logo
#

Latest news with #TheRoom

14 Terrible Movies That Some People Actually Love To Watch
14 Terrible Movies That Some People Actually Love To Watch

Buzz Feed

time7 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • Buzz Feed

14 Terrible Movies That Some People Actually Love To Watch

Recently, u/bsoupdude asked r/MovieSuggestions for "the absolute worst films y'all can think of". So we thought we'd share some of the most popular responses. Manos: The Hands of Fate "Every frame looks like someone's last known photograph!"–MoreReputation8908"Oh, if you have never been subjected to Manos, you really have to give it a try."–jbenzeBrief description: This low-budget horror is about a family who are stuck at a remote hotel which is under the management of a nefarious cult leader. The Room "Obligatory The Room recommendation."–masterslut"Take a drink every time there's an establishing shot of San Francisco and you'll be wasted half an hour in."–sandman_42"That film is so remarkably bad it belongs in the Library of Congress."–joshuatxBrief description: This cult classic, riddled with awkward dialogue and strange performances is about a love triangle, and is famous for being so bad it's good. Birdemic: Shock and Terror "I only watched the first one, and only because I was with a friend and we were getting drunk. Don't know that I'd survive the other two now that I've quit drinking..."–AltruisticCableCarBrief description: We watch as a small town is under attack from terribly animated birds. Geostorm "Geostorm is the undisputed king of big-budget, so-bad-it's-good movies. Hear me out. Unlike movies that are wink-wink 'bad' on purpose, ironically (e.g. The Meg, VelociPastor) this movie attempts to be very serious, which only exacerbates how hilariously bad it tries to recreate all the serious beats of movies like Independence Day and Deep Impact, but it's like too many acid-tripping executive producers had a say in the final product. It ends up a glorious trope-fuelled nightmare of hilarious bullshit."–PowermanFriendshipBrief description: This disaster movie is about climate-controlling satellites that, after malfunctioning, begin to cause extreme weather events that threaten the entire world. After Last Season "It's worth it just for the set pieces."–Safetosay333Brief description: This low-budget movie is about a group using tech in order to look into people's minds in order solve crimes. Battlefield Earth "Battlefield Earth is like if you described a sci-if movie to a toddler, dosed them with LSD and then gave them $100 million to make a movie."–MalmborgioBrief description: This bizarre sci-fi film sees humans having to fight off their alien overlords. Rubber "The plot is uninteresting but holds character development, the subplot is where the gold is."–hoggsauceBrief description: We watch the killing-spree of a sentient rubber tire that is on a mission of destruction for literally no reason. Aquaman: The Lost Kingdom "Just gave up halfway through Aquaman: The Lost Kingdom. Bafflingly awful. And for some reason obsessed with Aquaman literally getting pissed on."–BojukaBobBrief description: Aquaman must team up with his imprisoned brother in order to save the world from a mystical ancient evil. The Toxic Avenger "Comically bad and instant cult classic.... Which makes this a wonderful film!"–chrisdiaz73Brief outline: We follow a janitor who, after falling into toxic waste, becomes a crime-fighting superhero. Plan Nine From Outer Space "It is considered by some critics to be the worst film ever made. It's so bad that it can be fun to watch if one is in the right frame of mind."–Peaceful-Spirit9Brief outline: This cult film is about aliens who begin to resurrect the dead in an attempt to save humanity from itself. Megiddo: the Omega Code 2 "There is such a thing as so bad it's good, and the apex of that genre is Megiddo: the Omega Code 2."–tomrichards8464Brief outline: This apocalyptic film depicts the growth of a ruler of the world that turns out to be the antichrist. Velocipastor "Watch it now! You will not be disappointed."–SmarterThanMyBossBrief outline: This horror-comedy follows a priest who develops the ability to transform into a dinosaur and fight crime. The Stupids "Came here to recommend this one. It's the only movie I walked out of during a theatre showing."–hoople217Brief outline: As the name suggests, this slapstick comedy is about a family of intellectually challenged individuals who somehow get mixed up in a conspiracy. Prisoners of the Ghostland "Nicolas Cage doing his thing in a movie that is all over the place. No idea what the point of the whole thing was."–desteufelsbeitragBrief outline: This post-apocalyptic film follows a infamous criminal (Nicolas Cage), and his mission to rescue the governor's granddaughter from the dangerous region of Ghostland. H/T to u/bsoupdude and r/MovieSuggestions for having the discussion! Any more to add? Let us know in the comments below!

