Latest news with #SyedMushtaqAli
Mint
a day ago
- Sport
- Mint
BCCI rings in new ‘serious injury replacement' rule in domestic cricket after Rishabh Pant's England woes
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has rung in a new change in his playing conditions which will be applicable in the upcoming 2025-26 domestic season. Called as 'Serious Injury Replacement' rule, the new BCCI rule came in light of Rishabh Pant's foot fracture during the Test series against England which led him to miss wicketkeeping for two consecutive Tests at Lord's (third) and Old Trafford (fourth). Based on the new rule, which will come into effect from CK Nayudu Trophy, the 'Serious Injury Replacement' rule will allow the teams to replace players in case of a serious injury - somewhat similar in line to the concussion replacement rules. However, the rule will not be implemented in Syed Mushtaq Ali (T20s) or Vijay Hazare Trophy (one-dayers) and only be restricted in multi-day events for now. The revised playing conditions states that if a player sustains a serious injury during the match within the field of play, a Serious Injury Replacement will be allowed according to what described in the clause. 1.2.8.1 - If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances: 1.2.8.1.1 - the serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause 1.2.5.2 above. The injury must have occurred due to an external blow and result in fracture / deep cut / dislocation etc. The injury should render player unavailable for remainder of the match. 1.2.8.1.2 - on-field umpires shall be final authority do decide on extend of serious injury and allowance of Serious Injury Replacement. They may consult BCCI Match Referee and / or doctor available on ground. 1.2.8.1.3 - The Team Manager shall submit a Serious Injury Replacement Request to the BCCI Match Referee on a standard form, which shall: 1.2.8.1.3.1 - identify the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.2 - specify the incident in which the serious injury was sustained, including the time at which it occurred. 1.2.8.1.3.3 - confirm that, the player has sustained a serious injury and will not be able to participate further in the match due to the injury; and 1.2.8.1.3.4 - identify the requested Serious Injury Replacement, who shall be like-for-like replacement for the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.5 - In all circumstances serious injury replacement player shall be from nominated substitutes at the time of toss (For Col C K Nayudu Trophy from the time of nomination of players). Only in the case where wicket-keeper is seriously injured and needs a replacement then Match Referee may allow a wicket-keeper from player outside the nominated substitutes if there is no wicket-keeper in the nominated substitutes. 1.2.8.2 - The Serious Injury Replacement Request must be submitted to the BCCI Match Referee as soon as possible after the incident specified in clause 1.2.8.1.3.2 if a Serious Injury Replacement is to be permitted. 1.2.8.3 - The BCCI Match Referee should ordinarily approve a Serious Injury Replacement Request if the replacement is a like-for-like player whose inclusion will not excessively advantage his team for the remainder of the match. 1.2.8.4 - In assessing whether the nominated Serious Injury Replacement should be considered a like-for-like player, the BCCI Match Referee should consider the likely role that the seriously injured player would have played during the remainder of the match, and the normal role that would be performed by the nominated Serious Injury Replacement. 1.2.8.5 - If the BCCI Match Referee believes that the inclusion of the nominated Serious Injury Replacement, when performing their normal role, would excessively advantage their team, the BCCI Match Referee may impose such conditions upon the identity and involvement of the Serious Injury Replacement as he/she sees fit, in line with the overriding objective of facilitating a like-for-like replacement for the seriously injured player. For clarity, a Serious Injury replacement will inherit all warnings, penalty time and suspensions that were imposed on the replaced player. 1.2.8.6 - The BCCI Match Referee may, in reviewing a Serious Injury Replacement Request made in accordance with clause 1.2.8.1.3 request any such further information as may be required in order to make the determination required under clauses 1.2.8.4 and 1.2.8.5. 1.2.8.7 - The decision of the BCCI Match Referee in relation to any Serious Injury Replacement Request shall be final and neither team shall have any right of appeal. 1.2.8.8 - Once the Serious Injury Replacement has been approved by the BCCI Match Referee, the replaced player shall take no further part in the match. 1.2.8.9 - Both the Serious Injury Replacement and the replaced player shall be considered to have played in the match for records and statistical purposes. Pant's first injury in England came on the opening day of the Third Test at Lord's. He injured his left index finger while attempting to field a wide ball from Jasprit Bumrah. Such was the pain, Pant had to leave the field immediately and did not return to keep wickets for the rest of the game. While he only came out to bat, Dhruv Jurel kept wickets for India. Although he recovered before the fourth Test, the southpaw injured himself once again on the first day of the Manchester Test, this time a more serious one. Trying to reverse sweep a Chris Woakes delivery, the ball landed directly on Pant's right foot, leaving him grimacing in pain. The 27-year-old was immediately taken off the ground in a golf cart. Although he came out to bat later in the innings on the second day, medical scans showed Pant fractured his toe. Like at Lord's, Jurel did the job behind the wickets in Manchester Test, which ended in a draw. He was eventually ruled out of the fifth Test at The Oval which India won by six runs to level the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2-2.
