Latest news with #internationalOrganizations
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
'The hostages are my top priority': IDF officer on balancing aid distribution, freeing hostages
M., a mother of four and wife to a hi-tech professional, described her mission in five words: 'returning the hostages and denying Hamas aid." 'As a uniformed officer, my role is first and foremost to protect the State of Israel and everyone who lives here,' Lt.-Col. M., 42, head of the Foreign Relations Department in the Coordination and Liaison Directorate (CLD) for Gaza, told Walla in an interview. Since December 2024, she has overseen the coordination of humanitarian aid activity in the Gaza Strip with dozens of international organizations. M., a mother of four and wife to a hi-tech professional, described her mission: 'returning the hostages and denying Hamas aid." 'Most of our work involves coordinating humanitarian efforts with actors inside and outside the Gaza Strip,' she explained. 'We bring in humanitarian aid, and we also coordinate the evacuation of patients and the safe transfer of foreign nationals.' Her role extends far beyond supervising aid trucks. 'There's coordination that is not necessarily food—such as medical equipment, blood units, and more. On the one hand, we are fighting, and at the same time, medical teams or humanitarian convoys must move during or near combat zones. These are two parallel efforts that must be synchronized.' M. noted that the looting of aid is routine. 'Most of the trucks are looted along the way. We see it. Aid from these trucks, with international logos, is sold in the markets. You can even see its impact on prices—for example, flour prices have dropped.' She has also had to address complex incidents, including the deaths of World Central Kitchen (WCK) staff in an Israeli strike. 'After every incident, we stop, investigate, study what happened, and try to understand why. Gaza is a war zone. It's not a sterile area.' Returning the hostages M. was directly involved in Operation 'Derech Eretz,' which saw hostages returned and Palestinian prisoners released. 'The truth is, Operation 'Derech Eretz' shook me the most,' she recalled. 'To see the coffins of our hostages—it's to hurt, to cry on what happened to us as a people, a nation, an army on October 7. And a minute later, you have to pull yourself together, remember you're on an operational mission, and continue.' 'The hostages are my top priority,' M. stressed. 'Even if some of the aid we bring in reaches them and keeps them alive one more day, I've earned my bread. This is my life's mission.' Despite the strain, she insisted her fight is not against the civilians of Gaza but against Hamas. 'I will do everything to prevent Hamas from accessing humanitarian aid. And I live with the hope that at any moment, I will get the call: prepare for another hostage return.' Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
20-06-2025
- Business
- Bloomberg
Swiss Pumps $300 Million into a Geneva Left Reeling from US Cuts
Switzerland plans to invest more than $300 million to help international organizations in Geneva stay afloat after cuts in financing for multilateralism led by the US. Geneva, a historic hub for global diplomacy, is home to 38 international organizations including the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization and the International Committee of the Red Cross. They employ 29,000 people, spend some $7 billion each year and support around 400 non-governmental organizations.
Arab News
09-06-2025
- Politics
- Arab News
Beirut, Damascus and the challenge of being a normal country
The Lebanese people often complain about advice from ambassadors and dictates from international financial organizations. They believe that the outside world is paving their road and setting their goals for them. They are annoyed that their country is being treated like a minor; that the world has no faith in its ability to get itself out of the abyss. The abundance of doctors and treatments often deepen the patient's confusion. There can be no arguing that the Lebanese people, like all other peoples, have the right to address their present and shape their future. However, reclaiming this right cannot be achieved simply by reminding people of the obvious. Hegemonies begin when countries start to break apart under the weight of divisions and interventions. The Lebanese divisions are old and so are the interventions. The most dangerous thing that can happen to a country is the loss of its ability to take a decision. A lack of this ability depletes what remains of the fortifications that should be available to a sovereign and independent nation. The problem is compounded when the country is surrounded by wars and conflicts that are beyond its ability to either join or distance itself from. And so, the country becomes captive both on the inside and before the outside world. Al-Sharaa surprised the Syrians, the region and the world. His choice was Syria first and foremost Ghassan Charbel The truth is that the Lebanese patient has suddenly found himself