Latest news with #TheGovernanceofChina
Associated Press
18-07-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
Global Times: Translators' Voices: Moral framing becomes a key lever of China's geo-economic influence
07/18/2025, Beijing, China // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire // 'Promoting sustainable development,' 'opposing unilateral trade measures,' and 'upholding multilateralism' have emerged as some of the key words at the just-concluded 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The international community closely watched the summit, viewing the expanded BRICS as gaining greater weight and influence, and believing that the enlarged grouping will be better positioned to uphold multilateralism and push for improving global governance. The world today is undergoing profound changes unseen in a century, presenting both opportunities and challenges for emerging markets and developing countries. In the article 'the Role of the BRICS in Building a Global Community of Shared Future' included in volume III of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, President Xi noted, 'We BRICS countries need to keep abreast of the historical trend, seize development opportunities, jointly meet challenges, and play a constructive role in building a new model of international relations and a global community of shared future.' In October 2024, at the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, President Xi delivered a speech, emphasizing 'It is for our shared pursuit and for the overarching trend of peace and development that we BRICS countries have come together.' 'The more tumultuous our times become, the more we must stand firm at the forefront, exhibiting tenacity, demonstrating the audacity to pioneer and displaying the wisdom to adapt. We must work together to build BRICS into a primary channel for strengthening solidarity and cooperation among Global South nations and a vanguard for advancing global governance reform.' In the eighth installment of the special series 'Decoding the Book of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China,' the Global Times, along with People's Daily Overseas Edition, explores the theme: 'Combining the great strength of the Global South to build together a community with a shared future for mankind.' We continue to invite Chinese and foreign scholars, translators of Xi's works, practitioners with firsthand experience, and international readers to discuss China's theoretical innovations and practical contributions within the BRICS framework and Global South cooperation, and to collectively answer the question of our times: 'How does the Chinese model and wisdom empower multilateralism, global governance and sci-tech and innovation cooperation among the Global South?' In the eighth article of the 'Translators' Voices' column, Global Times reporter Ma Tong interviews Olga Migunova, (Chinese name: Mu Fengling), Doctor of Philosophy, Russian Sinologist and translator, and vice chairperson of the St. Petersburg branch of the Russia-China Friendship Association. Migunova is one of the translators of the Russian edition of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China. GT: As a translator of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, which concepts related to Global South cooperation do you find most representative and how is China advancing them through specific policies? What impact do these efforts have on promoting fair development in other Global South countries? Migunova: In Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, President Xi elaborates on cooperation with the Global South through several key concepts, which fully reflect China's commitment to promoting a multipolar world, mutually beneficial development, and offering a development option and strategic direction distinct from Western hegemonic models, with these principles forming an important component of China's contemporary foreign policy. The concept that resonates with me most is the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. This concept is profoundly rich and difficult to summarize in just a few words, but I believe its core lies in rejecting the condescending, hegemonic approach and 'civilizational posturing' of the West. China emphasizes equal partnerships and mutually beneficial cooperation, advocating for joint development without imposing political conditions. This stands in stark contrast to Western practices that often tie economic aid to forced democratic reforms or arbitrarily interpreted human rights standards. Moreover, China consistently upholds the principle of mutual benefit and cooperation. This approach manifests in multiple ways – from boosting local economies through infrastructure development to creating complementary win-win synergies by pairing Chinese technology with Global South industries. The core philosophy moves beyond one-way assistance to shared growth, embodying the Chinese wisdom: 'Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.' Another key concept is the 'new type of international relations,' embodying China's vision for a multipolar world that prioritizes cooperation over confrontation. This principle guides China's foreign policy. President Xi has summarized the core principles of the new type of international relations as mutual respect, fairness and justice, and win-win cooperation. My understanding is that mutual respect entails respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political choices of all nations, regardless of their size or level of development – a stance fundamentally different from Western practices of imposing values through intervention in other countries' internal affairs. Fairness and justice mean rejecting hegemonism, unilateral sanctions, and double standards, while empowering developing nations to play a larger role in global governance through multilateral frameworks like the UN. Win-win cooperation moves beyond the zero-sum mindset, advancing a collaborative approach where all sides gain. This principle is embodied in initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the BRICS mechanism, which drive shared development through economic partnership. More importantly, the principles proposed by President Xi in the book are not just proclamation, but also serve as action guide. The new type of international relations is already being practiced through China's global partnerships with Russia, African nations, and Latin American countries, without falling into traditional military alliances. Through the Global Development Initiative, Global Security Initiative, and Global Civilization Initiative, China provides new platforms for global governance. By enhancing the influence of BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, China injects positive energy into improving global governance. GT: In his speech at the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia in October 2024, President Xi stated, 'As we Chinese often say, 'A man of virtue regards righteousness as the greatest interest.' It is for our shared pursuit and