Latest news with #VictoriaFowell
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Beautician and dentist in £1.8m inheritance battle after both married same man in Las Vegas
A beautician and a dentist are locked in an inheritance battle over a dead accountant's £1.8m fortune after he married both of them in Las Vegas five years apart - but failed to get a divorce from his first bride. Wealthy accountant James Dinsdale died of cancer, aged 55, in October 2020, leaving a £1.8million estate to be fought over by the two women who called themselves his wives. After his death, his most recent partner, beautician Margaret Dinsdale, 41, began sorting out his affairs on the assumption that she would inherit his fortune as his next of kin. But she was left reeling when she discovered James was still legally married to his first wife when he whisked her off for a Las Vegas wedding in 2017 - making their marriage "void" and leaving her with no automatic right to inherit. Just five years earlier, James had married cosmetic dentist, Victoria Fowell, 53, at a Vegas wedding chapel on the same street and only 600 metres from where he wed Margaret, but never got round to divorcing her - making her James' heir alongside his adult son under intestacy laws. However, the two women are now locked in a High Court clash after Margaret launched a claim to a share of James' money on the basis she should be treated as a "spouse" because she married him in "good faith." In a short preliminary hearing, High Court judge Master James Brightwell heard accountant and Second World War history expert James Dinsdale built a thriving property development business, based around central London, before he died and left an estate now valued at around £1.8m. He wed Dr Victoria Fowell - a St Albans-based dentist with an expertise in 'cosmetic smile makeovers' - in 2012, but the pair never got divorced and he went on to marry Margaret Dinsdale in 2017. Margaret's barrister Jonathan Davey KC said his client and James had met in 2008 and become friends, before beginning a 'romantic relationship' in 2014, setting up home together the following year. However, she had no idea whatsoever that he was still married, only learning of it after his death. And because he had not made a will, James' money would be divided between Dr Fowell and his son, William Dinsdale, 28, under intestacy rules. 'Margaret believed that she was validly married to James Dinsdale and there is no evidence that she knew that the deceased was married to Dr Fowell as at 2017," he said. 'She understood the marriage between the deceased and Dr Fowell to have ended some time prior to the relationship between the deceased and the claimant beginning. "We have no idea what James' state of mind was, perhaps he didn't realise he wasn't divorced. "Margaret's assertion is that she believed the deceased to be unmarried and already divorced when she married him in good faith." Touching on their 2017 wedding in Las Vegas, he noted: 'The ceremony which took place between James and my client took place in almost the same location, and appears to have been of the same nature, as the earlier ceremony which took place between the deceased and Victoria Fowell in June 2012. 'The marriage ceremony between him and Dr Fowell took place in the Little White Wedding Chapel, Las Vegas Boulevard. The marriage ceremony between James and Margaret took place in the Chapel of the Flowers, Las Vegas Boulevard. 'But for the deceased's prior marriage to Dr Fowell, the latter ceremony would have been a valid marriage ceremony." The case reached court for a preliminary hearing after Margaret made a claim for "reasonable provision" from James' estate under the 1975 Inheritance Act, amounting to at least half of his £1.8m. The case is being brought against Dr Fowell and James' adult son William, who are currently due to share his fortune as his next of kin under intestacy rules. Mr Davey said Margaret had looked after James "24 hours per day" during his final struggles with terminal cancer and was his "primary carer." 'The evidence of his close friends is that James and Margaret had a loving relationship, and that he was very grateful for her care," he told the judge. He said the couple had been together for six years and planned to have children, with Margaret giving up work and becoming a housewife while he provided for her. "She and James had a relatively lavish lifestyle, which was funded by his wealth and she was entirely financially dependent on the deceased," he said. 'Dr Fowell and William Dinsdale were not being financially maintained by the deceased at the time of his death." There was no evidence of 'financial need' on the part of Dr Fowell, claimed Mr Davey, highlighting claims by Margaret that James once told her he had transferred to her a property and a £2million lump sum after their relationship ended. The court heard it is alleged that Margaret has already received £375,000 "from the estate or in sums derived from James," but Mr Davey said that is denied and that she has only received £20,000 from his pension. After a brief court hearing in which he was told it was "not disputed" that Margaret should be considered a "spouse" under the 1975 Act, Master Brightwell made a declaration to that effect for the purposes of her claim against the estate. He directed that there should now be a future hearing focusing on how James' estate should be divided up between his two wives and son. Under the Inheritance Act, payouts to those treated as a spouse or civil partner are higher than to unmarried partners of a deceased person. The judge also allocated cash-strapped Margaret £50,000 from the estate to help cover her bills and contribute towards hefty lawyers' bills as the case progresses - with the projected costs on her side estimated at around £175,000.
