Latest news with #TheFeed


Daily Mail
6 days ago
- Entertainment
- Daily Mail
Australian TV show gets 'derailed' by 'gross' sex debate - as viewers slam the controversial comments made about women on the shock series
SBS program The Feed has been slammed by viewers after it was 'derailed' by a 'gross' debate about how many sexual partners a woman should have. The episode, titled Men Debate Masculinity, saw six men weigh in on issues surrounding gender roles, domestic violence, and the male identity. But it quickly devolved within minutes when they were asked if 'having lots of sexual partners is tied to your status as a man'—leaving some viewers disgusted. While most agreed men didn't need many sexual partners to be masculine, some of the panellists were quick to bring up their views on the 'body count' of women. Clayton Harrop, a self-proclaimed hypnotherapist and performance coach, said he believed a woman with a 'high body count' had a 'chink in the armour'. 'I don't like the idea of a super high body count in women if I am completely honest,' he said. 'I personally believe that the lower a woman's body count, the better for her, and her future partner,' he continued. Clayton went on to boast he had 'slept with my share of women' and insisted he doesn't 'look at a woman any less because of it'. However, he confessed he wouldn't want '20 other men to be able to say, "Yeah I have been with her bro."' 'It's a chink in the armour that directly affects every other area of our life,' he said. Dean Wells, who got his controversial start on Married At First Sight in 2018 and is now engaged to Beauty and the Geek star Aimee Woolley, agreed and added he found women who had many sexual partners 'unattractive'. 'I am not going to try and break it down on an intellectual level, but I just find a chick that has been with way too many guys, unattractive,' he said. The episode was around 43 minutes long and saw a myriad other controversial debates between the men. Clayton, Dean and Chris Katelaris represented the conservative side of the panel, known for their inflammatory online posts about gender-related issues. Meanwhile, well-known advocates Tarang Chawla, Mitch Wallis and Jeff Kissubi represented the opposing progressive side of the debate. The episode has garnered significant backlash online, with many slamming SBS for platforming controversial views for 'rage bait'. Women's safety advocate Mia Findlay shared a video that called out the network for failing to host a productive conversation about men's violence and misogyny. 'What was this episode intending to achieve, other than virality, clicks and rage bait?' she asked on Instagram. 'It just underscores the continued lack of seriousness in having informed, effective conversations about men's violence and misogyny in this country.' Other viewers online agreed with her sentiment, with one person writing: 'The rage bait worked. We, women, as the collective, are enraged.' 'These men are so old to be talking about body count. I thought this was high school talk,' said another. 'Men still talking about "body count" as if that matters. It's so gross,' someone else added. 'Knowing that more people will see this type of red pill... regurgitated rhetoric, and believe it to be true. Makes me retract from the world even more,' commented one. 'I saw some of this clip first thing in the morning and it made me feel awful. Stop platforming these men and their... backwards ideas towards women. Do better @thefeedsbs,' yet another said. Tarang, one of the panellists, has since come out to say the debate was often 'derailed' with controversial remarks. 'The space of online coaches, podcasters and men's health advocates has an underbelly that often blames women or says controversial things for clout,' he told on Thursday. 'I didn't go on the panel to debate for entertainment. I went to discuss the realities of masculinity and because my sister, Nikita, was murdered by her partner, and too many men still don't take that seriously. 'If even one man who watched starts to question the culture we've built, then it was worth it for me to be there despite the personal cost.' Tarang became an anti-violence campaigner after his sister Nikita, 23, was horrifically murdered by her husband in a jealous rage in 2015. SBS has since released an official statement addressing the backlash the company has received on the episode. 'Like all our content, The Feed Debate is subject to the SBS Code of Practice, which states that SBS will share a diversity of views and perspectives, and requires our news and current affairs programs to provide balanced and impartial coverage,' the statement said. 'The six panellists who appeared in The Feed's 'Masculinity' debate were informed in advance that the program would be fact-checked and edited to fit The Feed's debate format, and were also told there would be a diverse range of views represented. 'We appreciate the participation of all the panellists who were willing to share their perspectives.'

