remarked. 'Regulations framed under central law' Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the state of Uttar Pradesh, said the directions were only in furtherance of a central law and regulations of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). 'These regulations are framed under a central law. It is not the state of UP. Last year, we had a law and order situation where the kanwariyas were ransacking a dhaba because of these kinds of issues. That is why the police authority issued that order. Last year, an ad interim order was passed without hearing us. I am only following a central law that is applicable to the entire country and not just for Kanwar Yatra,' he said, adding that the licensing rules mandate photo identity card as well. Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, also appearing for the applicants, said the customer's choice should be limited to what an eatery is selling at present and not extend to what it sells during the rest of the year. Justice Sundresh said such submissions come from an utter ignorance of the consumer law under which the consumer is the king. After the order was dictated, Ahmadi urged the court to clarify that 'the name of the owner and the QR code need not be disclosed. It has no backing in the law. Religious identity is sought to be exposed.' But the court said, 'We have said that we are not going into it. If you want to challenge it, go before the high court.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store