Time of India
a day ago
- Sport
- Time of India
After Rishabh Pant injury, BCCI introduces 'Serious Injury Replacement' rule in domestic cricket - all you need to know
MUMBAI: In a historic move in the light of injuries to and which initially ruled them out of the fourth and fifth Tests in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy recently, the Board of Control for Cricket in India ( ) has introduced a 'Serious Injury Replacement' clause in its playing conditions for the multi-day matches in the 2025-26 domestic season, which will allow teams to replace a player who can take no further part in the match due to an injury with another like-for-like player, just like in the case of the concussion substitute rule, which was introduced a few years back in international cricket. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. 'This rule is being implemented by the BCCI at the ICC's behest for one season in India's multi-day domestic cricket-basically first-class matches. The rule to replace a like-for-like is only for external injury, and was explained to the domestic umpires during an ongoing seminar for them recently in Ahmedabad," a source told TOI. The new injury replacement rule applies in the Duleep Trophy, Irani Cup and the Ranji Trophy, Cooch Behar Trophy (for Under-19) and Col CK Nayudu Trophy (for Under-23). Poll Do you think the introduction of the 'Serious Injury Replacement' clause is a positive change for domestic cricket? Yes, it enhances player safety No, it complicates the game Unsure, need more information However, no such injury replacement will be allowed by the BCCI in domestic white-ball cricket tournaments - Syed Mushtaq Ali or Vijay Hazare tournament. Presently, the International Cricket Council's playing conditions allow teams to make replacements if a player is concussed or contracts Covid-19, but there is no scope to replace an injured player, something which other sports normally allow. While there is no serious injury replacement rule in international cricket as of now, the new clause being introduced by the BCCI in India's domestic cricket for the upcoming season is part of the International Cricket Council's pilot run in this regard. In fact, the BCCI is the first full member to introduce this rule. How and why Rishabh Pant's England tour could come to an abrupt end due to toe fracture 'A player who suffers a serious injury on the field of play at any time after the match has started (including any pre-match warm-up period) may be replaced for the remainder of the match by a fully participating like-for-like player,' the ICC had said in a statement last on June 25. The newly-introduced rule is mentioned in the playing conditions (TOI has a copy) for domestic multi-day format matches for the 2025-26 season which were sent by the BCCI to the state associations recently, and will be effective immediately from the upcoming Duleep Trophy, which will kick off from Aug 28. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Under clause 1.2.8, which has a subhead with 'Serious Injury Replacement,' it has been mentioned that "If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances." the newly-introduced rule in the Playing Conditions states. 'The serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause 1.2.5.2 above. The injury must have occurred due to an external blow and result in fracture / deep cut / dislocation etc. The injury should render the player unavailable for the remainder of the match.' '1.2.8.1.2 (The) On Field umpires shall be the final authority to decide on the extent of serious injury and allowability of Serious Injury Replacement. They may consult the BCCI Match Referee and / or doctor available on ground.' In the first innings of the Old Trafford Test, Pant fractured his foot while trying to reverse sweep a Chris Woakes yorker, while Woakes dislocated his shoulder. Both, though, gallantly shrugged off their injuries and walked into bat for the sake of their, despite experiencing extreme pain. While many fans appreciated their bravery, there were calls for a replacement rule to be introduced, lest players aggravate their injuries. After Pant had to retire hurt in the first inning of the Old Trafford Test, India's head coach had called for the introduction of injury replacements in Test cricket, a stance which England captain said he considered "absolutely ridiculous". "Absolutely, I'm all for it. If the umpires and the match referee sees and feels that is a major injury, I think it's very important. It's very important to have this rule where you can get a substitute - that is, if it's very visible. There's nothing