Latest news with #abortioncare
CNET
19-07-2025
- Health
- CNET
Mapping the Margins: The Internet's Invisible Hand in Reproductive Care
We don't often think about the internet as being good for our health. In fact, 'internet' and 'health' are primarily related in a negative context in online spaces -- we're getting too much screen time, we're 'chronically' online, etc. It may come as a surprise, but access to the internet is commonly recognized as a "super" determinant of health. Limited internet access has been linked to high mortality rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, and having the internet in easy reach means we can stay informed about our health, order our prescriptions with a tap, consult with doctors and get access to pregnancy and reproductive care. Sara Javaid and Lexi Rummel are among several researchers highlighting this connection. Following the repeal of Roe v. Wade, access to abortion and reproductive care has become critical nationwide, especially in places without adequate access to the internet. According to the findings in Rummel and Javaid's report, published by the National Women's Law Center, nearly half of all counties in the US are abortion deserts, or counties where the travel distance to the closest abortion care facility is over 100 miles; 53% of abortion deserts are also pregnancy care deserts. Notably, over 740,000 women live in counties with both a broadband desert and an abortion care desert, and nearly one-third of those women are women of color. National Women's Law Center 'I think broadband has the potential to be the final way in which people can access abortion care,' Javaid, senior research analyst at the National Women's Law Center and lead researcher for the report, told CNET. Locating local internet providers Reproductive care is essential for services like cancer screening, gender-affirming care and the testing and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Black women and other women of color are overrepresented in abortion care deserts, which amplifies their vulnerability to negative health outcomes. According to a 2022 report by the Human Rights Watch, Black women are more than one and a half times as likely to die from cervical cancer as white women, a cancer which the Human Rights Watch notes is preventable with routine screenings and follow-up care. Javaid and Rummel's report explores the intersection of abortion care, pregnancy care, broadband and food deserts in America. "Women do not live single-issue lives, and this report really emphasizes that when looking at the data," said Rummel, counsel for health equity and justice at the National Women's Law Center. "There are significant, intersecting barriers that women are facing in accessing critical reproductive health care and resources across the United States." The internet plays a vital role in bridging the gap for abortion care, pregnancy care and even food deserts. The report defines an abortion desert as a county where an abortion clinic is more than 100 miles away -- but Javaid admits that doesn't fully capture the challenge. "100 miles is still a long way to go," Javaid said. "And if you don't have access to public transportation, you don't have access to a reliable car, then 25 miles could be an abortion desert for you." Additionally, the effects of one desert compound when multiple deserts overlap. In the case of broadband deserts, not being able to get preventative care via telehealth visits means being deprived of catching health issues or dangerous pregnancy conditions early. The internet effectively bridges the gap in reproductive care deserts, allowing women to consult with doctors or find an abortion care or pregnancy care facility. The report states that one in 10 US counties are broadband deserts, where more than half of residents do not have access to at least 100Mbps down/20Mbps up (a definition set by the Federal Communications Commission). National Women's Law Center While broadband deserts are technically among the report's less prevalent deserts, the definition relies on outdated FCC data from 2022. "I will say that the report is narrower in scope than we wanted because of a lack of data that exists," Javaid told me. "We know that it is likely an undercount because of the way they collect data. There's really not great broadband data collection out there." "I would guess there's probably four times more broadband deserts than they [Rummell and Javaid] recognize,' Christopher Mitchell, director of the Community Broadband Networks Initiative with the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, told CNET. While broadband may seem easily accessible for some, the truth is that for many, it's still unaffordable. Although broadband is available to 94% of US households, according to current FCC numbers, that data doesn't account for the number of homes enrolled in an internet service. "I would encourage thinking about broadband deserts from the supply side and the demand side," John Horrigan, a senior fellow at the Benton Institute for Broadband and Society, told CNET. "The other side of the coin is the number of households that are adopting broadband in a particular area." While broadband availability has drastically improved in recent years, adoption rates are still low in low-income communities and communities of color. A 2024 Pew Research Center survey found that only 57% of adults making less than $30,000 a year have an internet subscription, compared to 95% of adults making at least $100,000. US Census data from 2021 noted that low-income households, seniors and communities of color were more likely to be "smartphone-only" households. Recent data from Ookla reported that the broadband divide worsened in 32 states in 2024, potentially due in part to the ending of the Affordable Connectivity Program, which offered a significant discount of $30 on monthly internet bills for low-income families. (Disclaimer: Ookla is owned by Ziff Davis, the same company that owns CNET.) "There are a lot of broadband deserts where there are connections available, but people are not able to use them," Mitchell said. "High price, lack of a device, past debt, are all common things." "The lowest 20% of households in the United States, in terms of income distribution, is really where you begin to see substantial fall-offs in home internet adoption rates," echoed Horrigan. Recent policies, like President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, pose challenges for those affected by broadband, food and reproductive deserts due to cuts in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid. Care workers with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) participated in a living cemetery protest at the US Capitol on June 23, 2025, in Washington, the passing of Dobbs v. Jackson, access to safe reproductive care is more threatened than ever: Infant mortality rates increased after the passing of Dobbs, specifically in states that instituted complete or 6-week abortion bans. "We still don't know the true impact of the Dobbs decision," Javaid told me. "I don't know that we will know for several years, and that's where it's so important to rely on the community and the experience of people to inform our understanding of what's going on." Some possible solutions to making broadband more affordable and ensuring access to telehealth include state low-income requirements, like New York's $15 low-income plan required for ISPs serving 20,000 households or more. While the Broadband, Equity, Access and Deployment program hasn't resulted in buildouts yet, Horrigan notes that BEAD permits funding for nondeployment purposes, which could potentially improve connectivity by investing in anchor institutions like libraries or hospitals. Nondeployment funding is "under review," per the latest notice from the federal agency that oversees BEAD, the National Telecommunications Information Administration. While the NTIA and BEAD are being restructured, community-based solutions are more critical than ever for ensuring overlooked communities can get back online. To get involved, you can easily contact your state's broadband office and learn what statewide or community-focused initiatives are being implemented near you. Your local representatives need to know that the broadband divide is a topic of concern for you -- that's why it's always important to reach out and call. You can find contact information for your local representatives here.
