Latest news with #TheGreatDebate
Time of India
a day ago
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Dwyane Wade and his wife Gabrielle Union enjoyed some quality time with their adorable dog Trey
Dwyane Wade and Gabrielle Union. Image via: Chris Pizzello / Invision / Associated Press After reporting a short video of their romantic pose before the camera on Instagram story, Dwyane Wade and his wife Gabrielle Union shared adorable moments with their dog, Tre. In a recent Instagram Story, Union shared a beach getaway video of her husband, Wade, having quality time with Trey. It appears that Union was behind the camera while filming the moment. Dwyane Wade and his wife, Gabrielle Union, showed off love for their adorable dog Dwyane Wade recently posed for PLAYERS, where he appeared with a dog in two photographs. Robert Cordero, editorial director of the outlet, shared the photographs on his Instagram with a lengthy caption to hail Wade's astonishing legacy in the basketball scene. Gabrielle Union Instagram story. Image via: Gabrielle Union/Instagram Wade's wife, Gabrielle Union, reposted one of the photos on her Instagram story with the dog, captioning, 'Sir, where is our Frenchie @tr3_wade smdh.' She also added a few 'burst out laughing' emoticons with the image. In the next story, however, she shared the video of Trey with Wade on the beach. 'Meet Trey,' a graphic animation with a bone appeared along with the caption, 'Our actual dog.' It's worth noting that Trey has his own Instagram account, and the video was shared by Union from the dog's IG feed. Gabrielle Union doesn't allow Trey in the bedroom When it comes to their French bulldog Trey, the pair couldn't be more divided. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 13 Famous People Who Have Opened up About Living With Mental Illness Undo The couple previously joined Jenna Bush Hager on TODAY With Jenna & Friends for a playful 'The Great Debate' segment, where the topic, pets in the bedroom, turned into a laugh-out-loud moment. The lighthearted exchange quickly revealed Union's firm 'no' policy and Wade's determined defense of their four-legged family member. When asked if Trey should be allowed in bed, Union didn't hesitate, 'No. Absolutely not. Not that dog.' She explained that Trey's obsession with Wade borders on unhealthy, even admitting, 'He literally cries and screams like a human at the door whenever he leaves… then he will drop a deuce right on his pillow.' Also Read: Michael Porter Jr draws Kanye West comparison from ex-NBA player over outspoken personal interviews Wade countered with a heartfelt defense, describing early-morning runs, beach outings, and building 'emotional bonding' to boost Trey's confidence. It was indeed a hilarious segment, but in reality, the NBA power couple has their utmost love for their dog. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Dubai Eye
03-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Dubai Eye
Is AI destroying the music industry
Dane and Sana look into the band that's rising up the charts, but may not even be real. Plus things get heated on The Great Debate when we discuss pay. Is it ever OK to ask someone their salary?
The Age
28-04-2025
- Politics
- The Age
Harris v Trump re-energises Australia's live leaders debates
The four election debates between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition leader Peter Dutton have bucked a trend of declining live broadcast audiences as Australians prepare to head to the polls this Saturday. An average national audience of 973,000 watched the final leaders' debate across the Seven Network, with the audience of 60 undecided voters handing the prime minister a convincing victory. Audiences have been significantly more engaged with the debates this election based on the viewing numbers across Seven, Nine, the ABC and Sky News Australia, which held one debate each. Nine is the owner of this masthead. Nine's The Great Debate was the highest rating, with a national average audience of 1,097,000 and total reach of 2,128,000. Reach is a tally of the number of people who viewed the program for at least one minute on a metro or regional broadcast, or 15 seconds on a live-streaming platform. The ABC's debate had an average audience of 1.01 million, and a reach of 1.77 million, while the national reach of Seven's debate on Sunday was 1.68 million. Seven's debate audience was up 20 per cent compared with 2022, when Albanese faced off against incumbent Scott Morrison and Labor ultimately swept aside the Coalition after nine years in government. Nine lifted the audience of its debate by 15 per cent compared with 2022. Loading Viewership figures were at their highest since 2013. Election debates have had waning audiences for some time, alongside long-term declines in live television viewership, as younger audiences in particular move towards social media and online consumption for news and entertainment. The format was renergised by the second US presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in September 2024, with 67 million Americans, or about 20 per cent of the US population, watching. About 7 per cent of Australians turned on Nine's debate and 1.5 per cent watched Sky's broadcast on Foxtel or on regional television.
