Latest news with #V.S.Krishna
The Hindu
3 days ago
- Politics
- The Hindu
HRF demands immediate restoration of doorstep delivery of rations in tribal areas
The Human Rights Forum (HRF) has raised serious concern over the State government's decision to dismantle the doorstep delivery system for distribution of rations. According to Y. Rajesh, HRF AP State general secretary, and V.S. Krishna, HRF AP& Telangana Coordination Committee member, it a setback to the food security of the Adivasi communities. Introduced in 2021, the doorstep delivery model ensured rations were handed over directly to beneficiaries through mobile dispensing units (MDUs), even in remote habitations. This reduced the travel burden for the elderly, persons with disabilities and daily wage workers. In Adivasi areas - especially among the Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) such as the Chenchus resident in Nallamala forests - this system was a critical step towards ensuring ensuring they were able to access the welfare delivery. At several places, Adivasis are now forced to walk up to 10 km across difficult terrain to access rations. Consequently, many of them are having to forgo their rations altogether because of a clear logistical and financial burden. The State government's claim that beneficiaries were missing rations under the doorstep system is in contrast to evidence on the ground. A field survey by LibTech India, a policy research organisation, covering 790 Adivasi respondents in the Paderu ITDA region of Alluri Sitharamaraju district found that 83% preferred the doorstep delivery system over the depot system for collecting rations. Notably, 92% stated that it had reduced travel distance. While 75% of respondents said that under-delivery was a recurring issue at depots, 65% experienced coercion to purchase additional items. Clearly, for many Adivasi families' residing in remote areas, the doorstep system removed significant travel barriers to access ration supplies. The doorstep delivery system also allowed flexibility. If a household missed the first MDU visit, they could collect their ration from the mini-truck parked later at the local secretariat. In some instances, the trucks returned again within the month. However, instead of strengthening these mechanisms, the present government has chosen to abandon them entirely. The HRF leaders allege that the recent rollback appears to have been driven by a powerful lobby of ration depot dealers who felt threatened by the transparency and accountability introduced by the MDU system. The current decision subverts the core objectives of the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013, in particular Section 30, and also violates the spirit behind the Scheduled Tribe Componen t(STC) funds that aim to ensure targeted and equitable delivery of welfare services to the Scheduled Tribes. They demanded the immediate restoration of the doorstep ration delivery system across all Adivasi areas, with a provision for depot access to those who miss the MDU. The door delivery model must be strengthened through improved logistics, volunteer support and robust grievance redressal mechanisms.
The Hindu
5 days ago
- Politics
- The Hindu
HRF condemns AP Cabinet's proposed 10-hour work day
The Human Rights Forum (HRF) has criticised the Andhra Pradesh Cabinet's recent approval of the AP Factories Amendment Bill, 2025, which seeks to extend the workday to 10 hours. The HRF described it as an irresponsible and deliberate assault on labour rights, and has demanded its immediate and unconditional withdrawal. In a statement on Tuesday, V. Rajesh, HRF AP State general secretary, and V.S. Krishna – HRF AP & TG Coordination Committee member—said that the amendment to the Factories Act, 1948, is no 'reform' but rather a regressive and exploitative move. It undermines decades of hard-fought battles by the working class that established a humane and sustainable working environment. The HRF leaders pointed out that the State government now seeks to dismantle these rights to benefit corporate interests. The 8-hour workday is the cornerstone of modern-day labour rights, achieved through decades of working-class resistance. B.R. Ambedkar, who played a decisive role in institutionalising the 8-hour workday, was in many ways its architect. Ambedkar's relentless efforts in the 1940s, in conjunction with the working-class struggles, led to an 8-hour cap on daily work. This is now being sought to be rolled back. Mr. Krishna and Mr. Rajesh noted that HRF was of the view that the much-talked-about 'ease/speed of doing business' has become a euphemism for curtailing labour rights so as to appease the capital investors. In the current policy discourse in the State, 'attracting investment' is shorthand for systematic deregulation, casualisation, weakening of regulatory oversight, and erosion of labour rights. Extending the maximum daily working hours amounts to entrenching exploitation and a rollback of hard-won labour safeguards. It normalises overwork, erodes the right to rest and leisure, and deprives workers of dignity from labour. This measure constitutes a fundamental breach of the government's Constitutional obligations. The HRF leaders called upon all democratic forces to oppose this devious and retrograde move.