floundering in a cycle of wars that erupted after Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. Then it found itself confronted with the difficult endings of these wars, which were contrary to the goals of the ones who launched the flood and the 'support front.' The people of the region did not need new experiences to become acquainted with Israel's hostility and the savagery of its army. But what has happened has given the Israeli killing machine the opportunity to go to the extreme in its destruction and killing, even going so far as to commit genocide. Observers of Israel's behavior in Gaza, the West Bank, Syria and Lebanon sense that the balance of power has been broken and is now tipped heavily to the Israeli side. There is no need to remind the reader of the blood being shed at the aid distribution points in Gaza; no need to explain the meaning of the Israeli army warning residents of Beirut's southern suburbs to evacuate specific buildings before striking. The daily assassinations carried out by Israeli drones in Lebanon hold clear messages and so does the continued destruction of the remaining capabilities of the former Syrian army. The people of the region do not need someone to explain to them the significance of the collapse of the former Syrian regime. The end of the Assad regime changed certain features and roles in the region. The collapse broke the chain of the so-called Axis of Resistance that started in Tehran and ended in Beirut, passing through Baghdad and Damascus. This is a massive change that confronted officials with very difficult choices. Ahmad Al-Sharaa entered the Syrian presidential palace and was confronted with dangerous new facts. A country broken and without an army and state institutions. A country drowning in fear and poverty, where millions live in refugee camps near the border. Al-Sharaa had to choose and take decisions. The era of factions means endless wars, the fragmentation of Syria and more blood and death. Al-Sharaa had to convince the Syrians and the world. There needed to be a moment for Syria to catch its breath, regroup and bring in aid. Al-Sharaa surprised the Syrians, the region and the world. His choice was Syria first and foremost. He has no desire to surrender to old formulas, unyielding beliefs and outdated treatments. He decided to understand the balance of power in the region and the world and deal with it. The obsession of saving Syria and reclaiming it from militias and hegemonies took precedence. Al-Sharaa sent a frank message that the new Syria wants to be a normal country. One where the state monopolizes control over decisions of war and peace and the possession of arms. This is not an easy task at all. The establishment of a normal state demands respecting local and international laws and ensuring equality between segments of society. It means abandoning the rhetoric of eliminating the other and changing features. The world is demanding that Lebanon return to being a normal country that can be trusted, helped and supported Ghassan Charbel The emergence of such determination encouraged countries eager to help Syria. Al-Sharaa said the new Syria does not want to pose a threat to any of its neighbors. This desire to quit the military aspect of the conflict with Israel paved the way for handshakes and recognitions. Despite the difficulties, there is a sense that Al-Sharaa's journey has kicked off with regional and international support. This has taken place at the same time as the Lebanese people have been dreaming that their country could also kick off the journey of returning toward being a normal state. This dream was reawakened with the election of Joseph Aoun as president and the appointment of Nawaf Salam as prime minister. The Lebanese people were hopeful as a result of the president's swearing-in speech and the government's policy statement. Months have since passed and the Lebanese ship has not yet sailed. The conditions that led to Al-Sharaa's arrival to power differ from those that led to Aoun and Salam's arrival. Lebanon's composition is very complicated and uniting the people is not easy. It is evident that Hezbollah's reading of what is taking place in the region is different from those of other Lebanese segments and of Aoun and Salam. The world is demanding that Lebanon return to being a normal country that can be trusted, helped and supported. Aoun and Salam cannot do this alone. The responsibility equally lies with Speaker Nabih Berri, given his standing in the Shiite community and throughout the country. A return to being a normal state cannot take place without Hezbollah reading how the war ended and what is taking place in Syria. Keeping Lebanon hanging in the Iranian and non-Iranian balances will leave it at risk of wasting its international support. The world set a condition for the new Syria to agree to become a normal country, and it did. Lebanon's lack of serious collective decision-making to move toward such a goal will leave it vulnerable to many surprises. This article first appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat.
