Latest news with #SydneyHarbourFederationTrust
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Politics
- Sydney Morning Herald
Don't jump the gun. Paddington's Victoria Barracks must not be converted for housing
'It's just utter stupidity, I mean it really belongs to the people … the nation as a whole.' These words were spoken in the mid-'90s by the late, great Labor politician Tom Uren, whom Prime Minister Anthony Albanese calls his 'father figure'. Back then, Defence wanted to sell its priceless historic harbour military sites, partly for new housing. Thanks to John Howard, Bob Carr, the federal parliament, and the community, all the sites were saved. They were never sold nor transferred to the NSW government. A new federal Sydney Harbour Federation Trust took over. But 30 years later, it's eerily deja vu. Defence is pondering vacating its exceedingly historic Victoria Barracks, although no decision has been made. Located in Paddington, surrounded by a high convict sandstone wall, the vast 15-hectare 1840s heritage site is so large that it has vistas inside. As big as Hyde Park, it comprises many convict-built sandstone Edwardian buildings. It is a rare intact military village. The largest building, 740 metres long, is 'reputed to be the longest stone building in the Southern Hemisphere', according to Defence. The Barracks is Commonwealth Heritage Listed, being 'the finest complex of colonial barracks … in Australia', 'survives as the only substantial barracks … from the early Victorian period', is 'valuable for future archaeological investigation', and 'is one of the most architecturally imposing 19th century military establishments in Australia'. It is in excellent condition. But because it's an active military base, few members of the public have been inside, apparently including some City of Sydney councillors. Regrettably, City of Sydney council, in a unanimous resolution late last year, and in case Defence moves out, decided that one key priority for the Barracks should be 'affordable housing' and that it needed to develop 'guiding principles'. Intriguingly, the two-page resolution contains a significant error, stating, 'about 30-50 per cent of the site is heritage-protected, but the remaining area could potentially be redeveloped'. This is erroneous – the entire site is heritage-protected. Three councillors spoke to the resolution. The first – Labor's Zann Maxwell – strongly in favour, said the site 'could unlock transformative opportunities', and would help 'to address the ongoing demand for homes'.
The Age
a day ago
- Politics
- The Age
Don't jump the gun. Paddington's Victoria Barracks must not be converted for housing
'It's just utter stupidity, I mean it really belongs to the people … the nation as a whole.' These words were spoken in the mid-'90s by the late, great Labor politician Tom Uren, whom Prime Minister Anthony Albanese calls his 'father figure'. Back then, Defence wanted to sell its priceless historic harbour military sites, partly for new housing. Thanks to John Howard, Bob Carr, the federal parliament, and the community, all the sites were saved. They were never sold nor transferred to the NSW government. A new federal Sydney Harbour Federation Trust took over. But 30 years later, it's eerily deja vu. Defence is pondering vacating its exceedingly historic Victoria Barracks, although no decision has been made. Located in Paddington, surrounded by a high convict sandstone wall, the vast 15-hectare 1840s heritage site is so large that it has vistas inside. As big as Hyde Park, it comprises many convict-built sandstone Edwardian buildings. It is a rare intact military village. The largest building, 740 metres long, is 'reputed to be the longest stone building in the Southern Hemisphere', according to Defence. The Barracks is Commonwealth Heritage Listed, being 'the finest complex of colonial barracks … in Australia', 'survives as the only substantial barracks … from the early Victorian period', is 'valuable for future archaeological investigation', and 'is one of the most architecturally imposing 19th century military establishments in Australia'. It is in excellent condition. But because it's an active military base, few members of the public have been inside, apparently including some City of Sydney councillors. Regrettably, City of Sydney council, in a unanimous resolution late last year, and in case Defence moves out, decided that one key priority for the Barracks should be 'affordable housing' and that it needed to develop 'guiding principles'. Intriguingly, the two-page resolution contains a significant error, stating, 'about 30-50 per cent of the site is heritage-protected, but the remaining area could potentially be redeveloped'. This is erroneous – the entire site is heritage-protected. Three councillors spoke to the resolution. The first – Labor's Zann Maxwell – strongly in favour, said the site 'could unlock transformative opportunities', and would help 'to address the ongoing demand for homes'.
