Latest news with #indexfunds
Forbes
3 days ago
- Business
- Forbes
The Quiet Comeback Of Structural Alpha In A Crowded Market
A tiny delicate shoot of a plant grows out from an inhospitable crack on a concrete path, struggling ... More to survive and grow in the harsh conditions that it has taken root. Great survival, hope and and adversity concept. Good useable copy space also with shallow focus on the seedling. For the last decade, we've heard the same line: alpha is dead. Passive flows took over. Factor models dominated. Screens flattened the edge into noise. With benchmarks outperforming the funds meant to beat them, many assumed skills had nowhere left to hide. But that conclusion was too easy. Structural alpha is alive and kicking. Alpha didn't disappear. It stopped showing up in the obvious places. As the crowd chased macro calls and beta-led trends, real opportunity quietly moved to the edges of the market, where structure, pressure, and complexity still drive mispricing. These aren't trades you screen for. They're setups you uncover. Real returns didn't die; they just went quiet. And now, with capital behaving irrationally again, it's starting to reemerge. went quiet. And now, with capital behaving irrationally again, it's starting to reemerge. What Killed The Alpha Conversation The idea that alpha no longer exists didn't come out of nowhere. It came from a market shaped by passivity and scale. As trillions poured into ETFs and index funds, price discovery weakened. Buying became mechanical. Fundamentals faded. Meanwhile, hedge funds, the vehicles built to find alpha, underperformed. Many lagged their benchmarks, and capital shifted toward low-cost beta. Factor investing took over. Value, momentum, and quality were sliced into screens and sold as efficient. For a while, it worked. But it worked too well. Everyone chased the same patterns using the same tools. Edge got crowded. Outcomes flattened. Differentiation vanished. So, the industry declared alpha obsolete. What really happened wasn't its death. It was the disappearance of trades that looked like alpha but were just easy wins. The real edge didn't vanish. It moved out of reach. Where Alpha Hid Markets recently have just gone one way. Up. As assets ballooned, managers gravitated toward size and liquidity. Big names. Index-adjacent holdings. Anything that could take size without moving. What got left behind were the setups that couldn't be boxed or scaled. Spinoffs, breakups, restructurings. These weren't broken opportunities. They just require time, focus, and conviction. three things the modern market doesn't reward. Earlier this year, we followed a separation with all the signs: tight float, neglected parent, and forced selling. The setup was messy. But the structure was clean. Within weeks, coverage picked up and the multiple rerated. Not because momentum kicked in, but because recognition did. When most turned to screens, the edge went back to doing the work. Structural alpha didn't vanish. It moved where almost no one bothered to look. What Structural Alpha Really Is Structural alpha isn't a style. It's not about timing. It's inefficiency, specifically, inefficiency caused by how capital behaves, not what it believes. When funds are forced to sell because of index rules…When spins carve out unloved segments… When rights offerings get ignored… When incentives quietly shift inside a company… That's when price disconnects from value. Not because the fundamentals changed, but because the ownership did. These aren't trades based on some clever modeling; they're driven by process and structure. You're not chasing growth; you're positioning in front of mechanical pressure the market hasn't priced. Most won't bother. It's not clean. It's not scalable. It's rarely comfortable. But that's exactly where edge still lives, in the footnotes, in the filings, in the places where capital moves out of obligation, not conviction. The Edge Of Thinking Differently Edge today isn't about speed or access. It's about seeing what others avoid. Being early. Sitting with something that doesn't make sense yet. Structural trades don't come prepackaged. The story is unclear. The chart looks broken. Liquidity is thin. But that discomfort is part of the signal. If it felt easy to own, it would already be priced in. Most investors want clarity. They want confirmation. Structural alpha offers neither, until it does. This isn't about brilliance. It's about doing work that's out of fashion. It's about staying still when others chase. The ones who get paid aren't the fastest. They're the ones who understand before the market does and have the patience to wait until the structure catches up. What To Watch Now Structural alpha is reappearing, not in momentum, not in macros, but in overlooked setups forming quietly. We're watching spinoffs where capital-starved parents are shedding dead weight. Divestitures are driven by necessity, not strategy. Balance sheets are quietly restructuring under pressure the market hasn't priced yet. Margins are shrinking. Boards are getting squeezed. Conglomerates built in easy-money cycles are cracking. That's creating overlooked assets, forced reallocation, and new standalone businesses that the market still hasn't recognized. In many cases, the value is already there. But the float is small. The story's fuzzy. Sentiment ranges from indifferent to skeptical. That's the opportunity. Not when it's clean, but when it's misunderstood. If you want a signal in a noisy market, stop looking for comfort. Look for pressure. Look where businesses are being reshaped by need, not choice. That's where value hides before it's understood. Alpha didn't disappear. It just stopped making noise. It's coming back, but not where most are looking. It's showing up in the quiet corners of the market, where the structure breaks and capital moves blindly. The next cycle of returns won't reward scale or speed. It'll reward patience, discipline, and the willingness to make change before it's obvious. Structural alpha is back. Quietly. Steadily. Waiting to be seen. Edge never disappeared. It just went underground, waiting for someone willing to dig.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett: Here's What You'd Make If You Invested $100 a Week in These Index Funds
