Latest news with #Trump-style
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
‘El Salvador awaits you': Nigel Farage unleashes Trump-style prison plan to shock Starmer & UK
Nigel Farage Just Went Full Trump! Reform UK's Nigel Farage has announced a bold new crackdown on crime—promising Trump-style deportations of foreign prisoners to countries like El Salvador. At a fiery press conference, Farage said his goal is to 'cut crime in half' within five years, build five new prisons, and recruit 30,000 police officers. Show more Show less
The Mainichi
2 days ago
- Politics
- The Mainichi
Yoroku: Debate on regulations against foreigners in Japan should be conducted rationally
The term "xenophobia," derived from the Greek words "xenos" (meaning stranger) and "phobos" (meaning fear), was selected as one of the English-speaking world's "words of the year" in 2016. This came in response to the surge in online searches following the United Kingdom's move to leave the European Union due to a backlash against an influx of immigrants. In the United States, then-President Barack Obama used the term to criticize presidential candidate at the time Donald Trump's immigration policies. This was seen as a reaction against globalization, which had advanced after the Cold War's end and China's accession to the World Trade Organization. The trend continues, as evidenced by the anti-immigrant far-right's success in Germany's general election in February. Japan appears to have been no exception. In the July 20 House of Councillors election, "regulations on foreigners" became a more contested issue than measures to combat high prices. An American newspaper described the election strategy of the right-wing populist party Sanseito, which significantly increased its seats by promoting "Japanese First" policies, as Trump-style. Since the bubble economy era mainly in the late 1980s, Japan's society, once considered closed, has become more internationalized. The "alien" label disappeared from foreign entry counters at entry points to Japan in 1988. The following year saw the enactment of a revised immigration law, and in 1993, the Technical Intern Training Program for foreigners began. The rapid increase in foreign residents resulted from national policies addressing challenges like the declining birth rate and an aging population. The term "post-truth," where emotions have more influence than facts, was also named "word of the year" nine years ago. The lingering closed nature toward refugees remains, and "preferential treatment for foreigners" is far from reality. Seeking to vent dissatisfaction with foreigners and falling into exclusionary attitudes will lead to a dead end. Given the major setback of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and its junior coalition partner Komeito in the upper house election, political instability is inevitable, but it is hoped that the debate on regulations on foreigners will be conducted in a rational manner.
The Advertiser
06-07-2025
- Business
- The Advertiser
US tariffs 'second fiddle' to overseas student caps
Australia's limits on international students could be a bigger issue than US tariffs, an expert has warned. President Donald Trump's tariffs have become arguably the biggest economic story of the year, with most Australian goods being hit with a 10 per cent levy while 50 per cent tariffs are imposed on steel and aluminium sent to the US. But the direct impact of the measures on Australia is relatively small as most exports tend to go to China, Japan and Korea, according to University of Sydney economics lecturer Luke Hartigan. The bigger issue may be one Australia has already inflicted on itself. "It's important to look at the larger scheme of things," Dr Hartigan told AAP. "The tariff exemption is important, but if we wanted to shoot ourselves in the foot, we would reduce the number of international students." "What's happening with our tariffs with the US is second fiddle." International student education was worth $51 billion for the Australian economy in 2023/24, but both political parties have vowed to slash numbers, with Labor already revealing a 270,000 cap from 2025 after more than 445,000 commenced study the year before. Dr Hartigan said international students were important for soft power. "They get to see Australian culture, they get to learn about Australia and they go back and speak favourably about Australia, so it's a very positive thing," he said. But most Australian political commentary has taken on the tariff issue, especially as Mr Trump is set to lift his tariff pause on July 9. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said the government will continue negotiating for exemptions while keeping the national interest in mind, and dismissed Trump-style isolationist policies. However, opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan has said the government has "waved the white flag" and called out Mr Albanese for failing to meet Mr Trump face-to-face. "There are countries dealing and talking to the new US president, but not ours ... it is embarrassing," Mr Hogan said. Australia could feel some indirect effects when the pause lifts, Dr Hartigan said. Tariffs on China could cause issues for Australia and uncertainty around the levies could play out in the stock market. Australia's limits on international students could be a bigger issue than US tariffs, an expert has warned. President Donald Trump's tariffs have become arguably the biggest economic story of the year, with most Australian goods being hit with a 10 per cent levy while 50 per cent tariffs are imposed on steel and aluminium sent to the US. But the direct impact of the measures on Australia is relatively small as most exports tend to go to China, Japan and Korea, according to University of Sydney economics lecturer Luke Hartigan. The bigger issue may be one Australia has already inflicted on itself. "It's important to look at the larger scheme of things," Dr Hartigan told AAP. "The tariff exemption is important, but if we wanted to shoot ourselves in the foot, we would reduce the number of international students." "What's happening with our tariffs with the US is second fiddle." International student education was worth $51 billion for the Australian economy in 2023/24, but both political parties have vowed to slash numbers, with Labor already revealing a 270,000 cap from 2025 after more than 445,000 commenced study the year before. Dr Hartigan said international students were important for soft power. "They get to see Australian culture, they get to learn about Australia and they go back and speak favourably about Australia, so it's a very positive thing," he said. But most Australian political commentary has taken on the tariff issue, especially as Mr Trump is set to lift his tariff pause on July 9. