Latest news with #arXiv
Yahoo
3 days ago
- General
- Yahoo
Hi, 'Mom'! James Webb telescope discovers MoM-z14 — the most distant, early galaxy ever seen
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has spotted the most distant galaxy observed to date — breaking its own record yet again. The galaxy, dubbed MoM-z14, is "the most distant spectroscopically confirmed source to date, extending the observational frontier to a mere 280 million years after the Big Bang," researchers wrote in a new study that appeared May 23 on the preprint server arXiv. In other words, the galaxy emitted light just 280 million years after the birth of the universe; after its long journey across the cosmos, that light is only now reaching Earth and JWST's infrared sensors. "It's pretty exciting," Charlotte Mason, an astrophysicist at the University of Copenhagen who wasn't involved in the study, told New Scientist. "It confirms that there really are these very bright galaxies in the universe." Since beginning operation in 2022, JWST has spotted more bright, ancient galaxies than scientists expected, challenging previous theories about the universe's infancy. "This unexpected population has electrified the community and raised fundamental questions about galaxy formation in the first 500 [million years after the Big Bang]," the authors wrote. As more examples trickle in, scientists are working to confirm whether these luminous objects really are ancient galaxies. Study lead author Rohan Naidu, an astrophysicist at MIT, and colleagues combed through existing JWST images for potential early galaxies to check. After identifying MoM-z14 as a possible target, they turned the telescope toward the peculiar object in April 2025. One way scientists can measure an astronomical object's age is by measuring its redshift. As the universe expands, it stretches the light emitted by distant objects to longer, "redder" wavelengths. The farther and longer the light has traveled, the larger its redshift. In the new study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, the team confirmed MoM-z14's redshift as 14.44 — larger than that of the previous record holder for farthest observed galaxy, JADES-GS-z14-0, at 14.18. Related: James Webb telescope sees 'birth' of 3 of the universe's earliest galaxies in world-1st observations MoM-z14 is fairly compact for the amount of light it emits. It's about 240 light-years across, some 400 times smaller than our own galaxy. And it contains about as much mass as the Small Magellanic Cloud, a dwarf galaxy that orbits the Milky Way. RELATED STORIES —James Webb telescope spots Milky Way's long-lost 'twin' — and it is 'fundamentally changing our view of the early universe' —'I was astonished': Ancient galaxy discovered by James Webb telescope contains the oldest oxygen scientists have ever seen —'Totally unexpected' galaxy discovered by James Webb telescope defies our understanding of the early universe The researchers observed MoM-z14 during a burst of rapid star formation. It's also rich in nitrogen relative to carbon, much like globular clusters observed in the Milky Way. These ancient, tightly-bound groups of thousands to millions of stars are thought to have formed in the first few billion years of the universe, making them the oldest known stars in the nearby cosmos. That MoM-z14 appears similar could suggest that stars formed in comparable ways even at this very early stage in the universe's development. Though scientists still aim to confirm more high redshift galaxies, researchers expect to find even more candidates with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, an infrared telescope designed to observe a large swath of the sky, which is set to launch by May 2027. But JWST may break its own record again before then. "JWST itself appears poised to drive a series of great expansions of the cosmic frontier," the authors wrote. "Previously unimaginable redshifts, approaching the era of the very first stars, no longer seem far away."