Jenna Ortega And The Weeknd Hurry Up Tomorrow Reactions
Jenna Ortega And The Weeknd Hurry Up Tomorrow Reactions

Buzz Feed

time16-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Buzz Feed

Jenna Ortega And The Weeknd Hurry Up Tomorrow Reactions

Jenna Ortega and Abel Tesfaye, aka "The Weeknd," are in a film called Hurry Up Tomorrow, and the reaction is a bit surprising. So, the film is technically a companion to The Weeknd's sixth studio album, which has the same name. In the movie, he plays a fictional version of himself who gets caught up with this mysterious woman named Anima (Jenna). The movie also stars Barry Keoghan as his manager and friend, Lee. When a scene featuring Abel and Jenna went viral, people really had a lot to say about it. Perhaps Abel's last adventure into dramatic acting with The Idol rubbed people the wrong way, because all it took was for one scene to go viral on the internet, and now everybody's dragging the movie. As of writing this, Hurry Up Tomorrow had a shocking 15% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Jordan Hoffman of Entertainment Weekly said, "The nearly plot-free movie is self-indulgent, overly serious, and, worst of all, just plain dull."Maria Sherman of the Associated Press said the movie was "An exciting vanity project with surrealist imagiation but stiff writing, no stakes, limited emotional weight and an unclear narrative." While the Audience Score for Rotten Tomatoes wasn't too bad, based on the internet reactions, people seem to be mostly siding with the critics. One person said, "Hurry Up Tomorrow one of those ones where my interest increases the worse the reviews get." "One of the worst vanity projects I have ever seen. Could not believe my eyes at the ridiculous shit in this movie," somoene wrote. But according to this person, the third act is basically "a full on ad for The Weeknd's music," so that sounds like a win because his music is undeniably good. This person did come to the defense of the movie, writing, "We need to get rid of movie critics because it ruins the vision of the movie. Movies are made because its a form of art not because its getting graded. If The Room got 24% on rotten tomatoes the Hurry Up Tomorrow minimum should get that." Another person said, "I love HURRY UP TOMORROW for all the wrong reason. A beautifully crafted experimental art piece with gorgeous cinematography, a half-baked plot, and an atrocious lead performance, #HurryUpTomorrow is so film school coded that it almost made me feel nostalgic." Another fan wrote, "What a beautiful experience this movie was!! Loved the raw and natural emotions displayed by the cast. The concept was very smart, loved the visuals & Jenna was brilliant! Phenomenal movie by Abel for his fans, this is a must watch especially if you're a fan." So, perhaps to fully appreciate the movie, you have to be a fan of The Weeknd and understand the lore of his music? If not, you're in for a bumpy ride.

Best and Worst: Ghalyah Al-Sharif  talks styling, travel and trends
Best and Worst: Ghalyah Al-Sharif  talks styling, travel and trends

