logo
#

Latest news with #ViDiStudio

Ex-flight attendant warns not to pack these items in your carry-on: ‘Risking confiscation, fines or worse'
Ex-flight attendant warns not to pack these items in your carry-on: ‘Risking confiscation, fines or worse'

New York Post

time2 days ago

  • New York Post

Ex-flight attendant warns not to pack these items in your carry-on: ‘Risking confiscation, fines or worse'

Jet-setting with these things is just not allowed in the clouds. To avoid the frustration of confiscation at the airport, an experienced cabin crew expert is warning frequent flyers against packing these peculiar possessions in their bags. 'As a former flight attendant, I've seen it all at 38,000 feet,' Barbiebac La Azafata, 32, a travel influencer, from Spain, told What's The Jam. 'But nothing prepared me for the day a man casually opened a plastic supermarket bag, full of US dollars, and asked if it was ok to keep it there.' 6 Barbiebac La Azafata, an ex-flight attendant, has virally revealed the wildest things that are banned on planes. Jam Press/@ The cyber siren, who boasts over 4.9 million social media followers, says hitting the friendly skies with loads of dough is an absolute no-go. 'I'll never forget it — this wasn't some discreet envelope or a money belt,' continued La Azafata. 'It was a wide-open, crinkly bag, filled with what looked like $20,000 in cash.' 'No declaration or security alert,' she ranted, 'just bills floating around with a neck pillow on top.' 'What most people don't realize is that there's a $10,000 limit, or equivalent in other currency, when flying internationally,' the in-flight insider revealed. 'If you're carrying more, you have to declare it.' 'Otherwise, you're risking confiscation, fines or worse.' 6 The former air hostess warns that attempting to fly with wads of undeclared cash could result in trouble for the passenger. ViDi Studio – And a sack full of money isn't the only funny item on the no-fly list. From apples to fireworks, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), alongside other federal powers that be, have placed travel bans and limitations on specific goods for the safety of domestic and international trippers. Still, some of the forbidden effects have left folks feeling like the governmental authorities are straight tripping. 6 La Azafata reminded travelers that TSA agents will likely discard any liquid toiletry that exceeds 3.4 fluid ounces. kinomaster – 'I once saw a woman burst into tears because she had to throw away a luxury face cream she'd just bought,' La Azafata recalled of a despondent sightseer, who couldn't see the value in trashing her valuable beauty products before takeoff. 'It was in a 150ml (5-ounce) container, even though it was half empty,' said La Azafata. '[But] airport security doesn't care how much product is left.' 'If the bottle says over 100ml (3.4 ounces), it goes straight in the bin,' she confirmed. Plane passengers should also forgo packing their most cherished technology necessities, too, according to the pro. 6 La Azafata says flight attendants are skilled in handling fires caused by lithium batteries in digital devices. Jam Press/@ 'The average passenger boards a plane with six lithium battery devices,' La Azafata noted. 'That includes phones, tablets, laptops, smartwatches, even wireless earbuds.' 'Lithium batteries are small, but they can catch fire easily, especially if damaged or overheated,' she added. 'In fact, they're now the leading cause of fires onboard.' The TSA has even barred portable chargers and power banks that use lithium batteries in checked bags, per a new advisory from the Federal Aviation Administration. La Azafata claims she and her fellow ex-coworkers are well-versed in extinguishing the flames of a defective device. However, she says the little troublemakers should be left behind by vacationers. 'As crew, we're trained to handle it, we have fire gloves, containment bags, the works,' said the skyway savant. 'But, honestly, no one wants to see smoke midair.' 6 In addition to cash, creams and certain electronics, La Azafata says travelings with knives is typically off-limits in the friendly skies. Angelov – Lastly, but certainly not the least egregious no-no when it comes to carry-ons, are knives. 'I get it, you're in Geneva and you spot a beautiful Swiss Army knife and you think, perfect souvenir,' La Azafata said. 'But I've watched passengers get those exact knives confiscated at the security checkpoint and it's brutal.' 'If the blade is over 6cm, it's banned in hand luggage, full stop,' she asserted. 'If you're going to buy one, put it in your checked bag, or prepare to say goodbye at the gate.' 6 La Azafata encourages plane passenger to do their research well before boarding. Jam Press/@ The mile-high know-it-all recommends that air commuters double check an airline's policies before loading up their luggage with vetoed must-haves. 'Some passengers think once they're past security, they're good to go, but not quite,' La Azafata advised. 'Airlines can ban items even if security allows them.' 'A ball, for example, might pass the scanner, but if it's inflated, the cabin crew can take it away,' she said. 'It could expand and pop midair, which isn't dangerous, but it's definitely disruptive. 'Check your airline's website before flying,' urged La Azafata. 'It's all there, and it could save you from a very expensive mistake.'