wrong in doing that, especially in a series like this where it's been such a closely fought series in the previous three Test matches. Imagine if we would've had to play with ten men against 11. How unfortunate would this be for us," Gambhir had said. Post Pant's injury, India were able to use Dhruv Jurel, a substitute, as their wicketkeeper in Pant's place, but he was not eligible to bat in their second innings. However, Stokes had said that the conversation should be "shut down and stopped" because any proposal "would have too many loopholes" for the teams to exploit. "I think it's absolutely ridiculous that there's a conversation around an injury replacement. I think that there would just be too many loopholes for teams to be able to go through. You pick your XI for a game; injuries are part of the game. I completely understand the concussion replacement - player welfare, [and] player safety. But I think the conversation should just honestly stop around injury replacements because if you stick me in an MRI scanner, I could get someone else in straightaway. If you stick anyone else with an MRI scanner, a bowler is going to show, 'oh yeah, you've got a bit of inflammation around your knee; oh sweet, we can get another fresh bowler in'. I just think that conversation should be shut down and stopped," Stokes had said. The BCCI has elaborately laid out the procedure for an injury replacement (given below) and said the match referee will be the final authority who will decide after consulting a doctor and on-field replacement on the extent and seriousness of the injury. 'The breakup of the Serious Injury Replacement rule' 1.2.8.1 If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances: 1.2.8.1.1 the serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause 1.2.5.2 above. The injury must have occurred due to an external blow and result in fracture / deep cut / dislocation etc. The injury should render player unavailable for remainder of the match. 1.2.8.1.2 Onfield umpires shall be final authority do decide on extend of serious injury and allowability of Serious Injury Replacement. They may consult BCCI Match Referee and / or doctor available on ground. 1.2.8.1.3 the Team Manager shall submit a Serious Injury Replacement Request to the BCCI Match Referee on a standard form, which shall: 1.2.8.1.3.1 identify the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.2 specify the incident in which the serious injury was sustained, including the time at which it occurred. 1.2.8.1.3.3 confirm that, the player has sustained a serious injury and will not be able to participate further in the match due to the injury; and 1.2.8.1.3.4 identify the requested Serious Injury Replacement, who shall be like-for-like replacement for the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.5 In all circumstances serious injury replacement player shall be from nominated substitutes at the time of toss (For Col C K Nayudu Trophy from the time of nomination of players). Only in the case where wicket-keeper is seriously injured and needs a replacement then Match Referee may allow a wicket-keeper from player outside the nominated substitutes if there is no wicket-keeper in the nominated substitutes. 1.2.8.2 The Serious Injury Replacement Request must be submitted to the BCCI Match Referee as soon as possible after the incident specified in clause 1.2.8.1.3.2 if a Serious Injury Replacement is to be permitted. 1.2.8.3 The BCCI Match Referee should ordinarily approve a Serious Injury Replacement Request if the replacement is a like-for-like player whose inclusion will not excessively advantage his team for the remainder of the match. 1.2.8.4 In assessing whether the nominated Serious Injury Replacement should be considered a like-for-like player, the BCCI Match Referee should consider the likely role that the seriously injured player would have played during the remainder of the match, and the normal role that would be performed by the nominated Serious Injury Replacement. 1.2.8.5 If the BCCI Match Referee believes that the inclusion of the nominated Serious Injury Replacement, when performing their normal role, would excessively advantage their team, the BCCI Match Referee may impose such conditions upon the identity and involvement of the Serious Injury Replacement as he/she sees fit, in line with the overriding objective of facilitating a like-for-like replacement for the seriously injured player. For clarity, a Serious Injury replacement will inherit all warnings, penalty time and suspensions that were imposed on the replaced player. 