Latest news with #healtheffects
E&E News
25-06-2025
- Politics
- E&E News
Trump admin signals it will back Superfund PFAS cleanups
EPA put in writing its intentions to enforce 'forever chemicals' cleanups at Superfund sites, signaling the Trump administration won't entirely ditch the historic Biden-era rule. According to EPA's congressional justification for its fiscal 2026 budget proposal, the agency will use the revenue collected from industry taxes to 'initiate new remedial work at National Priority List (NPL) sites to address contaminants including lead and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).' It appears to be the first time the Trump administration has officially marked its intent to use its enforcement powers for PFAS remediation under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, aka the Superfund law. Advertisement EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has repeatedly stated his support for 'polluter pays' principles and cleaning up areas highly contaminated with PFAS, a family of thousands of compounds famed for their chemically strong bond that makes them resistant to water and adhesiveness but, in turn, doesn't naturally degrade in the environment and persists in bodies causing serious health effects such as cancer.
Yahoo
24-06-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Video: How Far Away Would You Need to Be to Survive a Nuclear Blast?
Next month it will have been 80 years since the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were devastated by nuclear attacks. More than 200,000 people – mostly citizens – would die by the year's end as a direct consequence of the blasts, with many survivors left with long-term health effects. To date, those are the only instances of nuclear weapons being used for warfare, but the reality is that as of the beginning of 2025, there are still a little over 12,200 warheads remaining in the world. Related: So, what would happen if nuclear war broke out tomorrow? Don't panic – this is just a hypothetical. But in the video below, the team from AsapSCIENCE breaks down the science of nuclear bombs to predict how likely you'd be to survive. First, let's get this out of the way – there is no clear-cut way to estimate the impact of a single nuclear bomb, because it depends on many factors, including the weather on the day it's dropped, the time of day it's detonated, the geographical layout of where it hits, and whether it explodes on the ground or in the air. But, generally speaking, there are some predictable stages of a nuclear bomb blast that can affect the likelihood of your survival. (You can also explore this chilling interactive to find out how a nuclear blast would spread through the area where you live.) As the video above explains, approximately 35 percent of the energy of a nuclear blast is released in the form of thermal radiation. Since thermal radiation travels at approximately the speed of light, the first thing that will hit you is a flash of blinding light and heat. The light itself is enough to cause flash blindness – a usually temporary form of vision loss that can last a few minutes. The AsapSCIENCE video considers a 1 megaton bomb, which is 80 times larger than the bomb detonated over Hiroshima, but much smaller than many modern nuclear weapons. For a bomb that size, people up to 21 kilometers (13 miles) away would experience flash blindness on a clear day, and people up to 85 kilometers away would be temporarily blinded on a clear night. Heat is an issue for those closer to the blast. Mild, first-degree burns can occur up to 11 kilometers away, and third-degree burns – the kind that destroy and blister skin tissue – could affect anyone up to 8 kilometers away. Third-degree burns that cover more than 24 percent of the body would likely be fatal if people don't receive medical care immediately. Those distances are variable, depending not just on the weather, but also on what you're wearing – white clothes can reflect some of the energy of a blast, while darker clothes will absorb it. That's unlikely to make much difference for those unfortunate enough to be close to the explosion, though. It's estimated the very center of a 1 megaton nuclear weapon can generate temperatures close to 100 million degrees Celsius, or roughly five times the temperature at the core of the Sun. That would be more than enough to instantly reduce a human body to its most basic elements, like carbon. But for those slightly farther away from the center of the blast, there are other effects to consider aside from heat. The blast of a nuclear explosion also drives air away from the site of the explosion, creating sudden changes in air pressure that can crush objects and knock down buildings. Within a 6-kilometer radius of a 1 megaton bomb, blast waves would produce 180 metric tons of force on the walls of all two-story buildings, and wind speeds of 255 kilometers/hour (158 mph). In a 1-kilometer radius, the peak pressure is four times that amount, and wind speeds can reach 756 kilometers/hour. Technically, humans can withstand that much pressure, but most people would be killed by falling buildings. If you somehow survive all of that, there could still be a great deal of radiation poisoning to deal with. The blasts that devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki were air bursts, with each explosion occurring hundreds of meters above each city. Had the detonations taken place at ground level, material on the surface may have been heavily irradiated while being cast high into the atmosphere. AsapSCIENCE touches on the consequences of this 'nuclear fallout' in their video above, but the ongoing effects on the planet are longer-lasting than you might expect. For example, a simulation study published in 2019 found that a nuclear war between the United States and Russia would plunge Earth into a nuclear winter within days, due to the levels of smoke and soot released into the atmosphere. We also know that radioactive particles can travel remarkably far; a recent study found that remnants of radioactive carbon from Cold War nuclear bomb tests have been found all the way down in the Mariana Trench, the deepest point of the world's oceans. Again, all of this is hypothetical – there are international treaties in place to stop the spread and use of nuclear weapons, so we hope you never need to know any of this information for real. However, to find out more about the current state of nuclear weaponry in the world, including the scale of the bombs, you can visit the Nuclear Notebook at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. An earlier version of this article was originally published in January 2017. Due to overwhelming reader interest, we have now updated this article in June 2025. What Really Killed The Neanderthals? A Space Physicist Has a Radical Idea Casino Lights Could Be Warping Your Brain to Take Risks, Scientists Warn 1930s 'Dragon Man' Finally Gives Elusive Ancient Human Species a Face
CBC
15-05-2025
- Health
- CBC
MAY 15, 2025 Invisible, toxic and slow to break down — forever chemicals are contaminating our food and water. Here's what we know about forever chemical hotspots in Canada. CBC News tracks forever chemical hotspots. DESIGN: ANDREW MCMANUS/CBC
Research has linked certain PFAS with a variety of potential health effects, including cancer, reduced vaccine response, reproductive issues, delays in child development, hormonal issues and increased cholesterol levels. Quebec toxicologist Marc-André Verner said the latest science suggests there may be no safe level of exposure to PFAS. At the same time, the chemicals are so pervasive that it doesn't take living near a hotspot to be exposed. In fact, the vast majority of Canadians have forever chemicals in their blood. The main way many people are exposed to them is through food, especially fish, seafood and meat. But if you live near a contaminated site, your drinking water could also be a significant source of exposure. 'If it's in the underground water and you're on a private well with the same underground water, then it becomes a concern for you, that's for sure,' Verner said. His advice is to find out what levels are in your drinking water, and to find out what local officials are doing to address the issue. Health Canada advises anyone concerned to reach out to local authorities for advice.
