Latest news with #T-Visa
Int'l Business Times
7 days ago
- Politics
- Int'l Business Times
Judge Allows Defamation Suit Against Newsweek Reporter to Proceed Amid Allegations of Visa Fraud Conspiracy
A federal judge has declined to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by Olivet University against Newsweek reporter Alex Rouhandeh, signaling a potential landmark case concerning media conduct and immigration manipulation. In a July 22 ruling, Judge Steven Merryday determined that Rouhandeh's article, which falsely claimed Olivet "pleaded guilty to money laundering," constitutes a materially false statement, thus supporting a valid defamation claim. Olivet had, in fact, pleaded guilty to "conspiracy in the fifth degree," a misdemeanor. The court acknowledged this distinction as having "substantial" legal and reputational significance. Beyond this legal ruling, emerging evidence suggests a broader operation involving fabricated trafficking claims, immigration fraud, and a concerted effort to undermine a Christian educational institution through media channels. In contrast to these allegations, Olivet University continues its development, recently securing unanimous zoning approval in Riverside County, California , for a significant expansion phase. T-Visa Conspiracy: The Alleged Roles of Sophia Yu, Tingbo Cao, and Dev Pragad Central to the lawsuit is a growing body of evidence reportedly linking Newsweek insiders to an alleged T-Visa (Victims of Human Trafficking visa) abuse scheme. This scheme purportedly aimed to manufacture human trafficking accusations against Olivet University in exchange for immigration benefits. Tingbo Cao, an international student, who stated in the past that he "came to the U.S. to live a better life", has emerged as a new figure in this alleged scheme. Sources indicate that Sophia Yu, a close associate of Newsweek CEO Dev Pragad, allegedly instructed Cao and others to falsely claim trafficking by Olivet to qualify for T-Visas. Ms. Yu reportedly promised individuals protection, housing, and legal assistance in exchange for their participation. One insider described her actions as those of a "T-Visa broker," characterizing the operation as "fraud posing as humanitarian advocacy." Ms. Yu's activities have reportedly drawn further scrutiny due to her documented association with a media outlet reportedly tied to pro–North Korean ideologies. This connection raises concerns about potential collaboration between international propaganda entities and U.S. corporate media, working together to target religious institutions in America. Evidence has also reportedly surfaced regarding Dev Pragad's links to these operations, including allegations of his financial support for platforms described as promoting fabricated narratives with foreign hosting. One such fringe outlet was reportedly characterized by Mr. Pragad as a "nuclear bomb" in a private conversation, raising concerns about foreign-backed smear operations. Newsweek's primary reporters involved in the coverage against Olivet, Alex Rouhandeh (of Persian descent) and Naveed Jamali (of Pakistani heritage), have also been noted. While journalistic diversity is valued, critics contend that their assignments and tactics have been exploited under Mr. Pragad's leadership to spearhead a coordinated and malicious campaign, particularly against Christian institutions. Coordinated Witness Recruitment: Newsweek's Alleged Ongoing Campaign As the lawsuit progresses, Newsweek reportedly continues its efforts. Multiple sources indicate that the outlet is developing another report, allegedly utilizing a dismissed Indian student identified as "Isaac," who was previously expelled from Olivet due to alleged misconduct. This is not the first instance of Newsweek and Mr. Pragad being accused of recruiting compromised sources. A 2022 exposé alleged that Mr. Pragad personally contacted individuals connected to a known extortion network targeting Olivet. Internal sources have also claimed that Mr. Pragad previously attempted to recruit Indian students by offering promises of immigration support, legal aid, or employment, raising significant ethical and legal questions. The central question remains: who is orchestrating these activities? Sources now point to Dev Pragad as the alleged mastermind behind the anti-Olivet operation. Further inquiries include Sophia Yu's specific role, whether Mr. Pragad funded her, and if individuals were compensated or promised favors for their cooperation. A whistleblower stated, "When Sophia was grooming Tingbo, she made it clear she wasn't doing it alone. Someone was supporting her. The question is—was that someone Dev?" Newsweek's Acquisition, Sophia Yu, and Alleged Criminal Exploitation of Visas Adding another layer of complexity, Newsweek recently acquired an advertising company where Sophia Yu previously worked. Ms. Yu has reportedly resumed a position of influence within this acquired company, raising questions about the motivations behind