Telegraph
4 days ago
- Business
- Telegraph
Two wives married to same man fight over his £1.8m fortune
A beautician and a dentist are locked in a £1.8m inheritance battle after their husband married both of them in Las Vegas five years apart and failed to divorce from his first bride. James Dinsdale, an accountant, died of cancer aged 55 in October 2020, and his most recent partner Margaret Dinsdale, 41, assumed that she would inherit his estate as next of kin. But the beautician was shocked to discover that Mr Dinsdale was still legally married to his first wife when they got married in 2017, making their marriage 'void' and leaving her with no automatic right to inherit. In 2012, Mr Dinsdale had married Dr Victoria Fowell, 53, a cosmetic dentist, in Las Vegas but never divorced her – making her the accountant's heir alongside his adult son under intestacy laws. The two women are now in a High Court battle after Ms Dinsdale launched a claim for her late husband's money on the basis she should be treated as a 'spouse'. In a preliminary hearing, High Court judge Master James Brightwell heard that Mr Dinsdale built a property development business and left an estate now valued at around £1.8m. Jonathan Davey KC, Ms Dinsdale's barrister, said his client met in Mr Dinsdale in 2008 and became friends, before beginning a 'romantic relationship' in 2014, but she had no idea he was still married. Mr Dinsdale had not made a will so his money is set to be divided between Dr Fowell and his son, William Dinsdale, 28. Mr Davey said 'there is no evidence' that Ms Dinsdale was aware of her husband's still-valid marriage to Dr Fowell when they married in 2017. He said: 'She understood the marriage between the deceased and Dr Fowell to have ended some time prior to the relationship between the deceased and the claimant beginning. Touching on Mr Dinsdale's 2017 wedding, he noted that the ceremony took place 'in almost the same location', in a Las Vegas wedding chapel – similar to the one where Mr Dinsdale and Dr Fowell were married in June 2012. Ms Dinsdale has made a claim in court for ' reasonable provision ' amounting to at least half of the £1.8m estate left by Mr Dinsdale. Mr Davey said Ms Dinsdale had looked after her husband '24 hours per day' during his final struggles with terminal cancer and was his 'primary carer.' He said the couple had been together for six years, and Ms Dinsdale was 'entirely financially dependent' on him after giving up work during their marriage. Mr Davey highlighted no evidence of 'financial need' on the part of Dr Fowell, and Ms Dinsdale alleged that her husband had provided his first wife with a property and a £2m lump sum after their relationship ended. Although the court heard it is alleged that Ms Dinsdale has already received £375,000 'from the estate or in sums derived from James', Mr Davey said that is denied and that she has only received £20,000 from his pension. Judge Brightwell ruled it was 'not disputed' that Ms Dinsdale should be considered a 'spouse' and said there should be a future hearing regarding how the estate should be divided between his wives and son. The judge also allocated Ms Dinsdale £50,000 from the estate to help cover her bills and contribute towards lawyers' bills as the case progresses.
