logo
#

Latest news with #inUSA

2 held with pistols in Ranchi, 2 others on the run
2 held with pistols in Ranchi, 2 others on the run

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

2 held with pistols in Ranchi, 2 others on the run

Ranchi: Acting on a tip-off related to sales of arms and ammunition, the police on Saturday conducted a raid near Pahari Mandir in Ranchi and arrested two persons. "The police also seized three country-made pistols and four cartridges from them," DIG cum Ranchi SSP Chandan Kumar Sinha said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The arrested persons are Anil Gadhi and Aakash Mirdha. The police said they confessed to being engaged in land deals and wanted to have the pistols and cartridges with them. Sinha said, "Police are trying to nab the persons who provided the weapons to Akash and Anil. One of the country-made pistols with mark Made in USA had a misfired cartridge in its magazine." Sinha said the accused persons had no criminal antecedents. A case was registered under various sections of the Arms Act. Anil and Akash had come to the Pahari mandir to purchase 30 cartridges. Two other accused persons in the case are Akash Kumar Verma and Sandeep Kumar Prasad, wanted for supplying arms are on the run, the police said. Ranchi: Acting on a tip-off related to sales of arms and ammunition, the police on Saturday conducted a raid near Pahari Mandir in Ranchi and arrested two persons. "The police also seized three country-made pistols and four cartridges from them," DIG cum Ranchi SSP Chandan Kumar Sinha said. The arrested persons are Anil Gadhi and Aakash Mirdha. The police said they confessed to being engaged in land deals and wanted to have the pistols and cartridges with them. Sinha said, "Police are trying to nab the persons who provided the weapons to Akash and Anil. One of the country-made pistols with mark Made in USA had a misfired cartridge in its magazine." Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sinha said the accused persons had no criminal antecedents. A case was registered under various sections of the Arms Act. Anil and Akash had come to the Pahari mandir to purchase 30 cartridges. Two other accused persons in the case are Akash Kumar Verma and Sandeep Kumar Prasad, wanted for supplying arms are on the run, the police said.

New Balance MADE in USA Dips the 990v6 in "Inkwell" Blue
New Balance MADE in USA Dips the 990v6 in "Inkwell" Blue

Hypebeast

time23-05-2025

  • Business
  • Hypebeast

New Balance MADE in USA Dips the 990v6 in "Inkwell" Blue

Name:New Balance MADE in USA 990v6 'Inkwell'Colorway:InkwellStyle Code:U990IA6MSRP:$200 USDRelease Date:June 12Where to Buy:New Balance It's been over two and a half years sinceNew Balanceintroduced the sneaker world to the990v6. The runner has remained in constant rotation since, with new in-line looks and collaborations with partners such asAction Bronsonbringing much excitement to the industry. We just previewed a'Black/Grey'colorway earlier this week and now a new 'Inkwell' pair courtesy of theMADE in USAteam has surfaced. This new rendition of the shoe sees it sport a mixed material upper that begins with a blue suede mudguard. From there, a blue synthetic base teams up with black suede and nubuck underlays. The 'N' logos on each side see a white outline encase blue lettering while additional touches of white come from the lining, laces, and forefoot of the otherwise gray and off-white midsole. At the time of writing, New Balance has not officially announced the release of this 990v6 'Inkwell' colorway by the MADE in USA division. Stay tuned for updates, including a closer look at the pair, as select retailers such as BSTN have listed the pair as arriving on June 12, which is likely when it will drop via New Balance at its standard price of $200 USD.

Reynolds Wrap maker must face lawsuit over 'Made in USA' claim
Reynolds Wrap maker must face lawsuit over 'Made in USA' claim

Yahoo

time05-03-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Reynolds Wrap maker must face lawsuit over 'Made in USA' claim

By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK (Reuters) -The maker of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil must face a proposed class action claiming it misled consumers who wanted to "buy American," by falsely claiming that its foil was "Made in USA," a U.S. judge ruled on Monday. U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter in Manhattan said consumers can try to prove that Reynolds Consumer Products violated New York state consumer protection laws by using false and misleading packaging for its namesake foil. Reynolds and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. According to the complaint filed last March, substantially all bauxite in Reynolds' foil comes from outside the United States, where little of the ore is produced, and much of it is eventually transformed into aluminum outside the United States. This made Reynolds' "Foil Made in USA" claim false and misleading to reasonable consumers, because they would spend more on products "made in America," the complaint said The plaintiff, Anaya Washington of Bronx, New York, said she bought Reynolds Wrap at Target and other stores, believing the brand as trustworthy and familiar as Kleenex and Vaseline, and wouldn't have bought the foil had she knows where it came from. In seeking a dismissal, Reynolds said Washington relied on generic "overpayment" accusations rather than show harm. It also called the case "another lawyer-driven class action seeking to profit from a truthful 'Made in the USA' statement." But the judge said Washington plausibly alleged she paid more than she would have but for the "Foil Made in USA" label. The lawsuit seeks at least $5 million of damages. Many lawsuits accuse companies of using imprecise labeling that induces shoppers to pay more, including through appeals to their patriotism. In 2021, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission adopted a "Made in USA Labeling Rule" to protect businesses and consumers from being misled over product origins. U.S. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, is encouraging global businesses to manufacture more products in the United States. Washington's lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The case is Washington v Reynolds Consumer Products LLC, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-02327.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store