for the overarching trend of peace and development that we BRICS countries have come together.' How do you interpret this principle? In contrast to exclusive cliques led by certain nations, how does BRICS collaboration in economic, cultural and other domains exemplify this approach? Migunova: President Xi is well-versed in the essence of Chinese traditional culture, often citing ancient famous sayings that embody ancient wisdom. The principle of 'regarding righteousness as the greatest interest' signifies that China's foreign policy is not driven by short-term profit-seeking but is rooted in the millennia-old Confucian ideal of 'noble conduct.' This profound philosophy indicates that China's cooperation with BRICS countries is built on a solid moral foundation, differing from Western models not only in economic terms but also in worldview. In Chinese culture, the concept of 'righteousness' permeates all aspects. It underpins concepts such as mutual benefit and win-win cooperation, opposition to zero-sum games, not sacrificing other countries' security for one's own security, the vision of a community with a shared future for mankind, and the Chinese Dream. This moral framing has become a key lever of China's geo-economic influence. Within BRICS cooperation, China's emphasis on shared interests, common goals and peace and development embodies the principle of 'righteousness,' while the long-term win-win benefits gained from equitable partnerships embody the concept of 'interests.' BRICS collaboration vividly illustrates how righteousness and benefits can be harmoniously integrated. For instance, the New Development Bank provides infrastructure loans without political strings attached, reflecting fairness and mutual benefit. BRICS supports the export of competitive products like Brazilian soybeans and Indian rice, creating new avenues for mutual gains. Additionally, establishing dedicated scholarships to train African youth elites fosters long-term trust-building through talent development. GT: At the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan, President Xi said, 'We should build a BRICS committed to innovation, and we must all act as pioneers of high-quality development.' In recent years, China has proposed a series of initiatives to promote technological cooperation among Global South nations, such as China-BRICS Artificial Intelligence (AI) Development and Cooperation Center. How do you assess the role that China is playing in advancing innovation among BRICS countries? How does this contribute to economic transformation and sustainable development in the broader Global South? Migunova: China has played a vital strategic role for technological advancement within BRICS, driving cooperation, integration and development through multiple channels. As a key integrator of technology value chains, China actively promotes the construction of joint innovation infrastructure. Notable examples include initiatives proposed in 2025, such as the BRICS+ Alliance of Science and Technology Innovation platform, which have gained support and aim to integrate member states' resources, conduct joint R&D, and establish laboratories. China is a global leader in renewable energy, smart grid systems, and energy storage technologies, providing strong support for BRICS' technological advancement. A prime example is the climate-monitoring satellite program jointly developed with Brazil, which demonstrates China's firm commitment to sustainable development and technological sovereignty. China also prioritizes youth engagement in innovation, facilitating in-depth exchanges in cutting-edge fields like artificial intelligence, digital transformation, and smart agriculture through platforms such as the BRICS Youth Innovation Summit. These initiatives enhance knowledge sharing and help cultivate high-caliber international youth innovation teams to jointly address global challenges. Unlike some nations that focus on financial speculation, China champions a real economy and innovation-driven growth model, strengthening its economic and technological sovereignty to navigate complex geopolitical challenges. This development path aligns with the strategic demand of BRICS countries, laying the solid material foundation for a multipolar world. Through open and inclusive tech collaboration, China has emerged as the key coordinator of BRICS innovation, accelerating the Global South's leapfrog progress in critical technologies. As the BRICS+ mechanism expands, China actively facilitates new members' integration, boosting the bloc's collective technological capacity. By linking innovation with global market needs, China helps BRICS countries gradually evolve into global innovation hubs—through resource sharing, infrastructure development, and a sustainable development model supported by the real economy. This offers the world a compelling alternative to Western-centric development models. GT: President Xi stated, 'In the face of new opportunities brought by new science and technology, every country has an equal right to development.' He stressed at the national science and technology conference in June 2024 that 'it is essential to materialize the idea of building a community of shared future for humanity to promote open cooperation in science and technology.' In your view, what are the potential areas for technological cooperation between China and the Global South? What makes China's open cooperation model attractive to Global South countries? Migunova: The science and technology partnership between China and Global South nations holds immense potential, particularly in strategic fields that address development priorities and overcome Western technological barriers. AI is a critical direction for cooperation. Through platforms like the China-BRICS Artificial Intelligence Development and Cooperation Center, China provides comprehensive support to Global South partners, including open-source algorithms, cloud computing services, and talent training, embodying the principle of 'teaching a man to fish.' Digital platform projects, such as digital corridors for trade and education, significantly enhance knowledge-sharing efficiency and logistical coordination, setting a new paradigm for South-South cooperation. At this year's BRICS Summit, how AI can better serve sustainable development was a key topic, with participating countries eager to jointly build a truly independent technological ecosystem. Undoubtedly, China's technological innovation strengths will make significant contributions to achieving this goal. Chinese companies are helping developing countries ride the wave of digitalization. Huawei and ZTE have assisted countries in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia in building 5G networks, with prospects for developing local digital ecosystems, such as smart cities in Nigeria and Indonesia. AI holds great promise for various applications, and Chinese technology is poised to make significant contributions in fields like agricultural algorithms, medical diagnostics, public health, and pharmaceuticals. China is