Latest news with #UttarakhandStateElectionCommission
India Today
8 hours ago
- Politics
- India Today
Court puts Uttarakhand local polls on hold over lack of clarity in reservation
The Uttarakhand High Court on Monday put an interim stay on the upcoming Panchayati Raj elections in the state, citing ambiguity over reservation its order, the court observed that the state government had failed to present a clear stance on the issue of reservation in panchayat bodies. The court noted that due to this lack of clarity, it was compelled to put a hold on the election court order came a day after the Uttarakhand State Election Commission notified the schedule for three-tier panchayat elections. State Election Commissioner Sushil Kumar had announced that polling across 12 districts would be held on July 10, with counting scheduled for July nomination process was set to begin on June 25, with the last date for filing papers being June 28. Scrutiny of nominations was to take place between June 29 and July 1, while election symbols were to be allotted on July the notification issued, the Model Code of Conduct had also come into force and was to remain in effect until the results were declared.
Hans India
8 hours ago
- Politics
- Hans India
Uttarakhand High Court Suspends Panchayat Elections Due To Reservation Confusion
The Uttarakhand High Court has imposed an interim suspension on the state's forthcoming Panchayati Raj elections, expressing concerns over the government's ambiguous approach to reservation protocols in local governance bodies. In a significant judicial intervention on Monday, the court determined that the state administration had not provided sufficient clarity regarding reservation implementation within panchayat institutions. The bench emphasized that this uncertainty necessitated halting the electoral proceedings until proper clarification could be established. The judicial order emerged just one day following the Uttarakhand State Election Commission's official announcement of the three-tier panchayat election timeline. State Election Commissioner Sushil Kumar had previously declared that voting across twelve districts would occur on July 10, with vote counting scheduled for July 19. The electoral machinery had been set in motion with a comprehensive schedule outlining key dates for the democratic process. Candidate nomination submissions were planned to commence on June 25, with the final deadline for filing papers established as June 28. The verification and scrutiny phase was scheduled between June 29 and July 1, followed by the allocation of election symbols on July 3. Following the commission's notification, the Model Code of Conduct had automatically activated and was intended to remain operational throughout the entire election period until final results were announced. This comprehensive framework governs political activities and ensures fair electoral practices during the campaign period. The court's intervention highlights ongoing challenges in implementing reservation policies at the grassroots level of Indian democracy. Panchayati Raj institutions serve as the foundation of local self-governance, making clear reservation guidelines crucial for ensuring equitable representation across different communities and social groups. The suspension creates uncertainty for thousands of potential candidates and voters across the affected districts who were preparing for the democratic exercise. Political parties and local leaders had begun mobilizing their resources and strategies in anticipation of the announced election schedule. The state government will now need to address the court's concerns by providing unambiguous guidelines on reservation implementation before the electoral process can resume. This development underscores the importance of having well-defined policies in place before initiating any democratic process, particularly at the local governance level where community representation is paramount. The High Court's decision reflects the judiciary's commitment to ensuring that electoral processes adhere to constitutional principles and legal clarity, even if it means temporarily disrupting planned democratic activities to safeguard the integrity of the system.
