Latest news with #WaveRunner
NZ Herald
03-08-2025
- Business
- NZ Herald
As the world fills up with surveys, how much do our reviews matter?
He both survived the ordeal and lived to review it, so: 'Five stars'. The surveys, they haunt us. Everywhere we dine, stay, shop, and travel, the inevitable 'rate your experience' awaits, ready to hound us for our thoughts as soon as the transaction concludes. SurveyPlanet, a customer-feedback platform for organisations, has identified both 'pre-survey fatigue' and 'post-survey fatigue' as emerging risks for businesses – consumers' annoyance at being asked to fill out a survey and annoyance at being asked to fill out a survey on the heels of another survey, respectively. Let me bear witness to the existence of said fatigues, which we might also call quantification sprawl, Letterboxd culture, five-star thirst. In the time since I started reporting this story, I was asked to leave a top rating for the seller of a phone case I bought on Etsy, a guy who sold me a lamp on Facebook Marketplace, and a mobile hibachi chef we hired for my friend's bachelorette party. Additional email and text prompts to review my experiences came from, among others, the scheduling department at my doctor's office (the scheduling department!) and a business that managed to turn four contracted days of painting my apartment into five weeks. How did we wind up spending this much of our precious lives sighing at our devices and futzing with cartoon stars? Reddit posts on the topic attract a chorus of beleaguered consumers ready to empathise: 'Sick and tired of being asked for reviews of everything I buy'. 'Sellers - stop doing this if you want good feedback.' 'I hate review culture.' Others let their resentments out in tweets: 'For the love of Pete stop asking me if I enjoyed my experience visiting your online store, going to the doctor or paying my bills!' For Ross Presser, a DevOps engineer based in south New Jersey, the exasperation spikes whenever he opens the app HelloFresh to make edits to his weekly order. ''Was your delivery okay? Did you like the meal? Do you have anything to say about the meal, can you post pictures of it on social media?'' Presser, 58, rattles off. 'Late-stage capitalism,' he says with a rueful laugh. Sometimes what's irksome is the sheer audacity. One X user described a delivery guy rooting around in her garage then asking for a five-star review; another was put off by a waiter who asked for one despite reeking of cigarette smoke. Many people have revealed their policies of giving negative reviews when asked specifically for positive ones or using surveys to complain about surveys; some describe feeling harassed or badgered, even bribed or quid pro quo'd into giving their experience the full pentad of approval. I, for one, remember that years ago a Wave Runner tour company in New Jersey withheld souvenir photos – me and each of my bridesmaids breezing past the Statue of Liberty, naturally – until I'd left a five-star review on Google that mentioned the staffer who'd asked for it by name. This is, somewhat newly, illegal in the United States: as of October 2024, businesses can offer consumers incentives for reviews, but not for specifically positive reviews, according to section 465.4 of the Federal Trade Commission's Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule. Obviously, there are worse fates than being asked, even repeatedly, to recall and rate a business transaction, especially when it can help customer satisfaction. Still, what can be unnerving is the surreal, dystopian feeling that you're just compacting all your delights and sorrows and random synapse-firings down into one flat digit (or one happy, angry or neutral smiley face). Anna Fitzpatrick, a 35-year-old writer in Toronto, laughs to herself every time she gets asked to rate purchases from her local cannabis shop: 'When I started smoking weed, it was just some guy at a party!' Absurdity became melancholy, though, when Fitzpatrick's first book came out and she found herself disturbed by the notion that its success could be influenced by something as reductive as Goodreads' star-rating system. Being asked to quantify her feelings about every book, every movie, every app, every tourist destination, she says, 'does, I think, change how I interact with the world, for the worse'. Lonas, too, wonders if review sprawl might be taking away opportunities to use human interaction for its noblest purpose: problem-solving. 'I think it's making people interact less with each other about when things are wrong, and especially when things are right,' Lonas says. 'You come to the review page and write 'One star, my chicken was undercooked,' but you didn't say anything to the server?' he adds. 'Maybe the restaurant could have done something to resolve this scenario if you had just spoken up.' Little academic research exists (yet) on survey fatigue. But Katie Mehr, a marketing professor at the University of Alberta who specialises in consumer evaluations, says that 'there's research to suggest that people often want to help small businesses by giving reviews that are quite positive', especially over faceless corporations that ostensibly need less help and make you feel like you're reviewing into a void. You are, of course, almost never actually reviewing into a void. And no one knows it better than the people whose services you're rating. Sarah and Chris Jarrach are 33 and 36, respectively, and their household income depends on how customers rate interactions with them. In their hometown of Boulder, Colorado, she owns a liquor store. He's a service-lane manager for a Mercedes-Benz service centre. Sarah wants more and higher ratings on her shop's Google page. 'If someone's Googling, like, 'liquor store near me,' those reviews are gonna come up, and you're not gonna go to the one that has 3.2 stars. You're gonna go the one that has 4.8 stars,' Sarah says. And with slim margins, every purchase counts. Chris' pay itself, meanwhile, is affected by the reviews he gets from customers. A few days after a transaction, his clients are invited to fill out a survey about their experience for internal use. On a past pay plan, Chris got US$50 for each survey a customer sent back as long as he stayed at or above the company's national average employee rating, US$25 if he fell below it. 'Surveys are people's personal report cards,' Chris says. 'People just need to remember to be kind to the person that helped them.' Tas Kabir, 43, who rents out the garden apartment of his Washington, DC, home, saw his Airbnb rating slip from 4.9 to 4.8 after a guest whose comments indicated he was perfectly satisfied with the stay gave him four stars. 'Not the end of the world, but, you know,' Kabir says. Even one more four-star review might endanger his Superhost status. And Phillip Arnheim, senior manager of market research for Amtrak, can attest that even an expansive corporation has humans looking over its surveys. In fact, the rail service recently used them to help overhaul its system for alerting passengers of delays. 'We've increased the amount of information we're sharing about what's taking place, when you can expect resolution, when you can expect to arrive,' Arnheim says. 'And before, that was only shared via email. Now we're serving it through the app and through text.' Some of Amtrak's long-distance routes serve steak in their dining car; thanks to the open-ended comments sections on their surveys, Amtrak knows it's a customer favourite and makes sure to keep it well-stocked. The signature Stephen Starr lobster mac and cheese introduced on first-class Acela dining cars a few years ago remains available for the same reason. 'There probably is some fatigue that takes place because there are so many companies asking for feedback,' Arnheim concedes. 'But we really do use those responses.' And on that note, valued customer, one more question for you. How would your rate your experience reading this article? Would you recommend it to a friend?