The Sun
4 days ago
- Business
- The Sun
Scorned wives locked in battle over bigamist husband's £1.8m fortune after he secretly married BOTH of them
TWO wives are locked in a battle over their bigamist husband's £1.8million fortune after he secretly married both of them. Accountant James Dinsdale died of cancer aged 55 in October 2020 - leaving second wife Margaret Dinsdale to sort his affairs. 4 But the 41-year-old beautician found out James was still legally married to his first wife Victoria Fowell. The discovery meant her marriage was "void" - leaving Dinsdale with no automatic right to inherit the £1.8million fortune. Both women are now battling at the High Court after she claimed she deserved a share of the cash as she married James "in good faith". The court heard James married Fowell - a cosmetic dentist - in 2012 after whisking her off to Las Vegas. But the pair never got divorced and he wed Dinsdale five years later at a Vegas chapel just 600m from his first wedding location. Dinsdale's lawyer said she had no clue James was still married and believed the money would be shared between her and her husband's son William under intestacy rules. Jonathan Davey KC added: "She understood the marriage between the deceased and Dr Fowell to have ended some time prior to the relationship between the deceased and the claimant beginning. "We have no idea what James' state of mind was, perhaps he didn't realise he wasn't divorced. "Margaret's assertion is that she believed the deceased to be unmarried and already divorced when she married him in good faith." Dinsdale has made a claim for "reasonable provision" from James' estate under the 1975 Inheritance Act, amounting to at least half of his £1.8million. The bid has been brought against both Fowell and James' 28-year-old son William. Mr Davey said James and Dinsdale had a "loving relationship" and that she looked after him "24 hours a day" after he was diagnosed with cancer. He added: "She and James had a relatively lavish lifestyle, which was funded by his wealth and she was entirely financially dependent on the deceased," he said. "Dr Fowell and William Dinsdale were not being financially maintained by the deceased at the time of his death." The court heard Dinsdale has already reportedly received £375,000 "from the estate or in sums derived from James" but her lawyer claims the amount is £20,000. High Court judge Master James Brightwell allocated the cash-strapped second wife £50,000 from the estate to help cover her bills and contribute towards hefty lawyers' bills as the case progresses. He directed there should now be a future hearing focusing on how James' estate should be divided up between his two wives and son. Under the Inheritance Act, payouts to those treated as a spouse or civil partner are higher than to unmarried partners of a deceased person. 4
The Independent
4 days ago
- Business
- The Independent
Beautician and dentist in 1.8m inheritance battle after both married same man in Las Vegas
A beautician and a dentist are locked in an inheritance battle over a dead accountant's £1.8m fortune after he married both of them in Las Vegas five years apart - but failed to get a divorce from his first bride. Wealthy accountant James Dinsdale died of cancer, aged 55, in October 2020, leaving a £1.8million estate to be fought over by the two women who called themselves his wives. After his death, his most recent partner, beautician Margaret Dinsdale, 41, began sorting out his affairs on the assumption that she would inherit his fortune as his next of kin. But she was left reeling when she discovered James was still legally married to his first wife when he whisked her off for a Las Vegas wedding in 2017 - making their marriage "void" and leaving her with no automatic right to inherit. Just five years earlier, James had married cosmetic dentist, Victoria Fowell, 53, at a Vegas wedding chapel on the same street and only 600 metres from where he wed Margaret, but never got round to divorcing her - making her James' heir alongside his adult son under intestacy laws. However, the two women are now locked in a High Court clash after Margaret launched a claim to a share of James' money on the basis she should be treated as a "spouse" because she married him in "good faith." In a short preliminary hearing, High Court