14-03-2025
Wisconsin housing crisis fueled by the Thurmond Amendment. Repeal this relic.
When former President Biden commuted the sentences of nearly 2,500 nonviolent drug offenders in January before leaving office, he reignited attention to the unjust sentencing disparities born from the "War on Drugs" policies that continue to harm thousands of Wisconsinites decades later.
Chief among these relics is the Thurmond Amendment, a draconian policy that enforces a lifetime of punishment by denying Fair Housing protections to individuals convicted of drug distribution, no matter how much time has passed or how much they've rebuilt their lives.
Imagine making a mistake as a young adult and getting mixed up with drugs. After serving your sentence, maturing, and working hard to rebuild your life, you're ready to start fresh. Only to discover years later that a single conviction legally locks you out of housing opportunities indefinitely. Some landlords won't return your calls. Others deny your application outright, regardless of your income, credit score, or rental history.
Opinion: Providing services to released inmates cuts recidivism and boosts life prospects
This is the reality for over 50,000 Wisconsinites living under the shadow of the Thurmond Amendment. These individuals and their families often face a lifetime sentence for low-level offenses involving small quantities of drugs.
Take the case of Stacey Smiter, a Wisconsin resident convicted of marijuana distribution. For years, Stacey faced rejection in the housing market or was forced to pay exorbitant security deposits solely because of his record. His punishment didn't end with his sentence — it extended into every corner of his life as he struggled to secure stable housing for his family.
Ironically, had Stacey been convicted of a violent crime, he would not face this legal barrier.
In 2016, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued guidance requiring landlords to consider criminal records in the context of other factors, such as rental, credit, and employment history. However, the Thurmond Amendment excludes drug distribution convictions from these protections, creating a loophole that leaves individuals like Stacey permanently locked out of fair housing opportunities.
The impact of the Thurmond Amendment in Wisconsin is staggering. Since its enactment in 1988, over 50,000 people in the state have been convicted of drug distribution offenses, many involving minor amounts of drugs. Eleven percent of all drug convictions in Wisconsin are for marijuana, and 81% of cocaine convictions involve small amounts tied to personal use. Many of these individuals, had they been charged in today's political environment, would have faced simple possession charges and retained their Fair Housing protections.
The law's effects are also deeply inequitable. Black Wisconsinites are 12 times more likely than white residents to receive a drug distribution conviction. For amounts as small as three grams or less, that disparity rises to 15 times. By denying stable housing, the Thurmond Amendment perpetuates cycles of poverty, recidivism, and family instability — all while offering no measurable benefit to public safety.
Housing is the foundation of stability and opportunity. In today's historically tight housing market, denying families protections based on decades-old convictions—while ignoring standard measures of risk like credit score or rental history — isn't just bad policy. It's an unjustified barrier to economic mobility that harms individuals, families, and communities alike.
Thankfully, there's reason for optimism.
Reforming this issue has strong support from industry leaders such as the Rental Apartment Association of Wisconsin and Wisconsin Realtors. Both groups have endorsed repealing the Thurmond Amendment, recognizing that the law harms individuals who have paid their debt to society without benefiting the housing market. As the Rental Apartment Association noted:
"Good renters deserve options in the rental market that align with their family's needs and wants. If a tenant qualifies for an apartment based on income, rental, and credit history, they should not be denied housing simply because of a conviction from decades ago."
Repealing the Thurmond Amendment would also align with bipartisan efforts like the First Step Act, signed by President Donald Trump in 2018, and the Fair Chance Act, co-sponsored by Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson.
Opinion: Doctors battle misinformation. RFK Jr. is wrong — and measles may only be start.
Policies that show reforming punitive laws can promote second chances without compromising community safety.
Now is the time for Wisconsin legislators on Capitol Hill to act. By removing this unnecessary and discriminatory barrier, we can ensure that people like Stacey Smiter are judged not by their past mistakes but by their current record of responsibility. Stable housing is not just essential for individuals—it strengthens families, supports economic growth, and builds stronger communities for all Wisconsinites.
Shannon Ross is the CEO of The Community and Co-founder of Paradigm Shyft. Yusuf Dahl is the CEO of the Century Promise, the past president of the Rental Property Association of Wisconsin and is currently leading the national effort to repeal the Thurmond Amendment
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Decades old convictions prevent many from securing housing | Opinion
