Latest news with #UttarPradeshRevenueCode
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Business
- Hindustan Times
Uttar Pradesh govt proposes new law to decriminalise 293 minor offences
In a bid to create an industry-friendly atmosphere and remove irritants in the ease of doing business, the Uttar Pradesh government proposes to enact a new law to decriminalise 293 minor offences and replace the provisions for imprisonment with civic penalties The state government is working on bringing the new law on the pattern of the Jan Vishwas Adhiniyam that the Centre enacted in 2023, those aware of the development said. (REPRESENTATIVE IMAGE) Those aware of the development said the 293 provisions proposed to be decriminalised are part of nearly 15-20 acts and the proposed law would ensure that the penalties are commensurate with the seriousness of the crime. The Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, the laws for urban local bodies that include the municipal corporations, the Fire Services Act, the Tree Protection Act, labour laws and the laws for industry have provisions for imprisonment for minor offences. The proposed new law will decriminalise them. Under the proposed new law, there will be provisions for compounding of minor offences. The provisions for imprisonment up to about six months will be replaced by a fine of a few thousand of rupees or to a lakh or so. 'We propose to enact a new law to decriminalise 293 of 294 provisions of law as part of the state government's efforts to provide an industry-friendly atmosphere and relax provisions for the ease of doing business. No relaxation will be made in the provisions for imprisonment if the offence causes health hazards or directly affects human lives,' said a senior officer of the state government. The state government is working on bringing the new law on the pattern of the Jan Vishwas Adhiniyam that the Centre enacted in 2023, those aware of the development said. Chief minister Yogi Adityanath has time and again asked the officers to remove irritants in the ease of doing business. Chief secretary SP Goyal also chaired a meeting convened on Tuesday to review the progress under the flagship Compliance and Reduction and Deregulation 2025 initiative. Efforts to ease the regulations and create an industry-friendly ecosystem are part of this initiative. A senior officer said the draft of the new law is being finalised and once approved by the state cabinet, the proposed legislation may be moved in the monsoon session of the state legislature commencing on August 11.
Time of India
15-07-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Can legislative committees interfere in Revenue deptt work?
Representative imageRepresentative image SC to examine their power to interfere in quasi-judicial functions New Delhi: Can parliamentary and legislative committees interfere in the quasi-judicial work of the revenue department? The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine this question arising from the directions issued by a parliamentary committee in the UP Assembly in a land dispute case. Appearing for a petitioner, senior advocate Amit Anand Tiwari told a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that multiple directions have been issued by the Uttar Pradesh govt, on the instructions of legislative committees, to revenue officers asking them to take 'necessary action' and submit report on the land dispute. 'Such directions directly and substantially impinge on free and independent adjudication by the revenue authorities in pending proceedings,' Tiwari said, which prompted the bench to entertain the petition and say that the question of law arising in this case is – 'Whether legislative committees can interfere in quasi-judicial functions of revenue authorities?' The issue pertained to demarcation and determination of possession of a plot, which according to the petitioner could be gone into by the competent authority, in this case the sub-divisional magistrate, under the UP Revenue Code. Tiwari said a proper and effective adjudication by the revenue authorities is not possible if there is regular and constant interference from the legislative Committees. He said the Allahabad HC erred by failing to issue appropriate directions to prevent interference by political authorities in the adjudicatory process before Revenue Authorities. The petitioner informed SC that he had filed a complaint before the Assistant Collector, Meja, Prayagraj under section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 against one R P Shukla, who using his influence, had encroached upon the public lands causing great hardships and obstruction to people in pursuing their agricultural activities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'While the petitioner was diligently pursuing the remedies available to him under the law, questions were being raised in the Vidhan Sabha and directions were being issued by the Secretariat to Revenue Officers asking them to take necessary action and to submit report regarding the land dispute concerning RP Shukla,' he alleged.
Hindustan Times
03-05-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Allahabad HC dismisses transfer petition against presiding officer
Prayagraj , The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a transfer petition due to a lack of evidence to support the allegations levelled against a presiding officer. The court has also imposed a cost of ₹5,000 on the petitioner, observing that litigants are increasingly turning aggressive towards the judiciary because of the reluctance of judges to use their contempt-of-court powers. Passing the order, Justice J J Munir further observed that while courts hesitate to invoke contempt powers out of respect for the citizens' fundamental right to freedom of speech, this liberal approach cannot be misused to make scandalous allegations against judges. "It is unfortunate that in contemporary times, litigants have turned aggressive because for one reason or the other, the courts are eschewing invocation of their power of criminal contempt. The restraint or the hesitation comes from honouring the citizens' fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression and their right to ventilate their grievances. This does not mean that any kind of scandalous allegations without basis can be hurled at the court," the judge said. The case involved a plea challenging the Board of Revenue's refusal to transfer an application under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 from the additional commissioner 3rd, Bareilly to another court. The petitioner had alleged bias and connivance between the presiding officer and the respondent, citing delays and long adjournments as evidence. During the course of hearing, the high court found these claims to be "utterly scandalous" and unsupported by evidence. "A wrong order or a wrong procedure does not lead to an inference of bias. Likewise, mere delay on the part of the presiding officer in hearing the revision is no ground to infer bias," the court said in its order dated April 25. It stressed that accusations of judicial connivance demand a high standard of responsibility and evidence.