News.com.au
7 days ago
- Entertainment
- News.com.au
Anger as SBS' airs ‘dangerous' show with conservative influencers
SBS has been accused of 'rage baiting' and platforming 'dangerous' views against women after it aired an episode of The Feed which featured several conservative male influencers. Titled 'Men Debate Masculinity', the current affairs program saw six high-profile men weigh in on issues surrounding gender roles, domestic violence and dating. The 43-minute segment, which dropped on YouTube on Friday, profiled three well-known advocates, Tarang Chawla, Mitch Wallis and Jeff Kissubi as they came face-to-face with Dean Wells, Chris Katelaris and Clayton Harrop, three men who regularly go viral with their outspoken views on women and relationships. SBS stressed the views discussed are not their own, and said the episode was aimed at bringing each of the men together to 'challenge each other's ideas in one room'. Topics posed on the show included, 'having lots of sexual partners is tied to your status as a man', 'men are wired to be more aggressive' and 'men have a responsibility to step up and stop domestic violence'. Anger at views on female 'body count' But some viewers, and the advocates who took part, have condemned what they believe were the 'disgusting' and 'harmful' opinions about women that aired. One particular view that garnered huge criticism came from hypnotherapist and performance coach Clayton Harrop, who discussed at length his views on sexual 'purity', a notion he said comes from his religious beliefs. 'I don't like the idea of a super high body count in women if I am completely honest,' he said. 'I personally believe that the lower a woman's body count, the better for her, and her future partner. 'I've slept with my share of women and had a great connection, and I don't look at a woman any less because of it, but if it's going to be the mother of my children, and she's going to be a representation of me, I don't want 20 other men able to say, 'Yeah I have been with her bro'. It's a chink in the armour that directly affects every other area of our life.' By his own admission, Mr Harrop – who boasts online that he 'helps men save their marriages' – described his views 'hypocritical', largely because he encourages men to 'go sleep with heaps of women'. While Dean Wells, a former reality star described as 'an unapologetically proud alpha male' during his stint on MAFS in 2018, agreed with the idea that women are more valuable when their sexual history isn't as extensive as a man's. 'I am not going to try and break it down on an intellectual level, but I just find a chick that has been with way too many guys, unattractive,' he said. He also claimed during the show that, 'we need to pull back on this over feminisation of men, this massive idea that all men just need therapy'. Advocates clap back at 'toxic' show Mr Chawla, an anti-violence campaigner whose 23-year-old sister Nikita was horrifically murdered by her husband in a jealous rage in 2015, said his biggest concern was that the conservative voices involved were self-described mentors. 'The space of online coaches, podcasters and men's health advocates has an underbelly that often blames women or says controversial things for clout,' he told 'I didn't go on the panel to debate for entertainment. I went to discuss the realities of masculinity and because my sister, Nikita, was murdered by her partner, and too many men still don't take that seriously. 'If even one man who watched starts to question the culture we've built, then it was worth it for me to be there despite the personal cost.' He also pointed out that while 'some of the views aired reflect deeply entrenched misogyny and male entitlement' that he praised SBS for fact-checking various claims throughout the segment. 'I do think it was important that SBS included fact-checking and context, so viewers could make up their own minds,' he added. 'And we can't pretend these views aren't out there, they're all over TikTok and in group chats. The difference here is that they were challenged. I made sure not to let claims that harm women – or don't serve boys and men either – slide.' Mr Kissubi, an activist and media personality who uses his platform to amplify the voices of Black, Indigenous, and POC individuals, said he was 'uncomfortable' during filming and called out SBS for airing 'toxic' messaging. 'It did not feel like a debate, per se, but it was pretty much a discussion where we had people speaking over each other asserting their views,' he said in a video. 'A lot of the times we had men centring their individual experience, their privilege within the conversation, that centred them and it was a reflection of men within societies of Australia. 'We have to understand the harm around this, when we platform people that obviously hold views that are hurtful and toxic.' He further called out the show for putting him in a position where he had to 'defend outdated beliefs', describing the experience as 'confronting' and labelling the segment as a 'Temu Jubilee'. 'Gross' Australian TV show slammed Female advocate Mia Findlay blasted SBS and said it completely missed the mark and failed to host an effective conversation about men's violence and misogyny in Australia. 'What was this episode intending to achieve, other than virality, clicks and rage bait,' she asked on TikTok. 