Gizmodo
24-05-2025
- Science
- Gizmodo
Researchers Claim Ancient Chinese Star Catalog Is the Oldest of Its Kind—But Not Everyone's Convinced
Humans have been stargazing for thousands—possibly hundreds of thousands of years. Ancient people around the globe looked to the heavens for physical and spiritual guidance. Dozens and dozens of generations later, their descendants are now arguing over which civilization created the oldest known visual star catalog in the world. Researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences' National Astronomical Observatories claim that Shi's Star Catalog, the oldest known star catalog in China, is actually the earliest known star catalog, period. They reached this conclusion using a technique that accounts for potential human errors made thousands of years ago. If their results prove to be true, it would mean that Shi's Star Catalog is centuries older than the other first place contender—the one created by Greek astronomer Hipparchus. But not everyone in the scientific community is convinced. 'In comparison to the observation epochs of other ancient star catalogs worldwide, the Shi's Star Catalog predates even the oldest Western star catalogs, affirming its status as the oldest star catalog in the world,' the researchers wrote in a study posted to the preprint server arXiv in April. Because Earth's axis wobbles, the location of stars in the night sky changes over the centuries in a phenomenon called precession. Researchers can use Earth's precession to date ancient visual star catalogs by calculating the difference between historical records of the night sky and what our stars look like now. Shi's Star Catalog, however, has been infamously difficult to date, not least because this one catalog depicts star positions that seem to span multiple centuries. In the preprint study, the researchers outline a number of previously suggested dates: around 360 BCE; around 360 BCE with an update around 200 CE; around 440 BCE with an update around 160 CE; sometime between 100 BCE and 70 BCE; and during the seventh century CE. 'A multitude of perspectives exist regarding the observational timeframe of the Shi's Star Catalog, with no definitive consensus reached,' the researchers admitted. As such, they decided to analyze the catalog's 120 stars with the Generalized Hough Transform method—an algorithmic imaging technique that 'statistically accommodates errors in ancient coordinates and discrepancies between ancient and modern stars, addressing limitations in prior methods,' they explained. This approach seems to confirm that Shi's Star Catalog was first drafted around 355 BCE and then updated around 125 CE. 'In comparison, the Western tradition's oldest known catalog, the Ptolemaic Star Catalog (2nd century CE), likely derives from the Hipparchus Star Catalog (2nd century BCE). Thus, Shi's Star Catalog is identified as the world's oldest known star catalog,' they added. Some scientists, however, have a different theory: The instrument used to record Shi's Star Catalog was off by one degree. Previous studies adjusting for this assumption date Shi's Star Catalog around or after 103 BCE, as reported by Science. Certain historians look favorably on this later date because it aligns the catalog's use of spherical coordinates more closely with the Chinese invention of the armillary sphere (a spherical mathematical instrument used to track the movement of celestial bodies around Earth) and their adoption of a spherical cosmological model, both of which took place in the first century BCE, according to Science. Suggesting that people used spherical coordinates hundreds of years before the invention of the armillary sphere, as the researchers do in the recent study, would be like finding 'a receipt from a gas station and somebody wants to say it's from 1700,' Daniel Patrick Morgan, a historian at France's Center for Research on East Asian Civilizations who was not involved with the study, told Science. Future research may provide more answers. Whether or not the recent study proves to be true, it's worth noting that the Western world's Eurocentric approach has historically undervalued achievements made elsewhere, including those in ancient China. Plus, the ancient Babylonian seventh century BCE Astronomical Diaries blow both European and Asian astronomical artifacts out of the water, even though the tablets list astronomical observations via text, not visuals.
Yahoo
23-05-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
Aliens Might Be Talking, but Our Ears Aren't Quantum Enough to Hear Them, a Scientist Says
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: For 75 years, scientists have consistently pondered the Fermi Paradox, which asks why we don't hear from other civilizations when there are so many Earth-like worlds in the galaxy. A recent study analyzes whether these civilizations might be using quantum communication technologies beyond our own, which could explain why we don't 'hear' them. Although interstellar quantum communication is possible, the technology to detect such communications is still far from our reach. In 1950, Enrico Fermi asked the question that all of us have likely pondered at some point in our lives: Where are all of the aliens? He wasn't the first to consider this question—Soviet sci-fi legend Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, for one, asked a similar query in some of his unpublished manuscripts—and he certainly wouldn't be the last. If anything, the question has accumulated ever greater urgency as astronomers have slowly realized that there are likely billions of Earth-like planets in our galaxy alone, and we're discovering more tantalizing, potentially-life-supporting planetary candidates all the time. This 'Fermi Paradox' has spawned dozens of theories, ideas, and hypotheses in the 75 years since. Maybe a 'Great Filter' lies in our distant past—the unlikely development of eukaryotic cells is a compelling candidate—or maybe (and this is the real bummer) it still lies ahead in our future. Are the aliens just not interested? A galaxy-spanning intelligence scoring a solid 'III' on the Kardashev Scale would likely be indifferent about a sub-I species intent on poisoning its own atmosphere. In other words, maybe we're an ant among giants. Or, maybe more simply, aliens are reaching out to us, but we're just not listening—not in the right way, at least. In a study published back in 2020 in the journal Physical Review D, University of Edinburgh physicist Arjun Berera determined that quantum communication—that is, communication that leverages photon qubits rather than the more classical radio waves we use today—could maintain what's known as coherence over interstellar distances. This idea got Berera's colleague Lantham Boyle, a fellow theoretical physicist at the University of Edinburgh, to start pondering if aliens throughout our galaxy (and beyond) could be using communication technologies outside of the classical realm (specifically quantum communication) that we simply can't hear. 