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said the government will continue negotiating for exemptions while keeping the national interest in mind, and dismissed Trump-style isolationist policies. However, opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan has said the government has "waved the white flag" and called out Mr Albanese for failing to meet Mr Trump face-to-face. "There are countries dealing and talking to the new US president, but not ours ... it is embarrassing," Mr Hogan said. Australia could feel some indirect effects when the pause lifts, Dr Hartigan said. Tariffs on China could cause issues for Australia and uncertainty around the levies could play out in the stock market. Australia's limits on international students could be a bigger issue than US tariffs, an expert has warned. President Donald Trump's tariffs have become arguably the biggest economic story of the year, with most Australian goods being hit with a 10 per cent levy while 50 per cent tariffs are imposed on steel and aluminium sent to the US. But the direct impact of the measures on Australia is relatively small as most exports tend to go to China, Japan and Korea, according to University of Sydney economics lecturer Luke Hartigan. The bigger issue may be one Australia has already inflicted on itself. "It's important to look at the larger scheme of things," Dr Hartigan told AAP. "The tariff exemption is important, but if we wanted to shoot ourselves in the foot, we would reduce the number of international students." "What's happening with our tariffs with the US is second fiddle." International student education was worth $51 billion for the Australian economy in 2023/24, but both political parties have vowed to slash numbers, with Labor already revealing a 270,000 cap from 2025 after more than 445,000 commenced study the year before. Dr Hartigan said international students were important for soft power. "They get to see Australian culture, they get to learn about Australia and they go back and speak favourably about Australia, so it's a very positive thing," he said. But most Australian political commentary has taken on the tariff issue, especially as Mr Trump is set to lift his tariff pause on July 9. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said the government will continue negotiating for exemptions while keeping the national interest in mind, and dismissed Trump-style isolationist policies. However, opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan has said the government has "waved the white flag" and called out Mr Albanese for failing to meet Mr Trump face-to-face. "There are countries dealing and talking to the new US president, but not ours ... it is embarrassing," Mr Hogan said. Australia could feel some indirect effects when the pause lifts, Dr Hartigan said. Tariffs on China could cause issues for Australia and uncertainty around the levies could play out in the stock market. Australia's limits on international students could be a bigger issue than US tariffs, an expert has warned. President Donald Trump's tariffs have become arguably the biggest economic story of the year, with most Australian goods being hit with a 10 per cent levy while 50 per cent tariffs are imposed on steel and aluminium sent to the US. But the direct impact of the measures on Australia is relatively small as most exports tend to go to China, Japan and Korea, according to University of Sydney economics lecturer Luke Hartigan. The bigger issue may be one Australia has already inflicted on itself. "It's important to look at the larger scheme of things," Dr Hartigan told AAP. "The tariff exemption is important, but if we wanted to shoot ourselves in the foot, we would reduce the number of international students." "What's happening with our tariffs with the US is second fiddle." International student education was worth $51 billion for the Australian economy in 2023/24, but both political parties have vowed to slash numbers, with Labor already revealing a 270,000 cap from 2025 after more than 445,000 commenced study the year before. Dr Hartigan said international students were important for soft power. "They get to see Australian culture, they get to learn about Australia and they go back and speak favourably about Australia, so it's a very positive thing," he said. But most Australian political commentary has taken on the tariff issue, especially as Mr Trump is set to lift his tariff pause on July 9. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said the government will continue negotiating for exemptions while keeping the national interest in mind, and dismissed Trump-style isolationist policies. However, opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan has said the government has "waved the white flag" and called out Mr Albanese for failing to meet Mr Trump face-to-face. "There are countries dealing and talking to the new US president, but not ours ... it is embarrassing," Mr Hogan said. Australia could feel some indirect effects when the pause lifts, Dr Hartigan said. Tariffs on China could cause issues for Australia and uncertainty around the levies could play out in the stock market.
