Latest news with #TheHamiltonProject
Yahoo
07-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
The era of big-time job gains may be drawing to a close
A surge of immigrants boosted the labor market and helped cool inflation during Joe Biden's administration. Under Donald Trump, the flow of new workers could become a trickle. A striking percentage of the job growth under Biden consisted of immigrant workers, economists say — with one major bank recently estimating they accounted for as much as two-thirds of the net gains over the last year. The Labor Department reported Friday that U.S. employers added 143,000 jobs in January, with the jobless rate slipping to 4 percent. The growth in payrolls was lifted by new arrivals whose legal status runs the gamut. The labor force participation rate among foreign-born individuals was 66 percent in January, compared with 61.4 percent among native-born workers, according to the release. If Trump delivers on his pledge to shut down the border and conduct mass deportations, a critical supply of workers would be shut off. 'What happens to net immigration over 2025 is a game changer for what we should expect to see in the payroll employment numbers,' said Wendy Edelberg, a former top economist at the Congressional Budget Office who's now the director of The Hamilton Project and a Brookings Institution senior fellow. 'We should get used to much, much smaller numbers than what we've seen over the last couple of years.' Trump says his sweeping agenda of deregulation, increased oil production and lower taxes will unlock growth and beat back inflation — an argument strongly endorsed by the American people in the election. But a broad-based crackdown on immigrants could slow the economy's expansion and choke off a supply of workers that Kansas City Fed researchers and others sayhave alleviated staffing shortages and eased wage pressures. Steve Englander, head of global G10 FX research and North American macro strategy at Standard Chartered Bank, says immigrant workers on temporary permits — including those who are on parole or seeking asylum — may have accounted for as much as two-thirds of the expansion in non-farm payrolls over the last year. 'It's not clear if it's going to be immediate — or in the next six to nine months — but by the end of the year it should be noticeable,' he said of the impact of Trump's border crackdown. Should those reductions occur, it could also pose challenges for Federal Reserve policymakers who use the jobs data to make decisions on inflation and interest rates. The rise in migration during the Biden years led to substantial upward revisions to UCensus Bureau estimates, which will affect how the Labor Department accounts for population growth over the next year. Those estimates assume that net migration will continue to rise over the next year, which would buoy overall employment numbers. But Trump's policies could push down migration, which would mean that total employment may be weaker than what's reflected in upcoming reports. Why does that matter? If there's less certainty about total employment because of lower net migration, it makes it harder to understand what non-farm payrolls say about the labor market's overall health. 'It reduces the importance that I'm putting on payroll job growth numbers — [and the] aggregate numbers — because there's a bunch of things that we can't observe,' Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said. If 'we don't know [if] this was a month where immigration went down, if this was a month where immigration went up? It just makes me that much more skeptical of using payroll job growth as the measure.' Of course, it's impossible to say with any certainty the effect Trump's immigration plans will have on future payrolls until his approach becomes clearer. Deportations could span from a few hundred thousand per year — which would be in line with those of recent administrations — or climb even higher if Congress ramps up funding for enforcement. The president has already ordered policies that could lead to the deportation of immigrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Haiti who had entered the country legally. The revocation of their legal status will limit their ability to get work permits. Still, despite a series of high-profile raids on immigrant communities in recent weeks, many of those have already been released. And beyond deportations – including self-deportations — another confounding factor is how much of a chilling effect Trump's policies will have on the inflow of new immigrants, legal or otherwise. Edelberg's team at The Hamilton Project believes that net migration in the U.S. could fall anywhere between 1.1 million and negative 650,000 over the next year, depending on the severity of Trump's policies. 'We're all going to be guessing at what the immigration numbers really are in coming months,' she said, adding that some immigrants who arrived over the last year are still entering the labor force, which could provide a 'delayed boost' in future reports. It may take time for the market to readjust to how immigration-related shifts affect the labor market, said Sarah House, a managing director and senior economist at Wells Fargo. 'It depends on how quickly that deceleration happens,' she said. 'In a year or two's time, you could have a reinterpretation of what constitutes a good jobs number if you are seeing much slower growth in labor supply.' Katy O'Donnell contributed to this report.