driving South-South cooperation in transformative renewable energy, implementing solar, wind, hydropower and hydrogen projects in nations like Saudi Arabia, Brazil and South Africa. Similarly, in agriculture, China is helping Global South countries modernize their agricultural industry through its advanced farming, fishery and aquaculture technologies, and cooperation with countries such as Egypt and Vietnam has achieved noticeable outcomes. Beyond hardware provision, these partnerships focus on technology transfer, enabling nations to build indigenous capabilities through customized core technology solutions. What makes China's cooperation model uniquely attractive is its no-strings-attached approach. Institutions like the New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank provide accessible financing in developing countries. China also emphasizes local capacity-building—building factories, training workforces, and delivering complete operational solutions. This 'turnkey' approach effectively reduces partners' reliance on Western tech systems. Notably, China's technological cooperation is always aligned with societal needs, such as addressing hunger through digital agriculture or creating jobs through factory construction. This model enables Global South countries to safeguard sovereignty while quickly reaping the dual benefits of infrastructure and innovation. Amid global trade, technology, and political fragmentation, China contributes its wisdom and solutions to the development of the Global South. GT: The volume III of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China includes part of President Xi's speech at the BRICS Business Forum in 2018, in which he states, 'It is necessary to promote international development cooperation, urge developed countries to fulfill their promises on official development assistance and increase support to developing countries.' How do you evaluate China's role in promoting a just and equitable global governance system? What pathways can the Global South consider in building a more inclusive and sustainable multilateral framework? Migunova: China plays a unique and pivotal role in promoting global development exchanges, reflected both in pioneering cooperative initiatives and in concrete practical explorations. As a core driving force in the transformation and development of BRICS nations, the country has creatively built a bridge connecting developed and developing countries. China has championed global development on the G20 platform, with a focus on the Global South, to improve global governance and collaborate with developing nations in achieving modernization. The BRI exemplifies this approach, offering accessible financing that enables African and Latin American nations to participate more fully in global economic systems. China's investments in transportation and energy projects foster sustainable, locally-driven development. At the financial architecture level, China is reshaping global governance structures. In 2024, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank approved $8.4 billion in financing for 51 projects, primarily benefiting developing countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Its practices are breaking the Western-dominated financial governance model, advancing the international order toward multipolarity. In this context, Global South countries should take a more proactive role, sharing agricultural, technological, and medical solutions through multilateral platforms like the UN. The 2025 BRICS Summit proposed opposing unilateral protectionist measures and upholding multilateralism, amplifying the Global South's voice in global governance. However, the Global South's influence in international institutions remains limited. In 2024, BRICS countries accounted for over 40 percent of global GDP, yet their representation in the International Monetary Fund and World Bank does not match their economic contributions. Recent developments like the African Union's inclusion in the G20 in 2023 and the 2025 Global South Financiers Forum's call for a fairer global governance system signals a trend toward multipolarity. President Xi's vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind advocates addressing challenges like climate change, pandemics, and inequality through dialogue and respect for sovereignty, resonating deeply with the Global South. By opposing unilateral sanctions and tariff wars and promoting cultural and knowledge exchanges, China is driving global governance toward greater fairness. Its new cooperation model, based on mutual respect and win-win outcomes, offers developing countries an alternative to the unipolar system. Source: Global Times:
Associated Press
04-06-2025
- Politics
- Associated Press
Global Times: Readers' Reflections: China is reshaping the global innovation landscape, says Italian scholar
06/04/2025, Beijing, China // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire // May 30, 2025 marks the ninth National Science and Technology Workers Day. In the early morning of the previous day, Tianwen-2, the country's first asteroid probe and sampling mission, soared into the sky, carrying with it humanity's aspirations for the stars and the universe. The nation will thrive when science and technology develops, and the country will be strong when science and technology becomes advanced. The book series of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China contains multiple important speeches on science and technology. In the article 'Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology' included in the fourth volume of the book series, President Xi emphasized that science and technology respond to the call of the times and have a global impact; they belong to all of humanity. 'We should participate to the full in global science and technology governance, contribute Chinese wisdom, and shape a philosophy of technology for good purposes, so that science and technology better serve human wellbeing, and enable China's science and technology industry to contribute more to building a global community of shared future!' In the fifth installment of the 'Decoding the Book of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China " series, the Global Times, along with People's Daily Overseas Edition, focuses on the theme of 'practicing the philosophy of technology for good purposes and polishing China's new name card in scientific and technological innovation.' We continue to invite Chinese and international scholars, translators of the work, practitioners of its concepts, and overseas readers to share their insights, understandings and reflection on China's philosophy of science and technology development and international cooperation. In the fifth article of the 'Readers' Reflections' column, Global Times (GT) reporter Ma Tong talked to Fabio Massimo Parenti (Parenti), an Associate Professor of International Political Economy at the China Foreign Affairs University, and a scholar of international studies at the Italian International Institute Lorenzo de' Medici. GT: The