Latest news with #conflictofinterest
New York Times
5 days ago
- Business
- New York Times
Ethics Panel Rebukes Congressman for Wife's Stock Trade in Firm He Helped
The House Ethics Committee on Friday rebuked a Republican congressman from Pennsylvania and urged him and his wife to sell their holdings in a steel company in his district after a four-year investigation into a stock trade found that he had violated the House's official code of conduct. In its report, the committee cited Representative Mike Kelly, a member of the Ways and Means Committee, for a 'lack of candor' in its inquiry into 2020 trades by his wife, Victoria, involving a local steel company that was seeking government intervention to prevent layoffs or the closure of its plant in Butler, Pa., in Mr. Kelly's district. Mr. Kelly was actively lobbying the Trump administration for trade protections for the plant, newly purchased by the company Cleveland-Cliffs, and learned that the Commerce Department was going to intervene in favor of the firm. The next day — five days before the Commerce action was made public — his wife purchased 5,000 shares of Cleveland-Cliffs stock. She later sold the stock at a nearly $65,000 profit, a roughly 285-percent gain. Members of Congress are prohibited from using confidential information for financial benefit and must disclose transactions by them or close family members valued at more than $1,000, but efforts to tighten those rules or bar lawmakers from trading stocks altogether have so far been unsuccessful. That has created an environment rife with potential conflicts of interest, in which many lawmakers who are active in the stock market have unique insight into or influence over companies whose shares they are buying and selling. The report said because of a lack of cooperation from Mrs. Kelly, it was ' ultimately unable to confirm whether Mrs. Kelly received nonpublic information from her husband or what her intent was in purchasing the Cleveland-Cliffs stock.' It did say, though, that the transaction risked creating an appearance of impropriety and self-dealing. 'Representative Kelly's conduct with respect to Cleveland-Cliffs and his wife's stock purchase raised significant concerns for the committee, even if it did not rise to the level of insider trading or clearly violate conflict of interest rules,' the report said. It also said that during his committee interview, 'some of Representative Kelly's answers to key questions were inconsistent both during his testimony and with his prior written responses to committee requests for information.' The report also said the committee was alarmed by the fact that Mrs. Kelly had made additional purchases of the company's stock in 2024 when the congressman was again working on an issue of importance to the company. 'Mrs. Kelly's subsequent purchase of Cleveland-Cliffs stock despite the ongoing investigation, and Representative Kelly's failure to timely disclose that purchase and answer questions relating to it, are yet more examples of his failure to recognize the gravity of the allegations in this case and indicate a lack of respect for the committee's role and processes,' the report said. It said he 'has not demonstrated sufficient appreciation for the harm to the institution caused by the appearance of impropriety.' In a statement, Mr. Kelly, who was first elected in 2010, said he and his family 'look forward to getting this distraction behind us.' 'Throughout this process, I have fought for the 1,400 workers at the plant, I've spoken with these workers, and they appreciate the hard work we have done to fight for those jobs and for Butler,' Mr. Kelly said in the statement.
Fox News
6 days ago
- Politics
- Fox News
House to vote on censuring Dem rep charged in ICE facility incident
A House Republican put forward a resolution calling for a vote to censure the New Jersey Democrat who was federally indicted for allegedly obstructing Homeland Security agents at an immigration facility in May. The measure from Clay Higgins of Louisiana states that Rep. LaMonica McIver's "continued service on the Committee on Homeland Security, which is charged with oversight of Federal immigration enforcement and other national security matters, would represent a significant conflict of interest" and that she should be removed from that committee as well. "Clay Higgins is a bigot who wants to be back in the news," McIver told Axios in a statement provided by a spokesperson. "This resolution aims to kick me off the committee that presides over the Department of Homeland Security and shame me for doing the oversight work that is my job," she reportedly added. "Good luck, Clay." The resolution mentions how McIver was hit with a "three-count indictment by a Federal grand jury for assaulting, resisting, impeding, and interfering with Federal officers" during the May 9 incident at the Delaney Hall Federal Immigration Facility in Newark, N.J. It states that "clause 1 of rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives provides, ''A Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House shall behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House'" and that "such actions of a Member of the House of Representatives do not reflect creditably on the House." During the incident, McIver and two other members of Congress were conducting a congressional oversight visit that coincided with an immigration protest, according to a Justice Department press release. After Newark Mayor Ras Baraka entered the facility's secured area, federal agents warned him to leave. However, when officers tried to arrest Baraka, McIver allegedly blocked them, putting her arms around the mayor, and "slammed her forearm" into one officer while grabbing another. After pleading not guilty during a court appearance last month, McIver said "At the end of the day this is all about political intimidation. "The Trump administration and his colleagues or cronies, or whatever you want to call them, have weaponized the federal government. They weaponized the Department of Justice and anybody who stands up to them, anyone who criticizes them, anyone who fights back against them finds themselves in these hairs that we are in today," she added. McIver is now headed for trial on Nov. 10. Higgins told Axios that he waited until just before the House of Representatives' 5-week recess to see if Democrats would remove McIver from her committee assignment. House Republicans' rules require indicted members to give up all their committee assignments, while Democrats only require those individuals to surrender committee leadership positions, according to Axios. McIver "should not be participating on the committee that has oversight and voting authority over the branch of federal government that she's been indicted for committing crimes against," Higgins told the outlet.