Sydney Morning Herald
28-04-2025
- Politics
- Sydney Morning Herald
Harris v Trump re-energises Australia's live leaders debates
The four election debates between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition leader Peter Dutton have bucked a trend of declining live broadcast audiences as Australians prepare to head to the polls this Saturday. An average national audience of 973,000 watched the final leaders' debate across the Seven Network, with the audience of 60 undecided voters handing the prime minister a convincing victory. Audiences have been significantly more engaged with the debates this election based on the viewing numbers across Seven, Nine, the ABC and Sky News Australia, which held one debate each. Nine is the owner of this masthead. Nine's The Great Debate was the highest rating, with a national average audience of 1,097,000 and total reach of 2,128,000. Reach is a tally of the number of people who viewed the program for at least one minute on a metro or regional broadcast, or 15 seconds on a live-streaming platform. The ABC's debate had an average audience of 1.01 million, and a reach of 1.77 million, while the national reach of Seven's debate on Sunday was 1.68 million. Seven's debate audience was up 20 per cent compared with 2022, when Albanese faced off against incumbent Scott Morrison and Labor ultimately swept aside the Coalition after nine years in government. Nine lifted the audience of its debate by 15 per cent compared with 2022. Loading Viewership figures were at their highest since 2013. Election debates have had waning audiences for some time, alongside long-term declines in live television viewership, as younger audiences in particular move towards social media and online consumption for news and entertainment. The format was renergised by the second US presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in September 2024, with 67 million Americans, or about 20 per cent of the US population, watching. About 7 per cent of Australians turned on Nine's debate and 1.5 per cent watched Sky's broadcast on Foxtel or on regional television.
Daily Telegraph
25-04-2025
- Politics
- Daily Telegraph
‘Deafening': Billion-dollar ‘national emergency' barely worth a mention in election campaign
Don't miss out on the headlines from Federal Election. Followed categories will be added to My News. It's the critical issue that costs Australia an estimated $26 billion a year and rising — and one that, if you've been listening to Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton for the past four of this five-week federal election campaign, has barely crossed the lips of either leader. Already in 2025, an estimated 23 Australian women have lost their lives — the majority allegedly as a result of male violence — according to award-winning journalist and Australian Femicide Watch founder, Sherele Moody. Seven of those have occurred within the last week. 'Each of them was a statistic. Each should still be alive,' National Women's Safety Alliance director, Katherine Berney, wrote in Women's Agenda this week. 'Yet not one question about gender-based violence was raised in the first two leaders' debates … The message from our political class is deafening – tax cuts, defence, and housing are national priorities. But women's lives? Not even worth a mention. 'This silence isn't just disappointing, it's dangerous.' Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanese during Channel 9's The Great Debate on Tuesday. Picture: Alex Ellinghausen/POOL via NewsWire Last year was the worst 12 months on record for men's violence against women in Australia since 2016. That approximately one woman was (allegedly) killed every four days by a current or former partner threw into sharp relief the effectiveness of the response systems – including police and courts – meant to keep them safe, and the dire lack of funding appointed to critical specialist domestic, family and sexual violence response services. Yet the federal budget in March hardly touched the sides of the level of investment needed to meet demand for frontline services, 'let alone allow services to expand and improve their capacity', Monash University's Dr Kate Fitz-Gibbon told at the time. Rendering men's violence against women, once again, little more than a political afterthought. Perhaps what best summarises the terrible imbalance of justice when it comes to crimes men perpetrate on women is authorities' response to it versus their swift action in 2014 – when they shut down the night-life of an entire city within months of two young men being murdered in one-punch attacks. The stark comparison has been made time and again as gendered violence in Australia morphed from crisis to epidemic, most recently by founder and CEO of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC), Kon Karapanagiotidis. 