logo
#

Latest news with #ex-Chicago

Ex-Chicago Police Officer Admits to Fatally Shooting Husband Following Argument Over Her Affair
Ex-Chicago Police Officer Admits to Fatally Shooting Husband Following Argument Over Her Affair

International Business Times

time28-05-2025

  • International Business Times

Ex-Chicago Police Officer Admits to Fatally Shooting Husband Following Argument Over Her Affair

An ex-Chicago police officer has pleaded guilty to shooting her husband, a fellow cop, over three years ago, but will only spend about a week in prison. As reported by WBEZ, as part of her plea deal agreed on Tuesday, Jacqueline Villasenor agreed to a sentence of more than six years. However, with Illinois' day-for-day sentencing law and credit for the years she spent on electronic monitoring awaiting trial, Jacqueline Villasenor is expected to serve only about seven days in the Illinois Department of Corrections, plus a year of supervised release, according to her attorney. Villasenor and Her Husband were Arguing Over a Previous Affair She Had and a Struggle Ensued, Leading to Him Getting Shot On Nov. 2, 2021, Jacqueline Villasenor and her husband, fellow Chicago police officer German Villasenor, were inside their Northwest Side home, arguing over a previous affair she'd had, when she pulled out her gun and threatened to kill herself, according to prosecutors. While struggling over the weapon, it fired, striking German Villasenor in his chest. Their then-16-year-old son heard the gunshot and went to his parents' bedroom, where he found his father lying on his back and his mother performing CPR, prosecutors said. Jacqueline was Charged with Involuntary Manslaughter Jacqueline Villasenor was charged with involuntary manslaughter. She resigned from the Chicago Police Department in December 2022. "She admitted that what she did was, in fact, a crime," her attorney Tim Grace said Tuesday. "It's a very triable case, but she didn't want to do that. She wanted to accept responsibility. She didn't want to put her family through it." In statements submitted to the court earlier this year, the couple's son and daughter asked the judge not to sentence their mother to time in prison for what they saw as an unfortunate accident. "I don't want to lose both my parents," the son wrote in a statement. Two of German Villasenor's siblings also wrote letters in support of Jacqueline Villasenor, asking that the children not suffer any further by having their mother taken away. "They have given the hardest gift of all. ...They've given forgiveness," Grace, her attorney, said in court Tuesday. 'There is No Punishment Worse Than the Punishment I Give Myself Every Day' Fighting through tears, Jacqueline Villasenor told Judge Arthur Wesley Willis Tuesday, "There is no punishment worse than the punishment I give myself every day." "Although the kids love and support me, I still see him in them every day, which makes it hard to know he's not here," Jacqueline Villasenor said before she was taken into custody. "We miss him every day." German Villasenor's parents, on the other hand, called for Jacqueline Villasenor to be punished, claiming this incident was no accident.

Supreme Court sides with ex-Chicago alderperson in corruption conviction appeal
Supreme Court sides with ex-Chicago alderperson in corruption conviction appeal

Yahoo

time21-03-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Supreme Court sides with ex-Chicago alderperson in corruption conviction appeal