'It's interesting that our galaxy (and the sea of cosmic background radiation in which it's embedded) 'does' permit interstellar quantum communication in certain frequency bands,' Boyle told back in September. This curiosity eventually led to the writing of a paper, which has been uploaded to the pre-print server arXiv, titled 'On Interstellar Quantum Communication and the Fermi Paradox.' In the paper, Boyle sets out to determine if an institute like the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) could somehow incorporate quantum communication detection as part of their never-ending search for interstellar beings. While the answer to that question is technically yes, it's practically a very strong, no-bones-about-it 'no.' The problem is the size of the dish we'd need to construct in order to hear this quantum convo. For example, Boyle calculated that interstellar quantum communication would need to use wavelengths of at least 26.5 centimeters in order to avoid quantum depolarization due to the cosmic microwave background (CMB). That's all well and good, but that means that to communicate quantumly with Alpha Centauri—the nearest star to our own—we'd need a diffraction-limited telescope with a diameter of roughly 100 kilometers (60 miles), which is an area larger than the city of London. To put it mildly, SETI doesn't have that kind of budget. 'We have seen that the sender must place nearly all of their photons into our receiving telescope, which implies that the signal must be so highly directed that only the intended receiving telescope can hope to detect any sign of the communication,' Boyle wrote. 'This is in sharp contrast to classical communication, where one can broadcast photons indiscriminately into space, and an observer in any direction who detects a small fraction of those photons can still receive the message.' Of course, if such an advanced civilization is capable of overcoming these engineering challenges, it's also likely that they could just glimpse our little corner of the cosmos and know we're not technologically equipped to hear what they're sending. So, who knows? Maybe some silicon-based lifeforms orbiting a M-type star in the Large Magellanic Cloud have a regular quantum correspondence with the reigning Kardashev III civilization in Andromeda all about the peculiar apes on one particular spiral arm of the Milky Way that won't return their calls. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
23-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
AI benchmarking platform is helping top companies rig their model performances, study claims
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The go-to benchmark for artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots is facing scrutiny from researchers who claim that its tests favor proprietary AI models from big tech companies. LM Arena effectively places two unidentified large language models (LLMs) in a battle to see which can best tackle a prompt, with users of the benchmark voting for the output they like most. The results are then fed into a leaderboard that tracks which models perform the best and how they have improved. However, researchers have claimed that the benchmark is skewed, granting major LLMs "undisclosed private testing practices" that give them an advantage over open-source LLMs. The researchers published their findings April 29 in on the preprint database arXiv, so the study has not yet been peer reviewed. "We show that coordination among a handful of providers and preferential policies from Chatbot Arena [later LM Arena] towards the same small group have jeopardized scientific integrity and reliable Arena rankings," the researchers wrote in the study. "As a community, we must demand better." Beginning as Chatbot Arena, a research project created in 2023 by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley's Sky Computing Lab, LM Arena quickly became a popular site for top AI companies and open-source underdogs to test their models. Favoring "vibes-based" analysis drawn from user responses over academic benchmarks, the site now gets more than 1 million visitors a month. To assess the impartiality of the site, the researchers measured more than 2.8 million battles taken over a five-month period. Their analysis suggests that a handful of preferred providers — the flagship models of companies including Meta, OpenAI, Google and Amazon — had "been granted disproportionate access to data and testing" as their models appeared in a higher number of battles, conferring their final versions with a significant advantage. "Providers like Google and OpenAI have received an estimated 19.2% and 20.4% of all data on the arena, respectively," the researchers wrote. "In contrast, a combined 83 open-weight models have only received an estimated 29.7% of the total data." In addition, the researchers noted that proprietary LLMs are tested in LM Arena multiple times before their official release. Therefore, these models have more access to the arena's data, meaning that when they are finally pitted against other LLMs they can handily beat them, with only the best-performing iteration of each LLM placed on the public leaderboard, the researchers claimed. "At an extreme, we identify 27 private LLM variants tested by Meta in the lead-up to the Llama-4 release. We also establish that proprietary closed models are sampled at higher rates (number of battles) and have fewer models removed from the arena than open-weight and open-source alternatives," the researchers wrote in the study. "Both these policies lead to large data access asymmetries over time." In effect, the researchers argue that being able to test multiple pre-release LLMs, having the ability to retract benchmark scores, only having the highest performing iteration of their LLM placed on the leaderboard, as well as certain commercial models appearing in the arena more often than others, gives big AI companies the ability to "overfit" their models. This potentially boosts their arena performance over competitors, but it may not mean their models are necessarily of better quality. RELATED STORIES — Scientists use AI to encrypt secret messages that are invisible to cybersecurity systems — What is the Turing test? How the rise of generative AI may have broken the famous imitation game — US Air Force wants to develop smarter mini-drones powered by brain-inspired AI chips The research has called into question the authority of LM Arena as an AI benchmark. LM Arena has yet to provide an official comment to Live Science, only offering background information in an email response. But the organization did post a response to the research on the social platform X. "Regarding the statement that some model providers are not treated fairly: this is not true. Given our capacity, we have always tried to honor all the evaluation requests we have received," company representatives wrote in the post. "If a model provider chooses to submit more tests than another model provider, this does not mean the second model provider is treated unfairly. Every model provider makes different choices about how to use and value human preferences." LM Arena also claimed that there were errors in the researchers' data and methodology, responding that LLM developers don't get to choose the best score to disclose, and that only the score achieved by a released LLM is put on the public leaderboard. Nonetheless, the findings raise questions about how LLMs can be tested in a fair and consistent manner, particularly as passing the Turing test isn't the AI watermark it arguably once was, and that scientists are looking at better ways to truly assess the rapidly growing capabilities of AI.
