Latest news with #ValmikKarad
Time of India
4 days ago
- General
- Time of India
Massajog sarpanch case: Court schedules June 17 for hearing on Valmik Karad's plea challenging invoking of MCOCA against him
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: The special MCOCA court in Beed district has scheduled June 17 for deciding on the plea of Valmik Karad, the key accused in the murder of sarpanch Santosh Deshmukh, challenging the invoking of sections of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against him. After attending the hearing on Tuesday morning, special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam , who is representing the state in this case, said, "Valmik Karad's lawyers have moved an application challenging the applicability of MCOCA against him. The court has scheduled June 17 as the next date for hearing the arguments on this application. Also, on behalf of the state, we moved an application for confiscating all the movable and immovable assets belonging to Valmik Karad. The lawyers representing him have submitted replies regarding our application before the court today. The argument on our application, too, will be taken up on the next date of hearing." Nikam urged the court to frame charges in the case, stating that there was sufficient evidence against the accused. One of the key issues under consideration is whether the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) can be applied to prime accused Karad. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The court is expected to deliver its decision on the applicability of MCOCA on June 17 after hearing arguments from both prosecution and defence. In a parallel development, the prosecution has moved an application seeking seizure of Karad's movable and immovable properties. Karad's lawyers submitted their response on the matter, which has been scheduled for hearing on June 17. Karad filed a discharge application seeking exemption from charges under MCOCA. His defence team requested the court to prioritise the hearing on the application. The prosecution did not oppose the request, and the court listed the matter for hearing on June 17. Nikam confirmed that Karad is the only accused who filed such a discharge plea. Defence lawyers Vikas Khade and Mohan Yadav told newsprsons after the hearing that the prosecution was yet to share the digital evidence with them. The prosecution, however, informed the court that the electronic evidence would be submitted in a sealed format, after which discussions could be held. While the hearing on the discharge plea was expected on Tuesday, it did not take place. Instead, arguments were heard on several procedural and ancillary applications. The court observed that before addressing the discharge plea, other pending applications should be disposed of. Khade noted that the hearing lasted for nearly 50 minutes. He added that the prosecution has filed applications related to property seizure, and the court has scheduled a consolidated hearing on all pending matters, including the discharge plea and digital evidence, for June 17. Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: The special MCOCA court in Beed district has scheduled June 17 for deciding on the plea of Valmik Karad, the key accused in the murder of sarpanch Santosh Deshmukh, challenging the invoking of sections of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against him. After attending the hearing on Tuesday morning, special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam, who is representing the state in this case, said, "Valmik Karad's lawyers have moved an application challenging the applicability of MCOCA against him. The court has scheduled June 17 as the next date for hearing the arguments on this application. Also, on behalf of the state, we moved an application for confiscating all the movable and immovable assets belonging to Valmik Karad. The lawyers representing him have submitted replies regarding our application before the court today. The argument on our application, too, will be taken up on the next date of hearing." Nikam urged the court to frame charges in the case, stating that there was sufficient evidence against the accused. One of the key issues under consideration is whether the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) can be applied to prime accused Karad. The court is expected to deliver its decision on the applicability of MCOCA on June 17 after hearing arguments from both prosecution and defence. In a parallel development, the prosecution has moved an application seeking seizure of Karad's movable and immovable properties. Karad's lawyers submitted their response on the matter, which has been scheduled for hearing on June 17. Karad filed a discharge application seeking exemption from charges under MCOCA. His defence team requested the court to prioritise the hearing on the application. The prosecution did not oppose the request, and the court listed the matter for hearing on June 17. Nikam confirmed that Karad is the only accused who filed such a discharge plea. Defence lawyers Vikas Khade and Mohan Yadav told newsprsons after the hearing that the prosecution was yet to share the digital evidence with them. The prosecution, however, informed the court that the electronic evidence would be submitted in a sealed format, after which discussions could be held. While the hearing on the discharge plea was expected on Tuesday, it did not take place. Instead, arguments were heard on several procedural and ancillary applications. The court observed that before addressing the discharge plea, other pending applications should be disposed of. Khade noted that the hearing lasted for nearly 50 minutes. He added that the prosecution has filed applications related to property seizure, and the court has scheduled a consolidated hearing on all pending matters, including the discharge plea and digital evidence, for June 17.
Time of India
26-05-2025
- Time of India
Beed prison superintendent says his transfer is on administrative grounds, nothing to do with claims by dismissed cop
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: Beed prison superintendent Baksar Mulani, who received a transfer order to Latur prison on Monday, clarified that his reassignment is unrelated to the allegations made by terminated sub-inspector Ranjit Kasale. The transfer, which came shortly after Kasale's video release claiming preferential treatment for Valmik Karad — the primary accused in Massajog sarpanch Santosh Deshmukh's abduction and murder case — attracted attention. Speaking to TOI, Mulani said, "The state prison department transferred me to Latur on completion of my three-year tenure on May 24. It is an administrative transfer. My transfer has nothing to do with the false allegations levelled by dismissed sub-inspector Ranjit Kasale that VVIP treatment was given to Valmik Karad, the prime accused in the Santosh Deshmukh murder case. This is because Kasale was lodged at the Harsul Central Prison. He was not lodged at Beed jail for security reasons." Kasale, released on bail in a case under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleged on Saturday that Valmik Karad receives privileged treatment in prison. He stated that Karad receives non-vegetarian meals twice weekly and makes substantial purchases from the prison canteen, ranging from Rs 25,000 to Rs 30,000, using other inmates' names. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The dismissed officer's social media videos additionally claimed that Karad receives special three-layered roti, premium tea, and a superior blanket. A senior prison department official responded, "The prison department has its checks and balances. Just because someone has claimed that another accused is getting VIP treatment inside the prison, the prison department will not go and initiate action against him. Nowadays, there are CCTV cameras installed in almost all prisons. Every allegation can be cross-verified."
