logo
#

Latest news with #damages

UAE: Man gets Dh300,000 in criminal case, appeal for more rejected by top court
UAE: Man gets Dh300,000 in criminal case, appeal for more rejected by top court

Khaleej Times

time16 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

UAE: Man gets Dh300,000 in criminal case, appeal for more rejected by top court

The UAE's Court of Cassation has rejected an appeal filed by a man seeking a higher compensation amount after already being awarded damages in a case linked to a previous criminal conviction. The case began when the first respondent was found guilty in a criminal case by the Abu Dhabi Criminal Court. As part of the verdict, the court ordered the respondent to pay the victim (now the appellant) Dh51,000 as interim compensation. Later, the victim filed a civil lawsuit requesting further compensation for the material and moral damages he suffered as a result of the harmful act committed by the first respondent. The civil court reviewed the case and awarded him a total of Dh300,000. The court's verdict does not mention the exact nature of the crime committed and only cites Criminal Case No. 111/2024. It also refrains from specifying the harm caused to the victim, referring only generally to material and moral damages. The appellant then tried to challenge this ruling, hoping for a higher amount. However, the Court of Cassation upheld the original judgment, stating that the Dh300,000 award was fair and based on solid evidence. The court also noted that criminal judgments are final in terms of proving the facts and cannot be re-examined in civil court. During the final ruling on July 23, the Court of Cassation found that the appellant's objections were merely disputes about how the trial court evaluated the evidence, which is not a valid ground for cassation. Since the appeal lacked valid legal grounds, the court dismissed the case, ordered the appellant to pay court fees and expenses, and confiscated the appeal insurance. The ruling simply affirms that the trial court evaluated the damage and found the compensation of Dh300,000 to be appropriate and justified, based on the documents and legal reasoning.

Dutch model Ivana Smit's mother awarded RM1.1m over police negligence in death probe
Dutch model Ivana Smit's mother awarded RM1.1m over police negligence in death probe

Malay Mail

timea day ago

  • Malay Mail

Dutch model Ivana Smit's mother awarded RM1.1m over police negligence in death probe

KUALA LUMPUR, July 29 — The High Court here today awarded RM1.1 million in damages to the mother of Dutch model Ivana Esther Robert Smit, whose nude body was found on the sixth-floor balcony of a condominium here eight years ago. Christina Carolina Gerarda Johanna Verstappen had sued the Inspector-General of Police, Dang Wangi investigating officer ASP Faizal Abdullah, the Home Minister, and the Malaysian government for alleged breach of statutory duties and negligence in the investigation into the cause of her daughter's death. In her judgment, Judge Roz Mawar Rozain ordered the defendants to pay RM500,000 in general damages, RM300,000 in aggravated damages, and RM300,000 in exemplary damages to Verstappen. — Bernama

B.C. tribunal settles dispute between neighbours over fire that engulfed hedge, damaged fence
B.C. tribunal settles dispute between neighbours over fire that engulfed hedge, damaged fence

CTV News

time2 days ago

  • CTV News

B.C. tribunal settles dispute between neighbours over fire that engulfed hedge, damaged fence

A man who sparked a fire that engulfed his next-door neighbours' hedges and charred their fence has been ordered to pay $4,200 in damages. The blaze broke out in West Kelowna on Boxing Day 2023 – triggering a response form the local fire department and the RCMP, according to a recent decision from the Civil Resolution Tribunal. Terrance Molsberry and Susan Lobb filed a claim against Andrew Wingerak, alleging he 'set fire to their property,' and seeking reimbursement for the cost of replacing the burned hedges and fence, the decision said. It was 'undisputed' that Wingerak caused the fire, according to the decision. '(Wingerak) placed hot ashes along the fence dividing his property from the applicants'. He did so to kill weeds. The ashes caused the fence and hedges to catch fire,' tribunal member David Jiang wrote. The fire department responded to a 911 call from another neighbour who spotted the flames and put the blaze out with a garden hose. The decision said firefighters called in the police who looked into allegations the fire was set deliberately but were 'satisfied this was not the case.' However, the tribunal found Wingerak was liable for damages on the basis of negligence. 'I find that the respondent acted unreasonably by dumping hot ashes near the fence and hedges. This created a serious risk of harm to both property and people,' Jiang wrote. 'I am also satisfied that the respondent's actions caused damage, and that the damage was reasonably foreseeable. The hot ashes were clearly a fire hazard that could cause fire-related damage.' Molsberry and Lobb sought damages equivalent to a landscapers quoted cost for replacing three cedar trees and one fence panel, including the purchase of soil and rental of an excavator, according to the decision. Wingerak, on the other hand, argued the damage was relatively insignificant and repairing it would cost much less. A review of security camera photos ultimately weighed in favour of Molsberry and Lobb, the decision said. 'They show that that some of the applicants' tallest hedges caught fire and 'candled.' The depicted fire and smoke were considerable,' Jiang wrote. 'Photos of the fire's aftermath show the damaged hedges suffered significant burn damage. The wood fence also had blackened portions. The respondent says the damage was minimal, but the photos contradict this.' Wingerak was ordered to pay $4,222.05 in damages for negligence, as well as $175 in tribunal fees.