1.2.8.6 The BCCI Match Referee may, in reviewing a Serious Injury Replacement Request made in accordance with clause 1.2.8.1.3 request any such further information as may be required in order to make the determination required under clauses 1.2.8.4 and 1.2.8.5. 1.2.8.7 The decision of the BCCI Match Referee in relation to any Serious Injury Replacement Request shall be final and neither team shall have any right of appeal. 1.2.8.8 Once the Serious Injury Replacement has been approved by the BCCI Match Referee, the replaced player shall take no further part in the match. 1.2.8.9 Both the Serious Injury Replacement and the replaced player shall be considered to have played in the match for records and statistical purposes. Deliberate short run A deliberate short run is an attempt for batters to appear to run more than one run, while at least one batter deliberately does not make good their ground at one end. Batters may choose to abort a run, provided the umpire believes that there was no intention by the batter concerned to deceive the umpires or to score the run in which they didn't make their ground. - request the captain of the fielding side to identify which of the two batters will take strike for the next delivery. Retiring batsman 25.4.3 If a batsman retires for any reason other than as in clause 25.4.2, he will be considered as dismissed immediately and will not have the option of returning to bat even with the consent of the opposite captain. His innings will be recorded as 'Retired - out'.
The Hindu
a day ago
- Sport
- The Hindu
BCCI introduces ‘Serious Injury Replacement' rule for 2025-26 season
In a major development, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has amended the playing conditions and allowed injury replacements in multi-day tournaments for the upcoming domestic season. The decision comes in the wake of Rishabh Pant's injury, when the wicketkeeper-batter had to walk out to bat despite a fractured foot during the fourth Test against England in Manchester last month. While such a rule is still not implemented by the International Cricket Council, the BCCI introduced the rule in Playing Conditions for the 2025-26 season in the multi-day cricket under a new category - 'Serious Injury Replacement' stating that a like-for-like replacement, somewhat similar to concussion replacement rules, will be allowed. While briefing the umpires and the match officials recently, the BCCI made it clear that such replacements will not be allowed in white ball cricket - Syed Mushtaq Ali or Vijay Hazare Trophy, and will only be restricted to the multi-day events for now. The rule will also be applicable in the multi-day Under 19 tournament for the CK Nayudu Trophy. According to the revised playing conditions: 'If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances… The serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause.' During the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, there was a demand for a player replacement in case of serious injuries. After Pant, England's Chris Woakes had to come out to bat in the Oval Test despite a dislocated shoulder. While England captain Ben Stokes had rubbished such a replacement rule, India head coach Gautam Gambhir backed the rule. Serious Injury Replacement - Full rule 1.2.8.1 If a player sustains a serious injury during the course of the relevant match, a Serious Injury Replacement may be permitted in the following circumstances: 1.2.8.1.1 the serious injury must have been sustained during play and within the playing area described in clause 1.2.5.2 above. The injury must have occurred due to an external blow and result in fracture / deep cut / dislocation etc. The injury should render player unavailable for remainder of the match. 1.2.8.1.2 On-field umpires shall be final authority do decide on extend of serious injury and allowance of Serious Injury Replacement. They may consult BCCI Match Referee and / or doctor available on ground. 1.2.8.1.3 the Team Manager shall submit a Serious Injury Replacement Request to the BCCI Match Referee on a standard form, which shall: 1.2.8.1.3.1 identify the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.2 specify the incident in which the serious injury was sustained, including the time at which it occurred. 1.2.8.1.3.3 confirm that, the player has sustained a serious injury and will not be able to participate further in the match due to the injury; and 1.2.8.1.3.4 identify the requested Serious Injury Replacement, who shall be like-for-like replacement for the player who has sustained the serious injury. 