'It just underscores the continued lack of seriousness in having informed, effective conversations about men's violence and misogyny in this country.' She's not the only person who has spoken out against The Feed on social media, with many arguing it 'completely missed the mark'. 'I'm glad this debate happened bc it is undeniable evidence that it is in fact as bad as we thought,' one commented. 'It's no wonder men's violence against women is rampant. Men still talking about 'body count' as if that matters. It's so gross,' said another. There's no suggestion any of the panellists have ever personally engaged in any violence against women. One pointed out that when Mr Chawla discussed the violent crime committed against his sister, Chris Katelaris, a self-described mentor known as 'Australia's Controversial Coach' on social media, replied 'dismissively' with the 'not all men' argument. 'A lot of men don't want to speak up, because unfortunately, there is a side of women that have been so heavily hurt that all men are now targets,' Mr Katelaris claimed. 'In my opinion that creates a massive massive divide. Women that have been hurt need to understand that not all men are their perpetrators.' Others described the episode as a 'tough watch' and said many of the views shared were 'small minded'. Conservative influencers defend their views In response to the backlash, Mr Wells, Mr Katelaris and Mr Harrop have responded. Mr Harrop claimed he has been 'misrepresented' by the editing process, and said what was aired 'mischaracterises what I have said'. 'Just to be clear. I did not say it's OK for men to sleep around. Absolutely not true,' he said in a statement to 'I didn't say women need a low body count. I said for me personally, I want a low body count, I would not date a woman with a higher body count, as I have many times in the past, which I then went on to explain why, and my personal reasons why I wouldn't.' The online dating coach added that it is 'somewhat of a double standard' for a man to be 'actively be sleeping around, contributing to women's body count' whilst holding that standard for his future partner.' He added that a promo video for the show that garnered a lot of views on social media 'was a number of clipped words, stitched together without accurate context or representation', claiming he has raised this with SBS and it has since been removed from social media. While Mr Wells, said nothing he or any of the other 'conservative men' platformed on the show, was 'remotely close to 'inappropriate' or 'outdated'.' 'There is a massive trend towards traditional values especially amongst young people …,' he told 'Many intelligent people, both male and female, who used to be on the side of the woke, so-called 'progressive' ideologies, (myself included) have over time realised that this group is crazy, dangerous, and we don't buy into their lies anymore. 'Many people are moving back towards a modern take on common sense traditional values. If SBS and others want to be inclusive, they should include these types of trending diverse viewpoints.' Mr Katelaris said that the backlash was 'expected', claiming he 'didn't defend anyone unworthy of a platform'. 'The panel could have been picked better to allow for a more balanced, constructive discussion,' he told 'Yes, there are weak men who hurt women, but there are also strong men now standing up for women, and I've seen many of them attacked by the extreme side of feminism. That only creates more division.'


SBS Australia
01-08-2025
- Entertainment
- SBS Australia
Clayton wants a 'pure' woman to marry. He cares about 'body count'
The Feed's full debate on Masculinity can be streamed on YouTube. Clayton Harrop believes it's inherently manly to pursue — to chase, to improve, to gain experience. That drive, he says, once shaped his sex life too. But he also believes in purity. Not his own, though, but for his future wife. "I don't like the idea of a super high body count in women if I'm completely honest," Clayton, 29, told The Feed on a discussion panel about modern masculinity. "Yeah, that bothers me ... I want to be her first." Clayton admits it sounds 'hypocritical' because he's had "his share of women" but says sex is sacred — the "most intimate thing in the world" —and should be treated with reverence. A reverence, it seems, that flows one way. He doesn't regret his past partners and acknowledges the double standard, but doesn't walk it back. His sexual experience, he insists, made him better. "You're better at sex. You can better sleep with your partner and give more to her." It's a view that experts warn is often harmful to women - and also men. Street interviews won't stop asking about 'body count' Clayton isn't alone in his worldview. The idea of "body count", how many people someone has slept with, has become a go-to topic online. It's not a new obsession, but it's found a revival in street interviews, dating podcasts and social media debates. In them, a certain script often plays out: men "level up" through experience. Women, not so much. Too many and she's "easy" or "less desirable". Too few, she's a prude. Too much sex from anyone, and they're labelled not "relationship material." None, and there's something wrong with them. "I don't want 20 other men able to say: 'Yeah, I've been with her, bro,'" Clayton says. Despite the different expectations, he says it's not about judging women, but about what their sexual choices represent to him — values, restraint, "femininity". But it's misogyny, says Lauren Rosewarne, an associate professor at the University of Melbourne's School of Social