B.C. man must pay $4,200 for ‘significant burn damage' to neighbours' hedge, fence: tribunal
B.C. man must pay $4,200 for ‘significant burn damage' to neighbours' hedge, fence: tribunal

CTV News

time2 days ago

  • CTV News

B.C. man must pay $4,200 for ‘significant burn damage' to neighbours' hedge, fence: tribunal

A man who sparked a fire that engulfed his next-door neighbours' hedges and charred their fence has been ordered to pay $4,200 in damages. The blaze broke out in West Kelowna on Boxing Day 2023 – triggering a response form the local fire department and the RCMP, according to a recent decision from the Civil Resolution Tribunal. Terrance Molsberry and Susan Lobb filed a claim against Andrew Wingerak, alleging he 'set fire to their property,' and seeking reimbursement for the cost of replacing the burned hedges and fence, the decision said. It was 'undisputed' that Wingerak caused the fire, according to the decision. '(Wingerak) placed hot ashes along the fence dividing his property from the applicants'. He did so to kill weeds. The ashes caused the fence and hedges to catch fire,' tribunal member David Jiang wrote. The fire department responded to a 911 call from another neighbour who spotted the flames and put the blaze out with a garden hose. The decision said firefighters called in the police who looked into allegations the fire was set deliberately but were 'satisfied this was not the case.' However, the tribunal found Wingerak was liable for damages on the basis of negligence. 'I find that the respondent acted unreasonably by dumping hot ashes near the fence and hedges. This created a serious risk of harm to both property and people,' Jiang wrote. 'I am also satisfied that the respondent's actions caused damage, and that the damage was reasonably foreseeable. The hot ashes were clearly a fire hazard that could cause fire-related damage.' Molsberry and Lobb sought damages equivalent to a landscapers quoted cost for replacing three cedar trees and one fence panel, including the purchase of soil and rental of an excavator, according to the decision. Wingerak, on the other hand, argued the damage was relatively insignificant and repairing it would cost much less. A review of security camera photos ultimately weighed in favour of Molsberry and Lobb, the decision said. 'They show that that some of the applicants' tallest hedges caught fire and 'candled.' The depicted fire and smoke were considerable,' Jiang wrote. 'Photos of the fire's aftermath show the damaged hedges suffered significant burn damage. The wood fence also had blackened portions. The respondent says the damage was minimal, but the photos contradict this.' Wingerak was ordered to pay $4,222.05 in damages for negligence, as well as $175 in tribunal fees.

Tesla Cybertruck sustains $3K in damages after man threw rocks at windshield: Edmonton police
Tesla Cybertruck sustains $3K in damages after man threw rocks at windshield: Edmonton police

CTV News

time4 days ago

  • CTV News

Tesla Cybertruck sustains $3K in damages after man threw rocks at windshield: Edmonton police

The Edmonton Police Service says this man threw rocks at the windshield of a Tesla Cybertruck in Edmonton on July 12, 2025. (Supplied) Edmonton police are searching for a man they say threw rocks at a Tesla Cybertruck earlier this month. The man threw rocks at the windshield of a parked Cybertruck at 11:05 p.m. on July 12, the Edmonton Police Service said. The vandalism resulted in $3,000 in damages, EPS added. Edmonton police released images from the Cybertruck's camera and are asking the public for help to find him. Anyone with information is asked to call police at 780-423-4567 or Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store