Latest news with #eliteuniversities
Fox News
2 days ago
- Business
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Why do elite universities take in students tied to foreign foes? Money, of course
For centuries, the traditional role of elite universities like Harvard has been to train the next generation of leaders in every field of endeavor, to hold before them an open door to power and influence. So why on Earth are we holding that door open to communist Chinese nationals? I had a good friend in high school, sharp as a tack, double legacy at Yale, graduated Harvard Law and by 30 she was at the State Department. The joke was, "Don't piss off Becca, she can pick up the phone and have you killed." The point here is that, for better or worse, and it's often the latter, graduates of top schools are meant to create a class of people who lead the country, who lead its industries and sciences, who stay at the Princeton Club in midtown, and wear their college ties. A top American degree opens up a world of the powerful that most Americans don't even know exists, much less ever interact with. Yet thousands and thousands of communist Chinese nationals are invited to this table every year. Why? There may have been a time when this influx of foreign students could be seen as exerting informational power around the globe, the idea being these students will go home and spread the gospel of democracy, free markets, and blue jeans. But let's not kid ourselves, these scions of Chinese Communist Party members who pay their way at Harvard aren't going home and creating movements for democracy in Beijing, not if they want to make it to grad school alive and well. In fact, we are the decided losers in this informational power exchange, as not just the Chinese, but Qataris, and 10,000 Iranian students for good measure, bring ideas and attitudes that undermine American foreign policy to the doorstep of the very people who will implement it. This brings us back to the question: Why are we doing this? Why are we training our foes and giving them access to the inner corridors of American power, and I'm sure nobody will be shocked that the answer is money. Foreign interests lavish our top universities with gifts like a rich guy who got caught cheating on his wife. In just the last five years, the Harvard Crimson reports $151 million from foreign governments and over a billion from foreign donors flowed to Cambridge. For hundreds of years, Harvard had educated the nation's great industrialists, financiers, and business magnates who kept the coffers of its endowment, still at a robust $52 billion, overflowing. But the blue-blood spigot is running dry. No, the non-binary womyns studies majors at the Harvard Divinity School are not going to be donating a new football stadium anytime soon. For that, these institutions have learned to rely on foreign money, and we all know that money ain't free. The money buys influence, it buys some say in how our nation conducts itself. During COVID, with a few notable exceptions, our country's entire healthcare apparatus just nodded along slavishly to every lie China and its mouthpiece the World Health Organization uttered. Why do you think that happened? It happened because China pays for research. It happened because China infiltrates the highest levels of our society, and sadly, they have become quite expert at it. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is obviously right to insist that we vigorously investigate any student from any nation that is a political or ideological foe of the United States, and frankly, any association with the Chinese Communist Party should be a dealbreaker. The first Harvard graduate to become the president of the United States was John Adams, who once famously wrote of his revolutionary adventures, "I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy." But today, it is our sons and daughters losing opportunities to study mathematics and philosophy to people from countries that hate America, and it is also those countries which stand the most to gain in terms of politics and war. American universities need to be American universities, not cosmopolitan, non-affiliated islands of corrupt foreign influence, and if the Harvards of the world can't be that, then places like conservative Hillsdale College or the University of Austin may well need to replace them. If Harvard and other storied elite universities want to return to serving the mission of helping America to be great, it would be welcome. But in the meantime, we don't have to give them taxpayer money, and we don't have to let them invite our enemies into the inner circle of American power.
New York Times
2 days ago
- General
- New York Times
Harvard as Symbol and Target
To the Editor: Re 'Is America Really Better Off if Harvard Gets Crushed?,' by Steven Pinker (Opinion guest essay, May 25): Dr. Pinker need not apologize for Harvard's imperfections and its shortcomings, or praise the best of what it has to offer. There has not been a studied analysis of this school by the Trump administration. Its attack on the university is simply a con. President Trump has announced his list of enemies. Elite universities are prominent among them, and Harvard is the perfect target for him, the head of the snake. Mr. Trump loves to hate. And when he hates, it is with the most intense fury. To him, Harvard is not a college, but a symbol, a vehicle, a place where he can make a point, in his own fashion, loudly and wildly. There are no shades of color in his universe — only black or white, for or against. There can be no appeasing Mr. Trump. For victims of his animus, the goal line will forever be moving. Antisemitism was the first excuse for his attacks, then D.E.I., then curriculum. Now it's foreign students. Tomorrow it will be something else, anything else. Harvard no longer exists to educate. It has disappeared under an avalanche of Mr. Trump's malice. Robert S. NussbaumFort Lee, N.J. To the Editor: As a trustee at another university in the Boston area, I have lived through similar experiences and agree with most of what Steven Pinker suggests. At a recent commencement dinner, I had the opportunity to sit with our provost, who expressed her view that she sincerely hopes that universities will do some in-depth soul-searching when the uproar we are experiencing now settles down. I believe we are doing just that. Thank you, Dr. Pinker, for pointing out that faculty members who use students to protest and express support for their personal views are being inappropriate and unprofessional. Those of us who protested in the 1960s were mostly students. Faculty generally did not protest with us. Instead, in the context of small group discussions, they led students toward deep discussions, encouraging us to defend our views, learn the law and express ourselves peacefully. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
News.com.au
3 days ago
- Business
- News.com.au
Elite US universities accused of prioritising foreign interests over American taxpayers
Centre of the American Experiment President John Hinderaker has criticised elite American universities, accusing them of cultivating 'unholy relationships' with foreign governments while turning their backs on the American taxpayers who fund them. 'University like Harvard gets billions of dollars in American taxpayer money, but they don't think that they are an American institution. They don't care,' Mr Hinderaker told Sky News host James Morrow. 'The last thing they care about is American taxpayers. 'They think they are a global institution and they train their students to be citizens of the world, and I think Donald Trump properly questions whether there's any reason why American taxpayers should be subsidising these operations to the tune of many billions of dollars.'
Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Business
- Bloomberg
Break Up Columbia? Maybe, and the Rest of Ivy League, Too
If universities want taxpayers to continue to fund scientific research, then they should create new institutions that stay out of politics. Save It pains me to say this, as both an economist and a graduate of Columbia, but: It may be time to break up not only Columbia but also America's entire system of elite higher education. America's large private research universities, such as Columbia and Harvard, have long been crucial to its economic exceptionalism. The symbiotic relationship between universities and the federal government, which subsidizes tuition and funds research, has created growth and innovation that is the envy of the world. Now, instead of being a source of national pride, many elite universities have become a source of national division, with some Americans viewing them as decadent, hypocritical or even hostile to their values. Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal
Washington Post
25-05-2025
- Politics
- Washington Post
The U.S. has more than 1 million foreign students. Here's who they are.
More than 1 million international students attend colleges across the United States each year, bringing billions of dollars to the American economy and bolstering the nation's science and technology sectors. Many of them now find themselves in the crosshairs of the Trump administration's battle to exert control over some of the nation's elite universities.