When you get some investment advice from Warren Buffett, you may want to heed it. The billionaire CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, one of the richest people in the world, has garnered the nickname 'The Oracle of Omaha' due to his legendary investment decisions and prowess in the stock market and beyond. That's Interesting: For You: Berkshire Hathaway, which is essentially a holding company for his investments, has a competitive advantage with him at the helm as it more than doubled the return of the S&P 500 over an incredible 60-year period, an enviable record that has brought him much acclaim. Yet, for most investors, Buffett is a huge proponent of low-cost index funds. Why has Buffett repeatedly said this, and how well has the S&P 500 done? Here are some investment tips from the man himself, to hopefully help you grow your net worth. What Has Buffett Said About Low-Cost S&P 500 Index Funds? In his long and storied career, Buffett has endorsed low-cost mutual funds numerous times. Here are just a few key principles from his quotes on the matter: In 1993, Buffett told his shareholders: 'By periodically investing in an index fund, for example, the know-nothing investor can actually outperform most investment professionals. Paradoxically, when 'dumb' money acknowledges its limitations, it ceases to be dumb.' In 2020, he continued to endorse the S&P 500 at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, telling shareholders, 'In my view, for most people, the best thing to do is to own the S&P 500 index fund. People will try and sell you other things because there's more money in it if they do.' In 'The Little Book of Common Sense Investing,' by Vanguard founder and former CEO John Bogle, Buffett said, 'A low-cost index fund is the most sensible equity investment for the great majority of investors.' In one of his most direct messages, Buffett outlined his philosophy to Becky Quick on CNBC's On the Money: 'Consistently buy an S&P 500 low-cost index fund. I think it makes the most sense practically all of the time… Keep buying it through thick and thin, and especially through thin.' Find Out: Buffett's Famous S&P 500 Wager As befitting such a legendary investor, Buffett put his money where his mouth was in 2007, betting $1 million that the S&P 500 would outperform hedge funds over the following 10 years. Ted Seides, a hedge fund manager at Protégé Partners, accepted the wager and picked five hedge funds he said would outperform the S&P 500 over the next decade. Unfortunately for Seides, the bet was so lopsided in the favor of Buffett and the S&P 500 that he acknowledged he had lost before the 10 years even elapsed. When all was said and done, the S&P 500 had trounced Seides' hedge fund selections, with an average annual return of 7.1% vs. 2.1%. Except for 2008, when the S&P 500 lost nearly 39% of its value, the index outperformed the group of hedge funds in every single year of that decade. How Much Would You Have If You Invested in the S&P 500? Over the last 20 years, the S&P 500 has posted an average annual return of 9.75%, right about in line with its long-term average. Here's how much you would have now if you invested in the S&P 500 20 years ago, based on varying starting amounts: $1,000 would grow to $2,533 $5,000 would grow to $12,665 $10,000 would grow to $25,331 $20,000 would grow to $50,662 $50,000 would grow to $126,654 $100,000 would grow to $253,308 Over the past decade, you would have done even better, as the S&P 500 posted an average annual return of a whopping 12.68%. Here's how much your account balance would be now if you were invested over the past 10 years: $1,000 would grow to $3,300 $5,000 would grow to $16,498 $10,000 would grow to $32,997 $20,000 would grow to $65,993 $50,000 would grow to $164,983 $100,000 would grow to $329,965 Final Take To GO: One Final Endorsement While Buffett is a professional investor, his wife is not. For this reason, as he wrote in Berkshire Hathaway's 2013 annual letter to shareholders, he has specific advice for the trustee of his estate after he dies. As Buffett wrote, 'My advice to the trustee could not be more simple: Put 10% of the cash in short-term government bonds and 90% in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund.' Buffett obviously wouldn't want to squander away the money he leaves to his wife, and that might be his strongest endorsement of the S&P 500 index. Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should) 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on Warren Buffett: Here's What You'd Make If You Invested $100 a Week in These Index Funds
Entrepreneur
17-07-2025
- Business
- Entrepreneur
JioBlackRock Gets Sebi Nod for Four Mutual Fund Schemes
The approved offerings include the JioBlackRock Nifty 8–13 Yr G-Sec Index Fund, Nifty Smallcap 250 Index Fund, Nifty Next 50 Index Fund, and Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund. Among these, three are equity-based index funds, while one is focused on government debt securities. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. JioBlackRock Asset Management, the joint venture between Jio Financial Services and global investment firm BlackRock, has received regulatory approval from the Securities and Exchange Board of India to launch four mutual fund schemes. The approved offerings include the JioBlackRock Nifty 8–13 Yr G-Sec Index Fund, Nifty Smallcap 250 Index Fund, Nifty Next 50 Index Fund, and Nifty Midcap 150 Index Fund. Among these, three are equity-based index funds, while one is focused on government debt securities. The company aims to tap into India's growing investor base with a digital-first approach that emphasises simplicity in fund offerings. This strategy aligns with models used by fintech firms like Zerodha, Groww, and Navi. With strong financial backing and access to a large user base, JioBlackRock is expected to bring increased competition to the market. Nithin Kamath, founder of Zerodha, responded positively to the entry of JioBlackRock, suggesting it could help broaden India's investor base. He also reiterated Zerodha's commitment to long-term profitability and customer-focused services, noting that financial strength alone does not create enduring advantages in stockbroking. Earlier this month, JioBlackRock completed its first new fund offer, raising INR 17,800 crore across three schemes. The offer attracted over 90 institutional investors and more than 67,000 retail investors in just three days. In addition to mutual funds, Jio Financial is expanding into wealth management and stockbroking. It recently established Jio BlackRock Broking Pvt Ltd, which is awaiting regulatory clearance to begin operations.