Yahoo
22-05-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
Scientists Identified the Oldest Star Chart In Existence, Written 2,300 Years Ago.
Ancient Chinese astronomer Shi Shen's star catalog, known as The Star Manual of Master Shi, is now considered the oldest star chart in the world. Later observations written into the catalog showed inconsistencies with Shi's findings. This was because of Earth's shift on its axis, or precession, which was corrected by an AI algorithm. This catalog predates the second oldest chart—compiled by ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus—by several hundred years. When astronomer and astrologer Shi Shen gazed skyward thousands of years ago, he beheld what must have looked like another realm glittering in the heavens. Constellations were seen by the ancient Chinese as palaces or celestial mansions. The imperial court of advisers, princes, and concubines were mirrored in individual stars. In the event of a solar eclipse, a dragon swallowed the Sun. Shi—who lived during the tumultuous Zhanguo or Warring States period—mapped the coordinates of 120 stars ranging from the Supreme Palace Enclosure of the Virgo, Coma Berenices, and Leo constellations to Polaris (the North Star), which represented the emperor himself. Eventually, the Star Manual of Master Shi, or Shi Shi Xing Jing, became a meticulous record of his observations. For centuries, despite this document being the oldest surviving catalog of stars in China, the star catalog of ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus (dated to 130 B.C.) was thought to be older. But ancient and modern worlds collided when a team of researchers at the Chinese National Astronomical Observatories (NAO)—led by Boliang He and Yongheng Zhao—used AI to date Shi's catalog to the 4th century B.C. That makes it 200 years older than the Hipparchus catalog, and the earliest known surviving catalog of stars. 'Based on the records of precession and retrograde precession, it is inferred that the Shi's Star Catalog approximately corresponds to the Zhanguo period, around 360 B.C.,' the researchers said in their study, which is awaiting peer review and has been uploaded to the preprint server arXiv. Earth rotates on an axis that slowly shifts position—the gravity of the Sun and Moon pulling at the planet and causing tidal forces that create a bulge at the equator results in changes to the Earth's rotation over time. This phenomenon is known as axial precession, and it affects how stars are observed from terra firma. Ancient celestial coordinates, as a result, eventually become outdated. When updates were made to Shi Shi Xing Jing by Han Dynasty astronomer Zhang Heng sometime around 125 A.D., axial precession meant that star positions were inconsistent with Shi's original catalog. To prove that precession was the reason for these inconsistencies, He, Zhao, and their team used an AI algorithm based on the Hough Transform, which can isolate features of shapes in an image, so long as those shapes are specified. Their version of the algorithm was designed to measure the difference in stellar positions due to precession. It ruled out errors made by later astronomers who copied coordinates (since the manuscript changed hands many times), and used statistics to estimate where the North Star—and therefore the stars surrounding it—must have been in relation to Earth at the time Shi mapped them. The results dated more recent observations to the 2nd Century A.D., but the oldest traced back to Shi's epoch. Still, there is some controversy over the findings, with skeptics such as historian Bosun Yang (from the University of Science and Technology of China) and Ziaochun Sun (from the Chinese Academy of Sciences) arguing that the spherical measurements suggests the use of an armillary sphere—an ancient Chinese invention used to measure the positions of stars. The armillary sphere did not yet exist when Shi was mapping celestial objects. If Shi used another instrument that had been misaligned, Yang and others found that would push the catalog to about 103 B.C.—still older than Hipparchus. Zhao and He still insist that their findings are accurate, and plan to investigate more of Shi's observations. '[Our method] effectively mitigates the error issues encountered in previous methodologies, thus reliably resolving the challenge of determining the observation epochs of ancient Chinese stars,' they said. 'The Shi's Star Catalog predates even the oldest Western star catalogs, affirming its status as the oldest star catalog in the world.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