1.2.8.1.3.5 In all circumstances serious injury replacement player shall be from nominated substitutes at the time of toss (For Col C K Nayudu Trophy from the time of nomination of players). Only in the case where wicket-keeper is seriously injured and needs a replacement then Match Referee may allow a wicket-keeper from player outside the nominated substitutes if there is no wicket-keeper in the nominated substitutes. 1.2.8.2 The Serious Injury Replacement Request must be submitted to the BCCI Match Referee as soon as possible after the incident specified in clause 1.2.8.1.3.2 if a Serious Injury Replacement is to be permitted. 1.2.8.3 The BCCI Match Referee should ordinarily approve a Serious Injury Replacement Request if the replacement is a like-for-like player whose inclusion will not excessively advantage his team for the remainder of the match. 1.2.8.4 In assessing whether the nominated Serious Injury Replacement should be considered a like-for-like player, the BCCI Match Referee should consider the likely role that the seriously injured player would have played during the remainder of the match, and the normal role that would be performed by the nominated Serious Injury Replacement. 1.2.8.5 If the BCCI Match Referee believes that the inclusion of the nominated Serious Injury Replacement, when performing their normal role, would excessively advantage their team, the BCCI Match Referee may impose such conditions upon the identity and involvement of the Serious Injury Replacement as he/she sees fit, in line with the overriding objective of facilitating a like-for-like replacement for the seriously injured player. For clarity, a Serious Injury replacement will inherit all warnings, penalty time and suspensions that were imposed on the replaced player. 1.2.8.6 The BCCI Match Referee may, in reviewing a Serious Injury Replacement Request made in accordance with clause 1.2.8.1.3 request any such further information as may be required in order to make the determination required under clauses 1.2.8.4 and 1.2.8.5. 1.2.8.7 The decision of the BCCI Match Referee in relation to any Serious Injury Replacement Request shall be final and neither team shall have any right of appeal. 1.2.8.8 Once the Serious Injury Replacement has been approved by the BCCI Match Referee, the replaced player shall take no further part in the match. 1.2.8.9 Both the Serious Injury Replacement and the replaced player shall be considered to have played in the match for records and statistical purposes. Related Topics BCCI / Rishabh Pant
Time of India
03-06-2025
- Sport
- Time of India
Rajat Patidar's captaincy saga: From self-doubt to brink of immortality
Royal Challengers Bengaluru's captain Rajat Patidar during a practice session. (PTI Photo) Just one match separates Rajat Patidar from immortality in cricketing folklore. A triumph against PBKS will end RCB's 18-year wait for a historic IPL title, earning Patidar cult status in his first season as captain. The Bengaluru-based franchise have been extremely dominant this season, pulling off impressive wins. None of the clumsiness which defined RCB in previous editions has been visible, making Patidar seem like a messiah sent by the divine forces. However, the cricketer, who leads Madhya Pradesh in limited-overs cricket, interestingly lacked self-belief as a captain initially, as revealed by the state team's head coach Chandrakant Pandit . Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "I was after him to take up the state team's captaincy for the last two to three years, considering the respect he commands among the players. However, he was not very keen initially. I don't think he believed in himself as a captain. Rajat was somebody who would speak very less. It was tough to understand what he was thinking," said Pandit during an exclusive interaction with by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo . Who's that IPL player? "However, Rajat came to me last season and said, 'I would like to take up the responsibility of captaincy'. Interacting with him during the off-season made me realise his ability to take quality decisions and emerge as a leader. MP did so well under his captaincy in the Syed Mushtaq Ali (SMAT) 2024-25, reaching the final. Rajat's confidence increased after the team started winning matches under his captaincy. I had a conversation with RCB head coach Andy Flower during the SMAT. He was very keen to know what's so special about Rajat," added the KKR head coach. 