Forbes
16-07-2025
- Business
- Forbes
The Mistake Most Companies Make When Offering Abortion Care Benefits
While companies are increasingly offering employee health coverage for abortion care and travel, ... More most are failing to adequately safeguard the private reproductive health data from their employees' benefits use. Companies have taken major steps to support women's access to reproductive healthcare since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health decision. Since Dobbs, offering employees abortion care benefits is becoming the corporate norm rather than the exception. Nine out of ten companies offer health coverage for both medically necessary and elective abortion care, according to the Reproductive & Maternal Health Compass 2025 Trend Report, based on data from over 150 firms representing a range of sizes, industries, and locations. Among the surveyed companies, 85% also offer abortion-related travel reimbursement. So where are well-meaning companies falling short when it comes to abortion care coverage? The most common mistake that companies make when offering reproductive health benefits is failing to protect the private data from employee benefits use, according to the RMH Compass researchers. Adopting the wrong delivery process for abortion care benefits can place companies and their employees at significant legal risk. The Missing Safeguard With Employee Abortion Care Benefits While 92% of companies surveyed offer comprehensive abortion care benefits, only 22% use a third-party platform to administer these benefits, according to the 2025 RMH Compass Trend Report. 'By skipping this critical safeguard, companies may be exposing both employees and their own organization to legal risk,' said Flory Wilson, RMH Compass founder and CEO, via email. Without a third-party benefits platform, employees must submit highly sensitive reproductive health information directly to managers, human resources and benefits staff, or company finance teams, in order to secure abortion care coverage. This creates a serious privacy risk for employees, particularly in states with abortion bans. To reduce the legal risk from offering abortion care benefits, RMH Compass experts recommend that companies use a third-party administrator that is bound by the privacy rules in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. HIPAA is a federal law that imposes strict confidentiality requirements on health plans, health providers, and associated businesses. This includes placing limits on responding to law enforcement requests to access individual medical information. 'Using a HIPAA-compliant third-party to handle fund disbursement for abortion care coverage not only ensures employee confidentiality and reduces legal risk for companies,' said Wilson, 'but also enhances employee trust.' The Privacy Stakes With Employee Abortion Care Benefits The privacy risks from employer-provided abortion care benefits are not merely hypothetical, according to a 2023 report by The Center for Democracy & Technology. These risks are particularly large in states with laws that criminalize abortion or assisting women who travel out-of-state to access abortion care. 'Increasingly, law enforcement and civil litigants may turn to companies to gain access to data that could help prove that a person sought, received, aided, or provided an abortion,' according to Andrew Crawford, senior policy attorney and author of the CDT report. This includes law enforcement seeking employee data on benefits claims. 'Employers must recognize that even inadvertently retaining or accessing reproductive health data can expose employees to potential risk,' said Crawford. 'The best way to prevent data that companies collect from being used against abortion-seekers is to simply not have that data in the first place.' This requires companies to take proactive steps to protect their employees' private reproductive health information. How Employers Can Reduce Risk When Offering Abortion Care Benefits Wilson does not suggest that companies retreat from offering abortion care benefits because of the privacy-related legal risks. 'Workers want access to a full range of reproductive health services, including abortion access—regardless of gender, age, even political affiliation,' said Wilson. Employees increasingly expect their companies to advocate for and take a stand on reproductive rights, particularly younger generation workers. The expansion of abortion care coverage reflects corporate recognition that investing in reproductive health benefits is a business imperative. Three quarters of the U.S. labor force ages 18 to 64 want their employer's health insurance to cover abortion care, according to a 2021 Perry Undem survey of over 3,400 individuals. Covering abortion-related travel expenses is also increasingly critical for employees in states with restrictive abortion laws. Total abortion bans with limited exceptions are in effect in 12 states, with another 29 states restricting abortion access based on gestational age, according to the Guttmacher Institute's legal tracker. The tax bill signed by President Trump on July 4, 2025, will likely exacerbate abortion access challenges. 'The new budget bill could have a significant impact on women's health care access in rural areas across the country,' said Wilson. 'It makes the travel reimbursement benefit even more important for workers and their families.' 'Reproductive health benefits don't just meet a moral moment—they strengthen workforce retention, reduce absenteeism, and build loyalty and trust,' said Wilson. 'But even the most well-intentioned efforts can create blind spots.' To reduce risk, companies should follow best practices when administering abortion care benefits. Best practices include using a third-party, HIPAA-compliant benefits provider. RMH Compass also recommends that companies design their out-of-state travel reimbursement plans to apply to medical services beyond abortion care. That expansion helps ensure that an employee's use of a travel reimbursement benefit does not inherently reveal the underlying medical purpose. RMH Compass offers a free guide to assist employers in reducing legal risk when designing abortion care benefits through employer-sponsored health plans. RMH Compass also provides advice to employees who are seeking to access and use abortion-related benefits.