Politico
07-02-2025
- Business
- Politico
The era of big-time job gains may be drawing to a close
A surge of immigrants boosted the labor market and helped cool inflation during Joe Biden's administration. Under Donald Trump, the flow of new workers could become a trickle. A striking percentage of the job growth under Biden consisted of immigrant workers, economists say — with one major bank recently estimating they accounted for as much as two-thirds of the net gains over the last year. The Labor Department reported Friday that U.S. employers added 143,000 jobs in January, with the jobless rate slipping to 4 percent. The growth in payrolls was lifted by new arrivals whose legal status runs the gamut. The labor force participation rate among foreign-born individuals was 66 percent in January, compared with 61.4 percent among native-born workers, according to the release. If Trump delivers on his pledge to shut down the border and conduct mass deportations, a critical supply of workers would be shut off. 'What happens to net immigration over 2025 is a game changer for what we should expect to see in the payroll employment numbers,' said Wendy Edelberg, a former top economist at the Congressional Budget Office who's now the director of The Hamilton Project and a Brookings Institution senior fellow. 'We should get used to much, much smaller numbers than what we've seen over the last couple of years.' Trump says his sweeping agenda of deregulation, increased oil production and lower taxes will unlock growth and beat back inflation — an argument strongly endorsed by the American people in the election. But a broad-based crackdown on immigrants could slow the economy's expansion and choke off a supply of workers that Kansas City Fed researchers and others say have alleviated staffing shortages and eased wage pressures. Steve Englander, head of global G10 FX research and North American macro strategy at Standard Chartered Bank, says immigrant workers on temporary permits — including those who are on parole or seeking asylum — may have accounted for as much as two-thirds of the expansion in non-farm payrolls over the last year. 'It's not clear if it's going to be immediate — or in the next six to nine months — but by the end of the year it should be noticeable,' he said of the impact of Trump's border crackdown. Should those reductions occur, it could also pose challenges for Federal Reserve policymakers who use the jobs data to make decisions on inflation and interest rates. The rise in migration during the Biden years led to substantial upward revisions to UCensus Bureau estimates, which will affect how the Labor Department accounts for population growth over the next year. Those estimates assume that net migration will continue to rise over the next year, which would buoy overall employment numbers. But Trump's policies could push down migration, which would mean that total employment may be weaker than what's reflected in upcoming reports. Why does that matter? If there's less certainty about total employment because of lower net migration, it makes it harder to understand what non-farm payrolls say about the labor market's overall health. 'It reduces the importance that I'm putting on payroll job growth numbers — [and the] aggregate numbers — because there's a bunch of things that we can't observe,' Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said. If 'we don't know [if] this was a month where immigration went down, if this was a month where immigration went up? It just makes me that much more skeptical of using payroll job growth as the measure.' Of course, it's impossible to say with any certainty the effect Trump's immigration plans will have on future payrolls until his approach becomes clearer. Deportations could span from a few hundred thousand per year — which would be in line with those of recent administrations — or climb even higher if Congress ramps up funding for enforcement. The president has already ordered policies that could lead to the deportation of immigrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Haiti who had entered the country legally. The revocation of their legal status will limit their ability to get work permits. Still, despite a series of high-profile raids on immigrant communities in recent weeks, many of those have already been released. And beyond deportations – including self-deportations — another confounding factor is how much of a chilling effect Trump's policies will have on the inflow of new immigrants, legal or otherwise. Edelberg's team at The Hamilton Project believes that net migration in the U.S. could fall anywhere between 1.1 million and negative 650,000 over the next year, depending on the severity of Trump's policies. 'We're all going to be guessing at what the immigration numbers really are in coming months,' she said, adding that some immigrants who arrived over the last year are still entering the labor force, which could provide a 'delayed boost' in future reports. It may take time for the market to readjust to how immigration-related shifts affect the labor market, said Sarah House, a managing director and senior economist at Wells Fargo. 'It depends on how quickly that deceleration happens,' she said. 'In a year or two's time, you could have a reinterpretation of what constitutes a good jobs number if you are seeing much slower growth in labor supply.' Katy O'Donnell contributed to this report.


CBS News
28-01-2025
- Business
- CBS News
What does Trump's federal funding freeze mean for people who get aid?
