logo
What does Trump's federal funding freeze mean for people who get aid?

What does Trump's federal funding freeze mean for people who get aid?

CBS News28-01-2025

A White House memo ordering a broad freeze on federal grants and loans by 5 p.m. Tuesday has ordinary Americans who depend on such aid, as well as seasoned budget experts, scratching their heads.
The memo suspending the federal funding was vague in its wording, causing confusion within federal assistance programs, at nonprofits and among Americans receiving government aid. Adding to the whiplash, a federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked the freeze as she considers arguments from the U.S. government and the plaintiffs in the case.
"If this was being undertaken pursuant to the executive orders on [diversity, equity and inclusion], why would the administration issue such broad, unclear and confusing directions?" Tad DeHaven, a policy analyst focusing on economic and fiscal policy issues at the libertarian Cato Institute, told CBS MoneyWatch.
"I don't really understand it, and I think even people who are in positions of power don't really understand it," added Wendy Edelberg, director of The Hamilton Project at Brookings, a liberal-leaning public policy research group.
What programs aren't affected by the funding freeze?
The memo, from the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), indicated that Social Security and Medicare programs would be exempt from the suspension in federal funding. Additional guidance released Tuesday further specified that "any program that provides direct benefits to Americans is explicitly excluded from the pause."
"In addition to Social Security and Medicare, already explicitly excluded in the guidance, mandatory programs like Medicaid and SNAP will continue without pause," the updated guidance said.
The memo adds that funds for small businesses, farmers, Pell grants, Head Start, rental assistance and other similar programs are also exempt.
But even if the order ends up being more narrowly tailored, it could still have serious financial implications for the millions of Americans who receive federal assistance, experts said.
"If it's resolved quickly, the aggregate economic effects for the first quarter will be modest, but it will matter a whole lot to people on the other side of these expected payments," Edelberg said. "It could be the difference between having a job and not, getting evicted or affording food — and the economic numbers won't fully reflect how individuals are going to feel this."
Here's what to know about who may be affected by the proposed pause in federal funding.
Will I still get SNAP benefits?
The freeze does not apply to all federal financial assistance, according to an Office of Management and Budget memo on Tuesday. The agency indicates that Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, better known as food stamps, are excluded, specifying that "... any program that provides direct benefits to Americans is explicitly excluded from the pause and exempted from this review process."
"In addition to Social Security and Medicare, already explicitly excluded in the guidance, mandatory programs like Medicaid and SNAP will continue without pause," the memo reads.
SNAP serves roughly 41 million low-income Americans.
Yet while the program appears to be exempt from the freeze, "You are still going to be really worried in the near term whether the federal government is going to make good on those promises," Edelberg said. "And that kind of uncertainty is not good for the economy."
Are meals for seniors affected?
The Older Americans Act Nutrition Program, a federal initiative that supports community-based senior nutrition programs like Meals on Wheels, could be affected by the proposed funding pause.
If the order includes the Older Americans Act, it "would halt service to millions of vulnerable seniors who have no other means of purchasing or preparing meals," Meals on Wheels said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. "The lack of clarity is creating chaos for Meals on Wheels providers not knowing whether they should be serving meals today."
Is housing assistance at risk?
The OMB memo added that rental assistance and other similar programs will not be paused. Still, the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) expressed concern that Department of Housing and Urban Development programs could be covered by the freeze.
"Even a short pause in funding could cause significant harm to low-income families and their communities," NLIHC Interim President and CEO Renee Willis said in a statement. "The longer the freeze continues, the greater the risk that low-income households receiving federal rental assistance could face eviction, and in the worst cases, homelessness — homeless shelters may be forced to close their doors, and nonprofit organizations may have to lay off staff."
Are student loans affected?
The federal funding freeze does not apply to student loans and Pell grants, according to the Department of Education. The funding pause "only applies to discretionary grants at the Department of Education," DOE spokesperson Madi Biedermann said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch.
Still, an advocate for students with government loans said they are worried about the impact of the freeze.
"Any kind of freeze to federal financial aid across the board is incredibly harmful to working families just trying to pay for college," Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director at Student Borrower Protection Center, told CBS MoneyWatch, adding that "Lots of questions remain about what the freeze applies to and what programs it does not,"
Meanwhile, many student borrowers rely on different kinds of government assistance to cover costs beyond tuition, Bañez noted.
"There are other types of federal work-study grants that go directly to colleges and universities, and supplemental education opportunities that go to some of the lowest-income students. People really rely on federal financial aid, and you could see families having to drop out of college or figure out how they will cover this gap," she said.
The OMB memo also indicated that Head Start, a preschool program serving nearly 800,000 low-income children that receives federal health funds, is not impacted by the pause.
But the National Head Start Association (NHSA) said that the OMB memo has already "created panic among Head Start grant recipients who are currently not able to draw down any funds."
"While we understand that this is an evolving story, this disruption, at best, will slow down Head Start agencies' ability to pay hundreds of thousands of staff, contractors, and small businesses who support Head Start operations in every corner of the country," NHSA Executive Director Yasmina Vinci said in a statement. "At worst, this means that hundreds of thousands of families will not be able to depend on the critical services and likely will not be able to work."
Despite the updated guidance issued Tuesday stating that programs including Medicaid are excluded from the funding pause, state Medicaid programs on Tuesday said they were locked out of the Department of Health and Human Services system used to track and disburse money.
The Payment Management Services web portal displayed a message reading: "Due to Executive Orders regarding potentially unallowable grant payments, PMS is taking additional measures to process payments. Reviews of applicable programs and payments will result in delays and/or rejections of payments."
The National Association of Medicaid Directors is seeking clarification on the interruption from the White House, according to a spokesperson.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows
Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows

Politico

time7 minutes ago

  • Politico

Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows

A majority of Americans believe President Donald Trump's multimillion-dollar parade celebrating the Army in Washington on Saturday is not a good use of government funds, a new AP-NORC poll shows. Sixty percent of Americans surveyed in the June poll said they believe the parade is not a good use of funds, while 38 percent said they believe the parade is worth the cost. Forty percent of Americans approve of Trump's decision to hold the parade, compared with 31 percent who neither approve or disapprove and 29 percent who are against the decision to hold a parade. The parade this weekend, which also coincides with Trump's 79th birthday, is expected to feature 6,600 soldiers marching along with 25 M1 Abrams main battle tanks and dozens of other military vehicles. Several generations of military aircraft are planned to fly overhead, including a World War II-era B-25 bomber, Huey helicopters similar to those used in the Vietnam War, and a P-1 biplane fighter aircraft like the ones first used in the 1920s. Trump is also expected to give a speech. The cost of the parade is estimated to cost between $25 million and $45 million, according to Army officials. Some Republicans have raised concerns over the cost. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, told POLITICO last week he 'would have recommended against the parade' after learning of its estimated cost. In an NBC News interview in May, Trump said the amount spent on holding the parade would be 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' Most Republican lawmakers are planning to skip the parade, including Speaker Mike Johnson and several members who have previously served in the military. Only seven out of 50 congressional Republicans surveyed by POLITICO as of Tuesday said they were planning to attend. The poll also finds 60 percent of Americans disapprove of Trump's job performance, while 39 percent approve, marking Trump's highest disapproval rating in an AP-NORC poll since he returned to office in January. The AP-NORC poll was conducted June 5-9 and is based on interviews with 1,158 adults around the country. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 4.0 percentage points.