Perth Now
06-07-2025
- Business
- Perth Now
US tariffs 'second fiddle' to overseas student caps
Australia's limits on international students could be a bigger issue than US tariffs, an expert has warned. President Donald Trump's tariffs have become arguably the biggest economic story of the year, with most Australian goods being hit with a 10 per cent levy while 50 per cent tariffs are imposed on steel and aluminium sent to the US. But the direct impact of the measures on Australia is relatively small as most exports tend to go to China, Japan and Korea, according to University of Sydney economics lecturer Luke Hartigan. The bigger issue may be one Australia has already inflicted on itself. "It's important to look at the larger scheme of things," Dr Hartigan told AAP. "The tariff exemption is important, but if we wanted to shoot ourselves in the foot, we would reduce the number of international students." "What's happening with our tariffs with the US is second fiddle." International student education was worth $51 billion for the Australian economy in 2023/24, but both political parties have vowed to slash numbers, with Labor already revealing a 270,000 cap from 2025 after more than 445,000 commenced study the year before. Dr Hartigan said international students were important for soft power. "They get to see Australian culture, they get to learn about Australia and they go back and speak favourably about Australia, so it's a very positive thing," he said. But most Australian political commentary has taken on the tariff issue, especially as Mr Trump is set to lift his tariff pause on July 9. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said the government will continue negotiating for exemptions while keeping the national interest in mind, and dismissed Trump-style isolationist policies. However, opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan has said the government has "waved the white flag" and called out Mr Albanese for failing to meet Mr Trump face-to-face. "There are countries dealing and talking to the new US president, but not ours ... it is embarrassing," Mr Hogan said. Australia could feel some indirect effects when the pause lifts, Dr Hartigan said. Tariffs on China could cause issues for Australia and uncertainty around the levies could play out in the stock market.
Indian Express
25-06-2025
- Business
- Indian Express
Trump's name could crown Tel Aviv hotel or make it a target: Report
On June 13, as Iranian missiles rained down on Tel Aviv in retaliation for Israel's attacks on its nuclear program, one missile struck the upscale Sarona neighbourhood, home to the Israel Defense Forces headquarters, luxury malls, and a soaring hotel tower under construction. That tower, soon to be Tel Aviv's tallest hotel, had reportedly caught the attention of the Trump Organisation. According to The New York Times, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump Organization, discussed a potential management and branding deal for the hotel in the weeks before the missile strike. In a statement, Eric Trump said, 'Israel has always been a market we would love to explore, but we have no plans at this time and any discussions have been strictly preliminary.' In April, during a virtual meeting with Israeli real estate executives, Trump reportedly said the project 'had the feel of a Trump property' and suggested adding residential floors. He was also quoted as saying he wanted to finalize at least one deal in Israel by year-end. The Sarona hotel project is being developed by the Nitsba Group, whose chairman Haim Tsuff has previously engaged in negotiations with the Trump family. This follows earlier attempts by the Trump Organization to break into the Israeli market, including a post-2020 deal in Jerusalem that was abandoned after the October 2023 Hamas attack. Despite the Tel Aviv hotel's Trump-style ambitions — 800 rooms, VIP levels, and opulent design — the war has complicated prospects. Any Trump-branded property in the region, experts told The Times, could become a political or military target. Eric Trump was said to be interested in extending the building by 12 stories, contingent on city approval. However, height restrictions near Ben Gurion Airport might pose a legal hurdle. The Times noted that the Trump Organization is also exploring other deals across the Middle East, including in Qatar, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia, all countries with strategic ties to US foreign policy and where the Trump brand has already gained a foothold. (With inputs from New York Times)