Wall Street Journal
15-07-2025
- Business
- Wall Street Journal
BlackRock Shares Tumble After Big Client Redemption Blunts Quarterly Results
BlackRock's BLK -5.36%decrease; red down pointing triangle shares tumbled more than 6% Tuesday after the investing giant said a large client pulled money during the second quarter. The investment firm's $5.42 billion in quarterly revenue fell short of analysts' average estimates, driven in part by lower net inflows. A key culprit of the shortfall was a move by a single institutional client in Asia to pull $52 billion from the firm's index funds.
Yahoo
12-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
£20,000 invested in a Stocks and Shares ISA 10 years ago could now be worth…
Even with all the geopolitical, pandemic, and economic uncertainty we've endured in the last decade, the markets have still been pretty rewarding for Stocks and Shares ISA investors. In 2015, the total amount of money saved in ISAs sat at around £500bn. According to the latest data, it's now closer to £800bn. And while a good chunk comes from additional contributions, the bulk's courtesy of strong stock market performance. So just how much money have ISA investors made since 2015? Everyone has a different portfolio. So the answer to the question – how much money have investors made – ultimately depends on which shares they bought. In most cases, index funds end up being the primary destination of invested capital. These passive instruments are cheap, automated and, most importantly, they've an impressive track record of steadily building long-term wealth. Here in the UK, the FTSE 100's by far the most popular index, and since 2015, it's delivered some solid gains. In fact, when including the extra returns from dividends, investors have reaped a 98.9% total return. That's the equivalent of a 7.1% average annual gain. And it means £20,000 in 2015's now worth £39,790. Those who opted for the FTSE 250 haven't been as fortunate. But their wealth has still moved in the right direction, expanding a £20,000 initial investment into £32,140. This deducted performance isn't entirely surprising given the increased exposure to the British economy, which has notoriously lagged in terms of growth. Investors who are more confident and willing to take on more risk go beyond index funds and invest in individual shares directly. This can either be incredibly rewarding or backfire spectacularly if bad investment decisions are made. It all depends on how wisely an investor approaches the markets. Those who focused on long-term hidden quality may have stumbled upon businesses like Computacenter (LSE:CCC). In a world of digitalisation, Computacenter positioned itself to be the go-to reseller for the private and public sectors of IT hardware. And as demand for automation, networking, and cybersecurity has continued to build, revenue over the 10-year period has more than doubled to £6.9bn while earnings have more than tripled. For shareholders, that's translated into a total investment return of over 200% transforming a £20,000 ISA into £60,590. Of course, there have been plenty of other UK shares that delivered far weaker returns, such as ITV and Currys, which are down a staggering 70% over the same period, leaving investors with just £6,000. Demand for Computacenter's services hasn't waned in 2025, with a record order backlog and an impressive growth outlook. With that in mind, I think investors could be well served to take a closer look. But of course, there are risks to watch out for. Macroeconomic uncertainty and global instability in trade can and have resulted in IT spending cuts in certain sectors. And a prolonged cyclical downturn could undercut the firm's current growth trajectory. This may prove to be only a short-term issue. The group's reputation for excellence is now well known so its shares trade at a premium. And that can invite unwanted volatility should spanners start getting thrown into the works. The post £20,000 invested in a Stocks and Shares ISA 10 years ago could now be worth… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Zaven Boyrazian has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Computacenter Plc and ITV. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