'Seven women have been killed in the past seven days. Not a word from Albanese or Dutton. Not a word,' he wrote in an Instagram post on Wednesday that's since gone viral. 'If seven men had been killed by one punch attacks in the last seven days we would have curfews, emergency task forces and billion dollar commitments to stop it. Women get nothing. 'We have a national emergency of male violence against women and no political leadership. 'Both care more about not upsetting male voters by naming this crisis than they do about protecting the human rights of women to live free of the threat of male violence. 'Both have failed women. Send a message with your vote this election.' It has taken both leaders until this week – early voting already open and within spitting distance of election day – to release their party's respective 'commitments' to overcoming the violence that continues to rob women and children of their lives. On Thursday, Mr Dutton announced the Coalition's 14-point plan, which includes expanding the Safe Places Emergency Accommodation Program and the Leaving Violence Program (which provides one-off funding to help cover the cost of leaving an abusive relationship). As part of the $90 million package, it would also criminalise the use of mobile phones by perpetrators to threaten and track partners, and increase crisis helpline support to ensure victim-survivors 'have their calls answered and get the immediate assistance they require'. 'As a former police officer who attended numerous domestic violence call-outs, I know the lifelong impact of these horrific crimes,' the Opposition Leader said. 'A government I lead will be focused on delivering real change so that families, women and children are safer and we end family and domestic violence.' Mr Dutton unveiled the Coalition's intended measures to combat gendered violence on Thursday. Picture: Richard Dobson/NewsWire The Prime Minister announced several more 'practical measures' if elected on May 3. Picture: Mark Stewart/NewsWire If elected again on May 3, the Prime Minister vowed to go further in addressing what he last year labelled a national crisis, with a raft of 'innovative' measures to target offenders, including spending $8.6 million for ankle bracelets on those who pose the greatest risk and early intervention programs. Labor's announcement also focused heavily on 'fast growing and insidious' financial abuse. Katy Gallagher, Minister for both Women and Finance, unveiled the plan on Tuesday, telling reporters her party will 'take action to legislate changes in the superannuation, tax and social security systems so they cannot be weaponised by perpetrators'. Can either party really call it a 'commitment', though, if it's taken you four weeks of a campaign to address? It seems much more akin to an afterthought. A demonstrator at last April's No More! National Rally Against Violence march at Parliament House in Canberra. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Martin Ollman Neither's plan, Monash's Dr Fitz-Gibbon and Australian National University Research Fellow Dr Hayley Boxall pointed out in a piece for The Conversation, 'represent a commitment to ending gender-based violence'. 'They both propose a patchwork of largely reactive initiatives. These will fail to deliver holistic reform to prevent violence and to intervene early enough to meaningfully reduce it,' they wrote. Neither party proposes any intended action against sexual violence, implementing housing or recovery support beyond emergency accommodation and age-appropriate crisis responses for children, or the need to effectively engage men and boys. 'Finally, there is no discussion of the need for greater monitoring and evaluation efforts. We cannot fix what we do not measure,' Dr's Fitz-Gibbon and Boxall wrote. While both Labor the and Coalition promised in their announcements to build on the National Plan – which aspires to eliminate to eliminate gender-based violence in one generation – three years into its delivery, 'the persistent prevalence of this violence shows we must do more'. 'We need visible, bipartisan leadership that treats this issue with the same gravity we afford to other national emergencies.' Originally published as 'Deafening': Billion-dollar 'national emergency' barely worth a mention in election campaign
