Latest news with #arthroscopy
Globe and Mail
19-05-2025
- Business
- Globe and Mail
Lucintel Forecasts the Global Arthroscopy Devices Market to Reach $9.2 billion by 2030
"According to a market report by Lucintel, the future of the global arthroscopy devices market looks promising with opportunities in the knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, spine arthroscopy, shoulder and elbow arthroscopy markets. The global arthroscopy devices market is expected to reach an estimated $9.2 billion by 2030 from $6.0 billion in 2024, at a CAGR of 7.3% from 2024 to 2030" According to a market report by Lucintel, the future of the global arthroscopy devices market looks promising with opportunities in the knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, spine arthroscopy, shoulder and elbow arthroscopy markets. The global arthroscopy devices market is expected to reach an estimated $9.2 billion by 2030 from $6.0 billion in 2024, at a CAGR of 7.3% from 2024 to 2030 According to a market report by Lucintel, the future of the global arthroscopy devices market looks promising with opportunities in the knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, spine arthroscopy, shoulder and elbow arthroscopy markets. The global arthroscopy devices market is expected to reach an estimated $9.2 billion by 2030 from $6.0 billion in 2024, at a CAGR of 7.3% from 2024 to 2030. The major drivers for this market are increasing incidences of sports injuries, rising geriatric population, and technological advancements in arthroscopic implants. A more than 150-page report to understand trends, opportunity and forecast in arthroscopy devices market to 2030 by type (arthroscopes, arthroscopic implants, fluid management systems, radiofrequency systems, visualization systems, powered shavers, and others), application (knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, spine arthroscopy, shoulder and elbow arthroscopy, and others), end use (ambulatory surgical centers, orthopedic clinics, and others), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World). Lucintel forecasts that, within the type category, arthroscopic implants will remain the largest segment over the forecast period due to the introduction of biodegradable implants and growing adoption of arthroscopic implants for internal tissue repair, bone grafting, joint fixation, and glenoid reconstruction. Within the application category, knee arthroscopy will remain the largest segment due to growing number of people suffering from bone diseases like arthritis and rising senior population. Download sample by clicking on arthroscopy devices market In terms of regions, North America will remain the largest region over the forecast period due to the rising cases of bone-related disorders and presence of well-established healthcare infrastructure in the region. Arthrex, Conmed Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Karl Storz, Medtronic, Richard Wolf, Smith & Nephew, Stryker Corporation are the major suppliers in the arthroscopy devices market. This unique research report will enable you to make confident business decisions in this globally competitive marketplace. For a detailed table of contents, contact Lucintel at +1-972-636-5056 or write us at helpdesk@ To get access of more than 1000 reports at fraction of cost visit Lucintel's Analytics Dashboard. About Lucintel At Lucintel, we offer solutions for you growth through game changer ideas and robust market & unmet needs analysis. We are based in Dallas, TX and have been a trusted advisor for 1,000+ clients for over 20 years. We are quoted in several publications like the Wall Street Journal, ZACKS, and the Financial Times. Contact: Roy Almaguer Lucintel Dallas, Texas, USA Email: Tel. +1-972-636-5056 Explore Our Latest Publications Infrastructure as a Service Market Pulse Generator Market Alternating Current (AC) Meters Sensors Market Flexible Hybrid Electronics Market Body Temperature Monitoring Market Media Contact Company Name: Lucintel Contact Person: Roy Almaguer Email: Send Email Phone: 972.636.5056 Address: 8951 Cypress Waters Blvd., Suite 160 City: Dallas State: TEXAS Country: United States Website:
Medscape
16-05-2025
- Health
- Medscape
7 T MRI Matches 3 T for Diagnosing Wrist Ligament Injuries
MRI at 7 tesla (T) and 3 T field strengths showed similar accuracy in detecting triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and scapholunate ligament (SLL) injuries, according to a new study. Although some injuries were missed, MRI identified additional pathologies not seen on arthroscopy, supporting its complementary role in diagnosis. METHODOLOGY: This prospective study (May 2020 to April 2024) included 24 patients with a suspected TFCC or SLL injury (median age, 34 years; 29.2% women) who underwent both 7 T and 3 T MRI examinations followed by arthroscopy. Four musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated MRI examinations in a randomised order, comparing findings to wrist arthroscopy results. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and other parameters were estimated for each MRI field strength. TAKEAWAY: For TFCC injuries, 7 T MRI had a sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.68, and AUC of 0.82, whereas 3 T MRI had a sensitivity of 0.75, specificity of 0.73, and AUC of 0.77. For SLL injuries, 7 T MRI had a sensitivity of 0.70, specificity of 0.65, and AUC of 0.74, whereas 3 T MRI had a sensitivity of 0.69, specificity of 0.55, and AUC of 0.70. For both TFCC and SLL injuries, no statistically significant difference was found between 7 T and 3 T MRI compared with arthroscopy. In 58% of patients, MRI identified additional pathologies including tendon injuries and ganglia, which were essential for a complete diagnosis. IN PRACTICE: "Neither MRI at 7 T nor 3 T can replace wrist arthroscopy, but MRI is an important complementary tool in the diagnostic workup of suspected wrist ligament injuries, with the ability to diagnose additional types of pathologies not accessible with arthroscopy," the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Simon Götestrand, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. It was published online on May 08, 2025, in European Radiology . LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by a likely selection bias as all patients were scheduled for arthroscopy, increasing the probability of injury. The small sample size also limited the statistical power. DISCLOSURES: Open access funding was provided by Lund University. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