The Supreme Court unanimously sided with a Chicago political scion in his criminal appeal Friday, agreeing an anti-corruption law barring lying to regulators only covers false statements, not misleading ones. Patrick Daley Thompson, a member of Chicago's most famous political dynasty, was convicted in 2022 of lying to regulators about the amount he borrowed from a now-defunct bank and already served a four-month sentence. In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices sent the case back to a lower court for another look at Thompson's charges, since he argues his statements were merely misleading. 'In casual conversation, people use many overlapping words to describe shady statements: false, misleading, dishonest, deceptive, literally true, and more. Only one of those words appears in the statute,' Roberts wrote. 'Section 1014 does not criminalize statements that are misleading but true. Under the statute, it is not enough that a statement is misleading. It must be 'false,'' he continued. The anti-corruption law Thompson was convicted of violating bars making false statements to influence certain government agencies and financial institutions. He also was convicted on tax charges that remain in place and weren't at issue before the high court. The ex-Chicago alderman's legal troubles stemmed from his insistence to a loan servicer's customer service line that he borrowed $110,000 — not the more than $269,000, including interest, the servicer claimed he owed. However, the former alderman neglected to mention two other loans, totaling $109,000. He settled the debt with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation by agreeing to pay the principal balance of $219,000 but not the interest and was later charged with violating the anti-corruption law. In concurring opinions, Justices Samuel Alito and Ketanji Brown Jackson noted that the instructions Thompson's jury received only indicated that false, not misleading, statements should be weighed, meaning the jury was properly instructed. 'Thus, in my view, there is little for the Seventh Circuit to do on remand but affirm the District Court's judgment upholding the jury's guilty verdict,' Jackson wrote. 'Whether Thompson's statements were, in fact, false is a question for the jury— and here, one the jury has already answered.' The justices' decision marks the second case in as many years where the Supreme Court found federal prosecutors overstepped while cracking down on local politicians. Last summer, they narrowed the scope of what can be considered an illegal gratuity to a government official in a case involving former Portage, Ind., Mayor James Snyder (R). Snyder in 2014 received a $13,000 check for consulting services from a garbage truck company after the town awarded lucrative contracts to the company the year before. That ruling was expected to make it tougher to prosecute public officials for accepting bribes. Updated at 10:59 a.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

18 people sick after mini pastries sold in Florida recalled for salmonella outbreak
18 people sick after mini pastries sold in Florida recalled for salmonella outbreak

Yahoo

time21-03-2025

  • Health
  • Yahoo

18 people sick after mini pastries sold in Florida recalled for salmonella outbreak

TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA)— Mini pastries sold in Florida made 18 people sick after an outbreak of salmonella, the FDA announced. The Sweet Cream-brand mini pastries with best-by dates from June 17 through Nov. 15, 2025, have been recalled. These mini pastries were distributed in Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Pennslyvania to food service locations like hotel cafes, bakeries, institutions, and restaurants. Supreme Court sides with ex-Chicago alderman in corruption conviction appeal LIVE: Tampa leaders announce millions in hurricane relief Northern California explored in 'Off Road Confidential' According to the FDA, as of March 14, 18 people were infected with the salmonella outbreak from seven states. One person has been hospitalized, and no deaths have been reported. Salmonella symptoms usually occur within 12 to 72 hours after eating food that has been contaminated and the symptoms usually last four to seven days, the FDA said. Symptoms include diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps. Customers who have received the recalled product have been notified, according to the FDA. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Judge delays ruling on wrongful conviction case involving disgraced ex-CPD detective
Judge delays ruling on wrongful conviction case involving disgraced ex-CPD detective

Yahoo

time25-02-2025

  • Yahoo

Judge delays ruling on wrongful conviction case involving disgraced ex-CPD detective

CHICAGO (WGN) — A man fighting his alleged wrongful conviction must wait a few more days to learn if a Cook County judge will clear his name. Attorneys for Tyrece Williams, who spent 20 years in prison, allege disgraced ex-Chicago police detective Reynaldo Guevara framed him. But the judge said Monday that she would need more time to review the case files, postponing her decision until next month WGN INVESTIGATES: The Chicago Tribune reports that if the judge rules in Williams' favor, the now-57-year-old would become the 50th person to have an overturned murder conviction in a case investigated by Guevara. The city has paid more than $100 million to defend, investigate, and settle misconduct claims involving Guevara, who allegedly falsified evidence to frame defendants. Despite the delay, Josh Tepfer, an attorney for Williams, says he remains optimistic. 'I've been doing this a long time and it's important to give the judge the time they need,' Tepfer said. 'These are important cases. It's certainly hard on the clients and their families but its part of the job to assure them this is part of the process and it happens.' Read more: Latest Chicago news and headlines The judge set a new ruling date for Tuesday, March 4. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store