Latest news with #SusanCarter
Yahoo
17-07-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Political knives sharpened for 'very troubling' Latham
Mark Latham would be sacked if he worked anywhere else, some parliamentary colleagues say, while others hold firm on collaborating with the controversial MP. The one-time prime ministerial hopeful turned independent NSW upper house MP has been the subject of days of reporting as a former partner, Nathalie Matthews, seeks an apprehended domestic violence order against him. Mr Latham rejects her allegations of a "sustained pattern" of abuse and manipulation, reported by several media outlets. A court has refused to release related documents as they contain untested allegations, and Ms Matthews' private application for the order is scheduled to be heard on July 30. Messages reportedly sent by Mr Latham to Ms Matthews from the floor of parliament have also been published, featuring photos and derogatory comments about female MPs including Liberal Susan Carter. Ms Carter told reporters Mr Latham rang her to apologise. "I appreciated the apology - now it's time to get on with the job people expect us to do," she said on Thursday. Senior government minister Rose Jackson said Mr Latham should be shunned by MPs across the political spectrum. "I don't like working in a workplace with someone like that who thinks that kind of behaviour is acceptable," Ms Jackson told reporters. Mr Latham's "very troubling" alleged behaviour would not be acceptable elsewhere, Premier Chris Minns said. "In a typical workplace he'd be gone tomorrow," Mr Minns told reporters. But opposition leader in the upper house Damien Tudehope defended working with Mr Latham, based on the merits of particular proposals. "We work in parliament, Mark Latham is a member of parliament," he said. "He is entitled to put up amendments as we are entitled to put up amendments, and people would expect to deal with those amendments on the basis of whether they are reasonable or not." The pair have collaborated on amendments relating to sexual harassment claims under workers' compensation, which Treasurer Daniel Mookhey criticised as shifting the burden of proof to victims. "Take Mark Latham's name out of it, I think it's an amendment that any reasonable person could accept," Mr Tudehope told reporters. The government plans to call for an inquiry into Mr Latham over unrelated alleged abuses of parliamentary privilege when parliament resumes in August. One matter relates to him revealing the medical information of another MP, Sydney independent Alex Greenwich. It came after Mr Latham was ordered to pay $140,000 to Mr Greenwich in September 2024 over a sexually explicit and homophobic social media post. The Federal Court found Mr Latham's tweet exposed Mr Greenwich, who is gay and a prominent LGBTQI community advocate, to a torrent of hateful abuse including death threats. Mr Latham resigned from federal parliament in 2005 after an unsuccessful campaign for prime minister as Labor leader. He later left the party, before being elected to the NSW upper house in 2019 as a One Nation member. He quit that party in 2023, becoming an independent. His term expires in 2031. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) Lifeline 13 11 14 Men's Referral Service 1300 766 491 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
ABC News
27-06-2025
- Politics
- ABC News
Tensions flare as senior NSW political staffers who risked arrest grilled at Dural caravan inquiry
Tensions have flared between the NSW premier's top adviser and an opposition MP in a highly anticipated appearance before an inquiry into the Dural caravan plot and the criminalisation of hate speech. Five New South Wales political staffers began giving evidence on Friday morning, one week after they risked arrest for failing to appear. The staffers include the premier's chief-of-staff James Cullen, deputy chief-of-staff Edward Ovadia and his director of media and communications Sarah Michael. The police minister's chief-of-staff Ross Neilson and deputy chief-of-staff Tilly South are also appearing. The inquiry is examining what the senior political staffers knew about the "terror" plot, which police later determined to be a criminal hoax, when the government was introducing legislation to combat antisemitism. Liberal committee member Susan Carter questioning Mr Cullen about what support his boss had offered in relation to the inquiry. A tense exchange ensued between the MP and the staffer, with both talking over each other. "Look, you can fight with the question or your can answer it. What would you like to do?" Ms Carter said to Mr Cullen. Mr Cullen said he first learnt the caravan bomb was no longer being pursued as an act of terrorism in late February — but it is unclear whether that was before hate speech legislation passed the parliament. "Effectively there was a finalised view from police … when the AFP source was discredited on the 21st of February," Mr Cullen said. "I recall after — I think it would have been NSW Police — got legal advice confirming that at that point they couldn't pursue terrorism charges … not long after that getting — might have been Mr Neilson — letting me know that police had contacted the minister or the minister's office, that that had been the case." A bill criminalising the incitement of racial hatred passed the parliament on February 21, having been introduced three days earlier. "I suppose then the next step was … the press conference with the AFP and NSW Police on the tenth of March outlining the results of their investigation." The staffers were summonsed to appear at the inquiry last Friday but failed to do so, arguing "it is ministers, rather than their staff, who are accountable to the parliament". Benjamin Franklin, the president of the Legislative Council, threatened to exercise powers under the Parliamentary Evidence Act to have the staffers arrested and brought before the inquiry. The staffers argued the summonses were not validly issued and that they had "important reasons" for not appearing. They also claimed the powers of arrest under the 124-year-old law, which have never been used, were unconstitutional. Mr Franklin sought legal advice from eminent barrister Bret Walker SC, who gave an opinion rejecting these arguments, prompting the staffers to change their minds. Ms Michael denied breaking the law when she and her colleagues failed to appear last week. "You were untroubled by breaking the law?" Ms Carter asked. "It wasn't that we were breaking the law here. It's just we needed to get more advice about what our rights were," Ms Michael said. "Do you always get advice about whether a law is valid or not before you follow it?" Ms Carter said. "In this particular instance — I like to think of myself a law-abiding citizen — so in this instance, yes," Ms Michael replied. Mr Neilson said the staffers believed their non-attendance was not illegal. "We had advice that we had just cause and reasonable excuse not to attend, and therefore we wouldn't be breaking the law," Mr Neilson said. Earlier Premier Chris Minns said he had let his staff "speak for themselves". "My position on it is very well ventilated," he said at a press conference on Friday. "I couldn't be clearer about the government and my perspective, but we are where we are. "I guess my main message is that there may well be shenanigans in the New South Wales legislative council but myself, my ministers and even my staff, when they're not appearing in front of parliament committees, are actually focused on the people of New South Wales." The premier added that he understood "some people, as part of their job, will try and divert us from that".