and Political Sciences who researches gender, sexuality and feminism. "I have incredible concerns with women's value being connected to both their perceived 'f---ability' — the extent to which men want to have sex with her — as well as her worth being tied to how much sex she's had," she says. She sees it as a tool for policing women's behaviour, while allowing men to write the rules and excuse their own choices. To her, it reinforces a system where women are judged and men are given leeway under the guise of "preference" or principles. Jeff, a social advocate who has dated both men and women, sees the body count narrative as just another way to police women's behaviour. Men's coach Clayton Harrop (left), anti-violence advocate Tarang Chawla and social advocate and commentator Jeff Kissubi on The Feed's Masculinity debate. "I wouldn't care at all," he says. "If someone shares that with me, fine. If they don't, I still wouldn't care because I wouldn't base a relationship on how many people they've slept with. That mindset is odd to me. I think it stems from power and control." Pressure looks different for men and women Rosewarne says that double standard often overlaps with purity culture — a belief system rooted in faith that links sexual choices to moral values. She says it's important people can express their faith in ways that are meaningful to them. But historically, she says, purity culture has "disproportionately screwed over women". While both men and women face pressures around sex and desirability, Rosewarne says the consequences aren't the same. "There are still different penalties attached to acting on that if you're a woman." Since the 1970s, studies have consistently found that women with strong Christian beliefs that emphasise abstinence are more likely to experience sexual pain disorders, according to research published in Sociology of Religion. It positions women as responsible for tempting men, and burdens them with being the sexual gatekeepers. That's a lot to carry. Lauren Rosewarne, associate professor at the University of Melbourne's School of Social and Political Sciences Some women exposed to negative beliefs about sex during childhood reported feeling more fear, pain and disgust during sex. "It disadvantages women and constrains their behaviour in ways it doesn't for men," Rosewarne says. "It positions women as responsible for tempting men, and burdens them with being the sexual gatekeepers. That's a lot to carry." Clayton isn't alone in his worldview, with the conversation gaining attention online. Source: Supplied She also notes that men face their own set of expectations, measured by different metrics, but restrictive in their own way. "I have concerns about men's value being connected to their perceived worth. That worth might be tied to resources, which it historically has been, but also to how much in demand they're seen to be." Assumptions made based on numbers Dr Millicent Churcher, a lecturer in philosophy at Australian Catholic University whose research focuses on sexual ethics, says people often treat "body count" like it's some kind of perfect metric, as if there's a magic number that means someone's "good in bed". But in reality, research shows the biggest predictors of sexual wellbeing are communication and trust and being on the same page. The pressure on men to 'perform' sexually, or appear to, is real. About 47 per cent of young Australian men said they felt pressure to live up to the idea that a "real man" should have as many sexual partners as possible, according to The Man Box 2024 report from Jesuit Social Services. About 56 per cent believed there's an expectation that a "real man" would never say no to sex. But around half said they didn't personally feel these pressures, highlighting a gap between social expectations and individual beliefs. "Body count, what does it really tell you?" Churcher says. "I don't see it as necessarily mapping onto sexual desire or to sexual skill or expertise." "You might assume someone with a high body count has a high sex drive or is really experienced. That may not be true."

SBS Australia
11-07-2025
- SBS Australia
Blood, rats, self-harm: The disturbing truth about police cells where children are held
This article contains distressing content. Tiny, windowless cells with no access to fresh air, or open-air cells infested with rats and insects. Exposure to blood, other bodily fluids and faeces. Fluorescent lights kept on 24/7, making it difficult to sleep. There are sometimes no doors on the showers or toilets, so female prisoners are exposed to male prisoners, while girls are exposed to adult prisoners or boys. The conditions are so poor that some prisoners deliberately injure themselves to be transferred to hospital. There have long been human rights concerns surrounding Queensland's police watch houses, where children are held indefinitely. Source: Supplied / Queensland Police Union These are some of the conditions many detainees — including children — are facing in Queensland's police watch houses, a damning review has revealed . Watch houses are police holding cells — they're designed for adults, but in Queensland, children as young as 11 are also held here indefinitely, while awaiting trial or transfer to a youth detention centre. The internal review into the state's watch house system was launched by the Queensland Police Service (QPS) last August, following an increase in complaints. It also came after media reports of human rights