Asharq Al-Awsat
09-06-2025
- Politics
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Beirut, Damascus and the Challenge of a Normal Country
The Lebanese people complain about the advice from ambassadors and dictates from international financial organizations. They believe that the outside was paving their road and goals and setting the means for them. They are annoyed that their country is being treated like a minor, who the world has no faith in his ability to get himself out of the abyss. The abundance of doctors and treatments often deepens the patient's confusion. There can be no arguing that the Lebanese people, similar to other peoples, have the right to address their present and shape their future. However, recalling givens is not enough to retrieve this right. Hegemonies begin when countries start to break apart under the weight of divisions and interventions. The Lebanese divisions are old and so are the interventions. The most dangerous thing that can happen to a country is the loss of the ability to take a decision. This lack of this ability depletes what remains of the fortification that should be available to a sovereign and independent nation. The problem is compounded when the country is surrounded by wars and conflicts that are beyond its ability to join or distance itself from them. And so, the country becomes captive on the inside and before the outside world. The truth is that the Lebanese patient has suddenly found himself floundering in a cycle of wars that erupted after the Al-Aqsa Flood Operation. Then it found itself confronted with the difficult endings of these wars, which were contrary to the goals of the ones who launched the Aqsa Flood and 'support front'. The people of the region didn't need new experiences to become acquainted with Israel's hostility and savagery of its army. But what has happened has given the Israeli killing machine the opportunity to go to the extreme in its destruction and killing even going to so far as to commit genocide. Observers of Israel's behavior in Gaza, the West Bank, Syria and Lebanon sense that the balance of power has broken and is now tipped heavily to the Israeli side. There is no need to remind the reader of the blood being shed at the aid distribution points in Gaza; no need to explain the meaning of the Israeli army warning to residents of Beirut's southern suburbs to evacuate specific buildings before striking. The daily assassinations carried out by Israeli drones in Lebanon hold clear messages and so does the continued destruction of the remaining capabilities of the former Syrian army. The people of the region don't need someone to explain to them the significance of the collapse of the former Syrian regime. The end of the Assad regime changed features and roles in the region. The collapse broke the chain of the so-called 'Axis of Resistance' that started in Tehran and ended in Beirut, passing through Baghdad and Damascus. This is a massive change that confronted officials with very difficult choices. Ahmed al-Sharaa entered the Syrian presidential palace and was confronted with dangerous new facts. A country broken and without an army and state institutions. A country drowning in fear and poverty where millions live in refugee camps near the border. Sharaa had to choose and take decisions. The era of factions means endless wars, the fragmentation of Syria and more blood and death. Sharaa had to convince the Syrians and the world. There needed to be a moment for Syria to catch its breath, regroup and bring in aid. Sharaa surprised the Syrians, the region and world. His choice was Syria first and foremost. He has no desire to surrender to old formulas, unyielding beliefs and outdated treatments. He decided to understand the balance of power in the region and world and deal with it. The obsession of saving Syria and reclaiming it from militias and hegemonies took precedence. Sharaa sent a frank message that the new Syria wants to be a normal country. One where the state monopolizes control over decisions of war and peace and the possession of arms. This is not an easy task at all. The establishment of a normal state demands respecting local and international laws and ensuring equality between segments of society. It means abandoning the rhetoric of eliminating the other and changing features. The emergence of such Syrian determination encouraged countries eager to help Syria. Sharaa said the new Syria does not want to pose a threat to any of its neighbors. This desire to quit the military aspect of the conflict with Israel paved the way for handshakes and recognitions. Despite the difficulties, there is a sense that Sharaa's journey has kicked off with regional and international support. This took place at the same time as the Lebanese people were dreaming that their country could also kick off the journey of returning towards the normal state. This dream was reawakened with the election of Jospeh Aoun as president and appointment of Nawaf Salam as prime minister. The Lebanese people were hopeful in the president's swearing in speech and the government's policy statement. Months have since passed, and the Lebanese journey has not yet sailed. The conditions that led to Sharaa's arrival to power differ than those that led to Aoun and Salam's arrival. Lebanon's composition is very complicated and uniting the people is not easy. It is evident that Hezbollah's reading of what is taking place in the region is different than the readings of other Lebanese segments and those of Aoun and Salam. The world is demanding that Lebanon return to becoming a normal country that can be trusted, helped and supported. Aoun and Salam cannot do this mission alone. The responsibility equally also lies on Speaker Nabih Berri given his standing in the Shiite community and in the country. The return to the normal state cannot take place without Hezbollah reading how the war ended and what is taking place in Syria. Keeping Lebanon hanging in the Iranian and non-Iranian balances will leave it at risk of wasting the international support to help it. The world set a condition for the new Syria to agree to become a normal country, and it did. Lebanon's lack of serious collective decision to move towards such a goal will leave it vulnerable to many surprises.
Jordan Times
12-04-2025
- Politics
- Jordan Times
Jordan, other countries to present legal arguments at ICJ on Israel's obligations
AMMAN — The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is set to hold public hearings starting on April 28 on the request for an advisory opinion "on the Obligations of Israel in relation to the Presence and Activities of the United Nations, Other International Organizations and Third States in and in relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory". In it statement, carried by the Jordan News Agency, Petra, the ICJ said that 40 states and four international organisations have expressed their intention to participate in the oral proceedings before the Court". Jordan's statement will be made on Wednesday, April 30, based on the ICJ's pleadings schedule. Page 2