Arab News

time25-04-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Arab News

Best and Worst: Ghalyah Al-Sharif  talks styling, travel and trends

DUBAI: The Saudi beauty content creator talks styling, travel, and trends. Best TV show or film you've ever seen? 'Breaking Bad.' It's an absolute masterpiece with thrilling twists, unforgettable characters and brilliant writing that kept me hooked from start to finish. Worst TV show or film you've ever seen? 'The Room.' It was honestly hard to get through because of the awkward acting and the storyline that did not make sense at all to me. A post shared by GHALIAH ALSHARIF (@ Best personal style moment so far? My green outfit at the Make Up For Ever event during Ramadan was definitely a standout. I feel like the rich color of the dress really captured my personality and made me feel so confident and elegant. Worst personal style moment? Honestly, I can't think of one. I always take time to choose outfits that make me feel confident and comfortable in my own skin. Best accessory for a little black dress? A pair of bold statement earrings. A sleek, structured clutch can also instantly elevate the look while keeping it chic and sophisticated. A post shared by GHALIAH ALSHARIF (@ Worst accessory for a little black dress? Anything overly flashy can distract from the elegance of the dress and throw off the entire vibe. Best fashion trend of 2025? Classic suits. I love them. They're so powerful and timeless. They give off an effortlessly elegant look that works for so many occasions. Worst fashion trend of 2025? I hate neon colors. They can be too loud and difficult to style in a way that feels polished or flattering. A post shared by GHALIAH ALSHARIF (@ Best advice you've ever been given? 'Be open to new ideas.' Personal and professional growth starts with curiosity and the willingness to evolve. It's something I strive for every day. Worst advice you've ever been given? 'Don't try too hard.' If you're passionate about something, you should give it your all without holding back. Best book you've ever read? 'The Four Agreements' (by Don Miguel Ruiz). It's such a powerful life-changing read that shifted my mindset and helped me find more inner peace. A post shared by GHALIAH ALSHARIF (@ Worst book you've ever read? 'The Secret.' Yes, the intentions were positive, but I just found it overly simplistic and lacking practical depth. Best thing to do when you're feeling low? I love to write down my thoughts and emotions. It really helps me process what I'm going through and gently releases any negativity I might be holding on to. Worst thing to do when you're feeling good? Procrastinate. It can really ruin any positive momentum and just leave you feeling like you haven't accomplished anything. Best holiday destination? Bali. It's incredibly peaceful, visually stunning, and has this unique spiritual energy that always makes me feel inspired. A post shared by GHALIAH ALSHARIF (@ Worst holiday destination? Honestly, I've been lucky so far. Every trip I have taken has offered something memorable and enjoyable. I learn a lot from each trip. Best subject at school? Art. It allowed me to express myself creatively and tap into my imagination in a way that felt natural and fulfilling. Worst subject at school? Math. I never really clicked with numbers, and it always felt more like a challenge than something I actually enjoyed. Best thing to do to ensure you have a productive day? Start the day with a clear plan and an organized mindset. It makes a huge difference in staying focused and achieving your goals. Worst thing to do when trying to be productive? Scrolling through social media. It's such a time drain and makes it harder to gain focus again.

Generative AI is most useful for the things we care about the least
Generative AI is most useful for the things we care about the least

