logo
#

Latest news with #corn

Iran's SLAL tenders for 120,000 metric tons corn, traders say
Iran's SLAL tenders for 120,000 metric tons corn, traders say

Zawya

time14 hours ago

  • Business
  • Zawya

Iran's SLAL tenders for 120,000 metric tons corn, traders say

HAMBURG - Iranian state-owned animal feed importer SLAL has issued an international tender to purchase up to 120,000 metric tons of animal feed corn, European traders said on Tuesday. The deadline for submission of price offers in the tender was also Tuesday, July 29, they said. Shipment is sought in the full month of August. The corn can be sourced from Brazil, Europe, Russia, Ukraine or elsewhere in the Black Sea region. Payment problems for Iranian businesses because of Western sanctions had made participation in recent tenders from Iran difficult, traders said. Food is exempt from Western sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, but sanctions have hit Iran's financial system, creating complex and erratic payment arrangements. Traders said immediate cash payment was offered in the tender, but the terms of payment would be negotiated during the purchase. Price offers should be made in euros, they said. (Reporting by Michael Hogan, Editing by Louise Heavens)

Chicago soybeans drop on abundant global supply, wheat and corn also fall
Chicago soybeans drop on abundant global supply, wheat and corn also fall

Zawya

timea day ago

  • Business
  • Zawya

Chicago soybeans drop on abundant global supply, wheat and corn also fall

BEIJING/HAMBURG - Chicago soybean futures fell on Monday, weighed down by abundant global supplies, sluggish demand and benign crop weather across the U.S. Midwest. Corn was pressured by expectations of a large U.S. harvest, with favourable weather expected in the Midwest crop belt. Wheat was weakened as accelerating harvests across the Northern Hemisphere boosted global supply prospects. Chicago Board of Trade most-active soybeans were down 0.6% to $10.14 a bushel at 0935 GMT. Corn fell 0.8% to $3.96 a bushel, wheat dropped 0.9% to $5.33-1/2 a bushel. "Soybeans continue to be under pressure from the large U.S. and global crops coming our way soon. It's hard for that market to get any real lift for the next few months," said Ole Houe of IKON Commodities in Sydney. Weak export demand further weighed on soybeans, with recent weekly U.S. export sales disappointing. On tariffs, the United States and European Union struck a framework trade agreement on Sunday, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods and averting a bigger trade war between the two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. 'Tariff elimination of some agricultural products was mentioned in the U.S./EU deal but the lack of any detail means no judgement can be made on it,' one German trader said. 'But there is overall relief that a damaging U.S./EU trade war has been avoided.' Wheat is suffering from the double burden of low demand and big supplies on the way from harvests in the U.S., EU and Black Sea, the German trader added. 'There are hardly any wheat purchase tenders in the market as the week starts,' he said. 'Russian farmers have been unwilling sellers of new crop. But as the Russian harvest expands farmers may be compelled to sell more for export, they cannot store everything.'

Does the 2025 Corn Crop Have a Pollination Problem?
Does the 2025 Corn Crop Have a Pollination Problem?

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Does the 2025 Corn Crop Have a Pollination Problem?