'We will try and win this for Virat Kohli': Rajat Patidar before IPL Final The RCB captain has witnessed his fair share of struggle and misfortune over the years, from limited opportunities to being constantly sidelined due to injuries. Pandit termed Patidar's attitude and desire to learn quickly as a factor behind his rapid progress, propelling him to such success. Poll Will Rajat Patidar lead RCB to victory in the IPL 2025 final against PBKS? Yes, definitely! No, PBKS will win. "Rajat takes spontaneous decisions without being fearful. At the same time, he is also aware of the things which are going wrong in his decision-making, which I noted during SMAT 2024-25. Rajat immediately came to me after missing out on some aspects and said, 'I should've done this instead'. Acceptance is very important," said Pandit. "There were certain instances where he got out after playing a bad shot. I was upset at him, but he took it in the right spirit without saying a single word. You could see the difference in the next match. Some other cricketers would've, maybe, termed the bad shot as a part of the game. However, Rajat is a very good learner and took the lessons from the interaction," he added. The KKR head coach highlighted a recent interaction with Patidar before an IPL 2025 match against RCB in Bengaluru, which showcases his strong mentality. IPL 2025 Final, RCB vs Punjab Kings: The wait will finally end in Ahmedabad "Rajat had suffered a finger injury. I asked him, 'What has happened to your finger?'. He said, 'Don't worry. I will be playing'. That is the level of confidence and mental strength he enjoys. Rajat is also a vocal communicator and expresses himself freely which is an indication of the self-belief he enjoys as a captain," stated Pandit. Former Madhya Pradesh captain Devendra Bundela termed Patidar leading RCB in the IPL 2025 final as a major moment in his career. "I expected RCB to do well but reaching the final is a massive achievement and a big moment in Rajat's journey. RCB have an edge over PBKS because of Rajat's ability to emerge as a game-changer in big matches. He had scored a sensational 81(40) in the SMAT 2024/25 final against Mumbai and I would back him to get another big knock. Rajat is simply unstoppable on his day. Players who toil it out in domestic cricket become tactically astute and mentally tough which he is a classic example of," stated Bundela.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
30-05-2025
- Sport
- Business Standard
What is highest successful run chase in Mullanpur? GT's highest run chase
Mumbai Indians have set a daunting 229-run target for Gujarat Titans in the IPL 2025 Eliminator at Mullanpur Stadium, Chandigarh. Should Gujarat manage to chase this down, it would mark the highest successful run chase ever against Mumbai Indians in the history of the tournament — a feat that would also propel Shubman Gill's men into Qualifier 2. The current record for the highest successful chase against MI stands at 196, achieved by Rajasthan Royals back in 2020 in Abu Dhabi. Surpassing that would not only be a historic achievement but also a major statement from Gujarat in this knockout encounter. What is the highest successful run chase in T20s at Mullanpur Stadium? Since the Mullanpur Stadium is a relatively new venue with only a handful of T20 matches played, the sample size for run chases remains limited. However, here's a look at the highest successful run chase recorded at this ground in T20 cricket. Highest successful run chase at Mullanpur Stadium Match Date Target Result Punjab Kings vs Delhi Capitals March 23, 2024 175 PBKS scored 177/6 in 19.2 overs Baroda vs Mumbai Syed Mushtaq Ali 2023 149 Baroda scored 149/7 in 18.5 overs Highest successful run chase by Gujarat Titans Gujarat Titans fans might find the stats a bit discouraging, as the team has managed to chase targets over 200 runs only twice since their debut. However, there is optimism for Shubman Gill's side, especially considering their best-ever successful chase came earlier this season. In IPL 2025 match 60 at the Arun Jaitley Stadium, Delhi Capitals posted 199 runs batting first. In response, Gujarat Titans pulled off a remarkable 10-wicket victory, led by Sai Sudharsan's century and a strong partnership with Gill. Adding to their confidence, the Titans' second-highest run chase also came this season—against the same opponent. On April 19, 2024, they successfully chased 204 runs against Delhi Capitals. With two massive chases already in the bag this year, Gujarat now has a golden opportunity to set a new benchmark by chasing down their highest-ever total in IPL history. Here's a look at their complete list of top chases. Highest successful run chase by Gujarat Titans Highest Total Chased Opposition Year 205/0 Delhi Capitals 2025 204/3 Delhi Capitals 2025 199/5 Sunrisers Hyderabad 2022 199/7 Rajasthan Royals 2024 198/4 Royal Challengers Bengaluru 2023