world today is undergoing major changes unseen in a century. China is promoting cooperation with Global South countries through concrete plans and pragmatic measures, particularly in areas such as technology transfer, digital infrastructure building and patent sharing. In his speech at a national science and technology conference on June 24, 2024, Chinese President Xi Jinping emphasized to be 'open to cooperation in science and technology for the benefit of mankind and pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up.' How do you assess the outcomes of China-Global South tech cooperation in recent years? Compared to traditional cooperation models dominated by developed countries, how do you see China's approach? Parenti: South-South technological cooperation has grown significantly over the past decade, becoming one of the central pillars of Beijing's foreign policy. Unlike the traditional Western-led development models, China's approach is pragmatic, prioritizing mutual benefit and non-interference. The latter has delivered tangible outcomes, especially in technology transfer and digital development, aligning with President Xi's governance philosophy that 'science and technology respond to the call of the times and have a global impact; they belong to all of humanity.' In agricultural cooperation, China has established over 20 agricultural technology demonstration centers in Africa, contributing to global food security. Through the Digital Silk Road initiative, China has helped build fiber-optic networks, data centers, and e-government platforms in many of these nations. An iconic example is China's partnership with Ethiopia, particularly in the telecommunications and agriculture sectors. In 2021, Chinese companies, represented by Huawei, played a key role in expanding Ethiopia's telecom infrastructure, providing low-cost mobile internet to rural areas and improving access to digital services. Chinese experts introduced hybrid rice strains and drip irrigation techniques, advancing local agricultural development. China's approach stands out from traditional Western models of international cooperation due to its focus on reciprocity, long-term infrastructure investment, and the lack of political strings attached. GT: In the article 'Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology' from the fourth volume of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China , President Xi emphasizes that 'major science and technology programs should focus on solving the most pressing problems.' In cooperation with Global South countries, China adheres to a people-centered and demand-driven approach, prioritizing long-term investment and capacity building. How do you assess China's contributions in this area? What impact do they have on technological and economic development in Global South countries? Parenti: China's mutually beneficial technology cooperation with Global South countries has made meaningful contributions to enhancing these nations' independent development capabilities. China-promoted training programs in fields such as agriculture, ICT, public health, and engineering are involving thousands of technical personnel from Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. For instance, nations like Kenya, Egypt and Pakistan host joint laboratories or research centers co-funded by Chinese institutions. Similar efforts are evident in educational initiatives under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and BRICS frameworks. President Xi stressed that 'major science and technology programs should focus on solving the most pressing problems.' This philosophy has driven Chinese programs tailored to address desertification in North Africa through solar-powered water pumps and drip irrigation, tackle public health crises via China-supported vaccine production facilities in Indonesia, Egypt, and Brazil, and advance e-commerce and fintech through Alipay-backed mobile payment pilots in rural Africa. Beyond exporting hardware, China is actively promoting the joint construction of innovation ecosystems, such as establishing technology parks like the China-Brazil Agricultural Science Industrial Park, and promoting Satellite and Space Cooperation, providing critical data and services for agriculture, disaster response, and climate monitoring. Joint bilateral projects in green energy, AI, and aerospace, such as China's satellite launches with countries like Nigeria, Pakistan, and Venezuela, are creating numerous opportunities to strengthen these countries' capacities for national independence and autonomous development. The satellite launch cooperation between China and countries such as Nigeria, Pakistan and Venezuela is a typical example of such collaborative efforts. These initiatives are reshaping the autonomy of many Global South nations by providing a partnership model that is not paternalistic and effectively supporting these nations in achieving autonomous and sustainable development. GT: In the article 'Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology,' President Xi also calls to 'participate to the full in global science and technology governance, contribute Chinese wisdom, and shape a philosophy of technology for good purposes, so that science and technology better serve human wellbeing, and enable China's science and technology industry to contribute more to building a global community of shared future.' Taking the global green transition as an example, how do you evaluate China's technological advancements and industrial progress in new energy? What positive impacts will these have on addressing global climate change, particularly in helping Global South countries tackle energy challenges? Parenti: China's technological and industrial leap in new energy sector is a unique story of the 21st century. In a video address at the opening ceremony of the celebration for the 60th anniversary of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in 2024, President Xi said that 'all sides need to harness the historic opportunity for innovation-driven development. It is important to build an open, inclusive and non-discriminatory environment for the digital economy, follow the people-centered, AI-for-good principle and strengthen AI-related rules and governance within the framework of the United Nations, actively advance green transition, and help developing countries join the trend of digital, smart and green development.' This vision offers 'Chinese solutions' that aim to be inclusive, innovation-driven, and sustainable. The new energy sector serves as a compelling and practical example of this strategic vision in practice. China has become the world's largest producer of solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicles (EVs), and a dominant supplier of lithium-ion batteries. In 2024, the country installed more renewable energy capacity than the rest of the world combined – a feat driven by the research and development efforts of Chinese firms underpinned by national strategies and policy incentives. One illustrative case is the State Grid Corporation of