Ohio purges 12,000 voters, and 350,000 more are at risk. How to check your registration
Ohio purges 12,000 voters, and 350,000 more are at risk. How to check your registration

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ohio purges 12,000 voters, and 350,000 more are at risk. How to check your registration

Ohio is removing 12,000 voters from its rolls and another 350,000 registrations are on the chopping block. Secretary of State Frank LaRose announced June 11 that nearly 12,000 registrations that belong to people who have registered and voted in other states for the 2024 general election are being removed from Ohio's rolls. The Ohio Secretary of State's Office of Data Analytics and Archives identified the registrations through multi-state data-sharing agreements. 'We have a duty under Ohio law to maintain accurate voter rolls,' LaRose said in a press release. 'This is a commonsense safeguard that's basically designed to prevent double voting." In March, LaRose published a list of more than 350,000 voter registrations that are eligible to be removed from the state's rolls. Voters on that list have until September 2025 to maintain their registrations. The 350,000 represents roughly 4.3% of the 8,159,946 registered voters Ohio had for the 2024 general election. Here's what you need to do to confirm your voter registration is valid or register to vote again. Election 2024: Ohio purged 155,000 voters from the rolls To check if you're registered to vote in Ohio, visit and enter your first and last names, and your county of residence. If you are having trouble finding your voter registration, the Ohio Secretary of State's office offers the following tips: Are you registered to vote? Could you be registered with a derivative of your first name, such as Bob or Robert? Could you be registered with a former last name? Could you be registered at a previous address in another Ohio county? If you are unable to locate your voter registration information, but believe you are registered to vote, it is recommended that you search again making sure all the information you provided is accurate. Contact your county board of elections regarding any questions pertaining to your voter registration. Election 2023: Ohio canceled over 26,000 inactive voter registrations To register to vote, or update your registration, head to To complete the process online you will need the following information: Ohio driver's license or Ohio identification card number Name Date of birth Address The last four digits of your Social Security number If you don't have all that information, download and complete a paper form and mail it to your county board of elections. You must register or update your voter registration no later than 30 days before an election. The deadlines are: July 7, 2025, for the August 5, 2025, Special Election. October 6, 2025, for the November 4, 2025, General Election. Boards of election are open until 9 p.m. on the registration deadline days. Early voting begins the following day. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: 350,000 Ohio voters at risk in purge. How to check your registration

The FBI raided the wrong house. The Supreme Court says the family is allowed to sue
The FBI raided the wrong house. The Supreme Court says the family is allowed to sue

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The FBI raided the wrong house. The Supreme Court says the family is allowed to sue

A family whose home was mistakenly raided in the middle of the night by the FBI eight years ago will be permitted to continue their damages lawsuit after the Supreme Court on Thursday sent their case back to a federal appeals court for additional review. The outcome represents a technical win for the family, which had been barred by lower courts from suing the government over the incident. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion for a unanimous court. Curtrina Martin, her partner and her then-7-year-old son were startled awake in 2017 when a six-agent SWAT team – believing that they were targeting the home of a gang member – smashed her front door with a battering ram, detonated a flash-bang grenade and rushed into their suburban Atlanta home. At some point after Martin was dragged from the closet where she was hiding and held at gunpoint, agents realized they had the wrong house. The federal government is generally immune from lawsuits, but Congress carved out an exception for some situations involving negligent or wrongful acts of government employees. That law was amended in 1974, following a series of other high-profile raids at the wrong house, to expand the ability of Americans to sue federal law enforcement agents. But the Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the government, holding that the Constitution's Supremacy Clause barred tort claims against the federal government in circumstances where an official's actions had 'some nexus with furthering a federal policy' and could 'reasonably be characterized' as within the range of federal law. The Institute for Justice, a libertarian public interest law group that represented the Martin family, argued that outcome would completely undermine the intent of Congress. Lawmakers strengthened the Federal Tort Claims Act following a pair of high-profile wrong-house raids in Collinsville, Illinois, in the early 1970s. During arguments before the Supreme Court in April, the FBI's handling of the Martin raid drew particular scorn from Justice Gorsuch, a conservative and sometimes-skeptic of federal government power. 'You might look at the address of the house before you knock down the door,' an incredulous Gorsuch pressed the lawyer representing the Justice Department. 'How about making sure you're on the right street? I mean, just the right street? Checking the street sign? Is that, you know, asking too much?' The Justice Department argued in part that it should not be liable because federal law bars tort suits when a federal employee is exercising discretion in carrying out their work. In this case, the government argued, the agents had to exercise discretion in how they confirmed they were at the correct house. This story is breaking and has been updated with additional details.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store