judge Master James Brightwell heard accountant and Second World War history expert James Dinsdale built a thriving property development business, based around central London, before he died and left an estate now valued at around £1.8m. He wed Dr Victoria Fowell - a St Albans-based dentist with an expertise in 'cosmetic smile makeovers' - in 2012, but the pair never got divorced and he went on to marry Margaret Dinsdale in 2017. Margaret's barrister Jonathan Davey KC said his client and James had met in 2008 and become friends, before beginning a 'romantic relationship' in 2014, setting up home together the following year. However, she had no idea whatsoever that he was still married, only learning of it after his death. And because he had not made a will, James' money would be divided between Dr Fowell and his son, William Dinsdale, 28, under intestacy rules. 'Margaret believed that she was validly married to James Dinsdale and there is no evidence that she knew that the deceased was married to Dr Fowell as at 2017," he said. 'She understood the marriage between the deceased and Dr Fowell to have ended some time prior to the relationship between the deceased and the claimant beginning. "We have no idea what James' state of mind was, perhaps he didn't realise he wasn't divorced. "Margaret's assertion is that she believed the deceased to be unmarried and already divorced when she married him in good faith." Touching on their 2017 wedding in Las Vegas, he noted: 'The ceremony which took place between James and my client took place in almost the same location, and appears to have been of the same nature, as the earlier ceremony which took place between the deceased and Victoria Fowell in June 2012. 'The marriage ceremony between him and Dr Fowell took place in the Little White Wedding Chapel, Las Vegas Boulevard. The marriage ceremony between James and Margaret took place in the Chapel of the Flowers, Las Vegas Boulevard. 'But for the deceased's prior marriage to Dr Fowell, the latter ceremony would have been a valid marriage ceremony." The case reached court for a preliminary hearing after Margaret made a claim for "reasonable provision" from James' estate under the 1975 Inheritance Act, amounting to at least half of his £1.8m. The case is being brought against Dr Fowell and James' adult son William, who are currently due to share his fortune as his next of kin under intestacy rules. Mr Davey said Margaret had looked after James "24 hours per day" during his final struggles with terminal cancer and was his "primary carer." 'The evidence of his close friends is that James and Margaret had a loving relationship, and that he was very grateful for her care," he told the judge. He said the couple had been together for six years and planned to have children, with Margaret giving up work and becoming a housewife while he provided for her. "She and James had a relatively lavish lifestyle, which was funded by his wealth and she was entirely financially dependent on the deceased," he said. 'Dr Fowell and William Dinsdale were not being financially maintained by the deceased at the time of his death." There was no evidence of 'financial need' on the part of Dr Fowell, claimed Mr Davey, highlighting claims by Margaret that James once told her he had transferred to her a property and a £2million lump sum after their relationship ended. The court heard it is alleged that Margaret has already received £375,000 "from the estate or in sums derived from James," but Mr Davey said that is denied and that she has only received £20,000 from his pension. After a brief court hearing in which he was told it was "not disputed" that Margaret should be considered a "spouse" under the 1975 Act, Master Brightwell made a declaration to that effect for the purposes of her claim against the estate. He directed that there should now be a future hearing focusing on how James' estate should be divided up between his two wives and son. Under the Inheritance Act, payouts to those treated as a spouse or civil partner are higher than to unmarried partners of a deceased person. The judge also allocated cash-strapped Margaret £50,000 from the estate to help cover her bills and contribute towards hefty lawyers' bills as the case progresses - with the projected costs on her side estimated at around £175,000.