China, which is advancing ultra-high-voltage transmission systems to enable the long-distance delivery of clean energy. The affordability of Chinese-made solar panels has also made large-scale solar farms viable in countries ranging from Kenya and Brazil to Pakistan. Beyond exports, China supports local assembly and manufacturing of EVs, batteries, and solar components in partner countries, with technology transfer often embedded in infrastructure agreements to foster local industrial ecosystems. In his special address to the 2022 World Economic Forum virtual session, President Xi called to 'uphold the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, promote international cooperation on climate change in the context of development, and implement the outcomes of COP26 to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.' China is actively shaping the rules and standards of the new energy market through multilateral frameworks such as the UN, the G77 and BRICS. Under initiatives like the BRI, it offers shared infrastructure development to Global South nations without imposing political conditions. GT: In the article 'Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology', President Xi noted that 'science and technology respond to the call of the times and have a global impact; they belong to all of humanity.' China is leading initiatives such as the Initiative on International Cooperation in Open Science, co-launched with Brazil, South Africa, and the African Union, to promote global technology and innovation cooperation. In the context of key technologies being long monopolized by a few countries, how will these initiatives within the Global South shape the global landscape of technological innovation? Parenti: China's push for open science cooperation through initiatives like the Initiative on International Cooperation in Open Science reflects a broader effort to reshape the global innovation landscape. Central to this initiative is a principle repeatedly underscored by the Chinese leadership that science and technology belong to all of humanity. This paradigm challenges the current high-tech landscape dominated by a handful of countries and major tech corporations. If successful, these South-South cooperation mechanisms could help foster a more multipolar, inclusive, and resilient global technology governance order. China-led South-South science and tech cooperation seeks breakthroughs along three key pathways: establishing knowledge-sharing mechanisms to dismantle structural barriers to technology access; setting up regional innovation hubs across Africa, Asia, and Latin America; and advancing joint research and development projects to replace traditional top-down aid models. A notable example is China's collaboration with Brazil in establishing a joint laboratory for agricultural science and with South Africa in establishing a genomics center, enabling local institutions to jointly participate in the development of tailored solutions. This model of equal and mutually beneficial cooperation demonstrates that true technological self-reliance can only be achieved by fostering indigenous innovation within a fair and inclusive international research environment. By promoting openness and sharing scientific resources, China is not only contributing 'Chinese wisdom' to the world, but also taking meaningful steps toward reshaping a more balanced and equitable global governance system for science and technology. GT: This year marks 70 years since the Bandung Conference, which kick-started South-South cooperation by uniting nations to promote solidarity and respect for sovereignty. Today, however, global issues like a slow economic recovery, shifting supply chains, and the climate crisis are posing new challenges. How are these issues playing out in real-world terms? How do see the potentials for cooperation between the Global South and developed nations? And what particular role can China play in fostering this cooperation and building a shared global future? Parenti: The 70th anniversary of the Bandung Conference is more than just symbolic. The Bandung Spirit – with its call for solidarity, friendship, and cooperation—still resonate today. Yet, modern challenges call for fresh approaches to coordination, not just within the Global South but also between the South and the North. Issues like crippling foreign debt, the digital divide, and uneven development are global problems that erode international solidarity, as nations increasingly retreat into inward-looking policies under domestic pressures. More alarmingly, the West's 'de-risking' strategy toward China is fracturing global trade and investment systems. All of this heightens the risk of a new techno-economic divide, particularly in sectors such as electric vehicles, semiconductors, and biotechnology. To overcome the current impasse, pragmatic cooperation among nations is essential. What's required is a reform of multilateral institutions such as the G20, IMF, and WTO, so they can truly reflect today's global realities, amplify the voice of developing countries, and advance the democratization of international relations. China is uniquely positioned to serve as a bridge in this process. As a technological and industrial powerhouse emerging from the Global South, China understands the developmental needs of the South while possessing the capacity to engage deeply with developed countries' systems. The way forward lies in fostering complementarity between the Western-dominant traditional international institutions and the newer initiatives led by China. Together, they can help build a non-hegemonic model of development cooperation grounded in mutual benefit, respect for sovereignty, and non-interference. This approach is not about confronting the West, but about offering an alternative model of governance – one that opens up new possibilities for shaping a more inclusive global development narrative. This story first appeared in Global Times: Company: Global Times Contact Person: Anna Li Email: [email protected] Website: City: Beijing Disclaimer: This press release may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies (including product offerings, regulatory plans and business plans) and may change without notice. You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. This content was first published by KISS PR Brand Story. Read here >> Global Times: Readers' Reflections: China is reshaping the global innovation landscape, says Italian scholar
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Scholars' Perspectives: 'For good purposes' serves as the greatest common denominator of global technology development, says member of UN advisory body on AI