Yahoo
17-02-2025
- General
- Yahoo
Lake Tarpon's water quality was a mess. A new report says it has gotten better.
Lake Tarpon, the largest freshwater lake in the Tampa Bay area and home to some of the best bass fishing in the state, has long been plagued by outbreaks of invasive species and poor water quality. For decades, water managers have treated the lake with expensive herbicides and mechanical harvesting of hydrilla, an invasive aquatic plant that crowds out native species and clogs boat propellers. It was often a losing battle. The aquatic weed even contributed to a fatal personal watercraft accident in 2000 when a man on a WaveRunner swerved to avoid a patch of hydrilla, throwing his passenger into the water where he drowned. One year later, the district published an update to its surface water plan, citing an alarming decline in water quality. When Southwest Florida Water Management District staff on Thursday unveiled the first surface water plan in more than two decades, water managers appeared much more optimistic. About half a dozen residents joined project managers at the Brooker Creek Preserve Center in Tarpon Springs, where Lake Tarpon water managers announced a 'hold the line' strategy — a turning point in the lake's health. Chris Anastasiou, the water management district's chief water quality scientist for the surface water program, said about 90% of the lake's submerged plants are healthy, which has created a thriving ecosystem and bass fishery. It took years of hard work to get here, and water managers can't drop their guard now, he added. 'Holding the line does not mean do nothing. It actually takes a lot of work to hold the line,' Anastasiou said. A draft lake management plan, published in August, credits Lake Tarpon's revival to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's recent efforts to treat hydrilla outbreaks early. Water managers keep invasive species at bay by spraying herbicide and collecting the aquatic weed with a marine tractor that scoops it from the surface. But in the 1990s, hydrilla growth had become out of control. A low point occurred in 1992, when lake managers treated 500 acres of hydrilla. In 1993, one resident told the then-St. Petersburg Times she had never seen an outbreak as bad in her 20 years working at a marina on the lake. Since 2010, fewer than 100 acres have been treated each year, according to the water management district. Lake Tarpon managers track the presence of hydrilla by measuring chlorophyll-a, a pigment used in photosynthesis. In 2001, they set a goal of 14 micrograms per liter, which managers based on data collected in Lake Tarpon between 1990 and 1992 — a very healthy period just before the lake's water quality nosedived. Water managers acknowledged in the plan that chlorophyll-a levels have remained 'well above' that goal over the last 25 years, though the report states Lake Tarpon is 'a very healthy system.' Anastasiou said he doesn't know why chlorophyll levels have remained so high despite the absence of hydrilla for many years. It's something that future research will need to address. Residents in attendance Thursday evening asked scientists about the effects of native species, drawdowns and hurricanes on the lake. Human impact was a main concern. Liz Lindsay, who has lived in Pinellas County for more than 30 years, said she was concerned with development encroaching on Lake Tarpon. She recently moved to north county after St. Petersburg became too crowded, she said. 'How are you able to keep up with the amount of development?' she asked. 'It seems like just everybody wants to move to Florida now. Are they really paying attention to the negative impacts of all this development?' In 1999, developed areas made up 38% of the lake's watershed. By 2020, urban land had grown to about 45%, according to the draft plan. Urban lakes often struggle with high nutrient loads that can feed algae blooms, but managers said that doesn't appear to be an issue for Lake Tarpon. Since 2003, levels of nitrogen and phosphorus, which are common in lawn fertilizer, have remained within managers' goals. Still, water managers asked homeowners to avoid excessive fertilizer use, especially in neighborhoods in the southwest and northeast portions of the lake where drastic elevation slopes quickly channel runoff into the lake. Anastasiou said development doesn't always spell doom for Florida's water bodies. He pointed to Sarasota Bay, which the state removed from the impaired water bodies list last year after county officials prioritized stormwater improvements and habitat restoration. 'You can have both. It's hard. It takes a lot of money,' he said. While celebratory in tone, the new lake plan echoed managers' caution. 'Careful attention is needed to ensure that the progress made over the past two decades is not lost due to land use change, sea level rise, climate change and other impacts,' the plan states. The draft plan will presented to the water management district's governing board in March before being sent for final review.