Forbes
6 days ago
- Business
- Forbes
How Trump Used The Presidency To Expand His Global Empire
On January 30, 10 days after Donald Trump's inauguration, a firm with ties to the president created two companies in Delaware, DT Marks Abu Dhabi LLC and DT Marks Abu Dhabi Member Corp. The naming conventions of the entities—starting with Trump's initials, followed by the word 'Marks,' then a location of a future project—match how the president has named more than 30 other licensing entities in his portfolio. The Trump Organization has not yet announced a deal in the capital of the United Arab Emirates, but it's likely just a matter of time. Since last fall, Trump has been on a dealmaking spree, with his business revealing eight new projects in just 10 months. His foreign licensing income shot up from an estimated $6 million in 2023 to nearly $50 million last year. More business is headed Trump's way: Corporate filings point to at least three other unannounced deals—in Abu Dhabi, Serbia and Hungary. All of this represents an about-face for the president, who hung onto ownership of his assets during his first term but stuck them in a trust and promised to launch no new ventures overseas. In the six years after his initial election, he added only one deal, agreeing to brand a golf development in Oman. But today, Trump profits from politics with little reservation—both domestically, recently signing crypto legislation that probably made him tens of millions of dollars—and abroad, expanding his licensing empire at dizzying speed. The conflicts of interest are now more brazen, and more overlooked, than ever before. Trump's international travel, for instance, seems to be as much about his personal business as his national priorities. He heads to Scotland Friday, with plans to visit the two towns where he has golf resorts. His only other trip abroad since reassuming the presidency, besides a quick jaunt to the pope's funeral and a couple of obligatory summits, was a tour through the Middle East. First, he landed in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, home of Dar Al Akan, a development firm whose subsidiary has signed a slew of new deals with Trump across the region, including in Riyadh. Next, he headed to Doha, Qatar, which will soon welcome a Trump-branded golf community about 25 miles north of the city. Finally, he flew to Abu Dhabi. It's all head-spinning for people like Walter Shaub, who led the Office of Government Ethics in Trump's first term and clashed publicly with the White House over the president's decision to hang onto his business; Shaub resigned in 2017. What Trump is doing today, Shaub says, is far worse than in his first term. 'This president has absolutely demolished any sense of a government-ethics program,' Shaub explains. 'In fact, it's gone so far as to be whatever is the direct opposite of government ethics—I suppose we'd call that corruption.' F oreign powers have tried to buy favor in the United States since America's founding. King Louis XVI gave Benjamin Franklin a snuffbox with 408 diamonds upon his departure from Paris, as Zephyr Teachout recounted in her book, 'Corruption in America.' Franklin, recognizing that the Articles of Confederation banned gifts from foreign rulers, got special permission from Congress to keep the box. The next year, he and his compatriots gathered in Philadelphia to rip up the Articles of Confederation and draft the U.S. Constitution. One section that remained: The emoluments clause, which required all officeholders to get permission from Congress if they wanted to accept 'any present, emolument, office or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince or foreign state.' More than 200 years later, Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election, sparking legal debate over the meaning of an 'emolument' and whether the president could retain foreign business interests. Trump's team took the issue somewhat seriously, not only promising to do no new foreign deals but canceling a handful of pending projects, like one in the former Soviet republic of Georgia. 'The emoluments clause was definitely the main concern,' Giorgi Rtskhiladze, one of the president's former partners in Georgia, told Forbes in 2017. 'Their concern was once you start negotiating with the government, then having Mr. Trump as president, they were worried, again, that the press and everybody else would look at it that he's getting favors.' Trump moved forward with other deals, delegating to his sons Eric and Don Jr. On a 2018 trip to India, Don Jr. bristled at his family's restrictions. 'We've put on these impositions on ourselves,' he said during a television interview, 'but essentially got no credit for actually doing that and for doing the right thing.' The reason the Trumps did not get any credit was because they were still taking in plenty of foreign money—via licensing deals, hotel operations, even property sales. Lawsuits landed, from a nonprofit group and the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia, accusing the president of violating the emoluments clause. The litigation took a slow route to the Supreme Court, which had never previously ruled on the definition of an emolument. It did not make a decision by the time Trump lost the 2020 election, and shortly after he left office, ruled the cases moot. If the issue had barely come up in 200 years, what were the odds of it resurfacing anytime soon? F rom a purely business standpoint, it also seemed unlikely that people would want to pay Trump to brand their buildings after he departed Washington. January 6 left a stain on the president's brand. Banks made it clear they wanted to cut ties, and social-media platforms shut down his accounts. 'People are not going to be willing to forgive,' Kevin Brown, a stock analyst who covers hotels for Morningstar, told Forbes a month after the attack on the Capitol. 