BEIJING, June 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- May 30, 2025 marks the ninth National Science and Technology Workers Day. In the early morning of the previous day, Tianwen-2, the country's first asteroid probe and sampling mission, soared into the sky, carrying with it humanity's aspirations for the stars and the universe. The nation will thrive when science and technology develops, and the country will be strong when science and technology becomes advanced. The book series of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China contains multiple important speeches on science and technology. In the article "Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology" included in the fourth volume of the book series, President Xi emphasized that science and technology respond to the call of the times and have a global impact; they belong to all of humanity. "We should participate to the full in global science and technology governance, contribute Chinese wisdom, and shape a philosophy of technology for good purposes, so that science and technology better serve human wellbeing, and enable China's science and technology industry to contribute more to building a global community of shared future!" In the fifth installment of the "Decoding the Book of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China" series, the Global Times, along with People's Daily Overseas Edition, focuses on the theme of "practicing the philosophy of technology for good purposes and polishing China's new name card in scientific and technological innovation." We continue to invite Chinese and international scholars, translators of the work, practitioners of its concepts, and overseas readers to share their insights, understandings and reflection on China's philosophy of science and technology development and international cooperation. In the fourth article of the "Scholars' Perspectives" column, which comprises interviews with and signed articles from renowned scholars across various countries, Global Times (GT) reporter Liu Caiyu and Chen Qingqing talked to Zhang Linghan, a professor from China University of Political Science and Law who is also a member of the UN High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence. Global Times: Addressing a meeting conflating the general assemblies of the members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering, and the national congress of the China Association for Science and Technology on May 28, 2021, Chinese President Xi Jinping said "We should participate to the full in global science and technology governance, contribute Chinese wisdom, and shape a philosophy of technology for good purposes, so that science and technology better serve human wellbeing, and enable China's science and technology industry to contribute more to building a global community of shared future." Today, as human beings step into the AI era, how do you interpret the concept of "technology for good purposes" that the Chinese leader has mentioned? How can we practice this concept? Zhang Linghan: China's concept of "technology for good purposes" can be understood from three perspectives. First is the positive development of technology itself. For example, the development of artificial intelligence technology in China has always adhered to the principles of "people-centered" and "intelligence for good," emphasizing that technology is a tool for serving humanity. Its development must align with the overall interests of humanity, ethical norms, and long-term well-being, highlighting the importance of "safety, reliability, and controllability" in the research, development, and application of AI technology. On AI products and services, China has very strict corporate compliance standards, requiring companies to take on social responsibilities alongside their responsibilities for technology research, development, and application. Secondly, empowering social development toward goodness through technology. For example, the widespread application of generative AI will liberate humanity from mechanical and repetitive labor, enabling people to engage in more creative and innovative work. In the field of public services, after the open-source release of large language models like DeepSeek, various platforms are integrating these technologies, which will promote the development of public services such as healthcare and education toward a more inclusive direction. Thirdly, promoting the construction of a "community with a shared future for mankind" through the concept of "technology for good purposes." The ideas of "technology for good purposes" and "community with a shared future for mankind" are rooted in the traditional culture of China and the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics. They emphasize that the ultimate goal of technological development is to serve sustainable development and the common good of all humanity. The term "common good" takes into account the different values and practical needs of various countries. Therefore, in a world full of uncertainties, "for good purposes" serves as the greatest common denominator that transcends differences and fosters consensus. China's commitment to "for good purposes" is "people-centered," insisting that AI be treated as a public product that serves all humanity. China not only hopes to enhance its national strength and improve the living standards of its people through AI but also aims to strengthen international cooperation and exchanges in the field of technology, achieving the open sharing of technological development outcomes on a global scale. In practice, it can be seen that China, as a responsible major country, has actively taken on the responsibility of helping developing countries strengthen their artificial intelligence capacity building, contributing Chinese strength to bridging the global digital divide. Global Times: On the afternoon of April 25, 2025, the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee held its 20th group study session, which focused on strengthening the development and regulation of artificial intelligence (AI). While presiding over the session, Xi Jinping, general secretary of the CPC Central Committee, said in the face of the rapid evolution of new-generation AI technologies, China must fully leverage the strengths of the new system for mobilizing the resources nationwide, achieve self-reliance and strength in this regard, and prioritize practical application so as to promote the healthy and orderly development of AI in the country in a beneficial, safe and fair manner. In your opinion, how does China's new system for mobilizing the resources nationwide help our country achieve self-reliance and self-strengthening in science and technology? With this system, what advantages does China have in AI technology? Zhang Linghan: In recent years, the advantages of China's new system for mobilizing the resources nationwide have become quite evident. Essentially, AI is a resource-intensive industry that requires vast amounts of data, complex algorithms, and powerful computing capabilities. Achieving self-reliance in AI not only requires advanced technologies but also sufficient resource investment and energy security. This places high demands on technology, funding, human resources, and energy, thereby highlighting the significant institutional advantages of the new type of national system in terms of its overall coordination, prudence, and foundational nature. In