concerns, including a joint investigation by The Feed and Guardian Australia which showed — for the first time — footage of children being locked inside isolation cells, allegedly for punishment. The review has highlighted issues that have been overlooked for years, facilities crumbling into disrepair, ill-equipped staff and an environment that is "unsafe for minors". "Watch-houses are not equipped to provide the space, privacy, natural light or support needed for children's physical and psychological well-being," the report said. "This can result in heightened anxiety, distress and an increased risk of self-harm." Children locked up for weeks There are 63 watch houses in Queensland — in 2024, more than 78,000 prisoners passed through them. Watch houses are not designed to hold people for more than 72 hours — however, children are sometimes held there for weeks on end. The review found children who were remanded or sentenced spent an average of 161 hours (over 6 days) in the watch house — and stays of more than 14 days were not uncommon. "The Review found that longer prisoner stays in watch-houses can lead to increased rates of non-compliance by prisoners and increase in self-harm events," the report said. A perfect storm of factors has led to children being locked up for longer — including a lack of beds in the overflowing youth detention centres, under-resourced courts, Queensland's strict bail laws and a crackdown on youth crime. For years, human rights groups have called for the release of children from watch houses, while oversight bodies have criticised the long-term detainment of children. Debbie Kilroy is the chief executive of Sisters Inside, an advocacy group for women and girls in prison. "Queensland's watch houses are dangerous, degrading, and unfit for any human being, let alone children," Kilroy said. "Right now, even as this report is being circulated, children are sitting in concrete boxes under fluorescent lights, with no schooling, no privacy, and no access to fresh air. This is not a question of capacity—it is a question of cruelty. "We must divest from police. We must shut down watch houses. And we must get our girls out." Vulnerable groups at risk While the review stressed "watch-houses are not suitable places for vulnerable groups" – including women, girls and children – there was an increase in the length of stays for these groups between 2021 and 2024. People in watch houses have higher rates of health issues compared to the general population — including mental health concerns, suicidal ideation, disabilities and substance abuse. The review also acknowledged women and girls in custody are often survivors of domestic violence, sexual abuse and trauma. It said: "The watch-house environment is largely designed with adult men in mind, leaving female prisoners with insufficient access to gender-responsive healthcare services". Staff find it challenging to assess prisoners' health needs, and there are often no on-site health services available. There's been a rise in complaints about watch houses, including the behaviour of watch house staff. The review found a quarter of the allegations are related to assault or excessive use of force, with around one in four relating to child prisoners. However, it noted: "the vast majority of total complaints … were unsubstantiated". Government and police accept recommendations The watch house review has made 34 recommendations, including urging the Queensland government to consider a maximum length of stay for watch house prisoners. Other recommendations include enhancing bail processes to minimise the use of watch houses and revising the training of staff. Both the Queensland Police Service and Queensland government have accepted the recommendations. Police Minister Dan Purdie has announced $16 million in funding to upgrade watch house facilities. He also said the watch house has become a more dangerous place to work. "One in seven staff and police who work in watch houses [are] the victim of assault, which is greater than that on the front line," Purdie told reporters on Thursday. "We will work with the police methodically and diligently to ensure that we have a strategy moving forward to ensure our police have a safer place to work and the facilities they need, to do their job and keep Queenslanders and themselves safe." Police deputy commissioner of regional services, Cameron Harsley, acknowledged significant work needs to be done to overhaul the watch house system. "The watch house officers … are doing a tireless job in challenging situations with very difficult people that we manage in watch houses, but we do that to keep our community safe and keep those that are at most danger to our community off the streets of Queensland." Readers seeking crisis support can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14, the Suicide Call Back Service on 1300 659 467 and Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800 (for young people aged up to 25). More information and support with mental health is available at and on 1300 22 4636. If you or someone you know is experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, domestic, family or sexual violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit If you or someone you know is feeling worried or unwell, we encourage you to call 13YARN on 13 92 76 and talk with an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Crisis Supporter. Aboriginal Counselling Services can be contacted on (02) 4707 7989.