Yahoo

time25-02-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

Generative AI is most useful for the things we care about the least

Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Midjourney can produce text, images and videos far more quickly than any one person can accomplish by hand. But as someone who studies the societal impacts of AI, I've noticed an interesting trade-off: The technology can certainly save time, but it does so precisely to the extent that the user is willing to surrender control over the final product. For this reason, generative AI is probably most useful for things we care about the least. Let's use the example of AI image generators. You probably have a rough idea of how they work. Just type what you want – 'a panda surfing,' 'a piece of toast that is also a car' – and the generative tool draws it. But this glosses over the countless possible iterations of the desired image. Will the image appear as a watercolor painting or a pencil sketch? How lifelike will the panda be? How big is the wave? Is the toast-car parked or moving? Is there anyone inside of it? When the images are generated, these questions have been answered – but not by the user. Rather, the generative AI tool has 'decided.' Of course, the user can be more specific: Imitate the style of Monet. Make the wave twice the height of the panda. Maybe the panda should look worried, since it isn't used to surfing. You can also pop open an image editor and modify the output yourself, down to the individual pixel. But, of course, drafting detailed instructions and revising the image take time, effort and skill. Generative AI promises to lighten the load. But as every manager knows, exercising control is work. In all art and expression, power lies in the details. In great paintings, not every brushstroke is planned – but each is carefully considered and accepted. And its overall effect on the viewer depends on all those considered brushstrokes together. Filmmakers shoot take after take of the same scene, each subtly or radically different. Only a small fraction of that footage makes it into the final cut – the fraction that the editors feel does the job best. Great artists use their judgment to ensure every detail helps to achieve the effect they want. Of course, there's nothing new about putting someone else in charge of the details. People are used to delegating authority – even about matters of expression – to marketers, speechwriters, social media managers and the like. Generative AI makes a new sort of contractor available. It's always on call, and in certain ways it is very technically competent. But compared with skilled humans, it has a limited ability to understand what you want. Moreover, it lacks intention, contemplation and the comprehensive mastery of detail that yield great expressive achievements – or even the comprehensive idiosyncrasy that spawns very unique ones. Ask ChatGPT for a film script, plus casting and shooting instructions. It will give you neither Francis Ford Coppola's masterpiece 'The Godfather' nor Tommy Wiseau's bizarre 'The Room.' You could, perhaps, approach a masterpiece, or a true oddity. But to do so, you'd have to exercise more and more time, more and more effort, and more and more control. What generative AI makes possible, above all, is low-effort, low-control expression. In the time I took to write and revise this article, I could have used ChatGPT to generate 200 grammatically correct, well-structured articles, and then I could have posted them online without even reading them. I wouldn't have had to carefully parse each word and decide whether it really helped me make my point. I wouldn't have even had to decide whether I agreed with any of the AI-generated write-ups. This is not a merely hypothetical example. Low-quality, AI-generated e-books of ambiguous provenance are already making their way into online vendors' catalogs – and into the libraries those vendors serve. Similarly, using image generators, I could now flood the internet with superficially appealing images, dedicating only a fraction of a second to decide whether any of them express what I want them to express or achieve what I want them to achieve. But in doing so, I would not just be skipping over drudgery. Writing, drawing and painting are not just labor but processes of considering, reviewing and deciding exactly what I want to put out into the world. By skipping over those processes, I surrender that decision-making process to the AI tool. Some scholars argue that the internet has produced an era of 'cheap speech.' People no longer have to invest a lot of resources – nor even face the judgment of their neighbors – to broadcast whatever they want to the world. With generative AI, expression is even cheaper. You don't even have to make things yourself to put them out into the world. For the first time in human history, the ability to produce writing, art and expression has been decoupled from the necessity of actually paying attention to what you're making or saying. I suspect that great art, journalism and scholarship will still demand great attention and effort. Some of that effort may even include custom-developing AI tools tailored to an individual artist's concerns. But unless people become much better at curation, great work will be increasingly difficult to locate amid the flood of low-effort content, which is also known as 'AI slop.' It's appropriate that generative AI becomes more useful the sloppier its users are willing to be – that is, the less they care about the details. I could end with some dire prognosis – that working artists and writers will be replaced with mediocre automation, that online discourse will get even stupider, that people will isolate themselves in personalized cocoons of AI-generated media. All these things are possible. But it's probably more useful to offer a suggestion to you, the reader. When you need an image or a piece of writing, take a moment to decide: How important are the details? Would the process of making this yourself, or working with a collaborator or contractor, be useful? Would it yield a better output, or give me the chance to learn, or begin or strengthen a relationship, or help you reflect on something important to you? In short, is it worth putting in real care and effort? The answer will not always be yes. But it often will. Art, writing, films – these are not just products, but acts. They are things humans make, through a process of thousands of little decisions that encompass what we stand for and what we want to say. So when it comes to art, expression and argument, if you want it done right, it's probably still best to do it yourself. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: John P. Nelson, Georgia Institute of Technology Read more: An 83-year-old short story by Borges portends a bleak future for the internet What makes some art so bad that it's good? ChatGPT, DALL-E 2 and the collapse of the creative process John P. Nelson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Rock & Roll Hall of Fame 2025: Will Delaware star (who isn't George Thorogood) get in?
Rock & Roll Hall of Fame 2025: Will Delaware star (who isn't George Thorogood) get in?

