Latest news with #TheSeductionofEasiness
Economic Times
17 hours ago
- Science
- Economic Times
Wharton professor calls out illusive ‘TikTok science': Says, ‘Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency'
Synopsis Adam Grant cautions against relying on TikTok for science education, highlighting the risk of overconfidence from simplified content. He warns that brief soundbites create an illusion of understanding, potentially leading to flawed judgments. Grant emphasizes that true expertise requires in-depth study, not just familiarity with viral clips, urging a balance between accessibility and rigorous learning. iStock Adam Grant warns against overconfidence from TikTok science lessons. He says short videos cannot replace in-depth study. Simplified content makes people think they know more than they do. (Image: iStock) Scrolling through TikTok, Shorts or Instagram reels for quick science lessons may feel enlightening, but according to Wharton professor Adam Grant, it could be leaving people dangerously overconfident in their knowledge. Grant, a best-selling author and one of the world's most influential management thinkers, took to social media to warn against the rising trend of bite-sized science content. His message was clear: simplified soundbites cannot replace the depth of systematic study. 'TikTok science can leave you overconfident in your knowledge,' Grant wrote in his post. 'Simplifying complex ideas makes them more compelling, but also fosters an illusion of deep understanding. Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency. Soundbites aren't substitutes for systematic study.'To back up his warning, Grant cited two academic papers: A new dimension of simplified science communication: the easiness effect of science popularization in animated video abstracts The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople's reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information Both studies explore how people are more likely to trust their own judgment when presented with simplified scientific explanations, even if their actual expertise is limited. — AdamMGrant (@AdamMGrant) According to the paper The Seduction of Easiness , when participants were given scientific arguments that appeared simple, they felt more confident in evaluating the claims themselves and were less likely to defer to expert opinions. The researchers noted that this false sense of understanding could lead to misguided conclusions, especially in areas requiring nuanced knowledge. The findings highlight what Grant calls the 'illusion of fluency'—where being familiar with a concept through simplified content creates a false impression of mastery. As a renowned organizational psychologist and Wharton's top-rated professor for seven consecutive years, Adam Grant's voice carries weight beyond academia. His concern about oversimplified science is not just about TikTok. It reflects a larger cultural shift where quick consumption of knowledge, driven by social media platforms, risks replacing in-depth learning. Grant's caution serves as a reminder that true understanding requires more than viral clips or catchy infographics. While platforms like TikTok make science accessible, they can also blur the line between awareness and warning struck a chord with many online users, who echoed Grant's concerns. One commenter noted that reels and shorts often 'sensationalize complex topics in 30 seconds, which is an injustice to knowledge.' Others agreed that while TikTok may spark curiosity, true mastery requires patience, depth, and critical thinking. Several pointed out that the culture of bite-sized content has its advantages in accessibility, but it should never be mistaken for a substitute for rigorous study and debate. As one user summed it up, 'There's no replacement for deep studying, diving into sources, and examining both pros and cons.'
Time of India
18 hours ago
- Science
- Time of India
Wharton professor calls out illusive ‘TikTok science': Says, ‘Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency'
Scrolling through TikTok, Shorts or Instagram reels for quick science lessons may feel enlightening, but according to Wharton professor Adam Grant, it could be leaving people dangerously overconfident in their knowledge. Grant, a best-selling author and one of the world's most influential management thinkers, took to social media to warn against the rising trend of bite-sized science content . His message was clear: simplified soundbites cannot replace the depth of systematic study . The Danger of 'Easy Science' 'TikTok science can leave you overconfident in your knowledge,' Grant wrote in his post. 'Simplifying complex ideas makes them more compelling, but also fosters an illusion of deep understanding. Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency. Soundbites aren't substitutes for systematic study.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo To back up his warning, Grant cited two academic papers: A new dimension of simplified science communication : the easiness effect of science popularization in animated video abstracts The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople's reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information Both studies explore how people are more likely to trust their own judgment when presented with simplified scientific explanations, even if their actual expertise is limited. — AdamMGrant (@AdamMGrant) According to the paper The Seduction of Easiness , when participants were given scientific arguments that appeared simple, they felt more confident in evaluating the claims themselves and were less likely to defer to expert opinions. The researchers noted that this false sense of understanding could lead to misguided conclusions, especially in areas requiring nuanced knowledge. The findings highlight what Grant calls the 'illusion of fluency'—where being familiar with a concept through simplified content creates a false impression of mastery. Why Grant's Warning Matters As a renowned organizational psychologist and Wharton's top-rated professor for seven consecutive years, Adam Grant's voice carries weight beyond academia. His concern about oversimplified science is not just about TikTok. It reflects a larger cultural shift where quick consumption of knowledge, driven by social media platforms, risks replacing in-depth learning. Grant's caution serves as a reminder that true understanding requires more than viral clips or catchy infographics. While platforms like TikTok make science accessible, they can also blur the line between awareness and expertise. Netizens React The warning struck a chord with many online users, who echoed Grant's concerns. One commenter noted that reels and shorts often 'sensationalize complex topics in 30 seconds, which is an injustice to knowledge.' Others agreed that while TikTok may spark curiosity, true mastery requires patience, depth, and critical thinking. Several pointed out that the culture of bite-sized content has its advantages in accessibility, but it should never be mistaken for a substitute for rigorous study and debate. As one user summed it up, 'There's no replacement for deep studying, diving into sources, and examining both pros and cons.'