A White House memo ordering a broad freeze on federal grants and loans by 5 p.m. Tuesday has ordinary Americans who depend on such aid, as well as seasoned budget experts, scratching their heads. The memo suspending the federal funding was vague in its wording, causing confusion within federal assistance programs, at nonprofits and among Americans receiving government aid. Adding to the whiplash, a federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked the freeze as she considers arguments from the U.S. government and the plaintiffs in the case. "If this was being undertaken pursuant to the executive orders on [diversity, equity and inclusion], why would the administration issue such broad, unclear and confusing directions?" Tad DeHaven, a policy analyst focusing on economic and fiscal policy issues at the libertarian Cato Institute, told CBS MoneyWatch. "I don't really understand it, and I think even people who are in positions of power don't really understand it," added Wendy Edelberg, director of The Hamilton Project at Brookings, a liberal-leaning public policy research group. What programs aren't affected by the funding freeze? The memo, from the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), indicated that Social Security and Medicare programs would be exempt from the suspension in federal funding. Additional guidance released Tuesday further specified that "any program that provides direct benefits to Americans is explicitly excluded from the pause." "In addition to Social Security and Medicare, already explicitly excluded in the guidance, mandatory programs like Medicaid and SNAP will continue without pause," the updated guidance said. The memo adds that funds for small businesses, farmers, Pell grants, Head Start, rental assistance and other similar programs are also exempt. But even if the order ends up being more narrowly tailored, it could still have serious financial implications for the millions of Americans who receive federal assistance, experts said. "If it's resolved quickly, the aggregate economic effects for the first quarter will be modest, but it will matter a whole lot to people on the other side of these expected payments," Edelberg said. "It could be the difference between having a job and not, getting evicted or affording food — and the economic numbers won't fully reflect how individuals are going to feel this." Here's what to know about who may be affected by the proposed pause in federal funding. Will I still get SNAP benefits? The freeze does not apply to all federal financial assistance, according to an Office of Management and Budget memo on Tuesday. The agency indicates that Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, better known as food stamps, are excluded, specifying that "... any program that provides direct benefits to Americans is explicitly excluded from the pause and exempted from this review process." "In addition to Social Security and Medicare, already explicitly excluded in the guidance, mandatory programs like Medicaid and SNAP will continue without pause," the memo reads. SNAP serves roughly 41 million low-income Americans. Yet while the program appears to be exempt from the freeze, "You are still going to be really worried in the near term whether the federal government is going to make good on those promises," Edelberg said. "And that kind of uncertainty is not good for the economy." Are meals for seniors affected? The Older Americans Act Nutrition Program, a federal initiative that supports community-based senior nutrition programs like Meals on Wheels, could be affected by the proposed funding pause. If the order includes the Older Americans Act, it "would halt service to millions of vulnerable seniors who have no other means of purchasing or preparing meals," Meals on Wheels said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. "The lack of clarity is creating chaos for Meals on Wheels providers not knowing whether they should be serving meals today." Is housing assistance at risk? The OMB memo added that rental assistance and other similar programs will not be paused. Still, the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) expressed concern that Department of Housing and Urban Development programs could be covered by the freeze. "Even a short pause in funding could cause significant harm to low-income families and their communities," NLIHC Interim President and CEO Renee Willis said in a statement. "The longer the freeze continues, the greater the risk that low-income households receiving federal rental assistance could face eviction, and in the worst cases, homelessness — homeless shelters may be forced to close their doors, and nonprofit organizations may have to lay off staff." Are student loans affected? The federal funding freeze does not apply to student loans and Pell grants, according to the Department of Education. The funding pause "only applies to discretionary grants at the Department of Education," DOE spokesperson Madi Biedermann said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. Still, an advocate for students with government loans said they are worried about the impact of the freeze. "Any kind of freeze to federal financial aid across the board is incredibly harmful to working families just trying to pay for college," Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director at Student Borrower Protection Center, told CBS MoneyWatch, adding that "Lots of questions remain about what the freeze applies to and what programs it does not," Meanwhile, many student borrowers rely on different kinds of government assistance to cover costs beyond tuition, Bañez noted. "There are other types of federal work-study grants that go directly to colleges and universities, and supplemental education opportunities that go to some of the lowest-income students. People really rely on federal financial aid, and you could see families having to drop out of college or figure out how they will cover this gap," she said. The OMB memo also indicated that Head Start, a preschool program serving nearly 800,000 low-income children that receives federal health funds, is not impacted by the pause. But the National Head Start Association (NHSA) said that the OMB memo has already "created panic among Head Start grant recipients who are currently not able to draw down any funds." "While we understand that this is an evolving story, this disruption, at best, will slow down Head Start agencies' ability to pay hundreds of thousands of staff, contractors, and small businesses who support Head Start operations in every corner of the country," NHSA Executive Director Yasmina Vinci said in a statement. "At worst, this means that hundreds of thousands of families will not be able to depend on the critical services and likely will not be able to work." Despite the updated guidance issued Tuesday stating that programs including Medicaid are excluded from the funding pause, state Medicaid programs on Tuesday said they were locked out of the Department of Health and Human Services system used to track and disburse money. The Payment Management Services web portal displayed a message reading: "Due to Executive Orders regarding potentially unallowable grant payments, PMS is taking additional measures to process payments. Reviews of applicable programs and payments will result in delays and/or rejections of payments." The National Association of Medicaid Directors is seeking clarification on the interruption from the White House, according to a spokesperson.