Yahoo

time13-02-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

Rock & Roll Hall of Fame 2025: Will Delaware star (who isn't George Thorogood) get in?

The legendary classic rock band Bad Company, which once featured a Delaware star, is nominated for the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame 2025 alongside Phish, Mariah Carey, Outkast and more. Paul Cullen of Millsboro is the local star who briefly played with the English rock band in the early 1990s. He didn't waste any time praising the original members of Bad Company after he learned about the group's first-ever Hall of Fame nod on Wednesday morning. "Finally! Congrats to Mick [Ralphs], Simon [Kirke], Paul [Rodgers] and Boz [Burrell]! Long time coming and so well deserved! Cheers to Bad Company," Cullen wrote in a Facebook post. Bad Company was formed in 1973 and has dropped favorites like "Shooting Star," "Bad Company" and "If You Needed Somebody." Cullen was a touring member of Bad Company, playing with them from 1990-94. Since Cullen isn't an original member of Bad Company, The News Journal/Delaware Online called the bassist Wednesday to ask if he would be enshrined into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame if the band gets in. "I doubt if they'd ask me [to join them]," Cullen told The News Journal, adding he was one of many musicians who rotated into Bad Company's lineup. "I haven't played with them in 30 years. You know what I mean? I was the touring bass player. I didn't [make] a mark on the band. I didn't write any songs." Famous Eagles fan celebrities: They each bleed kelly green Cullen played bass with Bad Company in the early '90s. After moving to Delaware in 2001, he's built a reputation as a singer-songwriter, private chef, sommelier, and in-home dining performer. Clients book Cullen to cook at their home where he also performs a private concert. He founded The Room at Cedar Grove in Lewes, which features concerts from local to national acts. Most of the performances at The Room include a meal and Cullen is the chef. Proceeds from The Room benefit Cullen's nonprofit Paul Kares, a charity he founded with his friend, Jim Rivette. The nonprofit supports young performing and culinary students. More about Paul Kares: Paul Kares combines music, food and fun to benefit aspiring performers and musicians Paul Kares has awarded grants to school bands, college curriculums and music schools. The organization provides funds for equipment, tuition and travel expenses. The Former Bad Company bassist said he's especially happy about one of the guys from the band having a chance to get inducted into the Hall of Fame. 'I'm really happy' for Simon because I got to know Simon really well,' Cullen said. 'And I got to meet Paul once or twice, but he wasn't in the band when I played in the band. Cullen also said he was blindsided by the band's Hall of Fame nod and didn't know it happened until The News Journal called him about it, which led him to immediately giving the guys a shout-out. "That's so good they got nominated. I just posted on Facebook because of you, thanks for telling me." USA TODAY named Restaurants of the Year: This Delaware favorite made the list Among the 14 hopefuls to gain entry into the storied institution are eight first-timers, most of them with rock as their musical anchor. To be eligible for a nomination, the artist or band must have released its first commercial recording at least 25 years before the year of nomination. Bad Company The Black Crowes Mariah Carey Chubby Checker Joe Cocker Billy Idol Joy Division/New Order Cyndi Lauper Maná Oasis Outkast Phish Soundgarden The White Stripes Inductees will be announced in late April, after an international panel of over 1,200 artists, historians and music industry professionals cast their vote. The selection criteria include an artist's impact on other musicians, the scope and longevity of their work, innovation and excellence in technique. The artists honored in three special nominee categories – musical influence, musical excellence and the Ahmet Ertegun Non-Performer Award – will also be announced in April. This year's ceremony will take place in the fall in Los Angeles, with ticket and location details to be announced. USA TODAY reporter Melissa Ruggieri contributed to this report. If you have an interesting story idea, email lifestyle reporter Andre Lamar at alamar@ Consider signing up for his weekly newsletter, DO Delaware, at This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: Bad Company gets Rock & Roll Hall of Fame 2025 nod, has Delaware ties

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store