the acquisition. Insiders claim that Ms. Yu has brought Tingbo Cao and his wife into the company, effectively providing employment to individuals she allegedly coached into making false trafficking claims. This suggests a potential criminal network exploiting immigration law to recruit labor under false pretenses, with alleged financial backing from media figures. If substantiated, these allegations would represent a significant abuse of journalistic and immigration systems, allegedly orchestrated by Newsweek leadership. Key questions remain for Mr. Pragad: whether he funded Sophia Yu and her operations, whether he possessed knowledge of the alleged recruitment and coaching of witnesses, and whether the acquisition of AdPrime Media was a strategic maneuver to leverage T-Visa applicants for labor or influence. Newsweek's Business Model: "Circular Hoax" and "Arson" Newsweek has consistently invoked "ongoing investigations" to legitimize its reports. Critics, however, contend this is a self-serving deception: Newsweek and its allies allegedly file complaints with government agencies, then cite the mere existence of these complaints as evidence of wrongdoing. Despite Newsweek's claims, some agencies have already returned property to Olivet University, suggesting the absence of active investigations . Nevertheless, Newsweek reporters, such as Mr. Rouhandeh, continue to portray these as active investigations to construct a narrative of guilt. It has been unequivocally stated that the "human trafficking" narrative against Olivet was reportedly fabricated by Newsweek, as documented in a prior International Business Times article . These accusations allegedly originated from coordinated media manipulation rather than genuine victim claims. The initial trafficking allegation was reportedly made by Newsweek in 2022, two years before the four students who filed a lawsuit against Olivet University. Some of these students, as noted, were reportedly recruited and potentially funded by Mr. Pragad himself, ostensibly to corroborate the earlier false trafficking allegations. "This is their playbook," remarked one legal expert. "Create the scandal, feed it to the government, then report that a scandal is being investigated. It's a circular hoax." Even media critic Jon Stewart has publicly criticized Newsweek's tactics, reportedly describing their business model as "arson" after Newsweek misconstrued comments he made to imply a link between J.K. Rowling and antisemitism. Stewart subsequently refuted the claim on X (formerly Twitter) with a video clip asserting that Newsweek "sets up the fire, not the good kind but a terrible one, and reports provocatively on it." Newsweek's alleged "arson" model is further evidenced by a recent complaint filed by an acquaintance of Mr. Pragad. Cornerstone Payment Systems, owned by Mr. Nick Logan, a business partner and friend of Mr. Pragad, is involved. In a recent court filing, Mr. Pragad reportedly downplayed his relationship with Cornerstone, falsely claiming he was compelled to take a loan due to Olivet. In reality, Mr. Pragad allegedly secured the loan to establish ties with Mr. Logan and his Republican network, even referring others to obtain similar loans from Mr. Logan to strengthen this relationship. Now, Mr. Pragad is reportedly influencing Mr. Logan to initiate a meritless lawsuit. Olivet University stated it has not been served with the complaint nor signed a waiver of service. An attorney representing the defendants confirmed that the plaintiff acknowledged Olivet University owes no balance and was fully repaid. Olivet anticipates being voluntarily dropped from the suit. According to Olivet, this attempted shakedown constitutes another smear tactic by Newsweek to disseminate false information online for its own legal advantage. Newsweek reportedly influenced Cornerstone to initiate this lawsuit against Olivet, and then is writing an article about the matter. Even though Olivet does not owe any money to the plaintiffs, but the complaint becomes publicly available, and Newsweek allegedly propagates these false allegations as true. Olivet University Prepares for Trial with Legal Validation With a clear ruling from a federal judge, Olivet University is now preparing to bring the defamation matter to trial. The court's decision not only rejected all of Mr. Rouhandeh's motions to dismiss—including arguments based on retraction statutes, the "substantial truth" doctrine, and fair reporting privilege—but also affirmed that the university's claims warrant a jury trial. Legal observers suggest the case could potentially expose the full extent of Newsweek's alleged involvement in media entrapment, immigration fraud, and witness tampering. "This is not just defamation. It's sabotage," commented a legal analyst familiar with the case. "They are reportedly attempting to undermine a Christian educational institution for financial and strategic gain, and they have allegedly crossed multiple legal lines to achieve this."