The common things you should never say to a toxic in-law if you want a long-lasting marriage, relationship expert reveals
The common things you should never say to a toxic in-law if you want a long-lasting marriage, relationship expert reveals

New York Post

time12-05-2025

  • General
  • New York Post

The common things you should never say to a toxic in-law if you want a long-lasting marriage, relationship expert reveals

If your mother-in-law is giving you Livia Soprano or Bunny MacDougal vibes, take a beat before you snap back with a zinger you can't take back. Marriage and family therapist Sara M. Klein, LMFT, says the key to dealing with a meddling MIL is to bite your tongue — and when in doubt, play it like a National Geographic docuseries. 'One strategy I might use,' Klein recently told PureWow in an interview, 'is to pretend you are an anthropologist and just observe and describe. This will help with judgments.' Rather than rolling your eyes when she criticizes your holiday traditions — which will most likely happen — Klein suggests saying something like, 'It's interesting that your family does holidays this way,' or 'Their family has rituals that I never did growing up.' If you're tempted to drop a snarky 'That's your son's decision' when your mother-in-law keeps intruding in your marriage, Klein warns against deflecting responsibility. 'Blame and shame are not effective relationally. They shut people down, and there is no space in between,' Klein told the outlet. 3 If your mother-in-law is getting under your nerves, pause before unleashing a zinger you might regret. ViDi Studio – Instead, she suggests saying, 'We made a decision about this and we are happy to discuss our thought process with you.' When it comes to parenting, the expert explained that it's normal to want to parent differently from how your in-laws raised their children. And statements like 'We'll never do that with our children' can feel like a direct critique of how your in-laws raised your spouse. Instead, try: 'We're trying to limit screen time while the kids are little — it's just what's feeling right for us right now. But who knows, ask me again in six months,' Klein explained. 3 Klein told PureWow that blame and shame tactics are counterproductive in relationships, as they tend to shut people down and leave no room for open dialogue. motortion – According to a 2021 study published in 'Evolutionary Psychological Science,' the whole 'monster-in-law' stereotype may be a product of evolutionary wiring. Researchers found that 44% of people reported more conflict with their mothers-in-law than with their own mothers, largely over financial resources and child care. 'This genetic conflict may cause affines (in-laws) to disagree about the distribution of resources and investment, just as we see mothers and fathers disagreeing in these domains,' the study authors wrote. They also noted that these conflicts are likely heightened because in-laws 'do not choose to have relationships with one another' but are thrown together as 'unintended consequences' of their children's romantic entanglements. 3 A 2021 study published in Evolutionary Psychological Science suggests that the classic 'monster-in-law' trope might actually be rooted in our evolutionary instincts. Elnur – Meanwhile, Dr. Terri Apter, a Cambridge University psychologist and author of 'What Do You Want From Me?' believes that much of the conflict between wives and mothers-in-law is fueled by both women striving to be the 'primary woman' in their respective families. 'Each tries to establish or protect their status. Each feels threatened by the other,' Apter wrote in her book.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store