promoting technological breakthroughs, the government can start from the overall national interest and systematically plan the path for technological innovation. This approach can overcome the short-term behaviors of the market in fundamental and cutting-edge technology fields, allowing for the concentration of human, financial, and material resources to rapidly and efficiently advance the research and development of core technologies. It helps to avoid resource dispersion and redundant waste, especially for high-difficulty, high-investment, and strategic projects, such as the BeiDou Navigation System and the Chang'e lunar exploration program, which both fall into this category. In terms of promoting industrial development, taking electric power resources as an example, the development of AI, which includes data storage and processing, algorithm operation, and model training, relies heavily on power support. China has built a globally leading green power infrastructure system. In 2023, China's total electricity generation ranked first in the world, and it has maintained stable growth in 2024. This provides a solid and environmentally friendly foundation for the development of the AI industry. In terms of enhancing security guarantees, China emphasizes achieving a "strategic balance" between development and governance. To adapt to the uncertainties brought about by the rapid development of the AI industry, we have introduced an "adaptive governance" concept that combines flexibility and foresight, ultimately aiming for a situation where the technology development is both healthy, safe and reliable. Global Times: Let's talk about how China can engage more deeply in global science and technology governance. As a member of the UN High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, how would you assess China's current level of participation in global tech governance based on your experience? What are the bottlenecks? Could you share some insights from your own experience? Zhang Linghan: In my personal view, China is already firmly in the top tier of global science and technology governance, especially in the field of AI. From groundbreaking technological advances like DeepSeek that have captured global attention, to the widespread application of AI across industries, and active participation in shaping international norms on multilateral platforms such as the UN, China is deeply engaged and making significant contributions. In many areas, its role has become increasingly indispensable. The UN High-Level Advisory Body on AI is composed of 39 experts in the AI field from 33 countries and a wide range of industries. Since its establishment, we have held over 100 online meetings and three in-person sessions. Within the UN system, many other international organizations—such as UNESCO, the International Telecommunication Union, and the World Intellectual Property Organization—are also engaged in specialized aspects of AI governance. Through my participation in these international governance efforts, I've clearly felt that the perspectives and proposals from Chinese experts are increasingly being heard and valued. It is no exaggeration to say that China's governance practices and experiences are continuously contributing innovative ideas and valuable insights to the development of a global AI governance framework. For example, when discussing how to balance AI development with safety and how to build an adaptive governance framework, we shared governance approaches based on China's experience—such as the "small, fast, and flexible" legislative model—which drew considerable interest and discussion among international experts. This model, explored in recent years in China, is characterized by "small scope, fast cycle, and flexible format," aiming to precisely address real-world problems. Some Global South countries, during their own legislative processes, sought guidance and advice from Chinese experts through the UN and other international organizations. All of this highlights China's growing engagement and contribution to the global AI governance agenda. Behind the growing global attention lies China's advanced governance practices and systematic experience accumulated over time in AI governance field. It is fair to say that it is the result of strategic national planning, sustained investment, and active exploration that has enabled us not only to speak with professional confidence in multilateral and bilateral dialogues, but also to expand our space for expressing views and participating in global discussions. In September 2024, world leaders adopted the Pact for the Future at the Summit of the Future, with several sections on AI governance incorporating recommendations from the UN High-Level Advisory Body. Being able to participate in such a major global governance agenda as a Chinese expert brings me a profound sense of responsibility and mission. If we are to discuss the challenges, it must be acknowledged that the current global AI governance landscape remains noticeably fragmented. Countries differ significantly in their governance philosophies, regulatory approaches, and institutional designs. In light of this, greater attention should be given to the positive momentum of "seeking common ground while reserving differences" in global AI governance practices. A particularly illustrative example is China's pioneering establishment of an AI labeling system, which has since been referenced and adopted by a growing number of legislative efforts in the US, the EU, and beyond—becoming an increasingly important component in the global governance toolbox. Overall, global AI governance remains in a crucial window of opportunity. The initiatives proposed by China not only reflect the country's distinctive governance philosophy developed through its own AI practices, but also directly address the shared concerns and practical needs of the international community—particularly those of developing countries. China's proactive role in advancing global AI governance is helping to shape a governance architecture that is more balanced, inclusive, and beneficial for all. This, in turn, serves as a vivid example of China's growing engagement in global science and technology governance, and its contribution of Chinese solutions and wisdom to the world. Global Times: In recent years, accelerated technological iteration and increasing geopolitical tensions have become defining trends in the global tech landscape. On one hand, the pace of innovation is quickening, and technology is playing an increasingly pivotal role in societal transformation. On the other hand, under the influence of great-power competition and other factors, global technological development is exhibiting signs of de-globalization and fragmentation. China's rise in science and technology has faced well-known "chokepoint" challenges. What should China do in response? Against this backdrop, how should we understand President Xi's call for "China's science and technology to make greater contributions to building a community with a shared future for