Economic Times
10-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Economic Times
July 11, 2025: Love Horoscope for All Zodiac Signs — Find Out How Capricorn Moon and Taurus Venus Influence Your Romantic Future
Synopsis Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025: Venus is in the Taurus sign, the Moon will transit into the Capricorn sign, and Mars is still in the Leo sign. Today brings a passionate yet pragmatic energy to love. Your emotions may be expressed with calm determination. Your romantic pursuits will benefit from patience and purpose. You can have strong desires, but also the need to align those desires with long-term values. The Feed Love Horoscope Today, 10th July 2025, Daily Love Predictions for All Zodiac Signs: Capricorn, Taurus, Leo, and Scorpio can be lucky today Love Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025: The transits today blend fire and earth elements. You need to balance impulsive romance with mature emotional expression. Venus in the Taurus sign continues to offer sensual pleasure. The Moon's transit into the Capricorn sign asks you to focus more on relationships. Meanwhile, Mars in the Leo sign ignites passion and romantic daring. ARIES Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:The Moon's transit into the Capricorn sign urges you to approach your relationship goals seriously. Mars in the Leo sign makes it hard to resist grand romantic gestures. Venus in the Taurus sign adds sensual depth to your interactions. It asks you to value substance over Love Horoscope Today suggests focusing on consistency rather than impulsivity. Your fiery nature is drawn to action. Having a grounded approach will yield better results when planning for long-term Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Venus is now comfortably in your sign. Your charm is magnetic and sincere. The Moon in the Capricorn sign boosts your ability to communicate emotionally. Your communication would have both depth and clarity. Mars in the Leo sign adds spice, but you need to balance between home and Love Horoscope Today is ideal for deepening relationships. It can help in attracting someone whose values align with yours. Your sensual energy is high. You should take the lead with authenticity. GEMINI Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:The Sun and Jupiter in your sign bring you attention and energy. The Moon in the Capricorn sign slows down emotional expression. Venus in the Taurus sign encourages introspection. Mars in the Leo sign helps you articulate your needs more Love Horoscope Today indicates a need to reflect before reacting. You may have a desire for emotional security. Your usual instinct wants you to keep things light. Allow your heart to lead Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Mercury in your sign makes you eloquent in love. The Moon in your Seventh House, Capricorn, invites serious talks around commitment and trust. Venus in the Taurus sign stabilises your emotions. Mars in the Leo sign gives you the courage to be bold in expressing Love Horoscope Today helps you in blending sensitivity with strength. Whether you're partnered or single, you can have meaningful conversations. This can lead to romantic Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Mars in your sign keeps your passion levels high. The Moon in the Capricorn sign asks you to channel that energy responsibly. Venus in the Taurus sign grounds your desires. It can urge you to show affection through meaningful actions rather than just Love Horoscope Today reveals a strong potential for growth in relationships. You need to be both fiery and reliable. You can get more attention from others. You should use it Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:The Moon in the Capricorn sign supports your natural inclination toward emotional structure. Venus in the Taurus sign helps you express love in grounded and thoughtful ways. Mars in the Leo sign activates hidden desires but may also bring out old Love Horoscope Today invites you to blend inner reflection with outer action. You can reconnect with a partner. You can open your heart to someone who reflects your emotional Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Your ruler, Venus, is in the Taurus sign. This can bring focus to emotional bonds. The Moon in the Capricorn sign may make expressing those emotions tough. Mars in the Leo sign adds a spark in social settings. The day is good for romantic Love Horoscope Today urges you to balance your emotional sincerity with playfulness. Relationships thrive well when you match your charm with Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Venus is transiting from the Seventh House in the Taurus sign. This brings love into focus. It can urge you to compromise and value stability. The Moon in the Capricorn sign enhances communication and structure in relationships. Mars in the Leo sign intensifies your need for romantic Love Horoscope Today shows potential for lasting emotional breakthroughs. Your usual depth is well-matched by today's grounded energy. Use the day to heal, not just Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Mars in the Leo sign supports adventurous love. The Moon in the Capricorn sign encourages emotional responsibility. Venus in the Taurus sign enhances physical intimacy and comfort. This might lead to stronger romantic Love Horoscope Today asks you to embrace love without sacrificing excitement. If you are willing to slow down, romantic evolution is Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:The Moon is transiting from your sign. You may feel more emotionally aware than usual. Venus in the Taurus sign promotes loyalty and sensuality. It is an ideal day for romantic bonding. Mars in the Leo sign intensifies intimacy, urging you to be more Love Horoscope Today supports emotional openness. The transits today encourage you to soften your guard. Let love unfold through patience and Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Rahu in your sign keeps your energy evolving. The Moon in the Capricorn sign activates introspective feelings. Venus in the Taurus sign grounds your romantic desires. Mars in the Leo sign challenges you to connect more actively with your Love Horoscope Today encourages emotional honesty. This is not a time for superficial affection. You should seek connections that nurture your values and respect your Love & Relationship Horoscope Today – 11th July 2025:Saturn in your sign continues to guide your emotional growth. The Moon in the Capricorn sign stabilises your romantic outlook. Venus in the Taurus sign enhances your emotional generosity. Mars in the Leo sign motivates you to take brave action in Love Horoscope Today is good for meaningful romantic foundations. You need to clarify what you want or deepen what you have. Your sincerity and structure will bring you closer to lasting by: Anand Sagar Pathak of For feedback, write to hello@ read: Daily Horoscope, July 2025 Daily Numerology Horoscope, July 2025