'He has done permanent damage to the Trump name and image, at least for two, three decades.' Or not. Trump launched his 2024 presidential campaign on November 15, 2022. The very next day, a Saudi real-estate firm signed an agreement to develop a Trump-branded golf community in partnership with the Sultanate of Oman. The deal kicked off more than $6 million to DT Marks Oman LLC, a company Trump owns outright. Then came 2024. In June, Joe Biden broke down on the debate stage, cementing Trump's position as frontrunner for the White House. That same month, the real estate developer quietly created companies with names that pointed to future business in Saudi Arabia and Dubai. In July, his two eldest sons apparently moved to take a bigger share of branding business, with a Trump-tied firm creating new entities in Delaware named DJT Jr Licensing LLC and ET Licensing LLC. Trump's stake in the ventures fell to 80%, as other family members—presumably Eric and Don Jr.—split the remaining 20%, according to documents the elder Trump later submitted to the government. The Trump family looked for places to add properties around the globe, finding fertile ground in Vietnam, where the prime minister reportedly promised to expedite a Trump project. Business picked up elsewhere after the election, as the Trumps registered entities named after three Indian locales—Pune, Noida and Gurgaon—as well as Hungary's capital and the Philippines. The Trump Organization publicly revealed its Saudi deal in December, with Eric Trump suggesting that his family would adhere to the same ethics guidelines that they did during their father's previous administration. 'I think we are going to navigate that very smartly,' he told Reuters. 'No different than we did in 2016.' T hat was clearly not true. With Trump's foreign licensing income up an estimated 650% in 2024, the promise to do no new foreign deals disappeared. Same with the concerns about working alongside foreign governments. Since the start of 2025, the Trump Organization appears to have created at least eight new companies to do business overseas. Why are so few people paying attention? In part, because there is a lot to scrutinize, including the president's new crypto ventures. 'There is burnout on Trump ethics scandals—it's just one thing after another,' says Richard Painter, George W. Bush's former ethics lawyer, who worked on the emoluments litigation in the first Trump administration but sounds skeptical that the cases will be refiled anytime soon. 'People think he's like Teflon, that nothing sticks to him.' They may be right. The White House press office, contacted for this story, declined to answer a list of specific questions but insisted the president acts in the interests of the American people, not himself. 'President Trump's assets are in a trust managed by his children,' said Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly, without acknowledging that a trust doesn't do much if the person who puts it together retains his holdings, routinely checks in on them and tweaks rules after they become inconvenient. 'There are no conflicts of interest,' Kelly added. The Trump Organization, meanwhile, continues to operate, announcing a fresh project almost every month, stomping all over the president's earlier promises—and the U.S. Constitution. In April, for example, a state-owned real estate firm in Qatar revealed that it had signed an agreement to develop a Trump-branded golf community outside of the nation's capital, Doha. Two weeks ago, the firm that registers companies for the Trump Organization created another two entities in Delaware, DT Marks Doha LLC and DT Marks Doha Member Corp. It's not clear whether those companies are connected to the already-announced project in Qatar—or an indication of yet another new foreign deal. More from Forbes Forbes How Barron Trump May Have Earned $40 Million From His Dad's Crypto Venture By Kyle Khan-Mullins Forbes The Saudi Real Estate Tycoon Who's A 'Member Of The Trump Family' By Giacomo Tognini Forbes Trump's Crypto Firm Raised $52 Million—Likely Sending Millions To His Family, New Disclosure Reveals By Zach Everson Forbes After Years Of Lying, Trump Organization Tries To Figure Out How Big Its Properties Actually Are By Dan Alexander
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
House Democrats raise concerns about T-Mobile role in 'Trump Mobile' service
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Three Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee raised serious concerns about T-Mobile's involvement in the Trump Organization's self-branded mobile service and a $499 smartphone dubbed Trump Mobile. Representative Frank Pallone, the ranking member of the committee and two other committee members, asked T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert to answer questions about the company's dealings with the Trump organization. "We are specifically concerned that T-Mobile's business relationship with the Trump Organization — while Donald Trump is serving as President of the United States — presents a conflict of interest that will harm the American people," they wrote in a letter Wednesday.
CNA
7 days ago
- Business
- CNA
House Democrats raise concerns about T-Mobile role in 'Trump Mobile' service
WASHINGTON :Three Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee raised serious concerns about T-Mobile's involvement in the Trump Organization's self-branded mobile service and a $499 smartphone dubbed Trump Mobile. Representative Frank Pallone, the ranking member of the committee and two other committee members, asked T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert to answer questions about the company's dealings with the Trump organization. "We are specifically concerned that T-Mobile's business relationship with the Trump Organization — while Donald Trump is serving as President of the United States — presents a conflict of interest that will harm the American people," they wrote in a letter Wednesday.