humanity." Zhang Linghan: Science and technology respond to the call of the times and have a global impact; they belong to all of humanity. President Xi proposed that China's science and technology should make greater contributions to building a community with a shared future for humanity. In its participation in global science and technology governance, China has consistently upheld the principles of multilateralism, openness and inclusiveness, and fairness and justice. China also looks forward to working with countries around the world to build consensus through equal dialogue and sincere consultation, and to foster mutual trust through pragmatic cooperation. In recent years, through extensive exchanges with Global South countries, I have increasingly felt their strong expectation for China to play a responsible role as a major power. These countries not only hope that China can assist them in developing AI technologies and applications to prevent the widening of the technological divide, but more importantly, they see in China's vision of a "community with a shared future for mankind" a future for AI that is truly open, secure, trustworthy, and beneficial to all of humanity. During the training programs I have participated in with officials and entrepreneurs from BRICS nations and Belt and Road partner countries, I often notice a surge of interest and engagement after introducing China's AI governance philosophy, core values, and successful experiences. Many of the participants are especially eager to learn from China's approach to AI governance, industrial development models, and digital infrastructure building, hoping to apply these experience to their own national development. It fills me with pride to see that China's ideas, systems, and development path are being increasingly recognized and welcomed by a growing number of countries. View original content: SOURCE Global Times Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25-03-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
The Hypocrisy of Zuckerberg and Meta's China Policy
Mark Zuckerberg's Meta (formerly Facebook) has positioned itself as a global tech giant with a mission to connect the world. Facebook was created in 2004 in a college dorm at Harvard University and now is used by approximately three billion monthly active users. It is an amazing company that has done much to share updates on life for individuals for both professional and recreational purposes. The revolutionary idea filled a need in our ever-expanding desire to consumer information and share updates on life with friends and family. However, one concern with the direction of the company's is rhetoric about China laced with hypocrisy. This is especially true as it relates to their lobbying and public relations campaign to ban one of its competitors while maintaining close ties with the Chinese government. From lobbying for a TikTok ban to facilitating content censorship of President Donald Trump, Meta's actions reveal a far more complex and concerning relationship with China than what Zuckerberg would have the world believe. Zuckerberg's overtures to China date back to 2014, when Zuckerberg actively courted the Chinese government by assembling a team to create a version of Facebook that could operate within the strict confines of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) regulations. This effort, code-named "Project Aldrin," sought to enable Meta's services to gain access to the Chinese market while appeasing the government's demands for censorship. In his pursuit of China's market, Zuckerberg was willing to compromise Meta's core principles. In 2014, Meta even drafted a letter offering the Chinese consulate in San Francisco the ability to "take down terrorist sites that are potentially dangerous for China," showcasing the company's willingness to work with the CCP to stifle dissent both inside and outside of China. In return for access to China's market, Zuckerberg's Meta was willing to give up privacy protections and allow the Chinese government access to data on its users, including those based in Hong Meta, Zuckerberg has his own personal relationship with China. In 2014, he wrote a blurb for Chinese President Xi Jinping's book The Governance of China. He even asked Xi to name his unborn child, a gesture that demonstrated his deep respect, or perhaps subjugation, to the Chinese leader. In Meta's transparency reports, the company admits to removing content at the request of the CCP. In 2017, Meta covertly launched social apps under a China-based company created by one of its employees, and even restricted the account of Guo Wengui, a Chinese billionaire and outspoken critic of the CCP, after receiving pressure from Chinese regulators. This selective censorship is not just about protecting Meta's interests; it signals a broader willingness to compromise its values to gain favor with a repressive regime. Meta's hypocrisy becomes even more apparent when compared to its stance on TikTok. Zuckerberg has consistently lobbied for the banning of the Chinese-owned social media app, claiming that TikTok poses a national security threat and that it should be banned in the United States. This stance is curious, given that Meta itself has deep ties to China. While Zuckerberg rallies against TikTok for its alleged ties to the Chinese government, he fails to acknowledge that his company operates under similar conditions. Meta built its AI programs with access to data and talent from China, and it continues to work closely with Chinese nationals in senior leadership roles. If TikTok poses a threat to the U.S. based on its connection to China, then Meta should be scrutinized just as intensely for its own actions in the country. Meta's hypocrisy extends beyond its dealings with the CCP. Zuckerberg has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to censor content in response to political pressures, most notably in his dealings with the U.S. government. Under pressure from the Biden administration, Meta took steps to restrict the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 and took down posts related to Hunter Biden's laptop. Zuckerberg's decision to ban President Donald Trump from Facebook raised questions about the extent to which the company is willing to censor political speech in the name of protecting its image or political interests. Zuckerberg's position on TikTok is part of a broader effort to secure Meta's dominance in the social media landscape. In a recent statement, Zuckerberg acknowledged that a potential ban of TikTok in the United States could benefit Meta, as TikTok is one of the company's main competitors. Zuckerberg has long sought to expand Meta's global reach, and the anti-China rhetoric seems more like a strategic move to weaken a competitor than a principled stance on censorship or national security. If Meta is truly committed to its mission of connecting the world and promoting democratic values, it must be held accountable for its actions. The public deserves transparency, and Zuckerberg's hypocrisy must be confronted head-on.