The US ag BRACE Industry has recently been squawking about a pollination problem with the 2025 US corn crop. We can ignore this group for the most part while focusing on what the market has been and continues to tell us about REAL fundamentals. More News from Barchart Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Here we see, for whatever reason, some interest in US supply and demand next spring. Does the 2025 US corn crop have a pollination problem? This seems to be the subject du jour with nearly every ag media outlet devoting as much time and space to the subject as possible. According to most of these media accounts, the US will be lucky to harvest one truckload of corn this fall, leaving the world in a crushing supply deficit while sending the market soaring to $42[i] per bushel[ii]. Now, if you believe all this, I have a mountain-top villa in south-central Kansas to sell you. Why do I seem skeptical? After all, I'm no more an agronomist than I am an economist. But here's the thing, many of the folks who are squawking about how the sky is falling in regard to the US corn crop couldn't tell an ear of corn from a head of milo. Most of them are members in good standing of the BRACE[iii] Industry meaning they turn to whatever direction the USDA office is from them each morning and repeat their official mantra, 'Everything is always bullish'. If it wasn't a pollination problem it would be 'not enough heat units', or 'it's too hot', or 'it's too wet', or 'it's too dry', or my favorite 'the latest trade deals mean China is going to save US agriculture'. Huzzah! Huzzah!! Huzzah!!! As a former long-time member of the ag media circus turned long-term investor, I've learned to ignore nearly all of what the industry has to say. It gives me a HIT[iv] advantage to listen to what the markets are saying rather than the cacophony screeching voices always present in the background. Given all this, what is the corn market telling us in late July? As always, I'll turn to our key reads on real market supply and demand: The National Corn Index[v], national average basis[vi], and futures spreads. The National Corn Index ($CNCI) was calculated near $3.85 last Friday putting it in the lower 20% of its 5-year price distribution range[vii]. Based on the economic law of Supply and Demand, this tells us spot cash supplies are large in relation to immediate demand. National average basis was calculated last Friday at roughly 14.5 cents under September futures and 34.0 cents under December. The previous 10-year average for last week was 14.75 cents under September with the previous 5-year (and 10-year) low weekly close for the first week of September at 30.0 cents under December. Which leaves us with futures spreads. As you know, I use the price relationship between futures contracts to indicate how the commercial side is position based on its long-term fundamental outlook. A quick recap of what we've seen this past year: Dec25 corn spent the 6-month period from the first weekly close last September through the last weekly close this past February buying 2025 planted area away from the Nov25 soybean futures contract. The September corn contract, a hybrid issue[viii], showed its new-crop side during 2025 indicating those increased acres were planted early. The September-December futures spread posted a high daily close of 3.0 cents inverse on February 20, steadily falling to last Friday's close of 19.5 cents carry. Therefore, the market told us there would be more acres and those acres were planted earlier than usual. Since then, we've seen the 2025-2026 futures spreads (Dec25-Mar26 through May26-July26, summarized by the Dec25-Jul26 forward curve) tell us, to quote Paul Harvey, 'the rest of the story'. To get a better understand of what the market is saying, I track the trend[ix] of percent of calculated full commercial carry[x] covered by each spread and the forward curve. Here's what the trends have done from the first weekly close of March through late July: Dec25 (ZCZ25) -Mar26 (ZCH26) futures spread: 37% calculated full commercial carry (cfcc) to 57%. While still a neutral read, the larger percent tells us the commercial side is comfortable with the number of supplies that will be available in relation to demand during harvest. This same week last year the Dec24-Mar25 spread covered 46%. Dec25-Jul26 (ZCN26) forward curve: 30% to 47%. Again, the increase has been consistent. However, here we see a low weekly close (high percent) of 48% the second week of July. Mar26-May26 (ZCK26) and May26-Jul26 futures spreads: Here's where things get interesting as both spreads have stabilized during July. The March-May reflects the reality of bushels being tucked away over the winter, meaning demand is expected to firm against available supplies. Further out, the May-July closed last weekly covering 30% cfcc as compared to its low two weeks prior of 35% and 36% the same week last year. Is the lower percent due to tighter supplies tied to pollination? Is it due to increased demand from ethanol, feed, and exports? All are possible. The reality is we don't know. What we do know is the commercial side is keeping a close eye on longer-term supply AND demand. This past week I had the privilege of participating in Barchart's Grain Merchandising & Technology meetings in Ames, Iowa and Manhattan. At the Ames meeting, the other guest grains analyst Thomas Call, Senior Consultant of Commodity Risk at Mid-Co Commodities talked about how the corn market didn't seem to have much downside risk at current[xi] levels and seasonal tendencies. I agree, based on my price distribution study and seasonal studies for December corn futures. At last Friday's close, Dec25 was in the lower 23% of its 5-year range. At the Manhattan meeting Guy Allen, Senior Economist at Kansas State University discussed how corn could soon start to rally. As I've talked about over the past year, from an investment point of view, the Dec corn only continuous monthly chart showed a buy signal at the close of August 2024 with another possible at the end of this month, if Dec25 finishes above its June settlement of $4.2550. So, does the 2025 US corn crop have a pollination problem? Maybe. Or maybe not. I'll counter the braying BRACE Industry with this question: Does it matter? Recall Market Rule #5: It's the what, not the why. The 'what' in late July is commercial interests have been providing longer-term support. We'll see what happens over the coming months. [i] According to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, '42' is the answer to everything. A tip of the hat to Scott K., one of my former editors back in the newsroom. [ii] No, the US could never figure out the metric system the rest of the world uses. [iii] BRACE = Brokers/Reporters/Analysts/Commentators/Economists who as a group have never met a USDA statistic they won't quote or a make-believe story they won't pass along. [iv] Hedging-Investing-Trading [v] National average cash price, intrinsic value of the market [vi] National Corn Index minus futures [vii] Based on weekly closes only. This shows us how often a market or contract posts a weekly close above or below certain price levels over a set period of time. It's based on the idea there was value in knowing the upper and lower 33%. What I find more important is what it says about a market when we apply the economic Law of Supply and Demand. [viii] Part old-crop, part new-crop [ix] Simply price direction over time. No extravagant technical analysis necessary. [x] The total cost, storage and interest, to hold supplies in commercial storage. The storage rate is set by the CME with interest the sum of the 90-day SOFR rate + 2.2125 percent. [xi] Sorry Tony D. On the date of publication, Darin Newsom did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store