Latest news with #congressionalboundaries
The Guardian
15 hours ago
- Politics
- The Guardian
California legislature poised to vote on redistricting plan in response to Texas gerrymandering
The California state legislature was poised on Thursday to vote on a plan to redraw its congressional boundaries and create five potential new Democratic House seats – an answer to the Republican redistricting push in Texas, sought by Donald Trump, aimed at tilting the map in his party's favor ahead of next year's midterm elections. The nation's two most populous – and ideologically opposed – states were racing on parallel tracks toward consequential redistricting votes, potentially within hours of each other. As Democrats in Sacramento worked to advance a legislative package that would put their 'election rigging response act' before voters in a special election this fall, Republicans in Austin were nearing a final vote on their own gerrymandering pursuit. Approval by the Texas senate, which is expected as early as Thursday, would conclude a dramatic showdown with the state's outnumbered Democratic lawmakers whose two-week boycott captured national attention and set in motion a coast-to-coast redistricting battle. The California plan, led by the state's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, is designed to flip as many as five Republican-held seats in California – the exact number of additional GOP seats Trump has said he is 'entitled to' in Texas. 'This is a new Democratic party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said on a call with reporters on Wednesday. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' The redistricting tit-for-tat is an extraordinary deviation from the norm. Traditionally, states redraw congressional maps once a decade based on census data, with both the Texas and California maps originally intended to last through 2030. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, is expected to easily approve new congressional maps despite sharp Republican objections. Newsom's signature would send the measure to the ballot in a special election this November. The California changes would only take effect in response to a gerrymander by a Republican state – a condition that would be met when the Texas legislatures sends the maps to the state's governor, Greg Abbott, for his promised signature. California was acting after a dramatic showdown in Austin, where Democratic lawmakers fled the state earlier this month to delay the GOP redistricting plan. When they returned, some were assigned police minders and forced to sign permission slips before leaving the capitol. Several spent the night in the chamber in protest ahead of Wednesday's session, where Republicans pushed through a map designed explicitly to boost their party's chances in 2026. The legislative action on Thursday followed a weeks-long showdown in Texas, after Democratic lawmakers fled the state in an effort to delay the GOP redistricting plan. They returned only after California moved forward with its counterproposal. California Democrats are moving ahead after days of contentious debate over the cost – and consequences – of a referendum to temporarily toss out the maps drawn by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Republicans estimated that a special election could cost more than $230m – money they said would be better spent on other issues like healthcare. On Wednesday night, the state supreme court declined an emergency request by Republican lawmakers seeking to block the Democratic plan from moving forward. The redistricting push has also caused angst among some Democrats and independents who have fought for years to combat gerrymandering. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Testifying in favor of the changes during a hearing earlier this week, Sara Sadhwani, a political science professor who served as a Democratic member of the state's independent redistricting commission in 2020, said the map-drawing tit-for-tat presented California voters with a 'moral conflict'. But she argued that Democrats had to push back on the president's power grab. 'It brings me no joy to see the maps that we passed fairly by the commission to be tossed aside,' she said. 'I do believe this is a necessary step in a much bigger battle to shore up free and fair elections in our nation.' The plan also drew the backing of former president Barack Obama and other champions of fair redistricting, such as his former attorney general, Eric Holder. But Newsom's redistricting plan – a high-stakes gambit for the term-limited governor who has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions – is not assured to succeed. It faces mounting opposition from high-profile Republicans, including the state's former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has vowed to 'terminate gerrymandering'. Early polling has been mixed. But a new survey conducted by Newsom's longtime pollster David Binder found strong support for the measure in the heavily Democratic state, with 57% of voters backing it while 35% opposed it. In a memo, Binder noted that support for the redistricting measure varies depending on how it is presented to voters. When framed as eliminating the state's independent redistricting commission designed to prevent partisan gerrymandering, support drops. However, when voters hear that the initiative would allow temporary map changes only in response to partisan actions in other states, like Texas, while retaining the commission, the measure enjoys a double-digit margin of support.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Tribune-Star Editorial: Hoosier GOP lawmakers should decline arm-twisting session at White House
Flickers of the bygone days of Indiana's political pragmatism have rekindled in the past week. Political pressure is already threatening that fledgling spark. It was lit by the Trump administration. The White House is trying to strongarm Republican-majority states into redrawing their congressional boundaries, years ahead of the constitutionally based post-census cycle. Now, President Donald Trump has invited all 110 Republicans in the Indiana General Assembly to an Aug. 26 meeting in the White House, the Indianapolis Star reported Friday. They should decline, politely if that softens the consequences for those lawmakers. The coercion from the White House is a purely political ploy to win more Republican seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Not through better candidates, policies or campaigning, but by simply erasing the existing lines and redrawing them to ensure a GOP victory. Trump's Republican Party holds a narrow 219-212 majority in the House, with four vacant seats. The party in control of the White House historically loses seats in midterm elections. If that holds true in the 2026 election, Democrats could regain the House majority, complicating Trump's plans. So, the White House has unleashed a pressure campaign on governors and state lawmakers in Republican-leaning states to redraw congressional districts to win more House seats. It started with Texas, where Republicans hold 25 of the Lone Star State's 38 seats in the U.S. House, and has spread to others. The U.S. Constitution provides for states to redistrict after the decennial census, which happens next in 2030. This is 2025. The president's rationale for disrupting that cycle, specifically in Texas? 'We are entitled to five more seats,' Trump told CNBC on Aug. 5. Soon, compliant Texas Republicans began working to conjure up new boundaries to deliver those five seats in 2026, setting off a wild clash with minority Democrats who left that state in a procedural move to stall the scheme. Then, Vice President J.D. Vance was sent to Indiana to twist the arms of Gov. Mike Braun, Indiana House Speaker Todd Huston and state Senate Pro Tem Rodric Bray to follow Texas's lead. The Hoosier leaders were basically noncommittal. Numbers illustrate the reason why Indiana officials should not join the power grab. Republicans already hold seven of the state's nine seats in the U.S. House. That calculates to 78% of the seats. That is far more than the actual Republican-Democratic split in Indiana. Braun won the 2024 governor's race with 54% of the vote, while Democratic challenger Jennifer McCormick got 41%. Trump wants 100% of Indiana's seats, and wants new lines drawn to guarantee that outcome. Admirably, a surprising number of Republican Indiana state legislators have pushed back against the scheme. Zionsville Rep. Becky Cash told WTHR in Indianapolis, 'I do not support redistricting and do not know of any reason why Indiana should redistrict.' Even staunch conservative Rep. Jim Lucas of Seymour gave the 'highly unusual and politically optically horrible' scheme a 'hard no' on social media, adding, 'If there are seats that need targeted, we should do it the old-fashioned way and campaign harder in those districts.' Spencer Deery, the Republican state senator from Lafayette summoned a slice of the late Richard Lugar's statesmanship, saying, 'We are being asked to create a new culture in which it would be normal for a political party to select new voters, not once a decade, but any time it fears the consequences of an approaching election. That would clearly violate the concept of popular sovereignty by making it harder for the people to hold their elected officials accountable, and the country would be an uglier place for it.' Deery is right; it would be. There is no need for state legislators to travel to the White House to face intimidation. Indiana should study its legislative boundaries after the 2030 census, and no sooner.