Daily Mail
4 days ago
- Business
- Daily Mail
Two wives battle it out over dead British accountant's £1.8m fortune after he married them BOTH in Las Vegas wedding chapels five years apart without getting divorced
Two wives are locked in a bitter inheritance battle over the £1.8million fortune of a bigamist accountant who married them both in Las Vegas five years apart without getting a divorce. Wealthy James Dinsdale died of cancer, aged 55, in October 2020, leaving his vast estate to be fought over by his two spouses. After his death, his most recent partner, beautician Margaret Dinsdale, 41, began sorting out his affairs on the assumption she would inherit his fortune as his next of kin. But she was left reeling when she discovered James was still legally married to his first wife after he whisked Ms Dinsdale off for a Las Vegas wedding in 2017 - making their marriage 'void' and leaving her with no automatic right to inherit. James had married cosmetic dentist, Dr Victoria Fowell, 53, in 2012 at a Vegas wedding chapel on the same street and only 1,960ft from where he wed Margaret five years later, but never got round to divorcing her - making her James' heir alongside his adult son under intestacy laws. However, the two women are now locked in a brutal High Court clash after Ms Dinsdale launched a claim to a share of James' money on the basis she should be treated as a 'spouse' because she married him in 'good faith.' In a short preliminary hearing, High Court Judge James Brightwell heard Second World War history expert Mr Dinsdale built a thriving property development empire, based around central London, before he died. He wed Dr Fowell - a St Albans-based dentist with an expertise in 'cosmetic smile makeovers' - in 2012, but the pair never got divorced and he went on to marry Ms Dinsdale in 2017. Margaret's barrister Jonathan Davey KC said his client and James met in 2008 and become friends, before beginning a 'romantic relationship' in 2014, setting up home together the following year. However, she had no idea whatsoever he was still married, only learning of it after his death. And because he had not made a will, James' money would be divided between Dr Fowell and his son, William Dinsdale, 28. 'Margaret believed she was validly married to James Dinsdale and there is no evidence she knew the deceased was married to Dr Fowell as of 2017,' he said. 'She understood the marriage between the deceased and Dr Fowell to have ended some time prior to the relationship between the deceased and the claimant beginning. 'We have no idea what James' state of mind was, perhaps he didn't realise he wasn't divorced. 'Margaret's assertion is that she believed the deceased to be unmarried and already divorced when she married him in good faith.' Touching on their 2017 wedding in Las Vegas, he added: 'The ceremony which took place between James and my client took place in almost the same location, and appears to have been of the same nature, as the earlier ceremony which took place between the deceased and Victoria Fowell in June 2012. 'The marriage ceremony between him and Dr Fowell took place in the Little White Wedding Chapel, Las Vegas Boulevard. The marriage ceremony between James and Margaret took place in the Chapel of the Flowers, Las Vegas Boulevard. 'But for the deceased's prior marriage to Dr Fowell, the latter ceremony would have been a valid marriage ceremony.' The case reached court for a preliminary hearing after Margaret made a claim for 'reasonable provision' from James' estate under the 1975 Inheritance Act, amounting to at least half of his £1.8m. The case is being brought against Dr Fowell and James' adult son William, who are currently due to share his fortune as his next of kin under intestacy rules. Mr Davey said Margaret had looked after James '24 hours per day' during his final struggles with terminal cancer and was his 'primary carer.' 'The evidence of his close friends is that James and Margaret had a loving relationship, and that he was very grateful for her care,' he told the judge. He said the couple had been together for six years and planned to have children, with Margaret giving up work and becoming a housewife while he provided for her. 'She and James had a relatively lavish lifestyle, which was funded by his wealth and she was entirely financially dependent on the deceased,' he said. 'Dr Fowell and William Dinsdale were not being financially maintained by the deceased at the time of his death.' There was no evidence of 'financial need' on the part of Dr Fowell, claimed Mr Davey, highlighting claims by Margaret that James once told her he had transferred to her a property and a £2m lump sum after their relationship ended. The court heard it is alleged that Ms Dinsdale has already received £375,000 'from the estate or in sums derived from James,' but Mr Davey said that is denied and she has only received £20,000 from his pension. After a brief court hearing in which he was told it was 'not disputed' that Ms Dinsdale should be considered a 'spouse' under the 1975 Act, Judge Brightwell made a declaration to that effect for the purposes of her claim against the estate. He directed there should now be a future hearing focusing on how James' estate should be divided up between his two wives and son. Under the Inheritance Act, payouts to those treated as a spouse or civil partner are higher than to unmarried partners of a deceased person. The judge also allocated cash-strapped Ms Dinsdale £50,000 from the estate to help cover her bills and contribute towards hefty lawyers' bills as the case progresses - with the projected costs on her side estimated at around £175,000.