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- General
- Yahoo
As Milwaukee leaders come to her support, MPS aide may not have to leave US immediately
As members of the Milwaukee Common Council stood in the council chambers for 14 minutes on June 3 — one for each year Yessenia Ruano has lived in the United States — news broke that her imminent departure from the country could be delayed as her visa application for trafficking victims is processed. The news was the latest twist in Ruano's public effort to fight her deportation. The Milwaukee Public Schools teaching aide was ordered on May 30 by U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement to return to her home country of El Salvador. Before her self-deportation order was delayed, her flight was scheduled for the evening of June 3. Ruano, who has a pending visa application for human trafficking victims, previously said that if ICE ordered it, she'd leave the country with her daughters, who are both U.S citizens. The 14 council members who stood together flanking a photo of Ruano asked that she be able to stay in the country while her T-Visa is being processed. "It's about due process,' said council President José G. Pérez, who organized the action along with Alds. JoCasta Zamarripa and Marina Dimitrijevic. Pérez said he hoped the unanimous show of solidarity would demonstrate to Milwaukee's immigrant community that the council doesn't believe Ruano's treatment is fair. Zamarripa called Ruano the "kind of person that makes Milwaukee a better place." "She is one of millions of people who are suffering at the hands of a broken immigration system and whose American dream is now turning into a nightmare," Zamarripa said. Dimitrijevic said Ruano's case is one of many nationwide, and she hopes the council's action would point to the larger issue. "This city was built on the backs of immigrants, and that's why we stood in solidarity today, and we're not going to back down," Dimitrijevic said. The council action came one day after U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Milwaukee, sent a letter to Immigration and Customs Enforcement expressing 'deep concern' over Ruano's deportation order despite her pending visa application. Calling Ruano a 'pillar in our Milwaukee community,' Moore wrote that deporting her 'will not make our country safer.' Ruano had a plane ticket out of the Chicago O'Hare airport for the evening of June 3. She was packing suitcases in the morning when she learned she may have at least a bit more time in the U.S. Ruano and her attorney, Marc Christopher, requested a 'stay,' or a pause, on her deportation after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers on May 30 said she had to self-deport and return to her home country of El Salvador. The request for a stay has been received and is being considered by ICE, Ruano said. Her understanding is that she can remain in the U.S. while the request is being processed. But it was not clear how long it would take to be processed. A big caveat is that ICE is not prevented from carrying out the deportation while the request is being processed, Christopher said. Also, it was not immediately clear how much longer Ruano could stay in the U.S. if the request for a stay were granted. 'Ms. Ruano and her legal advocates remain hopeful that ICE will take into account the humanitarian gravity of her case,' Christopher said in a statement. ICE officers had said they would not wait for Ruano's open application for a trafficking victims' visa to be processed by a different immigration agency. Processing times for those visas can be two years or more. 'All we ask is that she be allowed to stay – at least until her T visa is decided – so she is not sent back into the very danger she fled,' Christopher said. Alison Dirr of the Journal Sentinel staff contributed to this story. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: MPS aide Yessenia Ruano learns she may get more time in US
Yahoo
15-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
NM Supreme Court rules alleged crime victims don't need to disclose visa applications
The New Mexico Supreme Court on Nov. 20, 2023 in Santa Fe. (Photo by Austin Fisher / Source NM) The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday ruled unanimously that criminal defendants are not entitled to visa applications from their alleged victims who are seeking protections from deportations as part of their testimonies. So-called U and T visas allow non-citizen crime victims to report crimes and testify against perpetrators without fear of being deported. Approved visas allow victims temporary stays in the United States and also a potential avenue to lawful permanent resident status. Last year, the court ordered judges in San Juan and Bernalillo counties to return or destroy victim visa application material that prosecutors had previously provided to defense teams. The court's new ruling in an opinion issued today provides the legal reasoning for that order. Local DA says immigrant crime victims are going silent amid deportation fears, letting abusers free A rule requiring prosecutors to provide applications to defense teams could have a 'chilling effect' on 'immigrants' willingness to report crimes,' the court's opinion, written by Justice Shannon Bacon, said. First Judicial District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies recently told Source New Mexico that some immigrant crime victims have stopped answering her phone calls, potentially out of fear of being deported despite qualifying for U visas. About 25 alleged crime victims applied for the visa in her judicial district in the first two months of 2025. One woman who stopped participating in the criminal justice process accused her partner, a United States citizen, of abusing her and two kids, both under age 11 and citizens themselves, Carmack-Altwies said in February. While the court rules that visa applications are now confidential and protected against disclosure during discovery, there are instances when information in an application must be turned over. For example, if the prosecution knows that a victim has applied for a U visa, they should turn that over to the defense team, 'because the fact of a U/T-Visa application is relevant impeachment material,' the court wrote. A crime victim's credibility could reasonably be called into question, according to the court, because the benefits of a U or T visa are 'significant and could provide ulterior motives.' The court explained that 'the defense may impeach the victim's credibility by cross-examining the victim about the potential benefits that a U/T-Visa offers to a victim, acknowledging these benefits are significant and could provide ulterior motives.' When the U/T-visa application is relevant to the victim's motive, the court wrote, a defendant can: Cross-examine witnesses, including victims, regarding their knowledge and participation in the U/T-Visa application process and their reasons for involvement; impeach a witness who has made 'prior inconsistent statements on the topic'; educate the jury about what U/T visa is and their benefits by cross-examining the state's witnesses or direct examination of defense witnesses'; and make related closing arguments Also, if prosecutors have a copy of the visa application and material within it bears on the defendant's guilt, then the information — 'not the application' itself — must be disclosed, according to the court opinion. If the prosecution and defense disagree on whether information in the application is material, a judge may have to review it in private.
